Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Intervention Outcomes Project Allison Sedey, Ph. D. University of Colorado, Boulder Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. University of Arizona, Tucson Arlene.
Advertisements

Western States Early Intervention Outcomes Project Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. Shirin Antia, Ph. D. Tucson, Arizona Arlene Stredler Brown, CCC-SLP, CED Allison.
The BRIGANCE® Screens-II
EARLY START Federal and State Requirements. What Is Early Start Frequently asked Questions Frequently asked Questions Which children are served? What.
Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 13, 2013
Developmental Profile 3
Advances in Deafness Management Second Language Learning in Cochlear Implant Users October 9, 2005 Ripley K. WONG Speech Therapist In-charge Queen Mary.
Ages & Stages Questionnaires® is a registered trademark of Paul H
Assessment Considerations for Young Children with Cleft Palate Introduction CLEFT LIP AND/OR PALATE Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is the fourth most common.
PLS-5 Training.
DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY IN MA EARLY INTERVENTION A General Overview to Scoring.
Evaluating Deaf Individuals with Additional Disabilities Donna Morere, Ph.D. Gallaudet University.
Infant AND TODDLER SENSORY PROFILE
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
Childcare Quality and Early Learning Gail E. Joseph, Ph. D
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Language and Speech of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Characteristics and Concerns Language Acquisition.
Presenter : LEELA AGNES Co presenter : Prof. Dr. Thiruvalluvar : Prof.Dr. Prabakar Immanual.
EC Special Educators conceptualizer synthesizer instructor evaluator listener.
Assessment of Mental Retardation & Giftedness: Two End of the Normal Curve Lecture 12/1/04.
A Steep Hill to Climb: Identifying the Literacy Crisis for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Christine Yoshinaga- Itano, Ph.D. Professor University of.
Speech and Language Development
R ECEPTIVE VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS : Achievement in an intensive, auditory-oral educational setting Heather Hayes, Ann.
Chapter 6 ~~~~~ Oral And English Language Learner/Bilingual Assessment.
Hey Look Me Over! Ensuring Infants and Toddlers are achieving at every stage and every age.
Developmental Delays Ethical: Our beliefs about what is right and wrong and how we apply it to our behaviors Developmental: Growth and change Heredity:
Delaware Birth to Three Early Intervention System Evaluation: Child Outcomes July 15, 2004 Conference Call Series: Measuring Child Outcomes “Examples of.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge March 27-28, 2006.
Georgia Pathway to Language and Literacy What is Georgia Pathway? Georgia Pathway is a Community of Practice (CoP) of professionals, advocates, and parents.
All Aboard! Child Outcomes Measurement Across Early Childhood Systems Dawn McGrath ICAN/ISTAR Director Ann Ruhmkorff Indiana GSEG Project Coordinator.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Use of Signed Communication Among Parents of Cochlear- Implanted Children with Additional Disabilities.
Components of Language Review DES 320. Components of Language  Form  Content  Use  Comprehension and Production  Auditory-Oral System  Visual-Graphic.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Bankson-Bernthal Test of Phonology
WHERE ARE THEY NOW: Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Identified by Newborn Hearing Screening in Hawai`i 2005 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.
Introduction Gathering Information Observation Interviewing Norm Referenced Tools Scores Administering Why, What, How Learning Check 5 Authentic Assessment.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Supporting Students with.
Determining educational success Ralph Leverett and Kris Wolfe an expansion of the S.I.F.T.E.R.
Special Education 547 Unit Five Special Topics Kevin Anderson Minnesota State University Moorhead 2006.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
Objective The current study examined whether the timing of recovery from late onset of productive vocabulary (e.g., either earlier or later blooming) was.
But They Can’t Respond?!? Assessing the Severe Needs Students
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Language Disorders of Young Children
Functional Listening Evaluations:
Parent Guide to Using Lexile Scores Provided on the Georgia Milestones Individual Score Reports Using the Lexile Score to support the growth of your child’s.
The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.
Research Question Background ParticipantsDiscussion Kathryn Albers  Emily Cable  Bridget Foley  Allison Kallstrom  Jamie Milanowski Morgan Pieper 
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 1 Minnesota Child Development Inventory Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 6, 2013.
Test of Early Reading Ability-3 (TERA-3) By: Jenna Ferrara.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
E-LAP TRAINING. Who Can Administer? The Manual does not give guidelines as to who can and can’t administer the E-LAP.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
Early Intervention and Language for d/Deaf learners A Critical Theory View Magen Otwell Gallaudet University Magen Otwell Gallaudet University.
Chapter 11 Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 8 Children with Communication, Language, and Speech Disorders © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Amie Fredericks, M.Ed. Melanie Gates, M.Ed.. Why aren’t Deaf/Hard of Hearing children of average cognitive abilities performing at the same level as their.
Interpreting Test Results using the Normal Distribution Dr. Amanda Hilsmier.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Tonight’s Agenda :  Review of Unit 1-3  Class Discussion  Questions ?
Introducing preLAS 2000 Gina Davis Assessment Consultant preLAS.
Language Outcomes, Growth, and Predictors of Success: A Multi-State (NECAP) Perspective WREIC June 16, 2017.
Reporting Assessment Information (Assessment Report/ITP)
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Chris Russell Sam Morgan Hunter College SPED 746
Guidelines to PDMS-2 Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 August 2011
Presentation transcript:

Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013 Assessments for Children Birth to 3: Part 3 MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Sentences Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind November 20, 2013

Presenter Allison Sedey, Ph.D., CCC-SLP, CCC-A University of Colorado-Boulder Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu

Today’s Topics Description of assessment Instructions for administration Opportunity for families with children who are d/hoh to participate in NECAP Interpretation and use of results

Age level 16 to 30 months Older children with language delay Girls with 70 - 550 words in productive vocabulary Boys with 50 - 550 words in productive vocabulary

Areas assessed Expressive vocabulary (680 words) Semantic functions (how child uses words) Word endings Irregular nouns and verbs Sentence length/complexity

Published version Available from Brookes Publishing Co. Available in English or Spanish Separate norms for each language

Adapted version for d/hoh Adapted at the University of Colorado- Boulder “Sign” column added Can count words spoken, signed, and produced in both speech and sign Available in English or Spanish

Instructions to Parents Can rely only on instructions on form Can provide supplemental instructions Verbally In writing Go over section where parent picks one of two sentences varying in complexity(often misunderstood)

Discussing Inconsistencies Opportunity to learn something you may have been unaware of Opportunity to improve parents’ observational skills of child’s language “I see you marked that Anna says ‘now’. Can you give me an example of a situation when she said/signed that word?”

Scoring If child’s CA is within age range of the test (16 to 30 months) Obtain percentile scores If child’s CA is >30 months Obtain age scores Look for your child’s raw score on the 50th %ile line See age associated with that score

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project Assisting interested states in administering two developmental assessments Minnesota Child Development Inventory MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory

NECAP National Early Childhood Assessment Project For children who are deaf or hard of hearing Assessments scored by CU-Boulder Report of child’s results sent to interventionist and/or family Annual accountability report sent to participating state/agency

NECAP Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu **State- or agency-level administrators interested in participating in NECAP can contact: Allison.Sedey@colorado.edu

Interpreting Results Compare subscale scores Typically developing children generally show approximately equivalent scores across all sections

Interpreting Results Single words vs. word combinations By the time child produces 50 words, word combinations are expected Use of irregular forms (e.g., men, ran) Expected at about 2 years of age Not relevant to families using ASL only

Interpreting “often”, “sometimes”, “not yet” items Using the tables in the manual Compare child’s status with percentage of age-mates who received an “often” or “sometimes” response

Using Results to Guide Intervention Setting the Bar: Information from normative tables can help interventionists and parents understand the magnitude of vocabulary growth needed per month From 16 to 30 months children learn to produce an average of 37 words a month

Using Results to Guide Intervention Evaluate communication approach being used (# of words signed vs. spoken) Provide parent education significance of vocabulary development for future academic success Importance of having more than labels Setting the bar

Using Results to Guide Intervention Obtain ratio of nouns to “other” words Should be between .3 and .6 That is, for every 10 nouns a child produces, he/she typically produces between 3 and 6 other types of words Deaf/hoh children are often “noun heavy” Focus on vocabulary in semantic categories where child’s scores are low

Using Results to Guide Intervention To see which words are typically known at each age level go to: www.sci.sdsu.edu/cdi/lexical_e.htm Lists the percentage of children comprehending or producing each individual word at each age Can search database by age level, semantic category, specific words, or word frequency