LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year 2012-2013 A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Mentoring New Educators
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Five: Identifying Special Education and Related Services Standards-based IEP State-Directed.
Special Education. The purpose of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA 2004) is to assure that all children with disabilities are provided.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
JOB ANALYSIS.
A Programmatic Approach To Supporting Students Requiring Emotional Support IDEA Identification, Assessments, Monitoring, and Partnerships.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Prepare Understand the accommodation process & choose level of engagement. Engage Follow procedures for receiving accommodations.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
+ Project IDEAL in Minnesota: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
June 2014 “College and Career Readiness” for Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities 1.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Life Skills Assessment SpEd 556. Norm-Referenced Tests –Compare an individual’s performance to the performance of his or her peers –Emphasis is on the.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Transition Assessments Matrix Great Prairie AEA Transition Coordinators  Transition Assessment  Living, Learning and Working.
+ Distance Learning PD History and Development Model: Building a Community of ABE DL Practice Minnesota ABE DL Toolkit.
Intel ® Teach Essentials ICT in the Classroom Conference St John's College, Johannesburg 5-7 July 2011 Workshop by Claire Dean Senior Trainer SchoolNet.
Study Session   The purpose of the Comprehensive Examination is for Graduate students to synthesize in writing the knowledge, skills, and competencies.
A Model for EAP Training Development Zhiyun Zhang IDE 632 — Instructional Design & Development II Instructor : Dr. Gerald S. Edmonds.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Excellence in Vocational Teaching Symposium 23 & 24 September 2013 Qingdao, P.R. China.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Understanding Learning Difficulties This activity, titled Understanding Learning Difficulties, represents the first part of a two part professional development.
Teaching Students in Inclusive Settings. Getting Started Course Overview Discussion Posts and Rubrics Major Assignments Q & A Dr. Phyllis Schiffer-Simon.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 Student Career Plans A Person Centered Plan, Identifying Post School Employment Goals Washington Initiative for Supported Employment
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Training and Developing a Competitive Workforce 17/04/2013.
The Information Processing Model Part 1 Introduction to The Three Basic Stages Version 3 Revised 6/1/12 1 This professional development independent study.
TigerLIFE Behavioral Unit J. Brian Smith, Ed.D., BCBA Marissa Harris, M.S., Ed.D. Graduate Student.
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
Post Secondary Transition CANAR, NOVEMBER 12, 2015.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Eric M. Roubion EDLD 871. Online Teacher Professional Development Standard F.
ACT Now Achieving College Transitions Now: Implementation Strategies for Secondary Youth.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Policy: SCWDC WS Training Delivery Design: Individual Recommended: Read the policy prior to taking this training. It is helpful to have a copy of.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 310 Week 1 Individual Assignment Main Factors of Lesson plans EDU 310 Week 1 DQ 1 EDU 310 Week 1 DQ.
Rosenberg/Westling/McLeskey Special Education for Today’s Teachers: An Introduction Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter.
Curriculum Overview for New Teachers New Teacher Orientation August 5, :30 P.M.
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
Common Core State Standards
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
A Review of Effective Teaching Skills
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs in the areas of adapted instruction, learning differences and learning disabilities Developed by Richard Gacka Ed.D. PDS LD Content Consultant Phone: (814) Last revised 12/06/12

AREAS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREAS OF ADAPTED INSTRUCTION AND LEARNING DIFFERENCES The following slides will guide you through the “stages” of contact that occur between instructors, tutors, case managers and students. Each stage represents an area where program improvement might be focused. You can use the slides as a self-evaluation in order to identify areas where you would like to direct your program improvement efforts or simply where you would like to develop greater skills. The agency program improvement team can use this self-evaluation in order to define agency professional development needs. After you review the slides, call your assigned Professional Development System Lead Consultant or contact Dr. Gacka directly. Information from the needs assessment can be integrated into an agency’s integrated Professional Development Consultation Form or used by a specific instructor to guide his/her individual professional development planning. The completed self-evaluation is one component of a process of professional development planning and effective program improvement. It is recommended that you print out a copy of the PowerPoint slides and indicate the areas where you would like to receive professional development by marking the check-boxes that are used as bullet markers on each of the slides. The resulting document can be used as a guide during agency planning meetings or requests for consultation. If you have any questions feel free to or call (814) 2

THE GOAL OF THIS SELF-ASSESSMENT IS TO IDENTIFY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEEDS THAT WILL HELP YOU TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF SERVICES DELIVERED BY YOUR AGENCY. The stages of service delivery that will be reviewed include: 1.Orientation 2.Screening and diagnostic assessment 3.Instruction 4.Monitoring student progress 5.Transitioning to work or post-secondary school 6.Service monitoring 3

Stage 1: Orientation  Our program would like to have a better understanding of the characteristics and needs that students bring to the instructional setting.  A general orientation to the types of learning difficulties  An understanding of the kinds of learning problems that teachers might encounter in their class  An understanding of the need to adapt instruction to meet student needs and learning styles  Our program would like improve its use of the principles of “good teaching” as the foundation of effective instruction.  The importance of both the “art” of teaching and mastery of the “techniques” of instruction  The essential elements of “good teaching”  The process of direct instruction 4

STAGE 2: ASSESSMENT  Our program would like to improve in the area of screening students for learning difficulties.  How to complete a quick assessment of possible learning difficulties (educational triage)  Learn about materials that can be used for screening  Demonstration of, and practice using, screening instruments  Our program would like to improve its diagnostic assessment  Observation and interviewing skills  Criterion referenced or “alternative” assessment  Demonstration and practice with diagnostic assessment instruments  Our program would like to improve the linking of assessment to instructional planning. 5

STAGE 2: ASSESSMENT (cont) Diagnostic Assessment (cont.)  We would like professional development in a conceptual model that provides a framework for understanding various types of learning difficulties.  The Information Processing Model – the “unifying theory”  The Continuum of types, learning difficulties and LD Spectrum Disorder  The 3 A’s – Ability, Achievement, and Attitude  The “Get it – Do it” model that emphasizes the need for both “insight” and appropriate “action”  Specific Learning Disabilities - diagnosis and treatment  LD an introduction to learning difficulties 6

Stage 3: Instruction  We would like professional development in how to adapt instruction to meet student needs.  General instructional adaptation (linked to the preceding models)  Instructional materials and techniques (an LD “toolbox”)  We would like professional development in specific content area adaptations and techniques.  Reading and language (reading, writing, vocabulary)  Math (reasoning and computation)  Cognitive skills, memory development, attention and executive processing  We would like professional development in the use of technology for adapting instruction. 7

Stage 4: Skill Progress Monitoring  We would like to improve our ability to assess student learning.  Writing effective learning objectives  Implementing criterion referenced assessments in the classroom  Designing and using assessment tools with students who need an alternative to standardized testing  Developing a “skill based” model for instruction and charting student learning gain  We would like to improve our knowledge of the process and procedures used in applying for a GED ® accommodation. 8

Stage 5: Transitioning  We would like to improve our agency's ability to transition students into work, post-secondary education, or training.  Vocational assessment tools and strategies  Case management strategies  Obtaining GED ® accommodations, advocacy and student rights  Learning disabilities, employment and accommodations  Soft skills, maturity and executive processing expectations for students advancing to post-secondary studies  Creating program designed “certificates” of readiness for employment or post-secondary studies 9

Stage 6: Service Monitoring  We would like to improve our agency's ability to monitor the quality of services that are delivered to students with learning difficulties.  Access student data in order to identify students with special learning problems  Develop student awareness of the availability of GED accommodations and adaptations  Monitor requests for GED accommodations and track students through the process  Monitor referrals to the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation and other support service providers  Monitor the use and impact of special materials and availability of the LD Toolbox  Monitor the use of checklists for purposes of data collection and identification of service needs 10

How to use the Self-Evaluation of Professional Development Needs for Program Improvement Using this PowerPoint as a guide, identify two or three goals for your program. Your goals might look something like the following: “Our program would like to pursue professional development that would permit us to provide adapted instruction based on LD screening and diagnostic assessment.” “Our program would like to improve our staff’s understanding of learning difficulties so that they can integrate screening into the initial orientation process.” “Our program would like to establish informal assessment systems so that we can monitor the impact of instructional adaptations.” 11

Consider including learning differences in your Professional Development Consultation Plan and linking your objectives to program improvement. 1. Improving the quality of services provided to students with learning difficulties is a type of program improvement. 2. Engaging in job embedded professional development coordinated through the PDS Lead Consultant is an excellent way to approach program improvement. 3. The first step is to discuss professional development needs with the agency’s In-House Professional Development Specialist and assigned PDS Lead Consultant. The PDS LD Content Expert will work with your PDS Lead Consultant to identify and facilitate services. 12

Visit the PDE LD Content Expert web site for more information about learning differences 13

LD NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT POST-TEST 1. The LD needs assessment is built around six stages in the instructional process. What are the stages? In your own words, describe how each stage addresses a different issue. 2. Answer this question: How will you (or your adult education program) use the LD Needs Assessment Guide for program improvement? 3. Name two areas mentioned in the needs assessment survey that could be used to improve the quality of your agency’s assessment or orientation services. 4. Identify one sub-topic from each stage that you feel is the most important for you or your agency. 5. Visit the LD Content Expert web site at browse around a bit, and from the site send an to Dr. Gacka citing one item that is of interest. 1. The LD needs assessment is built around six stages in the instructional process. What are the stages? In your own words, describe how each stage addresses a different issue. 2. Answer this question: How will you (or your adult education program) use the LD Needs Assessment Guide for program improvement? 3. Name two areas mentioned in the needs assessment survey that could be used to improve the quality of your agency’s assessment or orientation services. 4. Identify one sub-topic from each stage that you feel is the most important for you or your agency. 5. Visit the LD Content Expert web site at browse around a bit, and from the site send an to Dr. Gacka citing one item that is of interest. Send your answers to Dr. Richard Gacka at 14

15 Thank you for completing the LD Self- Assessment of Professional Development Needs