ID: Semester: Class: Professor: Advisor: Student Dashboard for: Studenting Rubric Writing Rubric Student Name Faculty Member.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

On-Demand Writing Assessment
Writing to Learn-Using Informal and Formal Writing Inside and Outside the Classroom Rifat A. Salam, Ph.D. Borough of Manhattan Community.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice LDC Scoring Session Puget Sound ESD - Reach Associates February 11,
Cadre B Writing to Learn Refining Writing Through Thinking Refining Thinking Through Writing.
Essay Writing: An Overview. What is an Essay? According to The American Heritage Dictionary: Essay: n. 1. A short literary composition on a single subject,
Revision Techniques Dr. Karen Petit. A Definition of Revision The word “revision” means “to see again.” Revision involves carefully reading, analyzing,
DR. SUZANNE SPOOR DR. JENNIFER DIX Introducing ALP at AACC.
Qualitative Grading Notes compiled by Mary D’Alleva January 18 th, 2005 Office of Faculty Development.
C O L L E G E S U C C E S S ™ SAT Writing Rubric Prepare. Inspire. Connect.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Peer Editing Remember to check each paper thoroughly.
Looking at Texts from a Reader’s Point of View
Agenda Getting Students to Take Ownership of their Learning During the Writing Process November 20, 2014 (3:30-5:00 Merts) Assess your students using The.
1 Feng-Qi Lai Project Peer Evaluation: Assessment and Collaborative Learning Feng-Qi Lai Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Media Technology Bayh.
Faculty Senate Writing Skills Committee Scott Lazerus, ChairChristy Jespersen Jessica YoungJoAnn Arai-Brown Nancy GaussAnne Ryter Julie LukengaCourtney.
Team-Based Exercise Grading Rubrics
Parents and Students: Pretend County School System has made the decision to limit technology devices students may bring to school and/or use during the.
Group 8 ‘GudBoyz’ teaching writing to L2 learners Agus Prayogo Asih Nurakhir Nico Ouwpoly Sutarno.
National Center for Urban School Transformation Strengthening Instruction in Urban Schools National Center for Urban School Transformation.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
Essay Writing Tips Presented by: Calumet College Student Peer Advisors Date: Thursday, January 27, 2011.
Writing a Series of Paragraphs Expressing an Opinion.
Peer Editing Guidelines The Art of Giving and Receiving Constructive Criticism Courtesy of Mrs. Sally Shelton.
How to Evaluate Student Papers Fairly and Consistently.
 1. It not only fulfills the assignment but does so in a fresh and mature way. The paper is exciting to read; it accommodates itself well to its intended.
Personal Reflection on Readings How to write reflectively in an academic paper.
Tentative Unit 1 Schedule Week 2 1/19- MLK Day-No Class 1/21-Using library databases (bring computer to class) 1/23- Intro to Exploratory Narrative & Source.
Mrs. Laird 6th Grade ELA N.B.C Middle School What are the steps? Read Aloud (Self) Read Aloud Peer Check for making sense Check for Organization Check.
Start of class Sign out a computer and logon – Must share - 15 computers Have your final project folder If you were absent, look in the box Have out your.
The Essential Skill of Writing An Introductory Training for High School Teachers Penny Plavala, Multnomah ESD Using the Writing Scoring Guide.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
An Introduction.  To Build 21 st Century Survival Skills  Achieve a deeper understanding about the ideas and values in a text.
TAKS Writing Rubric
EDITING DAY #2! “The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress.” ~Philip Roth 3/11/14 Please take out your (updated?) rough draft with word count and.
1 CM 220 College Composition II UNIT 9 Seminar. Agenda Status Check Unit 9 Overview Unit 9 Final Project Guidelines & Checklist Time for Final Questions.
Introduction to the ERWC (Expository Reading and Writing Course)
Category 5 Above standards 4 Meets standards 3 Meets standards but needs work 2 Approaching standards 1 Below standards 0 Introduction/ Thesis Engaging.
How to Write an Excellent AP English Language and Composition Essay
Agenda: 1/2 Welcome back Final project overview and schedule – Clarification & questions Restriction analysis challenge Samples – gene cloning Homework:
Early PhaseImplementation PhaseInnovation Phase Reflection and Revision Teacher makes time and space for student to reflect on what they have learned and.
Class Participation Rubric – Grades given at mid-point and end of each marking period. Advanced ProficientProficient Emerging Proficient Below ProficientNo.
The Writing Process The Five Steps.
REVISING, EDITING & PROOFREADING
11/3/14 Do Now: Take out: -Notes and outline -Copies of Dialectical Journals -Gatsby books Homework: Gatsby Literary Analysis Essay due 11/4 by 11:59pm.
College Career Ready Conference Today we will:  Unpack the PARCC Narrative and Analytical writing rubrics while comparing them to the standards.
What is a Rubric? A rubric is a set of scoring criteria for a performance task. A rubric also serves as a blueprint for the student to use in constructing.
GEB 3213 Lecture 11 Outline Working in Teams. Why form groups and teams? 1._________________ 2.Faster response 3. _________________ 4. Greater “buy-in”
The Art of Persuasion English 102. Review of 6 Traits of Good Writing Content Define a specific topic with a main idea/thesis statement that supports.
Tentative Unit 1 Schedule Week 2 1/19- MLK Day-No Class 1/21-Using library databases (bring computer to class) 1/23- Intro to Exploratory Narrative & Source.
How to Write a Winning Argumentative Essay in 30 Minutes Palmetto Middle School ACTion for 8 th Grade Writing- Timed Persuasive Argumentative.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
DISCUSS WORKSHOPS AND PEER EDITING How to get the most out of your Peer Review.
Teacher Leadership & Action Research or Teachers As Leaders: Some Thoughts To Share Rebecca K. Fox, Ph.D. College of Education and Human Development.
Persuasive Letter Scoring Guide Category4321 Audience Demonstrates a clear understanding of the potential reader and uses appropriate vocabulary and arguments.
Revise and Edit I can work in small groups to revise and edit my essay. I can offer feedback to peers about revising and editing their draft.
ENG 113: INTRODUCTION TO COMPOSITION THE ART OF COMPOSITION.
Evaluator Identification & Preview Sign your name at the end of the essay. Review objective of the PROGRESS CHECK. Take 2 minutes to preview your peers.
Academic Decathlon Essay Judge Training. What Is Academic Decathlon? Scholastic competition for high school students Scholastic competition for high school.
The GMAS Writing Rubric
Advanced Proficient Proficient Emerging Proficient Below Proficient
Using Collaborative Learning Techniques in the Writing Classroom
thesis statements: argument writing
Faculty Instructional Rubric
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
Peer Reviews Tips for the author.
Editing vs Proofreading
Rubric for Group Activity or Group Project
INFORMATIVE ESSAY RUBRIC
Presentation transcript:

ID: Semester: Class: Professor: Advisor: Student Dashboard for: Studenting Rubric Writing Rubric Student Name Faculty Member

ElementUnsatisfactory 1Proficient 2Distinguished 3 Attendance  Student attended some class sessions. Student may have been tardy to class.  Student attended most class sessions. Student may have struggled with getting to class on time.  Student attended all class sessions. Student was prompt to most classes. Atttude/Advocacy  Student shared negative attitudes or practices with the class. (sarcasm, the expense of others).  Student did not challenge negative attitudes or practices in my class, but did not engage in them.  Student made a concerted effort to challenge negative attitudes or practices in class. Collaboration  Collaboration is difficult for student. Student dominates conversations or lets others do the work.  Student collaborates with others. Student lets others give direction to the group.  Student collaborates with others.  Student takes initiative in assuming leadership roles in groups.  Student scaffolds/coaches others. Content  Student conveyed a negative attitude toward the content in class, suggesting it was not important.  Student conveyed genuine enthusiasm for the content in the class. Student answered questions when asked.  Student demonstrated the content is important by actively participating, discussing or questioning in class, being curious, and taking initiative in class projects. Fairness  Student shows bias, prejudice, lack of fairness toward certain students, or groups of people.  Student is sensitive to others’ feelings. Student tries to be fair to all students.  Student is educated and sensitive to community and cultural norms. Student makes a concerted effort to challenge prejudice or injustice to others. Feedback  Student resisted feedback on work. Student argued with comments if sought. Student was unable to adapt to changing classroom circumstances.  Student accepted with some reluctance, feedback on my work or did not ask for feedback or seek it out. Student did not argue with comments  Student sought out feedback on work from the teacher and colleagues. Student was open to constructive criticism vs. being defensive. Relationships  Student’s relationships with colleagues and/or the teacher might be classified as negative or self- serving.  Student maintained cordial relationships with the teacher and colleagues. Student did not take the initiative in getting to know others.  Student’s relationships with the teacher and peers were characterized by mutual support and cooperation. Student took the initiative in getting to know others. Reliability  Frequently fails to complete reading and other assignments, duties, or tasks on time. A pattern is evident.  Reading and other assignments, duties, and tasks are completed with prompting. No discernible pattern of unreliability present.  Reading and other assignments, duties and tasks are completed on time or ahead of time. “Studenting” Rubric Student Name Faculty Member

ElementUnsatisfactory 1Proficient 2Distinguished 3 Content  Writing shows little understanding of assignment, lacks thesis, or is off topic.  Writing demonstrates basic thesis, clarity of thinking about one’s own perspective and opinions, and is mostly on topic.  Writing demonstrates an engaging a well-developed thesis.  Writer’s perspective and opinions are thought provoking, original, and on topic. Format  Little or no outside source material used.  Citations and format are used incorrectly or inconsistently.  Outside source material is utilized, but connection to own ideas is tenuous.  Sources are cited, but with errors.  Sources are skillfully integrated to support ideas and correctly cited. Mechanics  Writing is at the level of a first draft, with numerous errors that interfere with readability.  Contains multiple errors in sentence structure (run-ons, fragments, etc.) and spelling.  Writing could improve with revision.  Writing includes some errors in usage and syntax, but most do not interfere with readability.  Virtually free of punctuation, spelling and capitalization errors.  Mastery of grammar and mechanics. Organization  Writing is unfocused, ideas arranged illogically.  Writing shows basic sense of beginning, middle and end.  Logically sequenced.  Writing demonstrates logical, clear structure.  Well developed and related introduction and conclusion. Writing Rubric Student Name Faculty Member