The History of IFTA and IRP An awe inspiring look at how we got here…and the importance of keeping what we’ve got.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carrier / Registrant / Enforcement Education and/or Training by Jurisdictions.
Advertisements

IFTA / IRP Audit Process Mileage Audit
Senex Explosives, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 91 A. 3d 101 (Pa. 2014) Brief of Amicus Curiae By: Clark L. Snelson President, IFTA Attorney Section Office of.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
1 Motor Carrier Registration Motor Fuels Tax Division Rev. 08/09.
KC Transportation Inc. v. Dep’t. of Treasury, 2013 Mich. App. LEXIS 1197 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) By: Sukanya Mukherjee Comptroller of Maryland.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 10, 2009 Joy Prenger – Missouri Ron Hester - Ontario.
International Registration Plan
IFTA/IRP Joint Session Encouraging Cooperation Between IRP and IFTA Processes Joy Prenger, Missouri Mary Jo Pointer, Missouri.
REGIONAL ISSUES. Overview: An opportunity to breakout into geographic regions to: An opportunity to breakout into geographic regions to: Meet sit down.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
USDOT Numbers USDOT 123. What is a USDOT #? The USDOT # is the number that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) assigns to each commercial.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
IRP, Inc. Update IFTA Managers and Law Enforcement Workshop September 22 – 24, 2010 – Chandler, AZ Mary Pat Paris, CEO IRP, Inc. Tim Adams, Director MCS.
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Managers Workshop and Law Enforcement Seminar.
2007 IFTA BALLOTS & A CONCESUS BOARD INTERPRETATION.
IFTA TRIVIA - ANSWERS. IFTA TRIVIA – ANSWERS - #1 IFTA, Inc. was incorporated as a not- for-profit corporation in Arizona in what year? 1991.
International Cross Border Demonstration Project International Cross Border Demonstration Project ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION.
IRP, Inc. Update 2012 IFTA Annual Business Meeting Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Presented by: Jay Maxwell CIO, AAMVA The Driver’s License: Finally, National Standards Presented by: Jay Maxwell CIO, AAMVA.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Time for Change? Evaluating the Jurisdictional and Industry Benefits of a Full Reciprocity System in Commercial Vehicle Registration Jeremy Sage, Freight.
Town Hall Meeting. Reporting services – w/base jurs permission – 100 or more clients – report directly to the CH? Strictly first time filings. Should.
1. Department of Finance Revenue and Taxation Division 2 Exempt Status of Natives / First Nations.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ Workshop and Law Enforcement Seminar September 21-24, 2005 Ron Hester Tax Administration Manager ON Ministry of Finance Lt.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING JULY 20-21, 2007 JURISDICTION ONLY SESSIONS AN AUDIT MANAGER’S PERSPECTIVE.
NAFTA Teamwork At Its Finest. Team Members Border State Representatives – Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas – Both IFTA and IRP US Department of.
ANNUAL IFTA BUSINESS MEETING JULY 18-19, 2012 GRAND RAPIDS, MI Agreement Procedures Committee (APC)
Full Reciprocity Plan IRP Board Meeting February 2-4, 2010 San Antonio, Texas.
IFTA Law Enforcement Committee Fuel Tax Enforcement (IFTA) Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop Mesa, Arizona October, 2011.
2010 IFTA & IRP AUDIT WORKSHOP TOWN HALL MEETING MODERATORS: JAY STARLING (AL) THOM RABAGLIA (WI) ____________________________________.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING DISCUSSION OF IFTA FULL TRACK BALLOTS AND
International Fuel Tax Agreement Presented by Ghyslaine Lepage (QC) Debora K. Meise (IFTA, Inc.) Lonette L. Turner (IFTA, Inc.) Andrew Markle (ON) IFTA.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 19, 2008 Meg Cronk – New York Ron Hester - Ontario.
IRP, Inc. Report IFTA, Inc. Annual Business Meeting New Orleans, LA July 18, 2008.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc. TOWN HALL MEETING 2012 Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19, 2012 Grand Rapids, MI.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 20-22, 2006 Ron Hester Ontario Ministry of Finance.
The County Perspective Melissa Scott – Greenbrier County.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Presented by Anthony Madsen – Washington Diana Kay – Florida Bob Gattinella – Rhode Island Stacey Hammock - Wyoming Auditor 101_301.
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT Celebrating 30 Years of Cooperation and Trust Program Compliance Review Update By Richard Wagner, Vice Chair,
TEAM TWIX KS- Non Qualified carriers become qualified due to the way they are being registered. Vehicles are not qualified. Other stats: SC, ME, OR? QC-
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT Celebrating 30 Years of Cooperation and Trust Bob Pitcher VP, State Laws American Trucking Associations
August 12-13San Antonio, Texas 2015 Annual Business Meeting August 12-13San Antonio, Texas 2015 Annual Business Meeting IFTA Agreement Procedures Committee.
History and Nature of IFTA New IFTA Attorney training Clark Snelson Utah Assistant AG ( with thanks to Ted Spangler, former Idaho Assistant A.G. retired)
October 6, 2015San Antonio, Texas 2015 Attorneys Section Meeting IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS Lonette L. Turner, CEO IFTA, Inc.
International Fuel Tax Agreement An Overview. What is IFTA? Fuel Tax Collection Agreement between the 48 contiguous states. Non- IFTA = Yukon Territory,
Northeast Region 1.Bio diesel – Taxation & Reporting 2.Clearinghouse – NB only Canadian Jur – will others join? 3.Dyed diesel – IFTA & exempt usage 4.Decals.
Clark Snelson Assistant Attorney General State of Utah (With thanks and recognition to Ted Spangler, Assistant Attorney general, Idaho, retired) For presentation.
IFTA Law Enforcement Committee Fuel Tax Enforcement Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop Mesa, Arizona September 2010.
IRP, Inc. Report IFTA Annual Business Meeting July 2010.
IRP, Inc. Report IFTA, Inc. Annual Meeting Manchester, NH July 2009 Mary Pat Paris and Tim Adams.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Seminar September 12-14, 2007 Ron Hester Ontario Ministry of Revenue.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc. IFTA BOARD OF TRUSTEES UPDATE 2012 IFTA/IRP Managers’ & Law Enforcement Workshop September 12-14,
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, NV Dave Saddler Presented by: Dave Saddler Executive Director IRP, Inc.
IFTA Annual Report Database Presentation IFTA Annual Business Meeting July 2005 Halifax, Nova Scotia Presented by Garry Hinkley IFTA Board of Trustees.
IRP, Inc. Update 2012 IFTA/IRP Manager’s and Law Enforcement Workshop.
The International Non-Apportioned Commercial Vehicle Agreement (INCVA) A full and free reciprocity agreement created by the IRP community. AAMVA Webinar.
International Registration Plan A Model of Cooperation AAMVA Region I Conference July 2011 Baltimore, Maryland Presented by Anita Wasko, Pennsylvania.
2015 Annual Business Meeting August Indianapolis, Indiana 2016 Annual Business Meeting BREAKOUT C What's in a Status? CANCELLED.
IFTA Managers’ and Law Enforcement Workshop October 2011
Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC)
Promoting Cooperation Between Audit and Operations
New Commissioners’ Meeting IFTA BASICS
Clearinghouse Access Agreements
NAFTA Teamwork At Its Finest.
MOTOR VEHICLES DEFINING THE DIFFERENCE IN REGISTERED, UNREGISTERED,
IFTA, Inc. Strategic Plan
Consensus Board Interpretation CBID
Presentation transcript:

The History of IFTA and IRP An awe inspiring look at how we got here…and the importance of keeping what we’ve got.

Who is our audience?  New auditors  Experienced auditors  Industry (see above)

History of IFTA

IFTA – What is it? The IFTA Articles of Agreement states the purpose of the Agreement: to promote and encourage the fullest and most efficient possible use of the highway system by making uniform the administration of motor fuels use taxation laws with respect to motor vehicles operated in multiple member jurisdictions.

What happened before IFTA?  Prior to IFTA each state had its own licensing and fuel use tax reporting system.  A carrier needed tax licenses for each jurisdiction in which it operated. Many jurisdictions required indicia be displayed in and on the commercial motor vehicles.  Industry maintained licenses and reported to as many as 58 jurisdictions  The “each jurisdiction” system was burdensome to both the industry and the jurisdictions.

Resulting in too much…

What about audit BI (before IFTA)?  Jurisdictions audited any carrier with a license in that jurisdiction  Industry was subject to having the same data audited by multiple jurisdictions

What to do…what to do?  Some very smart people got a great idea…

And started thinking about an easier way…

The result… What about a base state agreement that we’ll call….

Early Interjurisdictional taxing efforts While the jurisdictions were progressive in their efforts, there was no agreement on standards for the Biofuels that powered the units. And the decals constantly fell off

The Hard Work Begins…  In 1983 a group of people from Government and Industry collaborated to come up with a tax collection process based “loosely” on the IRP (International Registration Plan) idea of a base state agreement to collect and distribute fuel use taxes.  There was a lot of give and take from everyone to make this work.

How would it work?  The jurisdictions would work together to collect taxes from motor carriers based in their jurisdictions.  Each jurisdiction would be responsible for their own carriers for: The licensing Renewals Tax Reporting Audits

How would Government & Industry both benefit?  One license  One decal  One audit  One jurisdiction to handle it all!

Making it happen…  Three states AZ, IA and WA were the initial jurisdictions to join.  Over the next 3 years, a working group modified the Agreement which, in 1986, was adopted by the current membership as the IFTA.  Over the next 15 (or so) years all of the lower 48 states and 10 Canadian provinces became members. (some kicking & screaming)

Keeping it going…  Even though IFTA is an excellent program, it is still a work in progress.  Important to remember why IFTA started in the first place.  Cooperation among jurisdictions critical  Keep lines of communication open Jurisdiction to Jurisdiction Jurisdiction to Industry  Embrace technology

Tips for Success… AAlways some give and take DDon’t regress…keep moving forward.

History of IRP

IRP – What is it? The International Registration Plan (Plan) is an agreement among the 48 contiguous United States, the District of Columbia, and the 10 Canadian provinces providing for registration reciprocity of commercial motor vehicles based on distance travelled in each jurisdiction.

What Happened Before IRP?

 The beginning of a highway system to accommodate the increased production of motor vehicles.  Jurisdictions began collecting motor vehicle license fees dedicated to the construction and maintenance of the highway system. Early-Mid 1900’s

 Three structured taxes were introduced: 1 st structure tax – license fees 2 nd structure tax – taxes on motor fuel 3 rd structure tax – taxes charged by jurisdiction based on the distance traveled plus the weight carried, or taxes assessed on the number of axles (precursor to IRP). Early-Mid 1900’s (continued)

 Automobiles were granted full reciprocity from the outset (a benefit still enjoyed today).  Reciprocity did not extend to commercial vehicles, resulting in a maze of conflicting regulations that created complex problems for the motor carrier industry.

Years Following WWI  Jurisdictions started levying taxes that ranged from having to buy license plates in each jurisdiction to purchasing a special permit just to enter a jurisdiction.

Years Following WWII  Interstate barriers were removed during WWII and war goods and other commodities flowed freely.  After the war ended, however, the spirit of cooperation began to disappear…….

Years Following WWII (continued)  Numerous bilateral agreements started being negotiated between jurisdictions.  A number of jurisdictions decided to become signatories to single compact agreements.

Early Compact Agreements Two reciprocity plans were established, which encompassed a majority of the United States:  The Multi State Reciprocal Agreement: Covering Southeast states, extended interstate reciprocity, requiring only one license plate, BUT limiting carriers to strictly interstate movement.  Uniform (or Western) Vehicle Registration Proration and Reciprocity Agreement: Paying registration fees based on percentages of use. Carriers were required to file applications with all jurisdictions in the agreement.

The Beginning of IRP

Designing a Plan 1968 AAMVA formed a subcommittee to develop a plan to incorporate all existing theories of reciprocity, one that would attract all jurisdictions in the U.S. and Canada. The two compacts were examined and portions of both used as a foundation for designing a new plan A proposed plan titled “Standard Reciprocal Agreement Governing Operation of Vehicles Between Jurisdictions” was presented. A National Proportional Registration Committee was formed to develop the proposed plan into an agreement that would be acceptable to jurisdictions and industry.

IRP Pilot Agreement 1973 A pilot agreement was made between Kentucky, Missouri and Tennessee. The name was changed from “National Proportional Registration” to “International Registration Plan (IRP).” AAMVA members passed a resolution to make IRP a reality, thus creating the first uniform interjurisdictional registration plan.

IRP Pilot Agreement By the end of 1973 the following nine jurisdictions signed on as members of the IRP agreement: Colorado Minnesota Nebraska Tennessee Utah Kentucky Missouri Oregon Texas In 1974 Alberta becomes first Canadian IRP member

IRP and IRP, Inc. In 1991 the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act took effect. In 1994 the IRP membership agreed to incorporate IRP, Inc., the repository for all IRP jurisdictions. In 2001 Nova Scotia became the last of the 59 jurisdictions to join the IRP.

Keeping it going…  Even though IFTA & IRP are an excellent programs, they are still a work in progress.  Important to remember why IFTA & IRP started in the first place.  Cooperation between jurisdictions critical  Keep lines of communication open Jurisdiction to Jurisdiction Jurisdiction to Industry  Embrace technology

Tips for Success… AAlways some give and take DDon’t regress…keep moving forward.

The History of IFTA and IRP An awe inspiring look at how we got here…and the importance of keeping what we’ve got.