1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Advertisements

What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Assess, Inform, and Measure (AIM) Court: An Evaluation of an Alternative to Incarceration By: Megan A. Buysse in collaboration with Dr. Donald D. Mowry,
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
Getting the Right People in the Right Program Urban & Rural Approaches to Offender Screening.
New Directions in Prosecution
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.
Pre-Trial Procedure.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
West Virginia’s Drug Courts: An Overview Division of Probation Services,
Ramsey County Mental Health Court: Working with the Mentally Ill Defendant Judge John H. Guthmann, Second Judicial District, State of Minnesota Judge William.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
UNIT 2B: THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. Steps In a Trial - Felony  1. Crime Occurs  2. Investigation  3. Arrest  4. Booking  5. Initial Appearance.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Criminal Justice Mental Health and Substance Abuse Reinvestment Grant Housing Strategies Ellen Piekalkiewicz Department of Children and Families Florida.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Pre-Sentence Investigation Proposal Purpose: To gather and provide information to the Courts and to other Criminal Justice stakeholders that will aid at.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Redesigning the Front End of the System Options for Analysis, Goal-Setting, and Change August 23, 2013.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
By Jacqueline Gallegos ……to  Chaired by Judge Wells  Invited Executive Level Management  Working toward Local Implementation ◦ Local government.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Early Intervention Juvenile Justice Request for Responses.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
PRETRIAL SERVICES IT’S COMING... FY 2001: project development/planning grant (9 months) FY 2002: project implementation grant for full operation.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
Mental Health Diversionary Program Purpose: To reduce the number of mentally ill clients incarcerated or insufficiently served while aiding in recovery.
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
U NIT 6 By: Amy Ng, ABD, MSCJA. O BJECTIVES Weekly Reminders Holiday Info Drug Treatment.
Criminal Procedure Chapter 16.2 Review. What is a crime? An action that breaks the law Felonies are serious crimes Misdemeanors are less serious crimes.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Attitudinal Survey on the CJS
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CRIMINAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Constitutional Criminal Procedure
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Jail Diversion Programs
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Summit County Probation Services
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Treatment Court Dockets
Corrections.
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June 2009

2 Diversion Pretrial release Treatment

3 80% of persons involved in crime are addicted $40 million new funds applied to drug abuse treatment Goal: “[a]ggressive and effective response to the threat to pubic health and safety created by persons with severe substance abuse addictions.”

4 Entry into the DOC intensive secure substance abuse recovery program is voluntary Defendant can leave the program at any time Hearing held if defendant wants to leave or wants shorter treatment Pretrial release screening is voluntary Note: this is not for the innocent client

5 Amends KRS Prosecutor still has control over who gets in under KRS and Flynt v. Com, 105 S.W.3d 415 (KY 2003) Begins with screening evaluation by PTRO “Condition precedent” for diversion: treatment where person has a history of substance abuse Options for the Court –Commitment to DOC program –Secular or faith based –Intensive outpatient –Residential program

6 Compliance with treatment program required to get diversion Demonstrated by: – performance on pretrial release –drug monitoring –treatment performance Compliance can be waived by the court by a showing of “exigent circumstances” sufficient to justify diversion

7 Class C felony charges may be diverted

8 Court commits to the DOC program “Intensive secured substance abuse recovery program” day program - length is determined by the program At least 200 persons in a minimum security facility

9 PTRO screens “for recent and relevant substance abuse risk factors” when someone is charged with a KRS 218A offense or when person is charged with a felony “whose criminal record indicates a history of recent and relevant substance abuse.” Refusal to be screened does not disqualify consideration for pretrial release

10 Where screening demonstrates “recent and relevant substance abuse risk factors,” court may grant pretrial release with conditions Conditions: –Drug and alcohol testing –Additional assessment –Treatment or recovery program –Appearance at a future hearing

11 Intent is to increase treatment available for Kentucky’s drug problem DOC treatment is to “serve the committed person’s substance abuse condition, and to provide the person with the skills and training needed to prevent the person from engaging in substance abuse upon release from the program.” DOC program requires an aftercare plan

12 Time spent in DOC facility counts as time in custody ONLY if person completes treatment Court has discretion whether to count time on other programs If person drops out or is kicked out, Court has discretion whether to count time or not

13 Counsel is involved Hearings are required to: –obtain pretrial release –enter DOC program –leave DOC program voluntarily –shorten time in DOC program –revoke program commitment

14 Assess worth of prosecution’s case early Assess client’s addiction Advise on whether to participate in pretrial release screening Prepare client for screening Advocate for pretrial release where appropriate Assess whether diversion is the goal Assess whether suppression issues exist Involve defense social worker Guide through the treatment process

15 Suppression issues? Conditional plea? Alcohol addiction? Ethical dilemma: treatment before discovery is complete?

16 Client’s decision Defense social workers will be vital to the success of this process because some defendants will be reluctant to choose this option

17

18 DPA Social Work Pilot Project The DPA Social Worker Pilot was funded by the 2006 Kentucky General Assembly to test whether a Social Worker in a Public Defender’s office could: Divert persons with significant social and economic barriers to services and treatment so that they can successfully transition into their communities and become productive citizens; Provide judges with relevant mitigating information about a defendant’s health, mental health, and social history, as well as viable alternatives to incarceration; Save incarceration costs by diverting persons with addiction and mental illness to community-based treatment; and Reduce recidivism rates.

19 What does a DPA Social Worker do for the DPA Attorney? Prepare alternative sentencing plans; Complete social histories on clients; Assist clients in establishing positive support systems; Request and obtain records; Make referrals for the client to enter treatment; Develop Re-Entry supportive plans Provide an up-to-date Resource Guide; Interviewing clients and families; Be a support system to the client and family; Assist the attorney with identifying what family members would be an asset to speak with.

20 The Results of the SWPP 229 adults and juveniles were served by 3 social workers A high percent of adults and juveniles reported signs of substance abuse (86% adults, 52% juveniles) A high rate of mental distress (73% adults, 73% juveniles) 181 defendants (141 adults, 40 juveniles) were re- interviewed after six months about services received and their current status and condition

21 More Results 167 defendants showed signs of mental illness. 180 defendants showed signs of drug or alcohol addiction. 147 defendants were dually diagnosed. 131 (of 181) reported abstinence following intervention. 118 stayed in treatment programs (74%). 15 cases were dismissed pretrial. 93 defendants were released on bond (40 to 50%).

22 Measuring Recidivism 6 month follow-up results: 79 (82%) of 96 adult defendants were released from prison or jail and were still in the community That is an18% recidivism rate for the DPA program, as compared to the 35% state- wide rate of those not a part of the DPA program

23 The Savings –Each Social Worker saved 10,000 days of incarceration –The percentage of defendants abstaining from substances was 93% or more, and the number of defendants participating in AA, NA or other self- help groups tripled –The program’s net annual savings was $290,508 –For $1.00 invested in Social Workers’ salaries, the state saved $3.25 of incarceration costs

24 The Bigger Picture Total annual savings was $1.3 million Projected savings for state-wide implementation is estimated to be $3.1 million per year. KY is saving $96,800 per social worker, which is more than double the cost of the social worker ($43,000).

25 Social workers are uniquely able to guide offenders into effective treatment programs 1)covered by the attorney-client privilege, increasing the likelihood and effectiveness of early intervention; 2) improve coordination and cooperation among criminal justice agencies and treatment providers. DPA represents the vast majority of criminal defendants in the state and is thus particularly well-suited to lead a collaborative effort to address substance abuse by offenders, and 3) intervention early in a case results in the presentation of detailed, evidence-based sentencing and pretrial release plans to the court, increasing the likelihood of pretrial release or probation with an individualized sentencing plan, decreasing incarceration costs and reducing recidivism.