Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Booking & Choice Colin Innes Executive Lead Choose and Book.
Advertisements

What is commissioning? Paul McManus Pharmacist Advisor Yorkshire and the Humber Office North of England Specialised Commissioning Group North of England.
Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS What does it mean for North Somerset? Chris Born Chief Executive.
Carole Green Project Director. Mental Health PbR Developments 2003 SECTA Report Variation Complexity No link between intervention and outcome Poor data.
1 Vision for better co-ordinated care: how could mental health payment systems serve as a key enabler for integration and personalised care? Mental Health.
Options for the Future of Payment by Results (PbR) – Consultation exercise Sebastian Habibi – May 2007.
C Commissioner Perspective How Quality Neonatal Clinical Indicators may relate to CQINs & QIPPs Ruth Moore Network Manager/Lead Nurse SSBC Newborn Network.
. JONATHAN HEPWORTH SNR SUPPLIER MANAGER SPECIALISED MENTAL HEALTH YORKSHIRE & HUMBER COMMISSIONING SPECIALISED MENTAL HEALTH & WINTERBOURNE REVIEW QUALITY.
REDCAR AND CLEVELAND BOROUGH COUNCIL In Partnership with TEES ESK AND WEAR VALLEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST and MIDDLESBROUGH AND REDCAR AND CLEVELAND PRIMARY.
Case study: older people’s services in Cambs Demography: an ageing population, rising cost Poorly funded CCG, need for savings Multiple providers, lack.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide.
A commissioning perspective - increasing user involvement to achieve better outcomes Mick Burns Secure Services Commissioning Team Yorkshire and the Humber.
Jane Jobarteh Midlands and East May 2013 The Future of Social Care Patients First and Foremost.
Practice based commissioning in Sutton and Merton PCT George Burns Practice Based Commissioning Development Manager
Update: Operational Delivery Networks Denise McLellan Transitional Lead, Networks and Senates, Midlands and East November 2012.
2014/15 National Tariff Payment System & Draft Guidance on Mental Health Currencies and Payment 1.
Using Payment by Results to commission better quality clinical care Eileen Robertson Payment by Results (PbR) Development Team.
Future of Payment by Results (PbR) PCT network – 19 Feb 2007.
How knowledge services can support the new commissioners? Tim Jones NHS Commissioning specialist.
National Update: The information revolution and the 2012 Caldicott Review Simon Richardson – Information Rights Manager.
Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. Background Published in July 2010, the White Paper ‘Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS’ outlined our.
Alcohol Payment by Results/Improvement in alcohol treatment delivery Best Packages of Care Implementing NICE guidelines Dr Tanzeel Ansari; Consultant Psychiatrist.
THE TRI-BOROUGH PROGRAMME Home Care Model for Tri-Borough Paul Rackham Tri-Borough Head of Community Commissioning Adult Social Care Will Tate (PPL), representing.
NHS Standard Contracts – Implementation Workshops New Standard NHS Community Contracts Part 2 April 2009 Christian Geisselmann Consultant – Contracts &
Their Right, our Responsibility: Involving young people in their health care Health Improvement Specialist and You’re.
Getting the NSF Moving Robyn Noonan Care Services Improvement Partnership Kent Acquired Brain Injury Forum 11 th June 2008.
© National Programme for Information Technology, London, All rights reserved. Do Once and Share Single Assessment Process Vision and Care Pathway.
Satbinder Sanghera, Director of Partnerships and Governance
NICE quality standard for COPD Craig Grime Technical Analyst Quality Standards NICE
The NHS KSF Learning Programme Days One & Two [Sessions 1- 6] The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework.
Open Data Platform Supplier Forum 13 January 2012.
Barry Cockcroft Chief Dental Officer (England) LPN Event East of England 8 March 2012.
Relieving distress, transforming lives IAPT Payment by Results Project Update David Perton IAPT PbR Project Manager Department of Health.
Health Strategy Management Contracting and Commissioning 5th February 2015 Pam Kaur Group Finance Manager University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire.
Makingadifference NHS SWINDON PRESENTATION FOR LINK MEETING 18 MAY.
WORKING TOGETHER TOWARDS INTEGRATION
Health Overview Policy and Scrutiny Panel Update on Health Reform Proposals James Foster North Somerset Council.
INFORMATION AND PERFORMANCE JO WORSWICK. Content Why we need to record activity data What is it used for and by whom Nationally Locally (commissioners)
Effectiveness Day : Case Load Weighting Friday 29 th November 2013 Where People Matter Most.
Calculating Quality Reporting Service – an introduction Chris Brown CQRS Design, Build and Test Project Manager 05 September 2012.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Programme for Health Service Improvement in Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
SEN and Disability Green Paper: Update March
How can Geriatricians help PCTs?. What on earth is world class commissioning? Department of health has set criteria by which it wishes PCTs to operate.
Developing Quality Indicators & Dashboards for Dementia Adam Cook South East Coast Quality Observatory.
Health, Wellbeing and Social Care Scrutiny Committee.
© Nuffield Trust 24 October 2015 NHS payment reform: evolving policy and emerging evidence Chief Economist: Anita Charlesworth.
CAMHS Data Event Barbara Fittall 5 th March 2013.
Anthony Kealy Policy Directorate Commissioning Team Developing Commissioning Policy.
Presentation heading Presented by / Sub-heading Commissioning Explained Sarah Freeman Local Service Specialist – West Midlands Team.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Choice of Hospital Patient Choice Jonathan Marron 5th May 2004.
Commissioning & Delivering Re-ablement & Rehabilitation within a Social Care & Health Organisation National Home Care Conference May 24 th 2012 Sarah Shatwell,
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
Five Year Forward View: Personal Health Budgets and Integrated Personal Commissioning Jess Harris January 2016.
Improving Purchasing of Clinical Services* 21 st October 2005 *connectedthinking 
NHS Reform Update October Context Health Reform Agenda Significant pace of change Clear focus on supporting the Transition Process At the same time.
2011/12 Operating Framework Vanessa Harris 21 st December 2010.
1 Reference Costs & Wheelchair Services. 2 Contents Background –Costing vs. collection –What are reference costs? –Governance –Why do we collect reference.
Presented by: Darren Plant Healthy Lifestyles Commissioner NHS Worcestershire November 2010 Health Trainers.
A Common Assessment Framework for Adults – Development 12 February 2008 Carl Evans Social Care, Local Government and Care Services Directorate Department.
Autumn Staff briefings As a NHS patient, care is provided free at the time you need it, whether this is from a hospital or community nurse or.
Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Programme Pauline Heslop Programme Manager 1.
The National Dementia Strategy in the East of England Maureen Begley Dementia Programme Manager East of England.
Integrated Care Workforce Showcase Event Nov 2015 Yvonne Rogers – Strategic HR/Workforce Lead.
Welcome to Southern Health Southern Health exists to improve the health, wellbeing and independence of the people we serve.
Pharmacy White Paper Building on Strengths Delivering the Future Overview.
Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS What’s it all mean??!
Commissioning for children
Presentation transcript:

Payment by Results for Specialist Alcohol Services Don Lavoie Alcohol Policy Team

What is ‘Payment by Results’? A system in which PCTs pay providers for the number and complexity of patients treated, using a price list – the national tariff – for all activity within the scope of PbR. Covers admitted patient care, outpatients and A&E Introduced in Previously Block contracts were awarded to provide services with prices based on historic local costs and negotiating skills. Now Under PbR, commissioners pay providers; (NHS trusts, Foundation Trusts and the independent sector) a national tariff or price for the number and complexity of patients seen. Provider income = activity x price

Three Tiers of Payment (A) National currencies with national prices: Depends on services being sufficiently standardised to support the use of national currencies and is appropriate to encourage contestability at national level, or to focus local contract negotiations on quality and outcomes. (B) National currencies with local prices: Appropriate where there is sufficient standardisation of services across different local areas. Appropriate where there is standardised data collection and information flows based on national definitions. Often a transitional stage in the development of a national tariff. (C) Local currencies with local prices: Appropriate where there is significant diversity amongst services at local level - where services are provided in very different ways and to widely differing individuals.

The Future Development of PbR This has been spelt out in a Revised NHS Operating Framework and the White Paper Liberating the NHS.

PbR Going Forward Coalition Government committed to introducing Payment by Results (PbR) across healthcare and beyond (e.g welfare, Children’s Centres). Desire for PbR to be linked more to the patient pathway and to be focussed on outcomes The White Paper Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, made a number of commitments around expanding the scope of PbR, including restating the timetable of 2012/13 for the introduction of PbR payments for adult MH services.

Mental Health PbR development history When PbR was introduced for acute physical services in 2005/06 work had already begun on mental health. Six Mental Health Trusts in the North East and Yorkshire and Humber regions came up with an approach of grouping service users in a clinically meaningful way. This was adopted as a national way forward in Autumn Development work continued around the country leading to a first set of agreed currency units (the care clusters), an allocation/assessment tool (the Mental Health Clustering Tool) and draft guidance in February 2010.

Planned future work in mental health Costing: Major strand of work is to determine cost per service user per cluster – has revealed that this level of detail lacking in most mental health providers. Costing work may inform understanding of costs of alcohol services. Care Packages: Care package response is left to local determination to allow for innovation and flexibility (may want to be more prescriptive for alcohol). Quality and Outcomes Measures: Seeking to define quality and outcome measures for each of the care clusters.

Mental Health PbR: Lessons Learned 1.PbR is not simply a financial initiative – has the potential to drive how care is given and its quality. 2.Works need to involve professionals who deliver services – will require a culture change in the information they collect and record. 3.Information systems take time to adapt to meet your needs. 4.Locally led development is good, but it is important to define where national consistency is needed and how agreement will be reached.

Background to PbR for Specialist Alcohol Services The Department of Health is establishing a project to develop a ‘Payment by Results’ (PbR) approach for Specialist Alcohol Services. The main purpose of the project is to create an opportunity to develop national currencies and tariffs that can be used as the basis for contracting and paying for specialist alcohol services in England. Alcohol PbR is seen as a natural progression from mental health PbR as specialist alcohol treatment is often delivered through NHS Mental Health Trust contracts. Where alcohol misuse is a complicating factor in mental health need, it is already included in mental health PbR

Specific Objectives To agree an approach for needs based clusters of patients. To agree standard individual needs assessment tool(s). To identify good practice in needs based packages of care. To agree an individual outcome measure for alcohol services. To cost up both good and existing practice. To ensure that an amended National Alcohol Treatment Monitoring Service (NATMS) data set is fit for the purpose of specialist alcohol services PbR. To successfully pilot local approaches to PbR for specialist alcohol services and extract the nationally applicable learning. To determine how reimbursement will occur e.g. will it be through utilising PbR-SUS (Secondary Uses Service) or another mechanism.

Project Scope The focus of the Alcohol PbR approach will be on men and women of working age. The project will include services in the community that are traditionally described as both primary and secondary care, with the exception of exclusions (detailed in PID). The customers of the project will be alcohol commissioners (whether practice-based, at PCT level or more specialised) and specialist alcohol service providers (NHS Trusts, Foundation Trusts, Independent Sector and Third Sector).

Products 1.National tool for classification for needs based clusters 2.Nationally utilised individual needs assessment tools 3.Best practice needs based packages 4.Individual outcome measure 5.Appropriate Minimum Data Set 6.Costing of best practice packages 7.Indicative tariffs (unit costs)

Project governance

Timescales The introduction of the currencies and tariffs developed will take place from April 2013 The project is anticipated to run between Oct 2010 to Summer the project will need to be in place to oversee and get feedback from first few months of implementation