Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central Tracking Detector FermiLab, October 2000 Erez Etzion 1, Gideon Dror 2, David Horn 1, Halina Abramowicz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
0 - Electron Discrimination in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber.
Advertisements

A brief review of non-neural-network approaches to deep learning
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Simple Neural Nets For Pattern Classification
Handwritten Character Recognition Using Artificial Neural Networks Shimie Atkins & Daniel Marco Supervisor: Johanan Erez Technion - Israel Institute of.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
Un Supervised Learning & Self Organizing Maps Learning From Examples
Bill Atwood, Core Meeting, 9-Oct GLAS T 1 Finding and Fitting A Recast of Traditional GLAST Finding: Combo A Recast of the Kalman Filter Setting.
1 Cluster Quality in Track Fitting for the ATLAS CSC Detector David Primor 1, Nir Amram 1, Erez Etzion 1, Giora Mikenberg 2, Hagit Messer 1 1. Tel Aviv.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Face Recognition Using Neural Networks Presented By: Hadis Mohseni Leila Taghavi Atefeh Mirsafian.
Yiftah Silver Tel Aviv University September 27 th 2012.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Position Reconstruction in Miniature Detector Using a Multilayer Perceptron By Adam Levine.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Using a neural network approach for muon reconstruction and triggering ACAT03, KEK, December 2003 Erez Etzion 1,2, Halina Abramowicz 1, Yan Benhammou 1,
HADES coll. meeting, Oct. 31, 2007 Charged pion production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV results of data analysis from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 Jehad Mousa.
1 Th.Naumann, DESY Zeuthen, HERMES Tracking meeting, Tracking with the Silicon Detectors Th.Naumann H1 DESY Zeuthen A short collection of experiences.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
AIHENP-99 Momentum Reconstruction of Particles...1 Momentum Reconstruction of Particles in the Forward Muon Trigger System of the ATLAS Detector Gideon.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.
1 CMS Calorimetry & Neural Network Abstract We review an application of neural network feed forward algorithm in CMS calorimetry ( NIM A482(2002)p776 ).
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Roberto Barbera (Alberto Pulvirenti) University of Catania and INFN ACAT 2003 – Tsukuba – Combined tracking in the ALICE detector.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Digital Image Processing Lecture 17: Segmentation: Canny Edge Detector & Hough Transform Prof. Charlene Tsai.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Object-Oriented Track Reconstruction in the PHENIX Detector at RHIC Outline The PHENIX Detector Tracking in PHENIX Overview Algorithms Object-Oriented.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
FPGA Helix Tracking Algorithm -- VHDL implementation Yutie Liang, Martin Galuska, Thomas Geßler, Wolfgang Kühn, Jens Sören Lange, David Münchow, Björn.
by students Rozhkov G.V. Khalikov E.V. scientific adviser Iyudin A.F.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
April12 DST calibration status
Summary of “Efficient Deep Learning for Stereo Matching”
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
G.Lamanna (CERN) NA62 Collaboration Meeting TDAQ-WG
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Update on the FPGA Online Tracking Algorithm
The LHC collider in Geneva
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Early Processing in Biological Vision
Binocular Stereo Vision
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Alignment of the PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker (VTX) in 2014
Soumya Chatterjee, Edward M. Callaway  Neuron 
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central Tracking Detector FermiLab, October 2000 Erez Etzion 1, Gideon Dror 2, David Horn 1, Halina Abramowicz 1 1. Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 HERA High energy e – p scattering probe deep inside the proton in order to study its constituents structure Study substructure of quarks, electrons, N and C current procesesss, tests of QCD and search fo new particles Ee=27.5 GeV, Ep=820GeV

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 ZEUS 3 level trigger Collision every 96 nsec (10MHz), FLT ~ 1MHz, SLT<100Khz

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Zeus Central Tracking Detector 205 cm long, 18.2<R<79.4. Magnetic field 1.43 T wires, 4608 signal wires, 9 superlayers (8 wire layer each) Axial wires Superlayer 1,3,5,7,9, Stereo (+/- 50) 2,4,6,8. 1,3,5 – z meas. (+/- 4cm)

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Input Data The Input SLT data: Xy position of superlayers 1,3,5,7,9 Z-by-timing in 1,3,5 (red)

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Ghost hits

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Z measurement uncertinties Example of z Meas. Uncertainty Left – single track in xy; Right – z vs r

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 The Network Based on step-wise changes in the data representation: input points ->local line segments- >global arcs. Two parallel networks: 1.Construct arcs & correctly find some of the tracks 2.Evaluate z location of the interaction point

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Arc Identification Network Follow the primary visual system Input neurons (the retina like) cover 5000cm 2 Neuron fire when hitted in its receptive field. (xy) Second layer – line segment detector (XY  ). An active 2ed layer=line segment centered at XY with angle 

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Receptive fields of line segment neuron A line segment centered about the central black dot with orientation parallel to the oblique line is connected to the input neurons(squares) with weight: pink +1 Blue=-1 Yellow=0

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Third layer Network A track from the IP project into circle in r-  Transform the representation of local line segments into arc segments. A neuron is labled by  I (curvature, slope and ring). Mapping = winner take all.

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Arc Identification last stage Neurons are global arc detectors. Detect tracks projected in z=0 plane. Each active neuron  is equivalent in the xy plane to one arc in the plot.

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 z Location Network Similar architecture to the first net A first layer input from the receptive field as its corresponding neuron in the first net. Get the mean of the z values of the points within the receptieve field. Second layer compute the mean value of the z of the first layer. The z averaging procedure is similary propagated to the third layer. Last layer evaluate the z value of the origin of each arc identified by the first network by simple linear extrapolation. The final z estimate of the vertex is calculated by averaging the output of all active fourth layer neurons.

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 z-location resolution

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Number of track found

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Network Performance Study performed with 324 Networks Sigma vs number of neurons Small correlation -.26 The classical histogram method width ~8.5 cm.

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Network Performance (2) The network output width as a function of N1 and N2 N1=# neurons in the first layer N2=#neurons in the third layer

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 New developments and cross- checks Form lateral connection between 1 st layer, which enabled us to reduce threshold still with good signal to noise - > reduce network size. Study network size –> x10 reduction. parameters: size and shape of receptive fields in 1 st layer, resolution in k-theta space, range of k- values (loosing tracks with r<45 cm)

Vertex Reconstruction FermiLab, October 2000 Summary FF double NN for pattern identification, selecting a subset of which is simple to derive the answer. Fixed architecture – can be implemented in HW. 1 st NN partial tracking in xy. The 2ed NN handles z-values of the trajectories estimating the z arcs origin. Performance is better than the “clasical method”.