ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8–3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO CODES M. CHRONOPOULOS, LRC/NTUA/ GR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenting: Units A1 and A2
Advertisements

Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Design should address: UNDERSTRENGTH OVERLOAD
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
Regional Policy Draft Implementing Act Consistent approach to determine the milestones and targets in the performance framework and to assess the attainment.
Chile Observatories Earthquake Readiness Workshop La Serena, Chile December Seismic Retrofit of Existing Observatories Chile Observatories Earthquake.
Charles SCAWTHORN Junji KIYONO Kyoto University Earthquake Risk Reduction 3- Mitigation and ERR Program Development 1. Concepts and Terminology 2. Hazard,
ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.
SOUTH ASIA LAUNCH OF GLOBAL CAMPAIGN MAKING CITIES RESILIENT MY CITY IS GETTING READY New Delhi June 8-9, 2010.
The University of Adelaide Earthquake Engineering in Australia – International Collaboration and Future Directions Mike Griffith President, Australian.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC) Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de.
Factor Analysis There are two main types of factor analysis:
Midterm Review Evaluation & Research Concepts Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling Survey methods.
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
Tripartite Meeting Beijing, 1 November 2005 IMO GBS Classification Society’s View about the Scope, Verification Process and Acceptance Criteria Roberto.
Dimensions of Data Quality M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
EUROPEAN CENTER OF PREVENTION AND FORECASTING OF EARTHQUAKES – ECPFE
Aaker, Kumar, Day Ninth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 8 Tests of Hypotheses Based on a Single Sample.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Risk analysis (UVER) Luigi Guerci. Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The organisational principles at the foundation of the management and control.
Sampling: Theory and Methods
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 Recent Greek Provisions for RC Structures with URM Infills M. Chronopoulos and P. Chronopoulos,
INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT
Static Pushover Analysis
OFSTED SUBJECT SURVEY INSPECTIONS (2009 framework)
Reinforced Concrete Design
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Engineering Science Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Copyright  2004 McGraw-Hill Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Marketing Research by Lukas, Hair, Bush and Ortinau 2-1 The Marketing Research Process Chapter Two.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
Chapter Outline 2.1 Estimation Confidence Interval Estimates for Population Mean Confidence Interval Estimates for the Difference Between Two Population.
1 The Washington State Board of Education Applying to Authorize: Authorizer Application and Evaluation Jack Archer, Senior Policy Analyst State Board of.
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Reliability-Based Design Methods of Structures
1/33.  Performance based approach  Definitions and responsibilities  Standard requirements  Exposure classes  Fresh concrete requirements  Hardened.
Dieser Platz ist für Ihr Bild vorgesehen Goal Based Standards – A unique chance to define a new framework for the development of rules and regulations.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Chapter 10 Sampling: Theories, Designs and Plans.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 InSAR Project Information. 2 Outline Purpose Two components – SAR investigation, InSAR study SAR investigation: presentation only InSAR study: presentation.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow - 09 December - 10 December, 2010.
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011
Research Methodology II Term review. Theoretical framework  What is meant by a theory? It is a set of interrelated constructs, definitions and propositions.
Chapter Two Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Marketing Research Process.
By Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Objectives At the end of the lecture student should be able to –  Explain types of examination  Discuss different types of.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
Establishing by the laboratory of the functional requirements for uncertainty of measurements of each examination procedure Ioannis Sitaras.
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
Research Skills.
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
M. Z. Bezas, Th. N. Nikolaidis, C. C. Baniotopoulos
Research Process №5.
ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8 – 3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013
Comparable MIMs Approach
DIRECT STIFFNESS METHOD FOR TRUSSES:
TECHNICAL REPORT.
Recognition Tools and Practices – Criteria and Procedure
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
Javier Hanna, UNFCCC secretariat, MDA
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK AMENDMENT BILL
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
Presentation transcript:

ATHENS WORKSHOP / EC 8–3 : 2005 and nGCSI : 2012 APRIL 12, 2013 MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO CODES M. CHRONOPOULOS, LRC/NTUA/ GR

Assessment and Retrofitting of existing structures for non-seismic actions is not yet covered by the relevant material-dependent Euro- Codes (or existing National Codes). The “framework” of the EC 8-3 (and the nGCSI) was specifically developed because :  For many older structures, seismic resistance was not considered during the original design/construction, whereas non-seismic actions were catered for, at least by means of “traditional” construction rules.  Seismic hazard evaluations in accordance with present knowledge may indicate the need for retrofitting programmes and campaings (“active” or “passive”).  Damage caused by earthquakes may create the need for major and costly structural interventions (repair/strengthening), not to mention other consequences.

DESIGN OF BUILDINGS FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING or STRUCTURAL (ASSESSMENT AND) INTERVENTIONS The EC8-3 : 2005 Main Body/Six (short) Chapters / approx. 30 pages, and Informative Annex A for RC Structures / approx. 20 pages. The nGCSI : 2012, for RC Structures (only), Final Harmonized Text Main Body and (Normative) Commentary / Eleven Chapters / approx. 350 pages. A new Chapter (no. 12) on Structural Additions or/and Changes of Use. Retrofitting = Str. Interventions, Repair or/and Strengthening

THE RATIONALISM OF THE nGCSI : 2012, ITS CONTENTS 1.SCOPE-FIELD OF APPLICATION-OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2.BASIC PRINCIPLES, CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES 3.INVESTIGATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING 4.BASIC DATA, ASSESSMENT AND REDESIGN + Four (4) Appendices (normative) 5.ANALYSIS, BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTERVENTIONS 6.BASIC BEHAVIOUR MODELS 7.THE BEHAVIOUR OF EXISTING OR NEW RC ELEMENTS + INFILLS + Four (4) Appendices (normative) 8.DESIGN OF INTERVENTIONS 9.SAFETY VERIFICATIONS 10.REQUIRED CONTENTS OF THE DESIGN FILE, ASSESSMENT AND REDESIGN 11.CONSTRUCTION-QUALITY ASSURANCE-MAINTENANCE

NOTE 1 The definition of the LS of NC given in EC 8-3 is different than that given in EC 8-1. Thus, the LS of NC is closer to the actual collapse and corresponds to the fullest exploitation of the deformation capacity of the structural elements. NC EC 8-1  SD EC 8-3

NOTE 2 Distinction between “ductile” or “brittle” structural elements and mechanisms, i.e. deformation or strength controlled ones. See additional details and rules given by the nGCSI (μ   2, μ φ  3). Distinction between “primary” (P) or “secondary” (S) seismic structural elements, using more or less conservative estimates of their capacities. EC’s :S/P+S  15% nGCSI :S/P+S  25%.

EC8-3 / STATE OF DAMAGE IN THE STRUCTURE Three (3) LIMIT STATES (LS’s), namely Near Collapse (NC), Significant Damage (SD) and Damage Limitation (DL). The National Authorities decide whether all three LS’s shall be checked, or two of them, or just one of them. NC:P e = 2% in L t = 50 years,T r = years SD:P e = 10% in L t = 50 years,T r = 475 years DL:P e = 20% in L t = 50 years,T r = 225 years _______________________________________________________ nGCSI : DIFFERENCES …

nGCSI / TARGET BEHAVIOUR PERFORMANCE LEVEL, SEISMIC ACTION IMPORTANCE : I / All, II / All but C2, III and IV / A1, A2, B1 EQ PL A/LDB/SDC/NC 10% / 50 years A1B1C1 100% 50% / 50 years A2B2C2 60%

Since existing structures (old ones, damaged or not) : (i)reflect the state of knowledge at the time of their construction, (ii)possibly contain hidden gross errors and problems, and (iii)may have been submitted to previous actions (accidental or not) with unknown effects, structural evaluation/assessment, structural intervention and redesign (if needed) are typically subjected to a different and a more complex degree of uncertainly than the design of new structures. Therefore, different sets of partial safety and structural safety factors are required, as well as different analysis, dimensioning and verification procedures, depending (among others) on the completeness and reliability of the information available. INVESTIGATION / DOCUMENTATION

EC8-3 / Capacities of ductile or brittle structural elements In general, mean value properties of the existing materials are used, as directly obtained from in-situ tests and from the additional sources of information, appropriately divided by the confidence factor (CF), accounting for the knowledge level (KL) attained. Especially for brittle primary seismic elements, their strengths shall be based on material strengths divided by appropriate partial safety factors (γ m ), taking into account that the γ m values of the EC 8-1 are meant for the design of new buildings. nGCSI : DRL and a full set of mod. γ f and γ m, as well as of γ Sd and γ Rd. Mat. properties : f m or f m – S.

EC8-3 / KNOWLEDGE LEVEL (KL), CONFIDENCE FACTOR (CF) Regarding the RC structural system, its components and its elements, for choosing the allowable type of analysis and the appropriate confidence factor values... Factors determining the appropriate knowledge level : 1)GEOMETRY From original outline construction drawings with sample visual survey or from full survey 2)DETAILSSee Table 3)MATERIALSSee Table ____________________________________________________________ KL1:Limited KnowledgeCF = 1,35 KL2:Normal KnowledgeCF = 1,20 KL3:Full (?) Knowledge CF = 1,00

KLDETAILSMATERIALSANALYSISCF 1 SIMULATED design + lim. in-situ inspection DEFAULT values + lim. in-situ testing LINEAR1,35 2 Original design + lim. in-situ inspection Original design + lim. in-situ testing ALL1,20 Extended in-situ inspection/testing 3 Original design + lim. in-situ inspection Original design + lim. in-situ testing ALL1,00 Comprehensive in situ inspection/testing … outline or detailed dwgs, visual, full, limited, extended, comprehensive

MIN. REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTION (OF DETAILS) AND TESTING (OF MATERIALS) FOR EACH TYPE OF PRIMARY RC ELEMENT (BEAM, COLUMN, WALL) Non-destructive combined with destructive testing … Cross-checks should be made between the data collected from different sources to minimize uncertainties. LEVEL DETAILS, PERCENTAGE OF ELEMENTS MATERIAL SAMPLES PER FLOOR Limited 201 Extended 502 Comprehensive803

EC8-3 / THE q – APPROACH Generally, not suitable for cheching the LS of NC. For RC structures of any type : SDq  1,5 NCq’  4/3. q  2,0. Higher values may be adopted if suitably justified with reference to the local and global available ductility (and overstrength …). ____________________________________________________________ nGCSI : A lot of provisions, rules, etc. The m – approach …

THE INFILLED RC FRAMES (OR QUASI-FRAMES) Existing or even new/added infills … EC’s… nGCSIA lot of provisions, rules, etc. See a specific presentation.

nGCSI : 2012 ASPECTS OF MODELLING AND ANALYSIS See the presentation by A. Kappos BEHAVIOUR OF EXISTING OR NEW ELEMENTS (RC, infills) See the presentation by M. Fardis BEHAVIOUR OF REPAIRED/STRENGTHENED ELEMENTS (RC, infills) See the presentation by S. Dritsos and T. Tassios FINAL CHECKS/SAFETY VERIFICATIONS See the presentation by M. Fardis