1 Douglas County Schools Colorado A Strategic Approach to Teacher Compensation & Appraisal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Teacher Evaluation and Rewards OECD Mexico Joint Workshop December 1-2, 2009 Susan Sclafani National Center on Education and the Economy.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
State of New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services Division of Personnel Workforce Development Strategic Plan.
Barren County School District 2002 The New Face of Student Technology Leadership Program Presented by: Valerie Stokes Melissa Moss & Ruth Ann Hammer.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Residencies/Internships Task Force Recommendations Recommendation #3: Refocused Principal Preparation Programs Extended, closely supervised residencies.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS AUGUST 7, 2012 Denver ProComp Plan Summary.
School Improvement Team (SIT)
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Consistency of Assessment
PUSD Compensation Committee Process Overview Governing Board Study Session January 7, 2013.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Minneapolis Public Schools QComp An Overview of Quality Compensation In Minneapolis Bill Gibbs Site administrator Kenny School Former district QComp Coordinator.
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Teachers Lead, Students Learn A landmark teacher contract that takes the transformation of Baltimore City Public Schools to the next level September 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter Introduction to Employee Training and Development.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
IDAHO STATE TEACHER ADVANCEMENT AND RECOGNITION SYSTEM.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Continuous Improvement of Teacher Effectiveness CITE May 2010 May 2010.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Putting It All Together Diane Gross USD 261 8/11/06.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Introduction to HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
S , F.S., Requirements for Employee Compensation and Salary Schedules Florida Department of Education May 23,
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Strategic Planning Goals
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Developing as a Professional
Resident Educator Program
Presentation transcript:

1 Douglas County Schools Colorado A Strategic Approach to Teacher Compensation & Appraisal

2 Performance Pay is a comprehensive system that aligns teacher appraisal and compensation with the school district’s strategic goals.

3 * Positive relationship between the district and the teachers * Leadership and stability on Board of Education and in central office * Union leadership is collaborative, flexible, and believes in taking risks * A tremendous sense of TRUST

4  Diverse committee ( )  Completely separate from negotiations  Very, very slow  At times deliberate  Sometimes unplanned  Often surprising

5 � supporting the district’s mission and core values � attracting, retaining and motivating the highest qualified teachers while competing in the employment market � rewarding growth, development and skill and knowledge acquisition � providing a degree of predictability and stability � ensuring teacher involvement in the development, evaluation and reward process Align Teacher Compensation and Appraisal with the District’s Strategic Goals by:

6 Professional Base Pay Knowledge Advanced Coursework and degrees Proficient Evaluation Evidence of proficiency in the classroom Outstanding Teacher Must apply and provide evidence Unsatisfactory Evaluation Teachers with an unsatisfactory evalua-- tion will not be eligible for any salary increases Skills Acquired, applied and demonstrated skills that support the goals of the school district Master Teacher Total General Compensation Responsibility Pay (District & Site-based) Group Incentive Total Teacher Salary + = Evaluation Credit

7 Unsatisfactory  Unsatisfactory in any single criterion  No evaluation credit or salary increase  Remediation program Proficient  Classroom performance  Evaluation criteria based on job description  Must be satisfactory in all criteria  Increase in base salary Outstanding  Must be proficient  Application process  Additional criteria  Proficient salary increase plus bonus

8 Four Program Options:  Type “A” - District Developed Criteria  Type “B” - Standards Based Instruction  Type “C” - National Board Applicants  Type “D” - Student Achievement Growth Decision by Principal* *Type D decision is not currently being made by principals

9  Assessment & Instruction  Content & Pedagogy  Collaboration & Partnership National Board Standards Major Areas of Emphasis:

10 ä Adjustment of Instruction ä Feedback on Student Progress ä Professional Collaboration ä Role of Assessments ä Student Ownership and Understanding ä Timing of Assessments Standards Based Instruction Major Areas of Emphasis:

11 National Board Certification Candidates may use the same portfolio as for National Board certification - with minor modifications

12 Student Achievement Growth Goals are Tied to: ä District Strategic Plan ä Feeder System Objectives ä Building Objectives ä Content Standards

13 Skills must be:  Newly acquired, applied and demonstrated  Supportive of district’s strategic plan  District/Teacher-selected  Taught by highly skilled teachers  Measured by authentic assessment

14  Student Growth  National Board or Twice Outstanding  Two additional  Leadership/Expertise  Recognition  Creativity/Innovation

15  PREVIOUSLY  Special assignment pay  Secondary school activities  Elementary school activities  NEW CONCEPT  Site-based responsibility pay - governed by the site  District responsibility pay Examples: Beyond the scope of the typical job description Committee work Curriculum work Ongoing commitments Positively impacts/affects students Mentor role for colleagues Draws upon professional skills and knowledge Additional responsibility during the school day

16 Work supported:  PPIC - the umbrella group  Group Incentive Board  Outstanding Teacher  Health Insurance Committee  Skill Blocks Development  Transfer Committee  Evaluation Committee  Professional Development  21st Century Partnership DETERMINING FACTORS  Number of meetings  Time of meetings  Difficulty of tasks  Time required outside meetings

17 Purpose: Ô Reward teachers for outstanding student performance -Tied to measurable gains in student achievement  Enhance collegiality  Encourage positive school and community relations

18 Process: Ô Establish group  Determine goal  Determine measurement ( pre & post)  Define activities, responsibilities & timeline  Submit plan for approval  Work the plan  Submit report & results

19 Ô Reading &writing skills Ô Mathematics proficiency Ô Conflict management/problem-solving skills Ô Computer/technology skills Ô Individual learning plans Ô Content-specific vocabulary Ô Most are tied to building accountability plans Sample Goals: 90% of Goals

20  General Salary$39,000  Evaluation* (SG)*$ 1,188  Knowledge**$ 1,000  Outstanding Teacher (SG) $ 1,250  Master Teacher(SG)$ 2,500  Group Incentive (SG) $ 437  Skill Block***(CD)$ 425  Site Responsibility***$ 225  District Responsibility***$ 500 $46,525 General Pay Incentive Bonuses SG - Student Growth CD - Classroom Demonstration Average $819

21 Douglas County Schools Colorado A Strategic Approach to Teacher Appraisal

22 The Teacher Evaluation Pendulum Input ?? Output Focusing on Achievement Alone Focusing on Teacher Behavior Alone A Balance

23 Achievement Growth K12Aug.May Achievement refers to what a student knows at a place in time Teachers must feel they have a large causative effect on the results of whatever measurement is being used. Growth refers to what a student has learned during a particular period of time

24 Student Growth Student Growth Teacher Appraisal Teacher Appraisal Teacher Compensation Teacher Compensation

25  Each site will have an action plan that is linked to the strategic directions of student achievement growth and effective use of resources.  Individual appraisals will include the use of data aligned with the strategic directions of student achievement growth and the building actions plans.

26  Measurable increases in student performance as demonstrated on standardized tests & other district assessments (We must be very cautious with these results)  Teachers are more able to qualify and quantify what they do  Increased collaboration and focus on goals and student performance measures  Entire system has increased knowledge of developing and using data

27  Greater buy-in by all constituencies because of increased input  Observed increases in teacher skill level and changes in teacher behavior  Greater focus on all aspects of teacher evaluation  Program choice has increased the feeling of professionalism among teachers  Enhanced public image and support

28  Communication systems  Ambiguity tolerance until “bugs” worked out  Time and attention - lots of both!!!!!  Implementation committee  Payroll system modifications  Ability to deal quickly with unforeseen issues  Training  Trust

29  Additional funding required to launch program  Cannot reward by “taking away”  Some increases applied to base  Some payments made in bonus format - easier to fund and to budget  Do not set quotas!!!  Prediction difficult until track record set  Basic salaries must remain competitive in market

30  Ellen Bartlett, Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources (303) Fax: (303)  Rob Weil, President Douglas County Federation of Teachers (303)