National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Managed Lanes in Washington State
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
I-15 MANAGED LANES Building on Success Institute of Transportation Studies’ Center for Urban Infrastructure March 7, 2003.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
CFEE Conference March 23 rd, 2007 By: Jim Madaffer State & Local Authority What We Have, and What We Need.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
FHWA Policy and Guidance
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Ginger Goodin, Texas Transportation Institute Greg Jones, Federal Highway Administration.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
ICM Minnesota – Interstate 394 Brian Kary, Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Transit Alliance 4 Founded in Coalition of 39 groups 4 Local governments 4 Business organizations 4 Community groups.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Wake County Transit Plan Choose how you move! December 7, 2011 Capital Area Friends of Transit 1.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Soup to Nuts: Changing Operating Parameters for HOV Facilities Sponsored by the HOV Pooled-Fund Study and the Federal Highway Administration.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Roles of TMCs in Incident Management on Managed Lanes INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW MICHAEL TANTILLO VHB.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 National Governors Association Roundtable Presentation April 2, 2001 Dr. Christine Johnson Director, ITS Joint Program Office Program Manager, FHWA Operations.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Greater Toronto Transportation System
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
October 12, 2017 Jesse A. Elam.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Presentation transcript:

National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration

Workshop Purpose Provide hands-on practice in applying lessons learned and best practices from implemented projects across the country understand the challenges in implementing pricing projects move pricing forward in your area

Workshop Agenda Review of Project Break into groups for exercises Five subject areas covered 5-10 minute overview of subject area minutes to complete exercise Break for lunch after second round of exercises Group reports

Subject Areas Planning Operations Design Funding and Finance Outreach  No specific order, all have overlapping elements

Our Project Radial freeway corridor serving major activity center 15 miles total length 3 GP lanes in each direction 1 HOV lane in each direction Transit service with two park- and-ride facilities Downtown rapidly developing and congestion growing No funding for expansion. Congested 4-lane adjacent radial freeway is funded for expansion Parallel arterial

Downtown Employment Suburban Community Population 40,000 $40k median income 40% minorities 1.3 autos per household Suburban Community Population 20,000 $75k median income 20% minorities 1.9 autos per household Park and Ride Competing ArterialLength: 20 milesPeak TT: min CompetingRadialFreewayCurrently 4 lanes,very congested, tobe expanded to6 lanes in thefuture Radial Freeway8 lanes (2 HOV)Length: 15 miles165,000 AADT Total Travelshed Population: 200,000 $50k median income 30% minorities 1.5 autos per household 8 miles Transit Service Peak TT: min Peak TT: min Freeway Travel Time to Downtown GPL Peak: min HOV Peak: 7-10 min Freeway Travel Time to Downtown GPL Peak: min HOV Peak: min

Project Characteristics Corridor History Congestion worsening Downtown businesses seeking alternatives to bring more commuters downtown Opposition to capacity improvements on adjacent radial corridor from environmental interests Corridor demographics Varies by sub-area Total travelshed population = 200,000 $50,000 median income 30% minorities 1.5 autos per household

Project Characteristics General Purpose Lanes 6 lanes with full shoulders 165,000 AADT and growing

Project Characteristics HOV Project History Operating for 9 years Construction funding came from state and federal sources Full-time HOV2+ operation (24/7) Peak period average vehicle occupancy of 2.21 Public perception of underutilization, 1000 vph in peak Park-and-ride utilization at 65%, 2 lots

Project Characteristics HOV lanes 2 lanes, one in each direction Buffer separated Peak volumes vehicles per hour Peak period speed 65 mph

Project Characteristics Project Partners State DOT Owner of lanes and ROW Operator of freeway Transit authority Operator of express bus service and park-and-ride facilities Regional toll authority Operates one toll road in region Cash and transponder-based electronic tolling State police HOV enforcement Metropolitan Planning Organization

Project Characteristics Legal authority HOT allowed by state statute Regional policies Conversion of HOV lane to HOT lane in long range plan No policies on toll rate setting, occupancy, etc. Environmental clearance – FONSI expected

Project Characteristics Cross section Access In addition to termini, two intermediate access points to HOV lane Between the two P&R lots Between P&R lot and downtown Enforcement Enforcement areas (14’ shoulder) located on downstream ends of intermediate access points

Project Characteristics Estimated project costs Capital costs: $10,000,000 Annual operating costs $1,000,000 Available funding State is committed to contributing $8,000,000 FHWA/FTA program requirements and limitations – FTA funds used in construction of HOV lanes Traffic and revenue studies – none

Planning Establish goals and objectives and clearly communicate a vision Take advantage of opportunities Maintain flexibility Engage project partners and encourage agency cooperation

Planning Exercise

Operations Develop a Concept of Operations to guide the process Determine vehicle occupancy based on current operating conditions Pricing strategy Tolling policy Enforcement Hours of operation Operating parameters/goals

Operations Exercise

Design Depends on design of HOV lanes and available room in the corridor to make modifications Separation mechanism Access locations Toll collection locations Coherent signing program Wider buffer when using pylons or paint Safe merging/weaving distances Incident detection and use of ITS Number of lanes

Design Exercise Design Group Exercise Develop an action plan that identifies critical design issues that need to be addressed to support a successful project. Identify user groups and design criteria based on the group requiring the greatest flexibility (buses?). Identify and establish fundamental design parameters of facility. What are the costs involved in adopting the different separation mechanisms and the width of the separation?

Funding and Finance Ownership for facility and right-of-way Available assistance through federal programs Stakeholders Revenue sharing

Finance Exercise

Outreach Identify project champions Conduct market research and identify issues Develop clear and concise messages Communicate project goals Outreach to travelers about changes in access or other conditions Continue from project development through operations Create brand awareness

Outreach Exercise

Breakout Group Reports