November 200667th Diego Requirements for delivering MPLS services over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-02.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
All Rights Reserved © Alcatel-Lucent 2006, ##### Scalability of IP/MPLS networks Lieven Levrau 30 th April, 2008 France Telecom, Cisco Systems, uawei Technologies,
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Introducing the TE Concept.
MPLS Over L3VPN Ron Bonica. Reference Model and Requirement 1 C0 CE1 CE2 C3 PE1 P1 Customer VPN Site A Customer VPN Site B Service Provider L3VPN Customer.
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
Draft-li-mpls-global-label-usecases-00IETF 88 SPRING WG1 Usecases of MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-global-label-usecases-00 Zhenbin Li, Quintin Zhao.
Pseudowire Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00 Rahul Aggarwal Yimin Shen
Draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/ draft-huang-i2rs-mpls-te-usecase-00 IETF 88 I2RS1 Use Cases for an Interface to MPLS Protocol draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/
Draft-li-ccamp-auto-mbb-te-path-00IETF 88 CCAMP1 IGP Extensions for Automatic Computation of MPLS Traffic Engineering Path Using Traffic Engineering Layers.
66th IETF Montreal July 2006 Requirements for delivering MPLS services Over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor.
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
Li Zhang, Zhenbin Li (Huawei Technologies) Dapeng Liu (China Mobile)
Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor Raymond Zhang BT Nabil Bitar Verizon
Diff-Serv-aware MPLS Traffic Engineering Network Management Information Base Using SMIv2 (draft-nadeau-mpls-dste-mib-01.txt) Thomas D. Nadeau
Lucy Yong Susan Hares September 20, 2012 Boston
514 Wrap-up. Summary of Course This was a course on modern Carrier Networks –i.e., how a telco might organise its IP network from the customer to the.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
61st IETF Washington DC November 2004 BGP/MPLS IP Multicast VPNs draft-yasukawa-l3vpn-p2mp-mcast-00.txt Seisho Yasukawa (NTT) Shankar Karuna (Motorola)
UNI Extensions for Diversity and Latency Support 13-Mar-13IETF 86 Orlando1 Don Dieter.
Metro Ethernet and evolution of Virtual Private LAN Services (VPLS) K. A. K. Perera MEng CEng MIET Deputy General Manager Data Services & VoIP Sri Lanka.
Forward-Search P2P/P2MP TE LSP Inter-Domain Path Computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2p-path-computation draft-chen-pce-forward-search-p2mp-path.
Draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-02.txt IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations Olaf Bonness, Tim Chown, Christian Hahn, Ciprian Popoviciu, Gunter Van de.
MLPP Update Fred Baker/James Polk. Drafts in question draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlef-concerns-00.txt draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-00.txt draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-00.txt.
1 Requirements for MPLS Over a Composite Link draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-02 Authors: C. Villamizar, Ed.D. McDysan, Ed. S. Ning A. Malis L. Yong Contributors:
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02.txt.
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
1 Path Computation Element (PCE) Architecture (draft-ash-pce-architecture-01.txt) Jerry Ash AT&T Adrian Farrell Old Dog Consulting
Draft-boutros-l2vpn-evpn-vpws-00.txt Sami Boutros Ali Sajassi Samer Salam IETF 84, July 2012 Vancouver, Canada.
Support for RSVP in Layer 3 VPNs draft-davie-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-01.txt Bruce Davie François le Faucheur Ashok Narayanan Cisco Systems.
73rd IETF Minneapolis Nov Framework and Requirements for Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS) draft-kamite-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-02.txt.
Draft-asati-bgp-mpls-blackhole-avoidance-00.txt1 BGP/MPLS Traffic Blackhole Avoidance Proposal draft-asati-bgp-mpls-blackhole-avoidance-00 Rajiv Asati.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
1 draft-behringer-mpls-vpn-auth-05.txt62nd IETF, Minneapolis, 7-11 Mar 2005 MPLS VPN Import/Export Verification draft-behringer-mpls-vpn-auth-05.txt Michael.
1 BGP Traffic Engineering Attribute draft-fedyk-bgp-te-attribute-03.txt Yakov Rekhter, Don Fedyk, Hamid Ould-Brahim IETF 70 th, Vancouver Meeting, CCAMP,
Applicability of PCE for Computing Protection Paths draft-chen-pce-protection-applicability Huaimo Chen, Huawei.
L1VPN Extended Overlay Model draft-fedyk-ccamp-l1vpn-extnd-overlay-00 Don Dieter
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 Multicast in VPLS draft-raggarwa-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-00.txt Rahul Aggarwal.
Inter-AS PCE Requirements draft-bitar-zhang-interas-PCE-req-01.txt Nabil Bitar (Verizon) Dean Cheng (Cisco) Kenji Kumaki (KDDI) Raymond Zhang (BT Infonet)
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Draft-deoliveira-diff-te-preemption-02.txt J. C. de Oliveira, JP Vasseur, L. Chen, C. Scoglio Updates: –Co-author: JP Vasseur –New preemption criterion.
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
MEF Protection Work Pascal Menezes Technical Contributor June 3 rd 2003.
61st IETF Washington DC, Nov GMPLS Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Requirements GMPLS Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Requirements draft-otani-ccamp-interas-gmpls-te-01.txt.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
Support for RSVP-TE in L3VPNs Support for RSVP-TE in L3VPNs draft-kumaki-murai-ccamp-rsvp-te-l3vpn-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI Corporation Tomoki Murai Furukawa.
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection Huaimo.
1 Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks draft-mpls-mpls-gmpls-security-framework-03.txt Luyuan Fang Michael Behringer Ross Callon Jean-Luis Le.
Extension of the MLD proxy functionality to support multiple upstream interfaces 1 Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos.
11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 1 Inter-AS MPLS TE Requirements draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-01.txt IETF 58, Minneapolis
IP/MPLS VPN Protocol GAP Analysis For NVO3 draft-hy-nvo3-vpn-protocol-gap-analysis-02 Lucy Yong Susan Hares March 2013 Orlando FL.
Segment Routing Traffic Engineering
P2MP LSP for IPTV 이동 무선 네트워크 연구실 홍 석 준
draft-zhao-teas-pcecc-use-cases-03
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks (L1VPNs) Basic Mode draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-00.txt Deborah Brungard (AT&T)
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
Tomohiro Otani Kenji Kumaki Satoru Okamoto Wataru Imajuku
<draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-dste-02
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
PCEP extensions for a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection
Extensions to RSVP-TE for P2MP LSP Ingress/Egress Local Protection
Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
WG Document Status Compiled By: Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram
WG Document Status Compiled By: Matt Hartley, Lou Berger, Vishnu Pavan Beeram IETF TEAS Working Group.
Presentation transcript:

November th Diego Requirements for delivering MPLS services over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-02.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor Raymond Zhang BT

November th Diego Summary of this draft This draft is to: –Clarify issues for an e2e MPLS TE LSP over BGP/MPLS IP-VPNs –Describe the reference model, application scenarios and specific requirements for these LSPs

November th Diego Reference model Service Provider’s network Customer’s or another SP’s network Customer’s or another SP’s network P-TE LSPs Vrf instances C-TE LSPs CE C C PE PP

November th Diego Application Scenario(1) The PE should choose an appropriate P-TE LSP based on local policy. –Preemption priority Voice : priority 0 The P-TE LSP head-end should control the bandwidth of C-TE LSP. DS-TE support for C-TE LSPs and P-TE LSPs Fast protection between CE1 and CE3 CE1 and CE3 may work as a PCC and PEs may work as a PCE. SP’s network CE1 PE CE2 CE3 Customer’s site P P P P SIP proxy server User agent client User agent server Primary LSP Backup LSP Priority 0,bandwidth 1M Priority 0,bandwidth 1G

November th Diego Application Scenario(2) SP A network CE PE CE SP B network C0 C1 C2 P P P P Priority 0,bandwidth 1G Priority 1,bandwidth 2G Priority 0,bandwidth 100M The PE should choose an appropriate P-TE LSP based on local policy. –Preemption priority Priority 0 : voice Priority 1 : video and television The P-TE LSP head-end should control the bandwidth of C-TE LSP. Fast Protection between CEs (voice) Load balancing of traffic across primary and secondary LSP to minimize the traffic disruption in case of a link or a PE failure (video and television) DS-TE support for C-TE LSPs and P-TE LSPs CEs may work as a PCC and PEs may work as a PCE. Priority 1,bandwidth 200M Primary LSP Secondary LSP Backup LSP

November th Diego Major Changes from -01 Added two Application Scenarios in Section 5 –Enterprise case –Service Provider case Added an Application Scenario in Appendix A –RSVP Aggregation over MPLS TE Tunnels

November th Diego Remaining Issues Any other specific requirements?

November th Diego Next Actions Need more comments and feedback from WG Work with other WGs? Request WG to accept this I-D as a WG document