Opportunities and Issues for IFE Chamber Science Jeff Latkowksi, Wayne Meier Fusion Energy Program, LLNL Per F. Peterson, Philippe Bardet, Haihua Zhao.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Paths for IFE Mike Campbell General Atomics FPA 25 th Anniversary Meeting December 13,2004.
Advertisements

TAREK A. TUTUNJI Rapid Prototyping. Prototype A prototype can be defined as a model that represents a product or system. This model is usually used for.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Welcome to the second “official” Laser IFE workshop Discuss our progress in Laser IFE Address some key issues as a group Oxidation of graphite walls Filling.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.
Richard M. Bionta XTOD October 12, 2004 UCRL-PRES-XXXXX X Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics, Overview Facility Advisory Committee.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley C.S. Debonnel 1,2, S.S. Yu 2, P.F. Peterson 1 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department.
An Update Point Design for Heavy Ion Fusion Wayne Meier LLNL ARIES Meeting Jan. 8-9, 2003 UC San Diego Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department.
The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Preliminary Dust and Debris Clearing Studies in an IFE Chamber David Petti J. Phillip Sharpe.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Action Items For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Project Meeting June 19-21, 2000 University of Wisconsin, Madison Electronic copy:
Findings and Recommendations from Wetted-Wall IFE Designs Jeff Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory March 9, 2001 Work performed under the.
ARIES-IFE Assessment of Operational Windows for IFE Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.
Nov 13-14, 2001 A. R. Raffray, et al., Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Effort 1 Progress Report on Chamber Clearing Code Development Effort A.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 S.J. Pemberton 1, R.P. Abbott 1, G.T. Fukuda 1 D.R. Welch 3, S.S.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Update on IFE Aerosol Analysis J.P. Sharpe INEEL Fusion Safety Program.
1 ARIES IFE - Some Concluding Comments on Thick Liquid Walls Wayne Meier, Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Ralph Moir, Susana Reyes ARIES Project Meeting September.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.
RRP:10/17/01Aries IFE 1 Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics Aries Electronic Workshop October 17, 2001 Robert R. Peterson Fusion Technology Institute University.
Distribution of Advanced Design Research FY02 FY03 (Current) ARIES (IFE & MFE) System Studies1,9661,939 Socio-economic Studies UCSD/UW/RPI 1,189.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Overview of the Components of an IFE Chamber and a Summary of our R&D to Develop Them Presented by: A. René Raffray.
Research Co-ordination Meeting on Elements of Power Plant Design for Inertial Fusion Energy 4-7 November 2003 DESIGN CONCEPT OF FAST-IGNITION HEAVY ION.
Final Focus Magnet Shielding Update Jeff Latkowski and Wayne Meier ARIES Meeting October 2-4, 2002 Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department.
The High Average Power Laser Program in DOE/DP Coordinated, focussed, multi-lab effort to develop the science and technology for Laser Fusion Energy Coordinated,
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Overview of the Components of an IFE Chamber and a Summary of our R&D to Develop Them Presented by: A. René Raffray.
A Plan to Develop Dry Wall Chambers for Inertial Fusion Energy with Lasers Page 1 of 46 DRAFT.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Los Angeles, California, June 2, 2004 This work was.
Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Projects Advisory Board Meeting, August 16, 2012 Project-2 Investigation of Artificial Lift Techniques in Horizontal Gas.
LA-UR “Mini-Workshop” on Coordination of IFE Target Thermo-Mechanical Modeling and DT Ice Experiments LANL, UCSD, and General Atomics at Los Alamos.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
ICHS, September 2007 On The Use Of Spray Systems: An Example Of R&D Work In Hydrogen Safety For Nuclear Applications C. Joseph-Auguste 1, H. Cheikhravat.
U.C. Berkeley Per F. Peterson, Christophe Debonnel, Philippe Bardet, Grant Fukuda Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley.
Robin L. Garrell Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry University of California, Los Angeles Jared Hund Inertial Fusion Technology General Atomics, San.
Update on Mass Production Layering Presented by Amy Bozek at the HAPL Workshop at LLNL June 20-21, 2005 A. Bozek, N. Alexander, G. Flint, D. Goodin, R.
Fusion Magic? “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Radical, transformative technologies typically appear ‘impossible’
Welcome to the eighth HAPL meeting Courtesy, Mark Tillack, UCSD.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.
Status and Plans for Systems Modeling for Laser IFE HAPL Progress Meeting November 2001 Pleasanton, CA Wayne Meier, Charles Orth, Don Blackfield.
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
The Neutronics of Heavy Ion Fusion Chambers Jeff Latkowski and Susana Reyes 15 th Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion Symposium Princeton, NJ June 9, 2004 Work performed.
1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.
Mercury DPSSL Driver: Smoothing, Zooming and Chamber Interface Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Ray Beach, John Perkins, Wayne Meier, Chris Ebbers,
Target Highlights Scaling (gain curves) and progress on “hybrid “ targets Fast ignition scaling and physics Improved models of fluid instabilities New.
Design of an Inertial Fusion Energy Target Injection & Tracking System Ronald Petzoldt, Dan Goodin, Mike Hollins, Chuck Gibson, Neil Alexander, and Gottfried.
DESIGN WINDOWS FOR THIN AND THICK LIQUID PROTECTION SCHEMES IN IFE REACTOR CHAMBERS M. Yoda and S. I. Abdel-Khalik G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical.
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHARUCH (014) Chemical Engineering department SEM-iii Sub: fluid flow operation topic: orifice meter & rotAmeter Guid by:
Ion Mitigation for Laser IFE Optics Ryan Abbott, Jeff Latkowski, Rob Schmitt HAPL Program Workshop Atlanta, Georgia, February 5, 2004 This work was performed.
A two-stage system for the future cooling system.
Liquid Walls Town Meeting May 5, 2003, Livermore, CA Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence.
Modeling of Z-Ablation I. E. Golovkin, R. R. Peterson, D. A. Haynes University of Wisconsin-Madison G. Rochau Sandia National Laboratories Presented at.
M. S. Tillack, J. E. Pulsifer, K. Sequoia Final Optic Research – Progress and Plans HAPL Project Meeting, Georgia Tech 5–6 February 2004.
Target and Horn status report
Summary of session 5: Innovative Ideas and New R&D
Welcome to the sixth HAPL meeting
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Laser Cutting Archish Bharadwaj V S
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
University of California, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

Opportunities and Issues for IFE Chamber Science Jeff Latkowksi, Wayne Meier Fusion Energy Program, LLNL Per F. Peterson, Philippe Bardet, Haihua Zhao Department of Nuclear Engineering University of California, Berkeley Heavy Ion Fusion Science VNL Program Advisory Committee Meeting Aug. 9-10, 2006 Livermore, CA

JFL 8/06 Outline Thick liquid wall chambers for IFE Near-term opportunities Preparing for an experimental test facility Connecting to NIF

JFL 8/06 Thick liquid wall (TLW) chambers have been the focus of chamber research for HIF Potential advantages are well known: –Chamber structures experience a much lower rate of damage  may last for plant lifetime (>30 years) –14 MeV neutron source (~$1B) not required  existing or slightly modified steels can be used –Chambers can be much more compact  improves HI focusing –TLW also protects from short range target emission and shock due to first surface ablation –Most fusion energy deposited directly in the coolant  efficient heat transport –Have high tritium breeding efficiency

JFL 8/06 The key issues can be summarized in three primary categories Issues related to repetitive nature of IFE, including liquid wall response and recovery of chamber conditions between pulses (reformation of protective liquid configuration, clearing of drops and vapor that could interfere with next shot). Issues related to shock mitigation, including ability of multi-layer thick liquid wall configurations to attenuate shocks and thus protect the structural wall from possible damaging effects of shocks. Issues related to use of molten salt (preferred liquid), including material compatibility (corrosion), target debris transport and removal, tritium recovery, heat transport and power conversion.

JFL 8/06 Recent past R&D has focused on fundamental understanding and key issues Hydrodynamic scaling High quality jets needed along beam paths Disruption and re-establishment of liquid protection Condensation and vacuum recovery Shock propagation through jet array New schemes, e.g., vortex flow, that may permit higher rep-rate Interface issues and integrated design studies, e.g., Robust Point Design

JFL 8/06 Near-term opportunities Re-engage Universities for small scale experiments Focus on schemes compatible with lower cost development path Small effort on system integration to assure coupling of development in targets, driver, and focusing schemes

JFL 8/06 Scaled water experiments have demonstrated multiple liquid configurations of interest for HIF Re = 100,000 High-Re Cylindrical Jets Vortex Layers for Beam Tubes Oscillating Voided Liquid Slabs UCB

JFL 8/06 Large liquid vortices could enable thick-liquid, high-rep-rate, lower yield HIF options Example: Chamber volume: 80m 3 Liquid volume: 28m 3 Open fraction of solid angle: 2.4%

JFL 8/06 UCB has performed detailed measurements of turbulence and surface topology in vortex beam tubes

JFL 8/06 A series of scaled experiments were constructed at UCB to provide proof of principle for large vortex generation A first-generation test device was fabricated from a short segment of cylindrical pipe (22.5-cm diameter) Eight pressurized plenums provided blowing flow Perforations between injection plenums provided suction –A suction = 2A injection End walls produced modest non-ideality

JFL 8/06 Liquid accumulated during startup was cleared in the first-generation device t = 2.0 sec t = 7.0 sec t = 14.0 sec The first viability issue for large- vortex flows is removing excess liquid during startup –UCB experiments demonstrate that this can be done by providing sufficient suction area After startup, flow dumps on suction drains can be closed, and pressure recovery can be achieved –Reduce pumping power –Increase layer thickness stable layer established

JFL 8/06 A large variable recirculation flow loop was constructed Flow meter Nozzle Manifold 1000 liter tank 50 hp pump Frequency controller Pump is rated for 500- gpm at 300-ft of head Thanks to the frequency controller, the flow rate can be accurately controlled at any flow rates up to 800-gpm

JFL 8/06 Larger scale facilities will be needed prior to ETF (could begin prior to ignition if funding available) Hydraulics Test Facility – Demonstrate the type of flow configurations needed for TLW chambers at ~1/4 scale. Simulant fluid (e.g., water) used to minimize costs. Facility would simulate (e.g., by using chemical detonations) flow disruption by fusion energy pulses to study chamber clearing. Also used to study/validate shock mitigation techniques. Chamber Dynamics Test Facility – Study vaporization/condensation dynamics of molten salt. Focus on aspects unique to molten salt and cannot be simulated in the hydraulic test facility. Molten Salt Test Loop(s) – Address issues related to use of molten salts in fusion applications: corrosion, transport & recovery of target debris, transport and recovery of tritium. Heat Transfer Component Facilities – Develop/demonstrate compact, efficient heat exchangers and power cycle components using molten salt coolants. Applicable to IFE, MFE and fission, including hydrogen production.

JFL 8/06 NIF will benefit from chamber science work and spin-backs are possible First opportunity for test with prototypical target emissions Experiments to validate chamber response models First opportunity for neutron isochoric heating experiment (disassembles jets in some TLW designs) IFE analyses tools will be improved and can be used for NIF experiment planning –X-ray and debris transport and deposition –Surface heating, ablation, shocks –Liquid motion, condensation, etc. –Neutron heating, neutron activation

JFL 8/06 Neutron isochoric heating can be an important issue for the NIF Neutron isochoric heating will first be experienced on NIF Can drive debris and shrapnel threats to the final optics (e.g., He-filled cryotubes was the original design) Understanding of the liquid response to isochoric heating is a critical issue for TLW IFE: –liquid break-up –droplet formation –chamber clearing Can ion beams be used as near-term surrogate and assist in these issues prior to high-yield shots on NIF?

JFL 8/06 Target drop experiment on the NIF? One could think about “dropping” a target rather than holding it on the target positioner Would greatly reduce the mass sitting near the target, and thus, debris and shrapnel issues Translates into reduced debris loading on diagnostics and final optics – may lead to reduced maintenance needs Would benefit IFE along path of getting past the giggle factor regarding target injection & tracking Can it be done? Is this also too many sigmas from the norm?

JFL 8/06 Conclusions A good start has been made in TLW chamber science for HIF Opportunities exist for modest cost, near-term R&D to continue progress A serious IFE effort will require larger scale facilities to address key issues Chamber science will benefit from experiments that can be fielded on NIF – more work is needed to define in detail HIF chamber science can also benefit NIF operation

JFL 8/06 BACK-UP SLIDES

JFL 8/06 An second-generation device was constructed, based on the previous experiment A test device was fabricated from a segment of cylindrical pipe (25.4-cm diameter, 14-cm wide) Injection and suction holes were fabricated with precision Eight pressurized plenums provided blowing flow Perforations between injection plenums provided suction –A suction = 2A injection End walls produced modest non- ideality 4-mm diameter suction hole 2-mm diameter injection hole

JFL 8/06 Different layer thicknesses have been obtained with Froude number as low as 3 in the second-generation device  /R = 5% Fr = U 2 /gR = 13.6 Re = UR/  = 5·10 5 the layer is inhomogeneous, due to sharp angle of injection Polygon shape layer

JFL 8/06 Dye marking of injection jets revealed their behavior in the layer - further work is required Homogeneous NozzleInline Nozzle Dye Marking Rapid prototyping nozzles Free Surface

JFL 8/06 Based on the 2 nd generation, a new area of study was commenced on concepts with modular nozzles To provide improved vortex layer control, distributed injection and suction are needed The investigation studied injection/suction modules to study the influence of the injection and suction angles the injection is homogeneously distributed over the circumference the modules can be built with rapid prototyping

JFL 8/06 Two nozzles with different injection/extraction patterns were built and tested in a ramp experiment Ramp experiment allows testing of a modular nozzle section (1/8 th circumference). Inline Concept Homogeneous Concept