Advanced Financial and Grants Management: Federal Audits & Common Pitfalls and Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Concepts for AmeriCorps. Session Objectives Provide an opportunity for participants to network in program specific group Discuss key fiscal and grant.
Advertisements

SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
Office of Inspector General Corporation for National and Community Service Senior Corps Virtual Conference August 14, 2012.
Financial Monitoring Techniques
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
Key Focus Areas for AmeriCorps Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, 2008 (updated 2010)
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Financial Management.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Audit Requirements  A-133 Gov't, Education and Non-Profit  Thresholds $500K or more expended during the FY - Single Audit required  Audit Report - due.
Financial Management What you need to know…. Agenda –Introductions –Webinar logistics –Financial management systems OMB circulars – ‘Super Circular’ Accounting.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
2011 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference Session #33, May 24, :30 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Anchorage,Alaska Federal Audits.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Fiscal Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring. Agenda I. Fiscal Monitoring I. Fiscal Monitoring II. Follow-up II. Follow-up III. Correction Action Plan III. Correction.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium. Documentation.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Internal Controls Protect resources against waste and fraud Ensure accuracy and reliability Secure compliance Evaluate the level of performance in all.
Kentucky Auditor of Public Accounts Libby Carlin, Assistant State Auditor (502)
THE BIGGEST WINNER FISCAL EDITION. Test Your Fiscal Fitness Fiscal Basics Property & Facilities Cost Allocation Nonfederal Share Records & Reports
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium Updates and Fixed Awards.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
INTERNAL CONTROLS. Session Objectives Understand why an organization should have internal controls Understand the key components of internal controls.
CACFP Financial Management
AUDITS. Session Objectives To familiarize participants with the Inspector General Audit Process To better prepare participants for the audit by providing.
2013 Summer Food Service Program March 19, Reviews Part II, Chapter 6 - Pages
Office of Field Services Fiscal Review Process Becky Pennington Susan Szymas February 7, 2013.
WELCOME 2014 AmeriCorps Program Director Training Saratoga Springs, NY October 20, 2014.
Financial Monitoring of Subgrantees You need to know... The information in this session is based on CNCS and Federal laws, rules, and regulations; CNCS.
Reimbursements, Reporting & Budget Modifications
Programmatic and Fiscal Compliance as a Team Effort 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
Avoiding Common Issues and Pitfalls 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Securing and Documenting Match and In-kind Support
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
Office of Inspector General Safeguarding Corporation Funds Demystifying the OIG.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Financial Management What you need to know…. Agenda –Introductions –Webinar logistics –Financial management systems Policies and procedures OMB circulars.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
OIG’S Audit Process Diane Kozinski Auditor. 2 MISSION STATEMENT OF OIG To serve the American Worker and Taxpayer by conducting audits, investigations,
College Reviews An Overview Presented by Howard Lutwak, CIA Director of Internal Audit January 2004.
Safeguarding Federal Funds OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Child Support Director’s Association 2007 Training Conference Administrative Audits Presentation #107 September 18, 2007.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
AmeriCorps Grantee Training Conference 2017
2016 AmeriCorps Texas All-Grantee Meeting February 25-26, 2016
Internal controls 01-Nov-2017.
Time Distribution Report OMB Circular A-87, Attachment B. Paragraph 8 h. Standard Operating Procedures
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Financial and Grants Management: Federal Audits & Common Pitfalls and Issues

Session Objectives Learn about Federal audits and how to prepare Learn about common audit pitfalls and issues

What is an Audit Examines a Corporation program or activity 1.Financial Audits Audits of costs incurred on grants and contracts, indirect costs, and internal controls 2.Performance Audits Audits of economy and efficiency of programs –Measure achievement of desired results or benefits

Office of Inspector General

OIG – Who are They? Office of Inspector General = OIG or IG Independent organization The Inspector General has the authority to: –Have access to all Corporation documents and records –Subpoena documents –Administer oaths –Have direct and prompt access to the Chief Executive Officer Debar and obtain reimbursement of funds from AmeriCorps programs that have been found to have committed serious violations of program requirements

OIG – What’s their Mission? Conducts & supervises –audits –investigations Works to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse Promotes economy, efficiency and effectiveness Keeps the CEO and Congress informed about problems and deficiencies

Who Performs an OIG Audit? Auditors: –OIG Staff OR –OIG Representative - Independent Public Accounting Firm (IPA) selected by the OIG All audits are managed by an OIG Audit Manager regardless of who is performing the audit

How are OIG Audits Selected? Risk-based process on the basis of a range of factors Annual OIG Audit Plan –Legislatively mandated audits –Discretionary audits –Corporation requested audits

What’s the OIG Audit Process? 1.Notification Letter in writing 2.Entrance Conference To provide audit scope and objectives 3.Survey Phase (planning phase) To obtain grantee’s background, mission, resources, responsibilities, key personnel, operating systems and controls

What’s the OIG Audit Process? 4.Develop the Audit Program A set of procedures for auditors to follow 5.Field Work Auditors complete the audit following the procedures in the audit program 6.Exit Conference A verbal briefing of auditor’s findings work with the opportunity to confirm information, ask questions, and obtain clarifying information

What’s the OIG Audit Process? 7.Draft Report Issued to the auditee and Corporation officials a request to provide written comments in 30 days 8.Corporation & Grantee Response The Corporation and Grantee each respond in writing to the draft report and comments are published in the final report 9.Final Report Issued after reviewing auditee’s and Corporation’s comments with complete description of findings and recommendations for corrective action

Audit Resolution Process Corporation management (Office of Grants Management, or its representative) works with the grantee to determine if the audit findings are founded OGM prepares a Management Decision based on grantee input and works with OIG management to agree on proposed corrective actions needed OGM takes action to improve operations or correct deficiencies identified in the Final Audit Report –Corrective action required to be completed within 1 year

The Auditors are Coming, What Should I Do? Locate all grant records and A-133 reports Be familiar with the grant provisions and regulations Check financial and program records to ensure there is support for all costs and compliance with all AmeriCorps grant provisions and Federal regulations

The Auditors are Coming, What Should I Do? Ensure written policies and procedures are in place to comply with Federal regulations Accounting systems should: –record operating costs separately from grant costs –record costs separately for each grant

Common Pitfalls and Issues

Member Eligibility Findings: Lack of documentation of Participant’s Age Criminal record/sex offender check if working with vulnerable populations Citizenship Consequences: May disallow all payments (any stipends/living allowances, health and child care benefits, or participant reimbursements) May disallow Education Awards for AmeriCorps participants May terminate grant or be disbarred depending on the extent and severity of findings May disallow all Federal funds if all or most of the participants are undocumented or ineligible

Member Eligibility Preventive Actions: Document how eligibility was confirmed Understand and document program specific participant requirements for eligibility Conduct appropriate National Service Criminal History Checks Understand requirements for Staff & Participants with involvement with children or vulnerable populations Customize member contracts if necessary to exclude working with vulnerable populations Create written policies and procedures that clearly outline the requirements for eligibility, documentation, screening, and maintaining records Initiate necessary reviews for deciding eligibility with final signoff for “hiring” Incorporate internal controls that include a review of decisions and documentation by the Project Director

AmeriCorps Members Findings: Member timesheets not signed by both member and supervisor Member timesheet does not add up to the number required to earn an Education Award for that term of service Members start serving before they sign the contract Members start serving before the grant award period Consequences: May disallow all payments (any stipends/living allowances, health and child care benefits, or participant reimbursements) May disallow Education Awards for AmeriCorps participants Member hours served prior to grant or before signing contract may not be counted towards education award or term of service

AmeriCorps Members Preventive Actions: Complete service log daily and submit in a timely manner Document only hours served, do not include lunch or breaks as service hours Record hours according to the activities performed (direct service, training or fundraising), and record these hours in separate columns Check the math! All totals should be mathematically correct Member and site supervisor must sign and date all service logs Sites must maintain a file with the original service logs Never use whiteout to make corrections Use a permanent means to document all time, i.e., never use pencils or erasable pen Periodically do a random check of member timesheets

Match Findings: Match requirement not met Cash and in-kind amounts were not supported by adequate documentation or not verifiable by grantee’s records In-kind contributions were not supported with after-the-fact documentation (promissory note is not acceptable) Other Federal funds were used as match without authorization Match claimed was not necessary to operate grant Match amounts were unreasonable or excessive Match was inadequately supported to determine if it was allowable and allocable Match was not related to a cost included in the approved budget Match covered expenses incurred outside of the grant award period

Match Consequences: May disallow match causing minimum match to not be met May disallow some Federal funds if minimum match cannot be met May decide to audit all match or question all match if unable to confirm if match is reasonable or allocable Preventive Actions: Ensure documentation is adequate for all match Review all match to ensure it is necessary and reasonable Followup on promises to provide in-kind and obtain documentation Obtain written approval from other Federal agency to its funds Request budget amendments to include new sources of match Determine if costs are allowable – ask questions, don’t risk it! Know the regulatory and other match requirements –AmeriCorps § 45 CFR 2521

Match Basics The same requirements apply to match and direct costs so that all costs must be: reasonable allocable allowable provided consistent treatment expensed in the accounting system supported by adequate & appropriate documentation

1.Document the basis for determining value of personal services, material, equipment, building, and land 2.Obtain written acknowledgement of the contribution including:  Name and signature of donor  Date and Location of donation  Detailed description of item/service  Estimated value of contribution, how value was determined, who made the determination  Was the contribution obtained with Federal funds *** Keep a copy of the receipt in your files *** Documenting In-Kind Contributions

Sample In-Kind Contribution Form See Handout

Time & Attendance – Staff Findings: Inadequate documentation to support salary expenses Staff allocating time to more than one grant were not keeping timesheets that show actual time spent on each grant Lack of proper timekeeping systems No timesheets or activity reports maintained or retained No reconciliation between estimates and actual time Non-compliance with OMB requirements Salaries and wages charged to the grant: –On the basis of budgeted amounts instead of actual after-the- fact time –Based on estimates –Unsigned or unapproved timesheets by employee or supervisor –Time not allocated among activities

Time & Attendance – Staff Consequences: May disallow entire claim for salary for all staff over the course of the entire grant Unmet match requirement Preventive Actions: Use timesheets that align with the payroll period that reports all activities of the employee, both on the grant and other projects Implement procedures whereby all timesheets are reviewed and approved by a supervisor before sent to payroll Reconcile budgeted salaries to actual time spent on the grant Know the regulatory and other requirements

Common Pitfalls & Issues 7 Main Areas: 1.Member Eligibility 2.Member Files & Records 3.Member Costs 4.Match 5.Reports 6.Administrative Areas 7.General Management See Handout

Auditor Recommendations OIG Recommendations Disallow expenses, which may result in –repayment of Federal funds –disallowed match funds causing minimum match to not be met. Disallow education award, which may result in –a pro-rated education award, –the grantee/subgrantee repaying the amount of disallowed education award already used by the member –the member not being allowed to use his/her education award.

AmeriCorps Self-Checks Do member files contain all required eligibility documentation? Citizenship, age, parental consent, HS diploma/GED, background check, documented compelling reason for early exit Do member contracts comply with grant requirements? Work description, service location, evaluations, entry & exit forms [see AmeriCorps provisions for complete list] Have required member mid-term and exit evaluations been prepared, discussed, signed and filed? Do the hours reported in WBRS agree with the member timesheets? Are member timesheets signed by both member and supervisor?

CaliforniaVolunteers and the OIG Audit Audit Period = January 1, 2001 through March 31, subgrantees audited –8 of these had findings Final Corporation Management Decision –Federal Questioned Costs: Disallowed $383,723 of the $1,041,476 (37%) –Education Awards: Disallowed $53,588 of the $414,260 (13%) –Match Costs: Disallowed $3,425,099 of the $8,694,506 (39%) [$3,422,854 due to administrative error] Website:

CaliforniaVolunteers and the OIG Audit Member Costs Questioned: Questioned excess member benefits paid to members after exiting Questioned living allowance and fringe questioned for members due to: –missing file –no citizenship documents –terminated member –no citizenship documents Questioned living allowances paid to non-members Questioned living allowance for member paid while working another job, questioning living allowance and fringe Questioned overclaimed living allowances for members Unsupported member hours

CaliforniaVolunteers and the OIG Audit Other Grant Costs Questioned: Administrative costs due to salaries that could not be supported Claimed costs on FSR exceeded general ledger costs for living allowances and fringe Travel costs paid in excess of allowed California state rate for grant staff Unallocable non-salary administrative costs Unallowable costs for –direct costs, fringe benefits, member support costs, mileage, meals, exceeding consultant rate, late fees, administrative costs, overclaimed costs Match and in-kind costs with –no documentation –inadequate documentation –unreasonable –missing files

CaliforniaVolunteers and the OIG Audit Member Education Awards Questioned: No HS diploma documentation Insufficient hours No member records No citizenship documents No age verification Exited for nonqualifying compelling reasons Missing files

Prepare now, so you don’t have to pay later! Surviving an OIG Audit

A-133 Audits

Ensures consistency and uniformity among Federal agencies for the audit of non-Federal entities expending Federal grant awards Required annually for entities expending $500,000 or more of Federal funds during its fiscal year Audit must be performed by an independent Certified Public Accountant Cost of audit should be recorded as an administrative (indirect) cost

A-133 Audits If an A-133 audit is required, an independent auditor must audit your organization to assess: –The reliability and accuracy of your organization’s financial statements and financial position –The adequacy of your organization’s internal control structure –Your organization’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations that may materially affect your financial statements

A-133 Corrective Action Plans If an A-133 audit report identifies findings, your organization must develop a Corrective Action Plan for each finding to include: The reference numbers the auditor assigns to audit findings Name of Contact Person Responsible for corrective action Corrective Action Planned or Taken Anticipated Completion Date If your organization does not agree with the audit findings or believes corrective action is not required, then the Corrective Action Plan shall include an explanation and specific reasons

Submit A-133 Reports Submit A-133 audit report to: –Federal Clearinghouse –CaliforniaVolunteers Submit to CaliforniaVolunteers: –One copy of the reporting package when the schedule of findings and questioned costs disclosed audit findings relating to CNCS Federal awards that the CaliforniaVolunteers provided

Fraud

What is Fraud? An intentional misrepresentation of facts made by an individual to deprive another of something of value OR Larceny by trickery

Common Fraud Areas Misuse of grant funds Timesheet fraud Embezzlement Theft

Misuse of Grant funds Non-grant related expenditures during a time when CNCS grant is the only funding source Receipts for what appears to be non-grant expenditures being charged to the grant Funds drawn down on unoccupied member slots Unauthorized personnel expenses charged against the grant

Misuse of Grant funds Drawdown of all or most of the grant funds well before the end of the program year Documents not signed or dated Changing or falsifying documents Preparing documents the night before an inspection, site visit, or audit

Timesheet Fraud Documents that appear to have all been prepared at the same time Hours claimed are not reasonable and/or allowable Members hand carry timesheet from sites to program office Member time not charged to correct grant when hosting multiple programs with multiple grants Other logged hours do not match timesheets Staff percentage of time charged to two or more programs in greater than 100%

Embezzlement No secondary endorsements on checks when required Members and staff are not being paid or checks bounce Double payments or payments to ghost individuals Frequent use of white out, pen and ink changes, or strikeouts Missing documents or using copies instead of originals Funds missing with no sign of break-in or burglary

Theft Purchasing items not used by the organization Receipts for items that cannot be traced to a valid purchase receipt Property and controlled, inventoried, or missing Charge card purchases not monitored Excessive mileage claimed for travel to project sites Mailing, telephone, or supply costs increase suddenly

Red Flags – Employees Personal problems or pressures Dramatic lifestyle changes (increases or excesses) Close relationship with suppliers or vendors Does not take vacation or sick leave Reluctance to share information

Fraud & Your Responsibility Per AmeriCorps grant provisions, General Provisions, Section V.C. The Office of Inspector General. –The OIG is available to offer assistance to AmeriCorps grantees that become aware of suspected criminal activity in connection with the AmeriCorps program –Grantees should immediately contact OIG when they first suspect that a criminal violation has occurred CaliforniaVolunteers must report issues to the OIG when issues are brought to its attention by grantees

OIG Hotline Report suspected fraud, waste, or abuse All Information is confidential You can remain anonymous Website:

CaliforniaVolunteers Monitoring Desk Reviews –Member File Reviews –Fiscal Desk Reviews –Program Desk Reviews Followup Audits Site Visits –Program Visits –Fiscal Visits

Questions?