Presented on January 20, 2012. ◦ Services 2 23 fixed routes, 10 specials, 67 peak buses 108 vans, 95 daily vehicle runs Zone defined general public demand.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

Berks County Proposed 2011 Budget County Commissioners Meeting November 16, 2010.
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
HART Transit Development Plan June 20, Overview TDP Purpose Plan Elements – Vision Plan – Status Quo Plan – Action Program Next Steps.
MacombGov.org Whether it’s Business, Family, or Pleasure…… Make Macomb Your Home! July 11, 2013 Annual Budget and Forecast Fiscal Years Ending December.
Medium Term Financial Plan (MTFP) April MTFP The MTFP is a high-level forecasting model that enables the Council to assess the financial direction.
Getting the Community Involved in Dealing with Current Financial Realities May 17, 2012 Mohsin Dada CFP® CFO North Shore School District 112, Highland.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
Butler Area Rural Transit FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
TWU 234 Wage Increases 1  Pattern wage increases —$1,250 lump sum payment —1.5% increase in July 2010 —1.0% increase in December 2010 —2.5% increase in.
Greene County Transportation. Transit Agency Status FY  Current Financial Position  Current Operations  Service Statistics/Trends  Funding.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions Capital Status Review.
Presented by Robert Fiume November 10, Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends.
Suburban Transit Network, Inc. (TransNet) FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends.
TOWN OF HAMPDEN 2011/2012 PROPOSED BUDGET INFORMATION.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Presented on January 20, ◦ Services 2 3 fixed routes, 1 bus 23 vans, 19 daily vehicle runs.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
1. Our Mission 2 To provide a reasonable level of safe, reliable, convenient, and affordable public transportation to the region’s residents.
Bucks County Transport, Inc. Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other.
County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs) December 5, 2007.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
1 A Review of MCPS Budget Category 12 Office of Legislative Oversight Report Presentation to Montgomery County Board of Education Fiscal Management.
AGENCY OVERVIEW Fixed Route Service / Direct Service, ADA Complementary Paratransit service Service 3 municipalities 4 Routes (Blue, Red, Green & The LOOP)
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Proposed 2011 Medical Plan Design June 8,  Background  Recommended Strategy  Summary  Next Steps  Action Requested Presentation Outline.
Cleveland Municipal School District Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Overview.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Wherever Your Path May Lead …. RTS Takes You There! New City Commissioner Presentation April, 2014.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
FY13 Student Tuition Consultation SFMC – March 22,
1 Huntingdon Bedford Fulton Area Agency on Aging CART.
1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.
CamTran At A Glance CamTran: Cambria County Transit Authority established in 1976 Service Area: Cambria County & Windber Provider of Fixed Route, Shared.
FY Budget Briefing General Fund Operating Budget and Fees & Charges.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions Capital Status Review Last.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
LYNX FY2013 Budget Presentation Orange County Board of County Commissioners John M. Lewis, Jr. LYNX Chief Executive Officer July 17, 2012.
1 What is GASB? The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is an independent, non-profit organization organized in 1984 by the Financial Accounting.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Wherever Your Path May Lead …. RTS Takes You There! FPTA /CTD 2015 Annual Training and Expo Marketing Network (FTMN) Session 1 Transit Discount Programs.
STRATEGIC BUDGET COMMITTEE CHARGE Develop model for a 5 year sustainable budget. The model budget should include strategies for cost reductions, recommendations.
1 FY2006 TDA Triennial Performance Audits Metropolitan Transportation Commission Programming & Allocations Committee October 4, 2006 GGBHTD (Golden Gate)
Financial & Budget Outlook City Council Strategic Planning Retreat March 19, 2012 Pueblo, Colorado.
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 7 OPERATING REVENUES: Fare revenue is above budget due to fare increases that became effective.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Financial Report through Q1 FY 2015 February 23, 2015
Wherever Your Path May Lead …. RTS Takes You There!
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Budget Development Discussion
Transit Agency Status FY
ADOPTED BUDGET FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30TH, 2019
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
DART Financial Plan and Fare Structure
Presentation transcript:

Presented on January 20, 2012

◦ Services 2 23 fixed routes, 10 specials, 67 peak buses 108 vans, 95 daily vehicle runs Zone defined general public demand response; integrated with LANtaVan

FY2011 Financial Position 3

4 (in 000s)FY2011 Current assets14,056 Noncurrent assets9,211 Capital assets, net18,300 Total assets41,567 Total liabilities17,294 Net assets: Invested in capital assets18,300 Restricted in net assets4,822 Unrestricted1,151 Total net assets24,273

 Current assets includes MATP receivable of $229K – estimated collection date is March 2012  Current liabilities includes line of credit balance of $3.2M – available line is $6M at an interest rate of prime + 0.5%  All accounts payable are current  Restricted net assets includes $4.8M of Act 44 Operating funding carryover  Unrestricted net assets includes $688K LANtaVan surplus 5

6 Revenues (in 000s) FY2011 Passenger fares5,544 Government fare assistance programs 6,996 Other operating revenues529 Nonoperating revenues17,709 Total revenues30,778

7 Operating Expenses (in 000s) FY2011 Wages7,250 Fringes6,664 Purchased transportation10,284 Fuel1,973 Insurance463 Other expenses3,298 Total operating expenses29,932

8 Net Assets (in 000s) FY2011 Invested in capital assets18,300 Restricted net assets Act 44 carryover4,791 Insurance reserves31 Unrestricted net assets LANtaVan surplus688 Other463 Total net assets24,273

FY2011 Current Operations 9

 Current organization chart is provided as Handout #1  There are no vacant positions  New bus operator and maintenance positions are planned as part of the implementation of Moving LANta Forward 10

Collective bargaining agreement term is 12/15/10 to 12/14/12. * Non-union employees 11 Bus OperatorsCurrentProjected FY13 Starting wage$10.87$11.20 Top wage$21.74$22.40 Average wage$19.12$19.70 Contract wage increase3% Job ClassificationNumber- Full TimeNumber-Part Time Bus operators1320 Maintenance workers240 Operations supervisors*110 General/administrative*143 Senior management*40

 Part-time employees are used in clerical positions only  Approximately 40% of bus operators are “split shift” drivers  Outsourcing report is provided as Handout #2  LANtaVan and LANtaFlex services are subcontracted through an RFP process 12

 Health plan overviews, including copayments and deductibles, are provided as Handout #3  Coverage and contributions are reviewed as part of collective bargaining  All employees receive same coverage  LANta is currently self-insured for health coverage. Total FY11 costs, including stop-loss premium, were $3M.  From 2007 to 2011, costs increased 2% per year.  LANta engages a consultant to review the estimated costs of self- insurance versus premium based plan  Employee contributions are 1% of gross wages based on a 40 hour work week. Maximum contribution is $500 annually.  Health plan covers employee, spouse and eligible dependent children  Retirees and spouses are covered to age 65 if employee retires between 62 and 65. No coverage for retirees after

 LANta administers and contributes to two defined benefit pension plans: the LANTA Union and LANta Non-Union Employees Pension Plans  Normal retirement age for both plans is 65  Early retirement under both plans is allowed at age 62 with 20 years of service  Participants in the Union plan make bi-weekly contributions of 3.5% of gross wages  Participants in the Non-Union plan make bi- weekly contributions of 3.0% of gross wages 14

 Plan descriptions and funding information is provided as Handout #4  Both plans are underfunded as a result of poor investment performance due to the current economic climate  The Union plan is 48% funded  The Non-Union plan is 65% funded 15

 LANta contributes the Minimum Municipal Obligation (“MMO”) to each plan  MMO is calculated by an independent actuary based on the current statute  LANta does not take advantage of protections available under Act 44, choosing to fund 100% of the amounts required to fund the plans 16

 Current Cost per Gallon ◦ Contract rate or market rate? Contract rate ◦ Terms of contract are provided as Handout #5 ◦ Includes purchase of fuel for LANtaVan  Projected Cost per Gallon and Basis for Projection ◦ Contract rate or market rate? Contract rate ◦ It is anticipated that the current contract terms/options will continue in future years 17

 Provide average fare: ◦ Current Amount ◦ Future Amount 18 Fare Type Date of Last IncreaseCurrent Amount Date of Planned Increase Amount After Planned Increase Base Fare 04/01/2007$2.00N/A Transfers $0.25N/A Zone Fares N/A Multi-ride passes One-Day Disabled One- Day 10-Ride 31-Day Annual 10/01/ /01/ /01/2011 $4.00 $1.00 $15.00 $55.00 $ /01/2013 N/A 10/01/2012 $5.00 N/A $16.00 $60.00 $660.00

 Date of Last Fare Increase – 10/01/2008  Current ◦ Average fare - $22.15 ◦ LANta has sponsorship arrangements with the County Area Agencies on Aging and MH/MR agencies  Planned Changes ◦ Date of planned increase - 10/01/2013 ◦ Estimated average fare - $25.50 ◦ There are no planned changes to the existing sponsorship arrangements 19

20 FactorsCurrent Amount Projected Future Amount Explanation Pension$907K$1,134KCosts are controlled by market factors Workers’ Comp Insurance $368K$561KCosts are controlled by experience Increased service$750K$800KCosts are based on hourly costs and amount of service added

21 FactorsCurrent Amount Projected Future Amount Explanation Fuel costs$1.9M?Costs are controlled by market factors at time of contract Easton Intermodal Center N/A$100KNew facility Health costs$3.0M?Costs are controlled by experience, market factors and regulations

22 InitiativeCurrent Cost Planned Action and Implementation Date Projected Savings Consolidation of LANtaVan services to one subcontractor $9.5MInitial contract awarded in FY2007; extension awarded in FY2010 $8M over contract term Wage freeze (salaried employees) N/AImplemented for FY2010$30K SAFTI$1.4MAggressive defense of claims keeps premiums lower $500K/ Year Printed timetables$100KInternalized art work$10K/ Year Paratransit contract extension $9MExtension resulted in lower costs in year 5 $100K

23 InitiativeCurrent Cost Planned Action and Implementation Date Projected Savings ADA certification program $2MIn-person certification will result in less paratransit use $300K/ Year Energy audit$100KResulted in suggestions for increasing efficiency $10K/year Hybrid buses$2.5MResulted in better fuel efficiency, less maintenance $10K/year in fuel and $150K in maintenance

24 InitiativeCurrent Revenue Planned Action and Implementation Date Projected Revenues New revenue vehicle and shelter advertising program $250KNew vendor selected in FY2011 $200K additional per year Raising average fareN/AImplemented for FY2010 to lower discount on fare pass media – See Handout #6 $100K per year Private/public partnerships N/AImplemented in FY2012 – example: Amazon contract $100K per year Grants$16MAggressively pursue

25 InitiativeCostPlanned Action and Implementation Date Projected Benefit Advanced Transit Management System $2MATMS project fully operational – includes APC, AVL and integrated operating systems (farebox, auto- announcement system, cameras) Data currently being used to assist in adding/re moving services ADA Certification$300K/ Year October 17, 2011 – in- person assessments for ADA- and MATP- sponsored consumers $300K/per year

26 InitiativeCostPlanned Action and Implementation Date Projected Benefit Computer Aided Scheduling N/A – part of ATMS Spring 2012 – being tested now Results in more efficient schedules Flex Service$25KImplemented in August 2011 Results in more efficient delivery of service

FY2011 Service Statistics/ Trends 27

 Describe Any Proposed Changes 28 Fixed RouteFY FY FY FY FY Rev. Veh. Miles2,7192,9263,066 Rev. Veh. Hours Passenger Trips5,6005,782- 5,963 5,924- 6,248 5,983- 6,435 6,043- 6,628 ACT 44 PERFORMANCE MEASURES Pass. Trips/Hour Op. Cost/Hour$88.97$89.48$91.15$93.89$96.71 Op. Rev./Hour$22.16$20.88$20.69$21.50$21.93 Op. Cost/Trip$3.35$3.36$3.43

29

30 Shared-RideFY FY FY FY FY Total Veh. Miles 4,8854,6054,7434,8855,032 Cost per Mile$1.95$2.07 Total Veh. Hours Cost per Hour$47.77$51.77$51.91$51.82$51.79 Total Pass. Trips Cost per Trip$21.33$21.95$22.61$23.28$23.98 Rev. per Trip$ $21.65$22.58$24.44 Trips per Hour

FY2011 Funding Statistics/ Trends 31

32 FY FY FY FY FY Total Operating Expenses18,77320,07824,43022,07322,735 Total Operating Revenue4,7614,6764,8645,0545,155 Total Operating Deficit14,01215,40216, ,580 Subsidies: Federal5,0404,9254,930 State8,2929,76310,88611,30111,823 Local Total Funding14,01215,40216,56617,01917,580 Balance (Cumulative)$4,800$2,800$841$100$0

33 FY FY FY FY FY Operating Expense10,80511,29511,63411,98312,342 Passenger Revenue1,3021,1881,4121,3841,385 Lottery2,5832,794 3,213 MATP4,2913,8573,9724,4144,546 Other (Includes ADA charges) 2,8123,1522,8593,2783,395 Balance (Cumulative)688384(123)184381

FY2011 Other Information/ Assumptions 34

 Moving LANta Forward ◦ 12 year strategic plan; adopted in 2010 ◦ Undertaken to address:  Rapid population growth and development  Significant growth in fixed route ridership  Prioritize use of Act 44 funding ◦ Plan includes:  Service Plan  Marketing Plan  Land Use Outreach Strategy 35

 MLF Service Plan identified three levels of expansion: 36 Level Change from 2010 Target Year Revenue Hours % Change Peak Vehicles Short22, Intermediate64, Long214, With available funding

 First implementation steps with August 2011 restructure ◦ Schedule simplification ◦ New direct connections ◦ Created system of core routes ◦ New route nomenclature  Three digit designation  Provides indication of level of service ◦ Running time issues addressed ◦ Structure to guide enhancements 37

 Close to reaching Short Term plan levels ◦ 2011 changes added 4% to annual rev hours ◦ Another 4% budgeted for ‘12-’13  Organization’s goal is to reach Intermediate Plan levels ◦ Brings LANta to avg. rev hrs/capita for peer systems 38

39 Revenue Hours per Capita 2010 Service Levels Revenue Hours per Capita Intermediate Term Plan

 Land Use Outreach – Expansion must be supported through land use decisions ◦ Municipal Planning Commission presentations ◦ HUD Sustainable Communities grant 40

 Continued frequency/span enhancements on 100’s routes – create a core system to: ◦ Be a feasible transportation alternative for more residents ◦ Create target corridors for development, economic incentives, specialty zoning 41

42

 100’s routes enhancements ◦ August 2011 restructure addressed many span issues; minor enhancements still needed ◦ Focus will be on frequency  Goal: 15 min peak; 30 min off-peak frequencies ◦ Trip time and frequency enhancements through new Enhanced Bus models  Enhanced Bus/BRT Study - underway 43

 Address demand resulting from employment growth and development in: ◦ Western Lehigh County (Route 100 corridor) ◦ Central Northampton County (Route 33 corridor) 44

45 Recently rezoned Jaindl property: Build out plans call for 4 million SF – Warehousing 450,000 SF – Retail Center 700 residential units Hamilton Boulevard: Expanding retail corridor. PCTI study Lehigh Valley West: Expanding industrial park; Primarily warehousing – fastest growing industry in Lehigh Valley

46 Major mixed use development New St. Luke’s Hospital Anderson Campus Major expansion plans “Mayo Clinic of the East” Major mixed use development LVIP VI Expanding industrial park Proposed new interchange: Major mixed used development planned Route 248/Nazareth Rd Major retail corridor Route 33 Park & Ride Trans-Bridge service

 Need for expanded service hours to industrial park areas ◦ Revenue guarantee partnerships a potential model  Need for expanded service to medical complex  Expanded fixed route service on Hamilton Blvd, Nazareth Rd/Uhler Rd  Potential for expanded use of LANtaFlex 47

 Projected Impacts of Intermediate Term Plan: 48 Item Net Impact by 2020 Operators40 Maintenance Employees5 G&A Employees2-3 Peak Vehicles8 Fleet Vehicles10 Revenue Hours64,000 Revenue Miles800,000 Annual Passenger Trips 902,000 – 1,800,000

 Improvements will be targeted to priorities  Enhancements will be identified through a planning process  Performance will be continually monitored to maintain target productivity levels ◦ ATMS data will be instrumental in service monitoring 49

Capital Status Review 50

51 Capital Assets (in 000s, Net of Accumulated Depreciation)FY2011 Land150 Buildings3,816 Revenue vehicles11,264 Service vehicles155 Shop equipment189 Furniture/office equipment1,643 Other revenue equipment1,085 Total capital assets18,300

 Current Fixed-Route Projects ◦ Purchase 20 hybrid buses ◦ Allentown maintenance facility ◦ Easton Intermodal Center ◦ Shelter/signs program  Current Shared Ride Projects ◦ Purchase 20 cut-away buses 52

 Short-term Future Fixed-Route Projects ◦ Replacement of 60 heavy-duty buses with hybrid buses ◦ Purchase of hybrid buses for service expansion ◦ Development of service hubs  Short-term Future Shared Ride Projects ◦ Replacement of 80 cut-away buses (existing fleet) ◦ Replacement of paratransit scheduling software 53