Perkins Accountability. Policymakers, educators, business, and industry leaders are all focused upon strengthening the United States for competition in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Core Indicator Preliminary Baseline Data. Overview: Core Indicator Preliminary Baseline Data Year-long process Year-long process Most current data:
Advertisements

Association for Career and Technical Education 1 Changes and Implications of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Perkins IV Update Legislation and Funding Legislation and Funding Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Technical Skill Attainment Indicator Accountability.
Purposes of the Act Develop challenging academic and technical standards and related challenging, integrated instruction Increase opportunities for individuals.
PERKINS FEDERAL CTE GRANTS IN 3-D Lorrie Toni, Perkins Director, CCCS September 16, 2010 For The CACTA Task Force Meeting.
Creating Secondary/ Postsecondary Programs of Study.
FY15 Perkins Oklahoma’s State Plan & Local Application Changes ODCTE Federal Legislation Assistance Technical Assistance Workshops May 2014.
Data, Accountability, & Advocacy Workshop May 8, 2014.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Selecting and Identifying Programs of Study Division of School and Community Academic Programs Camden County College Camden Pathways Professional Development.
IL State Board of Education - 9/18/2007 Perkins IV - Secondary Indicators Carol Brooks Illinois State Board of Education.
 align education/services to serve economic and community development  prepare the emerging workforce  offer portable skills and credentials to the.
CATE UPDATE Susan Flanagan, Director Office of Career and Technology Education March 12, 2013.
Data & Accountability DPI Career & Technical Education.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act: MCCCD Performance Jennifer Kaufman Fourness Manager, Workforce Initiatives Workforce Development March.
DQI State Plan Accountability Requirements, Guidelines, Timeline, Student Definitions and Indicators John Haigh, U.S. Department of Education Savannah,
11/15/07 1 Career-Technical Education Accountability Ohio Department of Education Sharon Enright Dave Ozvat Erica Cheyney Ohio School Improvement Institute.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
WTCS Framework for Student Success WTCS Board Meeting March
Next Steps – Dual Credit, Career Pathways and the Perkins Act Office of Vocational and Adult Education United States Department of Education, April 2005.
Kathy WilkinsLes Janis Montana University SystemGeorgia State University NACTEI Conference May 12, 2011 The proposed cut of 13 percent from Perkins Title.
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY NACTEI Annual Conference May 2012.
Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Community Colleges & Workforce Development Bureau of Labor and Industries September 2011 CTE Overview.
Pennsylvania’s 21 st Century Workforce Initiatives.
Perkins Update FY16 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
1 Occupational Supply and Demand System (OSDS): Design Improvements and Recent Applications SHEEO/NCES Network Conference and IPEDS Workshop May 21, 2009.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Vocational and Adult Education Division of Academic and Technical Education Progress of the State Perkins Accountability.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
Perkins IV: The Special Populations Perspective Mimi Lufkin, CEO CCCAOE Conference October 22, 2008 San Diego, CA National Alliance for Partnerships in.
111 TECH PREP ACCOUNTABILITY IN PERKINS IV National Association of Tech Prep Leadership September 30, 2009 NCPN October 2, 2009.
Perkins Update July 9, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Foundations for Perkins Accountability: Core Indicators, Annual Reports, Targets, and Gap Evaluation Carl D Perkins.
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New CTE Teacher Workshop September 22 nd and 23 rd, 2015 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department.
Perkins IV FY 2010 Plan ITV Meetings February 23, 2009 March 6, 2009 March 19, 2009 Daniel Smith, Education Supervisor Adult & Career Education
Oregon’s Approach: Policies and Practices that Link Economic and Workforce Development NGA Policy Advisors Institute September 19, 2005.
Perkins IV – What ’ s In Store? Mimi Lufkin NAPE/Women Work National Conference April 6, 2008 National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity.
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of.
Objectives  Name the four types of degrees and the approximate number of years for completion  Differentiate between the following and give one career.
OPERATIONALIZING PERKINS IV ACCOUNTABILITY DRAFT.
What is Perkins About and Why Should I Care? Student Services Endorsement Program November 3, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Janet Cooper.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Federal - Perkins IV Programs of Study (Pathways) Secondary/Postsecondary Links Improving Student Performance –Academic and Technical Skills –Graduation/Completion.
Kathy WilkinsLes Janis MontanaGeorgia NACTEI Conference May 12-14, 2009 High demand/wage/skill occupations (High-DWS) are mentioned 23 times in the Perkins.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education
Outcome Metrics and Industry-Recognized Certification Reporting
A Brief Look at Career and Technical Education NCCCS - Perkins Update
“Expanding Healthcare Education throughout Idaho”
Annual Perkins Planning Meeting
John Halpin, Associate Dean, Perkins & Work Experience
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Employability Skills Foundation Standard 4: Employability Skills
Perkins IV Postsecondary Accountability
Career Technical Education & Every Student Succeeds Act
National Association of
TECH PREP PERFORMANCE MEASURES & PROGRAMS OF STUDY
Perkins Reauthorization on the Horizon
CTE & YTP YTP Fall Regional Meeting
CTE & YTP YTP Fall Regional Meeting
High Skill, High Wage, High Demand
Perkins Core Indicators of Performance Report
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Perkins Accountability

Policymakers, educators, business, and industry leaders are all focused upon strengthening the United States for competition in this new global economy. Career education must now provide people with the needed assistance and skills to realize the opportunities and meet the challenges of the international workplace.

Perkins Accountability Academics and career and technical skills Higher, more rigorous standards High skill, high wage, or high demand occupations or further education

CTE Concentrator A postsecondary/adult student who: (1) completes at least 12 academic or CTE credits within a single program area sequence that is comprised of 12 or more academic and technical credits and terminates in the award of an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree; or (2) completes a short-term CTE program sequence of less than 12 credit units that terminates in an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree.

CTE Participant A postsecondary/adult student who has earned one (1) or more credits in any CTE program area.

Postsecondary Indicators 1P1: Technical Skill Attainment 2P1: Credential, Certificate, or Diploma 3P1: Student Retention or Transfer 4P1: Student Placement 5P1: Nontraditional Participation 5P2: Nontraditional Completion

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Number of CTE concentrators who passed technical skill assessments that are aligned with industry-recognized standards if available and appropriate, during the reporting year.

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Going for the Gold Any external, third-party assessment that objectively measures student attainment of industry recognized skills, appropriate to the educational level of CTE concentrators.

Assessments National/International credentialing or certification exams State credentialing of licensing exams (e.g. Cosmetology) State developed exam tied to industry standards Industry-developed exam for occupations specialties (e.g. Certified Executive Chef) Third party-exams measuring technical skills (NOCTI)

In Michigan, we are able to get information at the gold level for certain programs but not others. We are proposing that we report on those for which we can currently get information. Our plan outlines how we will add to this each year. Is this okay? Sent to John Haigh February 27, :51 P.M.

Sent From John Haigh February 28, :48 a.m. Yes

sent to Sharon Head 1/8/2008 8:53 a.m. Should we report on all concentrators even though different measures may be used (e.g. bronze and gold combined)?

from Sharon Head 1/9/2008 8:55 a.m. gold. States should not report on the bronzeand goldcombined method. Currently, the focus is

States must maintain an approved list Any test that meets the third-party standard 1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Any test that assesses industry-standards Colleges can use different tests Valid and Reliable Measuring students and not tests

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Going for the Gold Colleges ability to get 3rd party assessment results (based upon MODAC survey) Number of awards conferred – greatest impact Programs selected represent 37.89% of awards conferred during

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Going for the Gold Proposed timeline distributed and discussed at MCCDEC Builds upon each year by adding programs Can still be modified

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Corrections Criminal Justice/Law Enforcement Administration Criminal Justice/Police Science Fire Services Administration Fire Science/Firefighting Security and Protective Services

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Medical/Clinical Assistant Occupational Therapist Assistant Pharmacy Technician/Assistant Emergency Medical Technology Medical Radiological Tech/Science Dental Assisting/Assistant Dental Hygiene/Hygienist Health Related

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Respiratory Care Therapy/Therapist Surgical Technology/Technologist Radiological Technology/Science Clinical/Medical Laboratory Technician Histological Technician NURSING (RN) NURSING (LPN) Nurse/Nursing Assistant/Aide Health Related

1P1: Technical Skill Attainment Business Management, Marketing and Related Support Services Hospitality Administration/Management, General [HRA]

Assessment Timeline (Awards) N = 16,175

Assessment Timeline (Number of Programs) N = 255

NSWG (Next Steps Work Group) State Career and Technical Education Directors and others who share an interest in the effective implementation of Perkins Accountability activities. Monthly conference calls are held for the group to discuss issues related to accountability and performance measurement

Priority for NSWG in 2008 David Stevens (University of Baltimore) was invited to present the major findings of his recently published report based upon input from a handful of states that have experience with procuring data on such licenses and on industry certifications. Occupational Licensure

The report concluded: Such licenses generally meet the Perkins IV accountability criteria High validity Passable reliability (given geographic challenges especially reciprocity), Typically high agreement with industry standards (in most, but not all cases) Low quality of timely data availability

A national approach is not feasible; Each state will need to find its best way of utilizing this approach; There are reasons for increased credentialing importance that go beyond the technical skill proficiency indicator; and He expects to see an increase in the number of occupations covered. The report also concluded:

Technical Skill Taskforce [National Initiative] In process is the development of a master plan for technical skill assessments. A vision for a national assessment system comprising of a test item bank has been drafted by a small task force. This will be reviewed by a group of state CTE directors and a survey of all states. States and test developers will be convened in March/April and a feasibility and design report composed thereafter.

Validity and Reliability Checklist Taskforce [National] To develop a checklist for use by OVAE staff when reviewing accountability portion of state plans. This will enable them to relay better information to policy staff, who determines whether to accept the plan as is. The members strongly recommended that a product be developed by the taskforce that states can use. Checklist should be different for secondary and postsecondary

2P1: Credential, Certificate, or Diploma Number of CTE concentrators who received an industry- recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree and left postsecondary education during the reporting year.

A leaver is defined as a student who is no longer enrolled in any postsecondary institution. Students who are no longer enrolled at your institution should be counted as retained only if you can verify the students enrollment at any other postsecondary institution 2P1: Credential, Certificate, or Diploma

Students who did not receive an award (i.e., certificate or degree) from your college, but did receive an industry-recognized credential can be counted if data are available directly from the credentialing entity.

3P1: Student Retention or Transfer Percent of CTE concentrators who remained enrolled in their original postsecondary institution or transferred to another 2- or 4-year postsecondary institution but did not earn an industry-recognized credential, a certificate, or a degree in the previous reporting year.

4P1: Student Placement Number/Percent of CTE concentrators who were in the 2nd quarter following the program year in which they left postsecondary education placed or retained in employment military service or apprenticeship programs

4P1: Student Placement Do not include award recipients or other CTE concentrators who are still enrolled at your institution, in another postsecondary institution as identified by a student tracking service, or in another postsecondary institution as indicated by survey responses. Do not include students identified as leavers who indicate via survey responses that they are not employed and are not seeking employment.

5P1: Nontraditional Participation Percent of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated (were enrolled) in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.

5P2: Nontraditional Completion Number/Percent of CTE concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.

Non-Traditional Programs Listing put together by NAPE (National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity) Will remain stable for the entire period of the legislation

High Wage, High Skill, High Demand Occupations This Perkins IV legislation encourages individual states to develop their own, precise definitions of these terms for program applications.

Occupational Supply Demand System Developed by a national consortium under a grant from the U. S. Dept. of Labor to Georgia State University's Georgia Career Information Center (GCIC) in collaboration with the Georgia Department of Labor. GCIC continues to host, update, and make refinements to the OSDS. 4 states have included information [Ohio, Georgia, Montana, Oregon]

Occupational Supply Demand System [National] Combines national and state-level occupational characteristics, projections, wage trends, and industry employment (demand) with postsecondary graduation data (supply) for analysis of labor markets and training options. OSDS helps business and industrial analysts, program planners, workforce administrators and others determine labor availability and training programs offerings based on the supply demand mix.

High Wage, High Skill, High Demand Occupations Driven by Occupations Crosswalk Between CIP Codes and SOC codes Some CIP Code programs train students for more than 1 occupation Complete Crosswalk can be found at Hope to have the Program Inventory Updated

High Demand Occupations More than an average employment growth rate of 7.7% (reported by Michigan Dept of Labor for all occupations, ), or above the median annual openings (67).

High Wage Occupations Occupations paying at or above the median hourly wage of $15.86 or the mean annual wage of $41,230 or more (Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, 2006).

High Skill Occupations Minimum educational requirement of postsecondary training or those occupations with long-term on-the- job training or related work experience as a minimum educational requirement, and postsecondary training or above as a competitive educational requirement. Many of these occupations may also be defined in terms of the Occupational Information Network (O*Net) System, as occupations which could require at least some college. (O*Net OnLine at

Perkins IV Core Indicators Data for will be collected in the Fall (May have to modify due date for Placement) It will be collected at the program level Special Populations Tech Prep

Locals Do Have Options Colleges can accept state levels or negotiate different targets with the State Part 4 of the Annual Application, Accountability, has been updated to allow colleges to either accept or reject the state proposed levels If rejects state levels, the college must provide the level it would like to aim for along with supporting data Targets are negotiated at 2-year intervals

If a local fails to meet the adjusted level for a 24 month period: The state may withhold all or part of the locals allocation. If a state withholds funds from a local program, it must use them to provide, through alternative arrangements, services and activities to students within the area served by the local program.

Work in Progress Nothing is carved in stone Anything can still be modified Reliability and Validity will be an on-going issue throughout the legislation It will take a few years to refine our core indicator data

Contact Information Rhonda Burke, Higher Education Consultant