Protemp™ Crown Temporization Material Scientific Presentation
Protemp™ Crown Temporization Material
Innovative Technology! SMC Material Self-supporting Malleable Curable free-standing complex shapes preformed articles easily customizable and adaptable wax-like or clay-like light-curable Cure on Demand and immediate strength Strong Dental Composite light cure A Wax-like Dental Composite
Chemical Temporization Combined Advantages Prefabricated Crowns Advantages Fast & Easy No matrix Disadvantages Poor esthetics Not a custom fit Metal Chemical Temporization Advantages Custom fit Esthetic Disadvantages Matrix / impression Mix or dispense Heat / odor Protemp™ Crown combines advantages
New Protemp™ Crown Preformed Composite Crown Single unit Temporary Permanent Dentition
Temporary Crown Considerations Patient Comfort Dentin and Pulp Protection Periodontal Health Space Maintenance Provisional (Temporary) Occlusal Function Marginal Integrity Esthetics Phonetics Protemp™ Crown meets provisional needs
Features and Benefits
Protemp™ Crown Temporization Material
Features and Benefits Preformed Composite Crown 9 Sizes/shapes Universal Shade Indications Single-unit temporary Permanent dentition Molars, Bicuspids, Cuspids Donald Erickson, DDS Simple & Fast Technique No matrix, no dispensing hardware, no messy smear layer Excellent Strength Custom Fit - Malleable for easy adaptation
Simple and Fast No matrix, impression, mix tips or dispensing hardware Reduce fabrication time up to 50% n=105 Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data based on responses from 105 dentists globally
Sizes and Shapes
Highly dependent on materials used Advantages Protemp™ Crown Bis-Acrylic Materials Power / Liquid Systems Preformed Metal Crowns Single Unit can be formed under 4 Minutes Highly dependent on materials used No matrix or impression needed Custom Fit Esthetic results Preformed anatomy Low oxygen-inhibited layer Low intra-oral heat Cure on demand Chemical Cure N/A
Composition Resin Dimethacrylate Polymer bis-GMA Filler Zirconia Silica Fumed Silica Silane Pigments Crystalline Resin Aggregated Fillers A schematic representation of physical crosslinking of 3MTM ESPETM ProtempTM Crown Temporization Material
Mechanical Properties
Fracture Toughness Source: DeLong: University of Minnesota, MDRCBB IADR Abstract #0368, 2006
Compressive Strength Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Diametral Tensile Strength Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Flexural Strength Flexural Strength 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 MPa 80 60 40 20 Protemp™ Protemp™ 3 Luxatemp® Jet™ Trim® II Integrity™ Structur® Crown Garant™ Premium Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
ACTA 3-Body Wear Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data IADR Abstract #0130, 2007
Durability Source:Rosentruitt M, Lang R, University of Regensburg, Germany IADR abstract NO.1561 2006
Durability Mastication simulator Before and after SEM pictures of Protemp crown Simulating 2 years in the mouth (mechanical load: 50N, 480.000 cycles, thermocycling: 2400x 5/55 degrees C) Source:Rosentruitt M, Lang R, University of Regensburg, Germany IADR abstract NO.1561 2006
Oxygen Inhibition Oxygen Inhibited Layer 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 Percent 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Protemp™ Protemp™ 3 Integrity™ Luxatemp® Trim® II Jet™ Structur® Crown Garant™ Premium Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Radiopacity Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Polymerization Shrinkage Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Polymerization Temperature Source: 3M ESPE Internal test data, 2006
Customer Evaluation
Global Evaluation 105 Dentists (USA, Germany, France) 1558 Placements
Global Evaluation - Placements
Global Evaluation – Ease of Use Average Response *US data only, (EU not available) No Impression or Matrix Faster to obtain occlusion No mess or clean up Easier to obtain interproximal contacts
Global Evaluation - Esthetics Average Response Esthetics compared to current product
Global Evaluation – Final Fit Excellent Overall Permanent Crown Fit
Global Evaluation – Gingival Health Gingival Heath the same or better when compared current product
Customer Feedback Global Evaluation - Summary Easy to use and fast technique Esthetic High level of acceptability Lining crown not necessary Crown durable Good crown retention Gingival Health similar to better Overall very good permanent crown fit
Clinical Cases
Molar Crown Placement by Scott Arne, DDS Protemp™ Crown in crown case
Molar Crown Placement Scott Arne, DDS Film removal
Molar Crown Placement Scott Arne, DDS Trim to preparation height
Molar Crown Placement Scott Arne, DDS Initial marginal adaptation
Molar Crown Placement Scott Arne, DDS Marginal adaptation
Molar Crown Placement Scott Arne, DDS Finish using a carbide bur
Molar Crown Placement Protemp™ Crown after finish and polish Scott Arne, DDS Protemp™ Crown after finish and polish
Molar Crown Placement Protemp™ Crown occlusal and buccal view Scott Arne, DDS Protemp™ Crown occlusal and buccal view
Bicuspid Crown Placement by Robert Margeas, DDS Robert Margeas, DDS Placement on the preparation
Bicuspid Crown Placement Robert Margeas, DDS Marginal adaptation using composite instrument
Bicuspid Crown Placement Robert Margeas, DDS Occlusal view of the adapted bicuspid crown
Bicuspid Crown Placement Robert Margeas, DDS Facial view of temporarily cemented Protemp™ Crown
Molar Crown Placement by Donald Erickson, DDS Preparation, finishing and final Protemp™ Crown
Technique
Crown Size Selection Determine Crown Size Measure Width (mesial-distal) Determine Crown Size
Preparation Determine Height Open Package & Remove Crown Remove Film
Place & Form Trim Following Gingival Contour Place and Form Crown
Buccal Adaptation Close and Adapt Buccal Margin Adapt Occlusal Anatomy Close and Tack Cure Buccal
Lingual Adaptation Adapt Lingual - Hold Buccal in Place Tack Cure Lingual Tack Cure Occlusal Surface
Final Remove Crown Cure Finish & Polish
Cementation Apply Cement Seat Crown and Remove Excess Check Occlusion
Protemp™ Crown Fast Simple Strong Esthetic
Thank you!