October 21, 2013 Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 TRB – SHRP2 Symposium: Innovations in Freight.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oregon Freight Plan July 28, Linking Freight Improvements to Economic Growth Travel Time Freight Transportation Improvements Productivity Competitiveness.
Advertisements

Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012 Sandra K. Beaupre’ Wisconsin DOT Governor’s Freight Industry Summit Draft November 12, 2012.
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Florida Natural Gas Association June 18, 2014 | Boca Raton, FL.
Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
Dan O’Neal, Chairman Washington State Transportation Commission.
Marketing Plan Shipping on the Great Lakes The University of Toledo November 7, 2006 Intermodal Transportation Institute.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
™ Steve Phillips POLIS, October 2006 ERTRAC Priorities for Road Transport Research until 2020 Steve Phillips, FEHRL & ERTRAC Research Area Leader.
TRB Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 7, 2013 ANALYZING LONG-DISTANCE TRUCK TRAVEL FOR STATEWIDE FREIGHT PLANNING IN OHIO Presented by:
Advanced Modeling Practice at CMAP Kermit Wies October 2014.
Freight Data – National and Regional Transport Planning Eoin Farrell Land Use & Transport Planner 5 th October 2011.
SEMCOG Modeling Peer Exchange Panel Report. Overall Outline Topic Definition Planning Objective Problem Statement Basic Solution Advanced Solution Resources.
Presented to presented by Highway Freight Movement - Wisconsin Initiatives AASHTO BOD Roundtable November 19, 2012 Nov 2012 Mark Gottlieb Secretary, Wisconsin.
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
Getting More Value from All Highway Data FHWA’s Current Initiatives and Future Plans Presented at Data System Requirements and Gaps to Support Restructuring.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Using the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model for the Oregon Freight Plan Analysis Prepared for the TRB SHRP2 Symposium: Innovation in Freight Demand Modeling.
Presented to Wisconsin Department of Transportation - Northwest Region presented by Christopher Hedden and Brian Scott Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Craig O’Riley & Adam Shell Office of Systems Planning Wednesday, December 1,
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
University of Minnesota FUSING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TRUCK DATA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL FREIGHT PLANNING AND MODELING Chen-Fu Liao Minnesota Traffic Observatory.
WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Transportation Planning Conference WVDOT Traffic Data Collection, Processing and Analysis Handbook Presented to September 16, 2015 Presented.
PLANNING FOR DESIGN Shawn Dikes, AICP FHWA / KYTC / ACEC Partnering Conference 2015.
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY DECISION MAKING WEST VIRGINIA PLANNING CONFERENCE – SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 SALEEM SALAMEH, P.E., PH.D. KYOVA IPC.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Transportation and the State of Arkansas. Arkansas and Transportation Arkansas’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation:  Within.
Getting to Know Cube.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
Freight Impacts on Ohio ’ s Roadways presented by Suzann S. Gad, AICP The Ohio Depart Of Transportation Office of Urban & Corridor Planning.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
Greening Freight & Transportation Corridors Commission for Environmental Cooperation Mapping the road to a sustainable future.
Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions Freight Advisory Committee (FAC) Freight and Land Use: Making the Connection December 15, 2010 Ms.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
AASHTO-FHWA Freight Partnership II Survey and Meeting: FHWA Perspective Tony Furst, FHWA-Office of Freight Management & Operations April 18, 2007.
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on ITS Cross Regional Cooperation and Freight and Logistics Applications June 22, 2010 I ntelligent.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
National Modeling TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
Transportation and the State of Alabama. Source: Freight Analysis Framework, FHWA Total Freight Transportation in Alabama ,512 Current Millions$
Transportation and the State of Missouri. Missouri and Transportation Missouri’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation:  Within.
Transportation and the State of Louisiana. Louisiana and Transportation Louisiana’s infrastructure supports businesses by supporting transportation: 
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
City of Joliet - Sustainability City of Joliet Sustainability Initiatives American Planning Association National Conference April 16, 2013.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
Minnesota’s Freight Performance Measures Cecil Selness, Director Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Jeremy Sage, Eric Jessup & Ken Casavant
Transportation and the State of North Carolina
Transportation and the State of South Carolina
Presentation transcript:

October 21, 2013 Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief Wisconsin Department of Transportation 1 TRB – SHRP2 Symposium: Innovations in Freight Demand Modeling and Data Improvement

Create a statewide freight forecasting framework that integrates travel demand modeling with freight analysis tools, provides performance metrics and analyzes alternative strategies to move freight. 2

Objectives for Multimodal Freight Fusion Forecasting Model  Use forecasting model day-to-day  Implement national best-practices  Visualize the data in one place  Align transportation investment with needs  Build forward thinking and credibility with stakeholders 3

4 WISCONSIN Chicago Twin Cities Lake Superior Lake Michigan Mississippi River

5 Wisconsin Freight Facilities

6  Governor’s Freight Industry Summit  Freight Mobility Action Agenda  Transportation Finance & Policy Commission  Connections 2030: Wisconsin’s Long-range Transportation Plan  Stakeholder Meetings Freight Industry Partners

7 Top Commodity Profiles - Economic Drivers  Tonnage  Value  Economic Importance  Flows  Forecasts Commodity Tons Mode  Transportation issues associated with each commodity

Draft Highway Freight Factors on Southeast State Trunk Highways 8 Criteria Thresholds Weight/ Hierarchy Traffic segments assigned draft highway “Freight Factor” scores

9 Draft Highway Freight Factor Scores

Continued Partnerships 10

Multimodal Freight Fusion Forecasting Model  Freight supply-chain forecasting tool based on traditional statewide 4-step model  Economics of moving freight  Business production locations, product types, availability and general business development timeframes  System performance measures 11

Data Improvements Needed  Vehicle classification count data  Data disaggregation investigation Commodity information ○ Shipping costs ○ Commodity weights Freight supply-chain Intermodal terminal supply-chain data New business data  Diesel fuel consumption data  Non-highway modes 12

13 Permanent Count Stations (ATRs) Continuous Weight-in-Motion Continuous Class Continuous Length Portable Count Stations Short-term Length Miscellaneous Counts Manual Centralized Processing Data Analysis Data Collection Standards FHWA/WisDOT Standards Binning Data Collection Traffic Forecast/Projection Vehicle-Miles of Travel Modeling Meta Manager Travel Demand Model Microsimulation Identified Project Need Budget Capacity Analysis Accountability Expertise in Review and Development of Products Sufficient Truck Counts Standard WisDOT Approach Statewide Data-Driven Concept for Freight Fusion Forecasting and Modeling (as represented by Vehicle Classification Count Data) Data Refinement / Improvement

Freight Forecasting with Fusion Concept  Concept continuing to evolve – use the data, contribute to the data – “PLUG-IN”  Flexibility and tailored to needs Air quality modeling Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design software inputs Oversize, over-weight vehicles  Multimodal aspect provides insights  Survey businesses for data 14

15

Fusion Model Role  Analysis  Transportation project planning and programming  MAP-21 opportunities  Last-mile connections  Partnering  Good stewardship 16

Schematic Business Plan for Fusion Concept 17  Outline long-range goals, expectations  Specific uses for the model  Guidelines for development, technology, transportation modes, tool and data updates  Budget  Performance measures  Implementation - “the everyday”

Thank You! 18