Milestone #2 Project Proposal Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2011: 6-8p BA3008 Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2011.
Advertisements

Autonomous Sensor and Control Platform Rover Tae Lee Josh Reitsema Scott Zhong Mike Chao Mark Winter.
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR MOBILE AND WHEELCHAIR CHARGING OF PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED PEOPLE PROJECT BY : REBECCA ROY.
Final Presentation Group 18 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
Microprocessor Motor Control Spring Introduction  Stamp projects Robots  Sensors  Motor control  Logic Rocketry  Reading acceleration (“g”
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Sponsor: NAVSEA Keyport Mentor: Mike Kapus Ben Brand, Kendra Brower, Joe Langevin, Jeffrey Le To power our vehicle, we have.
 Autonomous Surface Vehicle Team Leader: Stanton Coffey Team Members: Pat Gray, Jack Nagle, Sam Riahi, Matt Cline Faculty Adviser: Dr. Gene Hou ME Graduate.
RED SAUC’ISSE SAUC’ Interval Super Submarine of ENSIETA The submarine robot of the ENSIETA.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
A.U.V. Emeric Rochford Dale Williams Bryan Douse Ryan Gray.
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
P07007: Adapted Home Entry Sponsor: National Science Foundation Wenbo Chen Project Manager, EE Tanvir Rasel EE Meklet Kidane EE Faculty Mentors: Dr. Elizabeth.
Tracking Rover Team Rubber Ducky Alex Chi Joshua Rubin Alexander Starick Ryan Ramos.
P09561 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System: Project Update Dave Lewis Steve Sweet Joanna Dobeck Lenny Calabrese Jason Thibado Darrell Draper Customer: Dr.
Remote Surveillance Vehicle Design Review By: Bill Burgdorf Tom Fisher Eleni Binopolus-Rumayor.
David Talaiver Vince Adams Robb Morris. Misson 2010 AUVSI ASV Competition Develop interest in marine robotic systems Provide opportunities for student/industry.
Infosession UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MECHATRONICS DESIGN ASSOCIATION.
AURORA A Aerial U Unmanned R Reconnaissance and O Operations R Research A Aircraft.
Milestone 2: Project Proposal and Statement of Work TEAM 8: ANDRE ELLIOTTPROJECT: BITCOIN WALLET MARK NIXON KISHEN PATEL ZACH HOELZLE.
WCBI Team Information Team number: Client: Faculty Advisors: Technical Advisors: Team Members: May02-11 Square D Company (Greg Wiese) Glenn Hillesland.
ABS(Antilock braking system)
Design and Implementation of Metallic Waste Collection Robot
Milestone #1: Specifications and Requirements. Overview of Design Team Goals Education Design and construction process Competition Teamwork Communication.
PIC Evaluation/ Development Board Dec02-12 December 10, 2002 Client: ECpE Department Faculty Advisors: Dr. Rover, Dr. Weber Chad Berg, Luke Bishop, Tyson.
LUMEN ALARM & LIGHTING SYSTEM Artem Aginskiy, Grayson Carr, Yinuo James Chen, Andrew McDowell.
Group Members: Brad Cox Kevin Burkett Tera Cline Arthur Perkins CS10 Battery Management System.
Communication Device for Handicapped Kids Dec Client Heartland Area Agency Sue Young Advisor Yao Ma Advisor Yao Ma Alex Leith Brian Grove Steve Peters.
Embedded Microcomputer Systems Andrew Karpenko 1 Prepared for Technical Presentation February 25 th, 2011.
NEEDS ANALYSIS & REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION Southeast Con 1B “Success” Senior Design Team Louis Cooper Evan Marshall Chelsea Ogle Lorenzo Smith Ivan Vargas.
Milestone #4 Test Plan & Conceptual Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthenor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
May Team Information Client Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University Faculty Advisor Professor Gary Tuttle Team Members.
Autonomous Tracking Robot Andy Duong Chris Gurley Nate Klein Wink Barnes Georgia Institute of Technology School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
MDA Info Session General Meeting: Information & Recruitment Sept 19, 2012: 7-8pm Mechatronics Design Association General Info Session Sept 2012.
Temperature Controller for Infrared Paint Curing September 13, 2001 Dec01-11 Team Members Michael Burman, CprE Jonathan Johnson, EE Matthew McMullen, CprE.
Sponsored by: Air Force Research Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base FAMU-FSU College of Engineering.
Milestone #3 Design Review Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1.
CS 360 Lecture 3.  The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software system.  Fundamental Assumption:  Good software.
ES100 Engineering Design Project Micro Air Vehicle
Abstract Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Personnel Efforts Item DescriptionCost STK300 Microcontrollerdonated (Kanda) GM28 Cellular.
Abstract Proposed Approach Solution Development Project Requirements Estimated Resources Other Resources Financial Resources Project Schedule Computer.
Wind Turbine Design and Implementation Phase III Senior Design May Team Andrew Nigro (EE) Chad Hand (EE) Luke Rupiper (EE) Ryan Semler (EE) Shonda.
1 Determining Feasibility and Managing Analysis and Design Activities.
Automated Bridge Scour Inspection FSU/FAMU College of Engineering Team 7 Proposal 10/27/2010.
Kurran Kelly – Lead Designer Silas Van Natter – Team Lead Josh Van Patten – Team Budget Manager Brandt Pedrow – Team Liaison and Recorder Branden Bakken.
Administrative Introduction Our goals for this project are for the three robots to work together intelligently to complete a maze faster than an individual.
Group Members Mike Svendsen – Computer Engineer Steve Towey – Computer Engineer Brian Walker – Architect Richard George – Industrial Technology Client.
University of Connecticut MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Project Statement.
Advisor: Dr. Edwin Jones 1 Client: Paul Jewell ISU Engineering Distance Learning Facility May01-13 Design Team: David DouglasCprE Matt EngelbartEE Hank.
DEVELOPMENT OF LABORATORY MODULE FOR SMALL WIND TURBINE CONTROL SYSTEM (Phase V) Advisor/Client: Dr. Venkataramana Ajjarapu Group MembersPosition on Team.
SMS (Speed Monitoring System) Collin Smythe Paul Rice Laura Deaner Alex Cancado Presenters: C.L. Murphy Rob Floodeen.
AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE Propulsion Vertical Thrust Controloverview The AUV Team Thrust Experiment Pool Testing The ultimate purpose of the AUV is.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Team Amaze Me. EE 296 Project (MicroMouse) Members –Brandon Gibu –Ah Ram Kim –John-Kalani Miyajima –Justin Ogata Website.
The Design of an Electronic Bicycle Monitor (EBM) Team P118: Gary Berglund Andrew Gardner Emrys Maier Ammar Mohammad.
MSU SeaMATE ROV Explorer Class
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
Smart Car Robot Prepared by Supervised by Mai Asem Abushamma
Unit 3 – Fundamentals of Electronics Examination Specifications
Unit 3 – Fundamentals of Electronics Examination Specifications
Garage Parking Indicator
Product Evaluation & Quality Improvement
Product Evaluation & Quality Improvement
Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle ( )
AN INEXPENSIVE ROBOTIC KIT FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION
Presentation transcript:

Milestone #2 Project Proposal Group 4 Victoria Jefferson Reece Spencer Andy Jeanthanor Yanira Torres Kevin Miles Tadamitsu Byrne 1

Problem Statement Vehicle must operate autonomously Dimensions of AUV : 6ft x 3ft x 3ft Weight of AUV must be less that 110lbs Pressure rated for a depth of 16ft Complete specified tasks (not yet released) follow a marked path, maneuver through a gate, drop markers into a specified bin, locate a pinger, and grasp a rescue object Upon time expiration AUV should surface in designated area 2

Operating Environment Camp Transdec, CA Salt water pool AUV will be hoisted into the pool 15 minutes to complete all objectives Traverse a distance of 50ft AUV must have a 0.5% buoyancy 3

4 Solutions Approach

Statement of Work Tasks have been divided into five technical areas Micro processing and programming Propulsion System Vehicle design Competition components Sensors Power and electronics Each member in the group is given a specific technical focus area based on educational background as well as technical interests, knowledge, and/or experience 5

BeagleBoard 6

The BeagleBoard is an OMAP3530 platform Power: USB Power/DC Power Additional memory can be added (if necessary) A 6 in 1 SD/MMC connector is provided as a means for expansion and can support such devices as: Camera GPS modules miniSD cards 7

BeagleBoard 8

Micro processing & programming Microprocessor Takes the input from the different sensors, analyzes the data, and then sends output signals to the motors, claw, and marker dropper Software Program the ARM microcontroller C++ Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems (JAUS) ARM Assembly Continuity (programming done in one computer language) 9

Micro processing & controlling C++ Decrease the complication of programming Increase the readability of the code JAUS Point bonus Opportunity to work with state of the art technology ARM assembly Ability to access the memory directly Work at a low-level programming stage 10

Computer Schedule 11

Computer Budget 12

Propulsion System 4 thrusters will control direction and depth Left and right thrusters control the turning as well as forward and reverse propulsion Front and back thrusters control depth Motor controllers Pulse width modulated output signal from microprocessor will be utilized to control the speed of the motor 13

Propulsion System Thruster Selection Seabotix SBT150 Built in motor controllers Provides sufficient thrust 14

Vehicle Design Hull Pelican box Water tight and large enough to house all electrical components Frame Must support and house all components 8020 (T-frame) Aluminum Easily adjustable Minimize cost 15

Vehicle Design 16

Vehicle Design 17

Competition Components Marker Dropper Use two magnets (permanent/electromagnet) Permanent magnet holds steel sphere Electromagnet cancels magnetic field Drop metallic sphere Mechanical Grabber Used to hoist a rescue object Design process not complete Scoop Array of claws 3 prong grabber 18

Competition Components 19

Sensors Camera Shape Recognition Color Recognition Webcam Charge Coupled Device (CCD) Excellent low light performance Housing Inertial Measurement Unit Stability control Data will be input into the microcontroller for data analysis 20

Sensors Hydrophone Locate fixed pinger 4 hydrophones, 2 parallel in the horizontal axis to determine direction, 2 parallel in the vertical axis to determine depth 21

22 Mechanical Schedule

Mechanical Budget 23

Power and Electronics Supply sufficient power electronics, sensors, additional components and four thrusters Identifying power required Thrusters have been chosen Electronics and sensors have to be finalized Additional components have to be finalized 2011 rules have not been released 24

Power and Electronics Battery Selection Thrusters Use two LiFePO 4 batteries in series Thrusters will be connected in parallel Thrusters can run for over one hour continuously Max current drawn by the entire circuit will be 21.2 Amps with Voltage of 28.1 V Microcontroller,Webcam,Hydrophones 5V, 5A battery using voltage/current regulators 25

Top-Level Design 26

Electrical Schedule 27

Electrical Budget 28

Risk Assessment Budget Miscalculations If budget is incorrectly estimated the treasurer is required to reevaluate all expenditures. reopen the parts/materials search process with the team and find cheaper parts to reduce expenses. required to begin searching for new sponsors in an attempt to raise more money. 29

Risk Assessment Critical Scheduling Issues If production is vastly behind schedule the project manager is tasked with evaluating team performance Every team member is required to work extra hours on weekends Sections of the design that are not critical may be eliminated Evaluate design to determine what to pursue and abandon 30

Risk Assessment Malfunctioning Parts Repair Warranty If the warranty holds the malfunctioning part will be returned in exchange for a working part If the budget allows, one spare part will be ordered for the important items when they are purchased Otherwise money will have to be raised to purchase replacement parts 31

Risk Assessment Loss of Team Member Sick, injured, or has departed Split additional work among the team The team member will be kept ‘in the know’ so that upon their return the team member can get back to work If the team member is unable to return the team will divide their part and ‘keep the ball rolling’ 32

Risk Assessment Requirements/Specifications Not Met Adjustment current design Reevaluate what can be accomplished Abandon components that are not required to qualify for the competition The team will have to adjust their goals and try to deliver a finished product The team will also lay the groundwork for the next team in meeting all requirements and specifications for the next competition 33

Risk Assessment Technological Issues Sensors Not communicating with the microcontroller correctly Reevaluate wired connections and programming Seek faculty assistance Exclude specific function until further notice Microcontroller Review specific software resulting in malfunction Rewrite and reintegrate software into main program Rewrite entire program 34

Risk Assessment Technological Issues Electronics All electronic equipment, connections and wires will be reviewed Any faulty equipment will be discarded and replaced The team will be required to provide extensive documentation as to why problems occurred and what can be done to prevent this problem for the next team working on the AUV 35

Deliverables Hardware Reports Project proposal Detailed design and test review Laboratory notebook Weekly meeting minutes AUVSI journal paper Schematic 36

References N/UploadedImages/AUV_Mission_Final_2010.pdf Team 4 Final Proposal BeagleBoard User Manual 37