Biorepository Software Selection University of Michigan 31-Aug-2012 Frank Manion, Chief Information Officer Paul McGhee, Lead Business Analyst Cancer Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Advertisements

The Veterans Affairs Central Biorepository and MVP Highlights Mary T
The IndianaCTSI Biorepository is committed to serving the repository needs for CTSI investigators. The core will tailor specimen management to the needs.
PERMISSION ONTOLOGY FOR INFORMED CONSENT AND HIPAA COMPLIANCE Maria Adela Grando PhD Division Biomedical Informatics, University California.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World
Chapter 8: Evaluating Alternatives for Requirements, Environment, and Implementation.
NBSTRN Update NCC/RC PI/PD Meeting November 19, 2010 Michael Watson.
ECM RFP 101 Presented by: Carol Mitchell C.M. Mitchell Consulting.
Hospital Information System (HIS) Stakeholder Consultation
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
Systems Analysis and Design 9th Edition
1 Knowledge Management for Disease Coding (KMDC): Background & Introduction Timothy Hays, Ph.D. Project Manager, Knowledge Management for Disease Coding.
Challenges in Conducting Multi-Center Clinical Studies: Results from the Rapid Empiric Treatment with Oseltamivir Study (RETOS) Kendra Thompson, Kelly.
Content Management Activities at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Interlab 2003 Nancy Stratton Annanaomi Sams Genevieve Millsap Pam Novak.
The Role of Information Technology For A Private Medical Practice Noel Chua Rosalinda Raymundo.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition
8 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition.
Chapter 4: Beginning the Analysis: Investigating System Requirements
Application Streamlining Initiative Kickoff Meeting August 23, 2011.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
Chapter 4: Beginning the Analysis: Investigating System Requirements
JumpStart the Regulatory Review: Applying the Right Tools at the Right Time to the Right Audience Lilliam Rosario, Ph.D. Director Office of Computational.
IDR Snapshot: Quantitative Assessment Methodology Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of an Integrated Data Repository Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD a James.
Data Integration Project. MoSTEMWINS Data Projects Strategy 1 -- Develop and Implement a statewide data system in support of tracking student performance.
Sara Kim, PhD, Director, Associate Professor Instructional Design and Technology Unit, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Katherine Wigan, BS, MBA, Senior.
Building a Roadmap for Research IT John Brussolo Research IT Program Director September 6, 2012 © 2012 The Regents of the University of Michigan.
CPRS/Pharmacy Laboratory Monitoring Project
9/17/ Access WHI: Proposing Analyses and Ancillary Studies Andrea Z. LaCroix, PhD Professor of Epidemiology and Co-PI WHI Clinical Coordinating Center.
UCSF IT Update November 2013 Presenter: Joe Bengfort.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Research with the Human Tissue Repository RAFT Session April 10, 2015 Corey C Ford, MD, PhD Sr. Associate Dean for Research.
Anticipated FY2016 Appropriations Agency$ Million NIH200 Cancer70 Cohort130 FDA10 Office of the Natl Coord. for Health IT (ONC) 5 TOTAL215 Mission: To.
Page 1 Informatics Pilot Project EDRN Knowledge System Working Group San Antonio, Texas January 21, 2001 Steve Hughes Thuy Tran Dan Crichton Jet Propulsion.
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine Cancer Center Administration Database.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations in Research using Residual Specimens Jeffrey R. Botkin, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics Associate.
Integrated Data Management System for the Biorepository.
Joyce Mull, MPM Director, Regulatory Affairs National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Consent Form and IRB Challenges that Arise with Specimen.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
1 Strategic Plan for Digital Archives Programme DAP PROJECT SCOPE OVERVIEW STATUS.
IT Overview January Virtual Tissue Bank for Arizona Biomedical Research will provide a de-identified repository of biospecimens from AZ institutes.
Informatics Analysis Case Study. Public Health Informatics: An Overview of Key Issues Requires: MORE THAN TECHNOLOGY! Public health and informatics Systems.
Clinical Research Informatics at the University of Michigan Daniel Clauw M.D. Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Assistant Dean for Clinical.
The Importance of a Strategic Plan to Eliminate Health Disparities 2008 eHealth Conference June 9, 2008 Yvonne T. Maddox, PhD Deputy Director Eunice Kennedy.
Software Development A Proposed Process and Methodology.
Team Building: Critical Role of Interdisciplinary Research Teams in Translational Research C. Kent Osborne, M.D. Director, Lester and Sue Smith Breast.
Flowsheet Analysis Design Concepts Introduction Acknowledgements Proposed Design By studying PICU flowsheets in the context of their actual use, we have.
CANCER IN THE WORKPLACE: HOW EMPLOYERS CAN HELP Lynn Zonakis Principal, The Zonakis Group LLC October 23, 2015.
Lynn Schmidt, PhD ATD Puget Sound October 21, 2014.
caELMIR an Electronic Laboratory Management Information and Retrieval system for pre- clinical experimental data.
Long Term Care Leadership Survey Dr. Douglas Olson  Health Care Administration  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Long Term Care Leadership Survey Dr.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
Facilitating tissue collection for translational research Jane Rogan Business Manager.
Knowledge Organisation Competency Survey ISKO SG – 11 March 2016 Matt Moore Patrick Lambe.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process. Welcome Overview of school leader selection process Activities and timeline Roles & responsibilities Q&A.
Building a Public Health Informatics Division. OSDH Public Health Informatics Division Identify the needs Develop the proposal Establish division Reality.
Duke Index of Biospecimens to Enable Sharing of Biospecimen Collections Abstract The Duke Biobank created the Index of Biospecimens (the Index) to promote.
Million Veteran Program Data Marts and Data Access
مدیریت داده ها و اطلاعات آزمایشگاه پزشکی
Sandy Jones, Public Health Advisor
Action Planning for Quality Improvement
21 NOVEMBER 2018 FREE STATE PROVINCE
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
17 JANUARY 2019 MPUMALANGA PROVINCE
Define Your IT Strategy
UAB Tissue Biorepository
Presentation transcript:

Biorepository Software Selection University of Michigan 31-Aug-2012 Frank Manion, Chief Information Officer Paul McGhee, Lead Business Analyst Cancer Center Informatics

Agenda Project Objectives Overview of Software Selection Process Biorepository – Business Processes Biorepository Application – Context Within the University Scripted Vendor Demos Establishing a U-M Biorepository Capability Critical Success Factors Governance and (half-baked!) informatics plan

Project Objectives Support the University’s personalized medicine strategy –Enable linking biosamples with highly annotated clinical and laboratory data Provide compliant environment for biosample management –Collection –Storage in a centralized repository –Receipt of samples and processing by individual research labs –Recording of assay results (including links to large datasets such as DNA sequencing) –Ability to readily analyze and share information Support specific research studies (clinical, population-based, laboratory) –Demographic data –Clinical data –Epidemiologic survey data –Biosamples –Lab assay results Provide capability to query across all University biorepositories to identify patients or samples for specific, protocol-driven research. Operationalize robust biorepository capability identified as one of the “strategic enablers” for UMHS

Overview of Software Selection Process Preliminary Screening Formal RFP Process Final Recommendation Interviewed contacts with cancer centers across U.S. Broadened project scope to include entire medical school Rigorous analysis of RFP responses Interviewed 2 large Cancer Center research teams over 3-month period Interviewed numerous additional key stakeholders Summarized weighted scores for each step of the scripted demos Created 177 requirements based on 38 use cases Added additional requirements for final total of 189 Conducted 1-hour interviews with at least 2 vendor-provided customer references 7 vendors scored applications against our requirements Issued RFP to 3 top vendorsPrepared final recommendation Internally scored 5 other applications in use at U-M Engaged stakeholders to finalize 34 scripted demos based on U-M requirements Result: 3 vendors met 90% of requirements (other vendors significantly lower) 51 stakeholders scored each step at full-day demos (was requirement met & usability)

Biorepository – Business Processes

Biorepository Application - Context Within the University Focus on “Scope of Proposed Application” while being aware of bigger picture

Scripted Vendor Demos Scripted vendor demos organized around U-M requirements Allowed attendees to evaluate whether software would really help them in their daily research processes Simple, unambiguous rating categories Attendees indicated they really liked this scripted approach

Establishing a U-M Biorepository Capability Biorepository leadership team formed to create business case and gain funding approval –Included key leaders from Office of Research –Included key biorepository stakeholders from across U-M Selection of diverse pilot programs based on scientific value and opportunity for learning –Head & Neck SPORE –Breast Cancer –Chronic Kidney Disease –Michigan Genomics Initiative

Critical Success Factors Stakeholder engagement –Spending time with Business Analyst to create use cases –Reviewing requirements necessary to perform each use case –Reviewing step-by-step scripted user demos to facilitate evaluating how well vendor solution will meet U-M needs –Scoring vendor demos based on U-M scripts (each step scored both on how well requirement met and usability) Using use cases to document user interviews –Allowed documenting requirements in context meaningful to user –Facilitated quick creation of scripted demo scenarios organized around user business processes Initial screening process included scoring current U-M applications that were not serious contenders –During key stakeholder reviews results from prior formal scoring quickly answered the question “Why don’t we use XXX?”

SPECIMEN BANKS (Assoc Research Manager) Collection/Processing/Storage/ Inventory Tissue Fresh/Frozen FFPE Serum Germ Line DNA WBC Buccal Swabs Specialty Urine Stool Breast fluid other? CLINICAL DATABASE (Assoc Research Manager) Collection/Entry/Retrieval Demographics Special data elements (appropriate for each disease) Treatment Outcomes (response, recurrence/progression, mortality) ADMINISTRATOR REGULATORY (Assoc Research Manager) IRB OHPR NCI OTHER SCIENTIFIC DIRECTOR (MD OR PHD) STANDARDIZED ELEMENTS for all: Specimen Collection/processing Specimen Storage Specimen distribution Information Models Data Collection Data storage systems QC/QA data entry Data retrieval Etc. BIOINFORMATICS/BIOSTATISTICS Generation and Analysis of “omics” data from specimens Association with clinical outcomes Compliant with Regulatory Standards Investigational Data Generated by Investigational Labs

Informatics Framework Biospecimen System Common Lab Identifier System Reporting System Sequencing Facility Research Data Warehouse Sparql Query Framework OBI Framework CDE to OBI Mapping CBM? Note: Not fully baked yet… Questions: What are pro’s/con’s to CBM? What other issues can this group suggest? Various Labs…

Questions? Comments?