What are Delta Participants Learning about the Practice of Teaching? NSF Supplement Pillar Study CIRTL Network Meeting – Project Update (10/21/10) Chris.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The CIRTL Network 2010: The CIRTL Network 2010: Taking Stock University of Colorado at Boulder Howard University Michigan State University Texas A&M University.

Advertisements

Don Gillian-Daniel Associate Director Delta Program in Research, Teaching and Learning University of Wisconsin-Madison In collaboration with… Riqué Campa.

The Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning CIRTL-Network Meeting June 3 – 4, 2009 College Station Texas A&M.

CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING University of Colorado at Boulder, Howard University, Michigan State University, Texas A&M.

Folahan O. Ayorinde, Ph.D. Folahan O. Ayorinde, Ph.D. CIRTL Network Meeting CIRTL Network Meeting June 3-4, 2009 June 3-4, 2009 Texas A&M University Texas.

Increasing Capacity: Website Increasing Capacity: Network Communications and Promotion.

Initiative on K-12 Teacher Preparation Natasha Speer, Univ. of Maine Tim Scott and Omah Williams, Texas A & M Noah Finkelstein, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.

CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING University of Colorado at Boulder, Howard University, Michigan State University, Texas A&M.

III. Demonstrated skills in teaching and learning... Curriculum Vitae University of Wisconsin - Madison Madison, Wisconsin Your Name i)Ability to.

CIRTL Network Meeting: Overview Ann Austin Texas A&M University June 3, 2009.

Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) NSF Center for Learning and Teaching University of Wisconsin - Madison Michigan.

CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING University of Colorado at Boulder, Howard University, Michigan State University, Texas A&M.

CIRTL Impact on the Nation University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University of Michigan Carleton College Madison Area Tech College U.S.G.S Purdue University.

1 Name: Person responsible: Time Commitment: # times offered: Primary Audience: Participants per offering: Total participation: Enter your institution.

CIRTL Spring Meeting TAMU June U.S. doctoral education needs to meet policymakers rising expectations: Currently grad ed provides limited preparation.

Follow-Up Workshop on Institutional Evaluation Plans March-April, 2009.

Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Reform and Innovation in Higher Education

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,

An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections

Core Curriculum for Clinical Coaching Intro - VNIP Model

Collaboration Works! 10/20/20101 Planning Research Institutional Effectiveness.

What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.

Team Teaching Section 7: Monitoring Teacher. The Monitoring Teacher model One teacher assumes the responsibility for instructing the entire class. The.

ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.

Section 4 Coursework Requirements 1.State federal laws, regulations and case law affecting Illinois public schools; 2. State and federal laws, regulations.

Team Teaching Section 5: Parallel Instruction. The Parallel Instruction model In this setting, the class is divided into two groups and each teacher is.

Student Engagement and Liberal Arts at Truman State University Analyzing Faculty/Student Perceptions Spring 2006 Assessment Internship Chris Roberts and.

1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.

GINGER HOLDEN, LEARNING COMMUNITIES COORDINATOR Innovative Collaborations: Enhance Your Teaching, Enrich Student Learning.

 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 

Data Collection and Preliminary Analysis Our survey addressed the first two of the questions presented in this study. The Qualtrics survey was framed by.

CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING A national network of 25 research universities committed to using graduate education to.

What We Are About! Ain Shams Univ., Cairo University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Tufts University Lawrence University Utah State University University.

Common Core Update – Opening March 11, Common Core Standards  What are the Common Core Standards?  How do the Common Core Standards compare to.

CIRTL Impact on the Nation University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign University of Michigan Carleton College Madison Area Tech College U.S.G.S Purdue University.

FACULTY DEVELOPMENT Options for the Future Bruce Cordell Dan Tesar 8/9/05.

Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.

NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.

Funded by the Library of Congress.

Assessment Research and Tools: when, why, how? Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University

Learning Initiatives to Improve Undergraduate Education at a Research-Oriented Institution Robin R. Rastani * and Michel A. Wattiaux Department of Dairy.

Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal

Integrate English as a Second Language (ESL) strategies into the teacher preparation program for all students the semester prior to student teaching. Require.

CIRTL Curriculum Committee ET/2- 3 CT/1-12 MT/12-1 PT Begin by running the Audio Setup Wizard, Select :

Elaine Baker, Baker Communications, Inc. Laura Hope, Chaffey College Kelley Karandjeff, RP Group Center for Student Success Contextualized Teaching &

WELCOME Please help yourself to refreshments and: introduce yourself to the colleagues at your table fill out your Support Provider survey LAUSD BTSA Induction.

Developing An Excellent Education Plan for your Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program Proposal.

Interdisciplinary Terms for an Integrated Social Studies and English Curriculum.

©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Instructional Planning.

1 Name: Post-Doctoral Professional Development Program Person responsible: Dr. Robert Webb & Gurlovleen Rathore Time Commitment: As many or as few as time.

Assessing student learning in Delta’s Diversity in the College Classroom: Achievement Gap course Don Gillian-Daniel University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Transforming Geoscience Preparation for K-8 Pre-Service Teachers at St. Norbert College.

CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting 11:00-12:00 ET/ 10:00-11:00 CT/ 9:00-10:00 MT / 8:00-9:00 PT This meeting will be recorded.

The Impact of CIRTL on Member Institutions Lucas Hill, Ann E. Austin Michigan State University Summary Methods What do institutions gain from Network Participation?

1 Program Details Name: TIGER DAD (Design & Development) of College Pedagogy Courses Persons responsible: Laura Border, PJ Bennett, Vivek Kaila, Abby Watrous,

Robin Greenler Cross-Network Coordinator Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) The CIRTL Cross-Network Learning.

CIRTL Needs Assessment Meeting 3:00-4:00 ET/ 2:00-3:00 CT/ This meeting will be recorded Begin by running the Audio.

1 Vanderbilt University Name: Vanderbilt TAR Fellows Program Persons responsible: Thomas R. Harris, Derek Bruff, Jean Alley Time Commitment: Introductory.

CIRTL Network Meeting October,  To guide program development and evaluation  To identify the purposes of specific programs to participants and.

Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.

Conceptual Framework: The Reflective Practitioner

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan

ACTIVE LECTURE Amy Chase Martin

Building Relationships for UNLV Students’ Success

EdTPA: An Overview.

ECH 514 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com

Assignment Design Workshop

WAC & English Language Learners

Presentation transcript:

What are Delta Participants Learning about the Practice of Teaching? NSF Supplement Pillar Study CIRTL Network Meeting – Project Update (10/21/10) Chris Pfund & Brian Manske University of Wisconsin-Madison

Research Data CC DCC InEd ETT IMD ISIF Courses n = 21 CCLE EL Intern Programs n = 20 CC= The College Classroom, DCC = Diversity in the College Classroom, InEd = Informal Education, ETT = Effective Teaching with Technology, IMD = Instructional Materials Development, ISIF = International Students, International Faculty; CCLE = Creating a Collaborative Learning Environment, EL = Expeditions in Learning, Intern = Internship Seminar Participants n = 312 SatisfactionLearningApplicationParticipation Final Evaluations

Final Evaluation Questions 1.What major concepts* are you taking away from this course, program or activity that will affect your practice as an educator? If possible, please give 23 specific examples. 2.Suppose that you were preparing to teach some scientific concept from your discipline (e.g., the nitrogen cycle, amplitude, statistical significance, human development in early childhood). Describe the steps that you would take to do so, based on what youve learned in this course, program or activity. *Please note: Questions did NOT specifically ask participants to name or describe the pillars

Study Objectives Identify the teaching and learning themes present in participant responses to the two final evaluation questions Examine the occurrence of pillar language and concepts within these themes

Coding Bins w/ Example

WORDLE ( Words removed for readability: teaching, students, learning, class, concept, different

Theme Prevalence by Respondent

Pillar Related Themes Learning Goals & Outcomes Assessment & Evaluation Teaching-as-Research (by name) Learning Style Inclusive Teaching Diverse Students Learning-through-Diversity (by name) Group Work Community Learning Community (by name) LC LtD TAR

Discussion Questions 1.What do we expect Delta Program (and CIRTL Network Program) participants to say about their teaching practice? What would be a satisfactory answer? What themes/ elements would it include? 2.Do we expect CIRTL Network participants to integrate the pillars into descriptions of their teaching practice? A.By name? B.Conceptually? C.To what level of detail? 3.If we expect integration of the pillars and/or pillar- related concepts across the CIRTL Network, what participant outcomes will indicate success? 4.To what extent does common language matter in the CIRTL Network community?