1 ARR and Transmission Tariff Proposal of OPTCL for FY 2007-08 Together, let us light up our lives. ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAPTER22 CASH FLOW STATEMENTS.
Advertisements

1 A Presentation on ARR & Tariff Proposal of OPTCL for FY Analysis/Objections/Suggestions February 6, 2008 By Dr. Shibalal Meher (Consumer Counsel)
OPEN ACCESS IN INTER-STATE TRANSMISSION. DEFINITION OF “ OPEN ACCESS ” IN THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 “The non-discriminatory provision for the use of transmission.
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of NESCO for FY on
ESTIMATES Mrs.Nirupma Kumar Prof. Fin & Investment.
Analysis of ARR & Tariff Proposal of WESCO for FY February 07, 2011 World Institute of Sustainable Energy (Consumer Counsel)
BUDGET: A TECHNICAL INTRODUCTION. ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT: the core budget document, shows estimated receipts and disbursements by the Government of.
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of OHPC for FY on
Analysis of ARR & Tariff Proposal of SLDC Consumer Counsel.
Understanding Your Financial Requirements
© 1999 by Robert F. Halsey Agenda Review Accrual Basis Income Statements Importance of Cash Flow Preparation of Statement of Cash Flows Interpretation.
ACCOUNTING MECHANISM. Accounting Documents and Records.
1 Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making, 4th Ed. Kimmel, Weygandt, Kieso CHAPTER 1 Prepared by Dr. Joseph Otto CSLA.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Financial Aspects of a Business Plan
12-1 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Financial Accounting, Sixth Edition 12.
1 A Presentation on ARR & Tariff Proposal of GRIDCO for FY Analysis/Objections/Suggestions February 7, 2008 By Dr. Shibalal Meher (Consumer Counsel)
1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS w The Balance Sheet enables a banker to assess the financial position of a company / unit and assists him in forming a.
Section 36.2 Financial Aspects of a Business Plan
1 Understanding of Financial Statement 1. Balance Sheet 2. Income Statement 3. Statement of appropriation of retained earnings 4. Cash Flow Statement 5.
Faculty: Ms. Luvnica Rastogi Amity International Business School Imp Website:
Financial Statement Basics Roy Williams – FHA Deputy Chief Underwriter.
Billing, Collection and Disbursement Procedures
Balance sheet on Assets (mln. bel. rubles) Long-term assets _____________________ Intangibles assets ___________________ current.
1 APresentationon ARR & Tariff Proposal of OHPC for FY BroadSuggestions/Objections Broad Suggestions/Objections February 7, 2007 Together, let.
1 A Presentation on ARR & Tariff Proposal of NESCO for FY Analysis/Objections/Suggestions By Dr. Shibalal Meher (Consumer Counsel) Nabakrushna.
Presentation on CERC Discussion Paper on Tariff Norms By powergrid.
BASIC TERMINOLIGIES USED IN FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING BY: WAQAR AHMAD LECTURER MANAGEMENT SCIENCE DEPARTMENT RANA UNIVERSITY KABUL, AFGHANISTAN.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter Thirteen: Statement of Cash Flows.
T HE F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS OF THE LIMITED C OMPANIES AND C ASH F LOW S TATEMENT Profit&Loss Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statements.
24-1. The Statement of Cash Flows Section 1: Sources and Uses of Cash Chapter 24 Section Objectives 1.Distinguish between operating, investing, and financing.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CASH FLOW ANALYSIS CHAPTER 24.
Financial Accounting 1 Lecture – 41 Profit and Loss Account Shows profit earned or loss sustained from the operations of the business during the period.
Requirements of the Standard IAS 7
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Accounting Principles, Eighth Edition
FUNCTIONS OF COMMERCIAL BANKING
Section 7.5 –4 – ii of Indian Electricity Grid code (IEGC): “The summation of station-wise ex-power plant drawal schedules for all ISGS after deducting.
Chapter 17-1 Chapter 17 Statement of Cash Flows Accounting Principles, Ninth Edition.
Notified on April 10,2015. Practically  (1 st part) Main Audit Report (2 nd part) Annexure which is covered by S.A. 700 which is covered by CARO.
Analysis of ARR & Tariff Proposal of SOUTHCO for FY February 10, 2011 By World Institute of Sustainable Energy (Consumer Counsel)
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and BSP Application of GRIDCO for FY on
1 Analysis of OPTCL’s ARR and Transmission tariff for FY By: World Institute of Sustainable Energy, Pune (Consumer Counsel) 4 th February, 2011.
Analysis of ARR & Tariff Proposal of OHPC World Institute of Sustainable Energy Consumer Counsel.
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of SLDC for FY on
Atrill, McLaney, Harvey, Jenner: Accounting 4e © 2008 Pearson Education Australia 1 Accounting for Management Decisions WEEK 6 MEASURING AND REPORTING.
Balance Sheet/Off Balance Sheet Balance Sheet It is a statement of a bank’s financial position (as of a specific date) listing: –assets owned, –liabilities.
Analysis of ARR & Tariff Proposal of NESCO for FY February 09, 2011 By World Institute of Sustainable Energy (Consumer Counsel)
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of OPTCL for FY on
1 A Presentation on ARR & Tariff Proposal of SLDC for FY Analysis/Objections/Suggestions February 8, 2008 By Dr. Shibalal Meher (Consumer Counsel)
Credit Risk. Possibility of loss from the failure of loan or debt instrument repayments. Change in the repayment capacity of borrowers or debt instruments.
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of OPTCL for FY on
PROF. MS. TRUPTI NAIK Accounting Terms (Semester I)
Preparing Financial Documents The Income Statement & Balance Sheet.
Submitted to:Submitted by: Ms. Nisha AggarwalSunayana Khanduja (4279) Dhruvika Sharma(4321)
ARR & Price Proposal of GRIDCO For FY and Views of Stakeholders February 15, 2007 Together, let us light up our lives. ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY.
CHAPTER 14 Statement of Cash Flows. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 2008McGraw-Hill/Irwin 14-2 Reporting Format for the Statement of Cash Flows The Statement.
Finanacial Statements Balance Sheet & Profit and Loss Account.
Financial Accounting II Lecture 14. Presentation and Disclosure of Assets in Balance Sheet Areas Covered.
Chapter 36 Financing the Business Section 36.1 Preparing Financial Documents Section 36.2 Financial Aspect of a Business Plan Section 36.1 Preparing Financial.
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and BSP Application of GRIDCO for FY on
Chapter 11 Statement of Cash Flows
Chapter 9 Financial Statements.
Chapter 36 Financing the Business
Queries raised by Director (Tariff) on ARR and Tariff Application of CESU for FY on
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITIES
Dr.S.S.Jadhav Head, Dept of Commerce mrs.k.s.k. college beed
Accounting for Assets Cash Flows.
Accounting for Construction Projects
Presentation transcript:

1 ARR and Transmission Tariff Proposal of OPTCL for FY Together, let us light up our lives. ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

2 Transmission Assets of OPTCL Voltage Level (KV) Length of Line in Ckt-Km No. of Bays Total OPTCL has 75 grid sub-stations including switching Stations.

3 Sources of Revenue for Sl.No.Customer MU approved for MU proposed to be Handled ( ) Rate (P/U) Energy Handled before Transmission Loss (MU) Amount Rs. Crore 1.CESCO NESCO WESCO SOUTHCO Total DISTCO Emergency sale to CPP Wheeling of ICCL power Wheeling of NALCO power Total  OPTCL will earn miscellaneous receipt of Rs.3 crore from inter-state wheeling of 300 paise/unit.

4 Revenue Requirement Item Approval for FY OPTCL’s Proposal for FY Employee Cost A&G Cost Repair & Maintenance Cost Depreciation Advance against Depreciation Interest on Long Term Liabilities Interest on Working Capital Reasonable Return-8.40 a) Sub-Total b) Pass Through Expenses c) Additional Expenses (Contingency Reserve + GCC Expense) d) Total ARR (a + b + c) e) Less inter-state wheeling f) Net Transmission Cost (ARR) = d - e Note : (i) No. of employees 5022 (ii) OPTCL should provide actuals for and first half of in respect of revenue requirement.

5 Repair & Maintenance Expenses YearApprovedActual (Provisional) (Proposed)  Actual R & M Expenses have been much less compared to the approved figures.

6 Principal as on Interest Approved for Interest Proposed for Total Govt. Loans Total Institutional Loans Total Secured Loan Total GRIDCO Bonds Total Deposit from EHT Consumers Other Loans and Finance charges--- Total Less Interest Capitalization5.00 New Projects Loans in Grand Total Loan Details (Rs Crore)

7 Depreciation & AAD The detailed Statement of Fixed Assets and block-wise computation of depreciation is given as under: Rs. in Crore Fixed Assets Depreciation Rate prescribed by CERC Gross Block ( ) (As per GoO Transfer Notification) Gross Block As on (Provisional) Proposed Depreciation For (Rate as per CERC) Land and Rights Buildings 1.80% Plant and Machinery- (Other Civil Work) 1.80% Plant and Machinery 2.57% Plant and Machinery - (Lines, Cables & Network Assets) 2.57% , Vehicles 18.00% Furniture, Fixture 6.00% Office Equipment 6.00% Total  OPTCL proposes Advanced Against Depreciation (AAD) of Rs cr based on CERC norm.  OPTCL should have provided loan repayment schedule and compared the same with allowed depreciation to justify the necessity of AAD.

8 Pass Through Expenses  The details of past losses & estimated uncovered gap during FY & FY , are shown in the table below: Summary of uncovered expensesAmount (Rs. in Cr.) Sl. NoItemsUn-Covered Gap 1 Loss for FY (based on Provisional Accounts for FY ) Expected Uncovered gap during FY Employees Cost including Terminal Benefits for (Prorated based on Apr'06 to Sep'06) OERC Approval for Interest on Loans As per Repayment Schedule OERC Approval for Repayment of Principal As per Repayment Schedule OERC Approval for Depreciation & Advance Against Depreciation Total  What about transmission charges on account of export of power and Open Access customers?

9 Excess or Deficit in ARR & Tariff Design Excess or Deficit in ARR for is shown below: ItemTariff Proposal for Total Net ARR to be raised through Tariff (Rs. Crore) Expected Revenue at existing Transmission Tariff i.e. 22 P/U (Rs Cr.) Excess or Deficit in ARR (Rs Crore) Tariff Options : Option 1 : Monthly Fixed Transmission Cost for Recovery (Rs Crore) Option 2 : Total Energy for Transmission (MU)16310 Proposed Transmission Tariff (P/U)41.41

10 Schedule of Transmission Charges Transmission Rs crore per month P/U shall be applicable for the purpose of transmission energy from generator end to the substation. Transmission charge shall be applicable on prorata basis on quantum of energy delivered to long-term customers. Long Terms Open Access Charges shall be Rs /MW/Day and Short Term Open Access Charges shall be Rs /MW/Day in addition to other applicable charges and losses. Rebate shall be 2% of the amount of the monthly bill if full payment is made within 48 hours of presentation of bill. 1.5% of the amount of monthly bill, if a minimum of 85% of whole amount is paid within 48 hours and 1% on the balance amount if paid in full within 15 days. 1% of the monthly bill if full payment is made within 15 days from the date of presentation of the bill. DPS : If the payment is not made within 30 days, 2% shall be levied prorata for the period of delay from the due date. Duty & Taxes : ED levied by the State Government and any other Statutory levy/duty/tax/cess/toll imposed under any law shall be charged over and above the Tariff.

11 Time & Cost Overrun OPTCL is required to justify the huge amount of loan (Rs cr) taken for new projects during OPTCL does not make cost-benefit analysis of delaying a project and also the revenue earning thereof. Delay in completion of the on going projects has added to interest during construction. This has raised project cost and finally transmission tariff. Why the same shall be allowed in revenue requirement?

12 Views of Stakeholders

13 Views of Stakeholders Transmission Costs: Some stakeholders estimate employees cost at Rs crore while some others stated this should be based on the approved cost for Others stated that in absence of the figures relating to man-power for & , the projection of employees cost at Rs crore is not justified. OPTCL has proposed O&M cost of Rs. 250 crore based on CERC norms mentioned for inter-State transmission system of Power Grid Corp of India. OPTCL’s proposal for investment towards Contingency Reserve does not find support in the OERC Tariff Regulation, 2004 and National Tariff Policy. No reasonable return may be allowed to OPTCL along the lines of thinking adopted for the year The R&M cost, depreciation and interest cost have been over stated and should be determined based on the norms adopted by the Commission for

14 Views of Stakeholders Transmission Costs: Cont… The Original Cost of Fixed Assets should not be based on the up rated value of the assets as on Depreciation calculated by OPTCL at Rs crore for needs detailed verification and may have to be trimmed. Some stakeholders considered depreciation of Rs crore to be allowed during Regarding short fall of repayment of loan over and above the allowed depreciation, OPTCL may negotiate with the Banks / FIs for a longer tenure or moratorium for repayment of Principal. Some have suggested that advance against depreciation might be disallowed. Advance against depreciation is disallowed in the National tariff policy based on which ATE has also disallowed the same. OPTCL has not provided a comparative chart of loan repayment and allowable depreciation to justify provision of AAD.

15 Views of Stakeholders Tariff: National Electricity policy envisaged a tariff mechanism sensitive to distance, direction and quantum of flow. The Commission may determine transmission tariff for based on the approved norms for Taking the quantum of energy handled as MU, the transmission tariff has been calculated at 17.3 P/U by one stakeholder. Further, there is scope to reduce tariff to 15 P/U. Some stakeholders estimated transmission tariff at 13 paisa per unit. Transmission tariff should not be made applicable to CGPs operating in the State for wheeling of their power. Wheeling charges for the CGPs should be reduced. Proposed STOA rate appears to be higher as compared to those in the neighboring states. LTOA charges may be fixed at Rs /MW/day and STOA charges at Rs /MW/day for

16 Views of Stakeholders Transmission Loss: Most stakeholders did not agree with OPTCL’s proposal of 5% transmission loss. The reasons stated to enhance the “transmission loss” to 5.00%, against the target of 3.70% is unacceptable. Based on the previously allowed loss figure of 3.58% in and stipulated reduction of 0.3% per year, the present allowable transmission loss for should be 2.38% only. However, transmission loss of 3% may be allowed during Some submitted that the transmission loss should be less than 4%. SOVEN KANUNGO COMMITTEE had recommended a stepwise reduction of transmission loss so that the same is brought down to a level at par with that of CTU (i.e. the POWER GRID) by OPTCL should be directed to reduce the transmission loss to a level below 3% in coming 3 years starting from with a base level loss of 4% as approved by the Commission for

17 Views of Stakeholders Finance : An amount of approx Rs. 75 crore may be allowed towards interest payable against OPTCL’s proposal of Rs crore. Some stakeholders computed the interest on loan based on the principle adopted by OERC and put the same at Rs crore. As the loan base is yet to be divided in to capital expenditure loan and working capital loan, no interest on loan be allowed to OPTCL in the ARR The amount claimed for pass through of previous losses and liabilities, needs a detailed examination by OERC. The claim made by OPTCL towards past losses has no merit as these items were already dealt in the ARR of

18 Views of Stakeholders Transmission Projects: Delay in completion of the on going projects has added to interest during construction. This has raised project cost and finally transmission tariff. Why the same shall be allowed in revenue requirement? OPTCL has not furnished firm dates to complete the ongoing transmission lines. OPTCL should be directed to complete all the projects as per the target dates fixed by the Commission. OPTCL’s filing do not indicate as to how many lines at different voltage levels are operating under normative surge impedance loading as per CERC guidelines. The ARR application does not throw any light on transmission planning and systematic investment required to construct the EHT lines / substations to develop the requisite evacuation system in order to meet the additional power demand of 9000 MW of Orissa Power Sector by 2010/2011.

19