Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK Opportunities and Conflicts of Commercial Uses of Peatland in Europe Socio-Economic Comparison of Case Studies from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GREEN PAPER on Maritime Policy - PlanCoast Statement 2nd PlanCoast Meeting Constanta EU GREEN PAPER ON MARITIME POLICY.
Advertisements

Meeting of Heads of National Forest Research Institutes Brussels 12 November 2004 Future research issues in the European context Risto Päivinen European.
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR RESEARCHERS. Output 1: Current economic interdependence between the two communities assessed and recommendations for reinforced.
Forest Management and forestry methods in France Forest Management and forestry methods in France (UE)
Socio-economic approach of the french peatlands Carine MAITRE « RECIPE »
RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES IN BULGARIA Nedka Ivanova UNWE, Sofia, Bulgaria.
LECTURE XIII FORESTRY ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. Introduction  If forestry is to contribute its full share to a more abundant life for the world’s increasing.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Strategic Framework for Future Use of Peatlands Presentation to the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine 13 May
GOOD INDICATORS ARE HARD TO FIND Susan Offutt Economic Research Service United States Department of Agriculture.
Natural Choices Greening the Gateway Kent & Medway 11 June 2011.
23/06/20151 Northern ToSIA Assessing sustainability of forest based activities in rural areas of the Northern Periphery Elspeth Macdonald, Forest Research.
Philip Eckersley Senior Specialist – Enforcement The ECONAT 2000 Network.
Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK SOCIO-ECONOMICS Progress report RECIPE meeting, Scheyern, Germany, May 2005.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Climate Change Research Initiatives in EU Member States Side event: Research in response to the IPCC TAR 21 June, 2004, Bonn SB20 Dr. Frank McGovern, Ireland.
Intergenerational contributions to childcare across Europe Alison Smith University of Edinburgh.
The case for a Wilderness Directive Louise Waddell- LLB Simon Boyle, Solicitor.
CONTENTS Introduction Introduction Changes in Forest Cover Changes in Forest Cover Reforestation Reforestation Community Forestry Community Forestry Forest.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE The conservation context: What are the natural assets of Lao & the region? Integrating business skills into.
Ecosystems, Economy and Employment: A labour approach to biodiversity Ana Belén Sánchez 19 October 2012 COP 11- Hyderabad (India)
Environmental Prosperity: Business and the Environment in the East of England A study by SQW Ltd and Land Use Consultants on behalf of 22 regional partners.
ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY INITIATIVE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING September 2005, Bratislava, Slovakia Forest Land Use in the context of Environment and.
The potential for hardwood business in the South Baltic Region Edgar Kastenholz European Network of Forest Entrepreneurs (ENFE)
Thailand’s National Strategy on Climate Change Aree Wattana Tummakird Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) Ministry.
Wood for Energy Experience of Coillte to date Presentation to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Marine, Communications and Natural Resources George McCarthy.
Rural Development in Sweden Rural areas have been depopulated rapidly Farming and forestry used to be dominant in rural economy 60% of the farmers are.
Marcello Bonitatibus – Zvolen, Slovakia – June 2007 Transnational cooperation summary Common goals Viera Petrášová – Zvolen, Slovakia, 11. – 12.
Agriculture Sector Structure and Restructuring Dang Kim Son IPSARD/MARD 1.
Environmental resources management WORK PACKAGE 3 PETRÁŠOVÁ, ČERNOTA, KOVALČÍK NATIONAL FOREST CENTRE ZVOLEN SLOVAKIA.
Rural areas from the point of view of Nature Conservation Andreas Krug Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Germany Bonn, June 18th 2007.
EP Hearing on the White Paper on Transport Michael Nielsen General Delegate IRU Permanent Delegation to the EU.
Finnish Trade Policies and Developing Countries: Case Africa Antti Loikas. Senior Adviser Department of Africa and the Middle East.
Bellringer for 10/19/12 Tell me what you know about Britain. 3-5 sentences.
Agriculture’s Dual Challenge of Delivering Food While Protecting the Environment Tamsin Cooper A Future for a Strong CAP – European Symposium.
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements.
Internationalisation of Finnish Public Research Organisations Dr. Antti Pelkonen Senior Scientist, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Comenius Project Lahr Second Year Meeting.
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
ESPON TERRITORIAL TRENDS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NATURAL HERITAGE 1Context and objectives 2Facts and Figures 3Physical developments and policy.
Socio-economics consequences of peatland exploitation in Switzerland Froidevaux Viviane European research programm RECIPE Swiss Federal Research Institute.
Key Players in EU Policy Making § The COMMISSION ( in principle independent) – Has sole right of proposal § The COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ( the member states.
Productivity vs hours growth Presentation based on: F.Daveri, “Labor productivity growth in Europe: an update”, background paper for the Seventh CEPS Macroeconomic.
Sub-global Assessments: Synthesis and Case Studies (Portugal) June 2004 Tiago Domingos.
Intelligent Energy for Europe 2009 Good practice in reconciling onshore and offshore wind energy with environmental objectives GPWIND.
NEGOTIATIONS ON SERVICES NEGOTIATIONS ON SERVICES Commercial Diplomacy Programme &TrainForTrade.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
Special Interest Tourism Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 29/10/ /10/20131Dr Nicos Rodosthenous.
“The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead”, November15 – 17, 2009, Orlando, Florida Impacts of future energy price.
Chapter V. RURAL DEVELOPMENT Ing. Barbora Milotová, PhD. Department of Regional Development
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being State of Finland’s Forests 2012 Based on the Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management.
European Survey FENCA Number of respondents Austria 0 Belgium 0 Czech Republic 4 France 11 Germany 103 Greece 0 Italy 30 Netherlands 0 Norway.
Road to prosperity. Cathing-up ▪ The Finnish GDP per person grew 21-fold ▪ A growth of 2,2 percent per annum ▪ In the 15 EU-countries, the.
Natuurwetenschap & SamenlevingScience, Technology & Society Large Scale International Bio-energy Trade - Perspectives, Possibilities and Criteria; introduction.
Network for Certification and Conservation of Forests.
Nigel Hannam and David Phillips Parish Conference – 11th September 2013 Balancing Development.
Anne Miller Associate Director, ESKTN (On behalf of Keith Golding Head: Department for Sustainable Soils and Grassland Systems, RR) Delivering the options.
Copa-Cogeca Workshop “Sustainable use of forests in Europe” EU 2020 Strategy, resource efficiency and the potential of EU forests Hilkka Summa.
Role of forests in Finnish climate change policy Ministerial conference and workshop on the role of boreal forest in CO 2 balance Dr. Tatu Torniainen.
Information Needs for Sustainable Forests Management Nguyen Tuong Van Forest Sector Support Partnership 17 th of March 2010, Hanoi.
Unit 4.3 Economic Integration Globalization. Economic Integration Types of preferential trading arrangement The degree of economic integration can be.
Research Center For China-EU Economic Cooperation (CCEEC), UIBE
The Finnish Bioeconomy
Daniel Deybe – Ewald Pertlik DG RTD – I-1 Brussels – Jan 20, 2005
NATIONAL FORESTRY AUTHORITY
Social economy as an opportunity to deal with local problems
University of Economics in Prague
SOCIAL DIALOGUE IN THE SOCIAL SERVICES SECTOR IN EUROPE
Main results and conclusions of the
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
Presentation transcript:

Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK Opportunities and Conflicts of Commercial Uses of Peatland in Europe Socio-Economic Comparison of Case Studies from Finland, France and Switzerland Contact: Tel: +44 (0) ext th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Gerald Schwarz, Harri Vasander, Anni Takko, Viviane Froidevaux, Vincent Pheulpin, Walter Rosselli, Philippe Grosvenier, Daniel Gilbert, Carine Maitre, Andreas Gattinger, Matthias Droesler and Kenn Nwokoro RECIPE Project

Outline  Introduction  Objectives  Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland  Peat production and trade  Alternative peatland uses  Conclusions  Future project tasks 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004

Introduction  Peatland ecosystems posses a unique biodiversity.  Across Europe there are many abandoned areas of peatland that have been cut-over.  On the other hand, peatland is in may areas of central and northern Europe a valuable raw commodity and income source for rural communities.  But the extent of peatland and the use of peatland vary between different European countries, e.g.:  Finland is the sixth richest country in peatland with peatland providing significant contribution to the forestry and energy sectors.  In France peatland represents only a relatively small area with minor economic importance  In Switzerland peatland is protected and peat exploitation is prohibited. 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004

Objectives  To identify opportunities and conflicts of commercial uses of peatland in different European countries.  To summarise different European country case studies and compare the socio-economic importance of peat exploitation and alternative peatland uses. Main objectives are: 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004  Differences between European countries point out the need to evaluate the conflicts of peatland utilisation and conservation in a national context and to compare different opportunities.  The paper is part of an on-going wider socio-economic study, part of the RECIPE project, and more country cases will be added.

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland  Finland 1 :  Total peatland area of 8.9m ha (30% of total land area).  Forestry is the main type of peatland use (5.7m ha), followed by pristine and protected peatland (2.7m and 1m ha) and agriculture (0.4m – 1m ha).  56,000 ha are used for peat production.  France 2 :  Decline of peatland from 120,000 ha to 60,000 ha in the last 50 years.  15 peatland sites are still exploited but most extraction authorizations will terminate in  Switzerland 3 :  Total peatland area of 87,334 ha, but peat exploitation is prohibited.  Protected bogs have a size of 1500 ha distributed over 500 sites, but legal protection covers also surrounding areas. 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Regional distribution of peatland Sources: 1) Ohtonen & Kotanen (2003), 2) Maitre (2003), 3) BUWAL (2002)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Peat production and trade in Finland  Peat production for the Finnish energy sector increased from 9.2m m 3 to 23.3m m 3 from 1980 to  Peat production for horticulture increased from 1.6m m 3 to 2.2m m 3 from over the same period adding up to a total amount of 25.5m m 3 in  Peat consumption increased from 6.2m m 3 to 22m m 3 in the same period. 1  Energy peat production and transportation contributed a net-income of €110m in 2002 and additionally power plants that use peat as fuel paid about €13m taxes to the state. 1  Peat production is an important employer in rural areas, in particular in the north of Finland, with a total employment of 7766 person-years. 2  Finland is a net-exporter of peat mainly exporting to Sweden, Netherlands and Spain. Sources: 1) Association of Finnish peat industry (2003), 2) Leiviskae & Kiukaanniemi (2000)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Peat production and trade in Finland Sources: Statistics of the Customs (2003)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Peat production and trade in Finland Sources: Statistics of the Customs (2003)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Peat production and trade in France  Peat production is much lower than in Finland but also increased from 161,382 t to 400,000 t from 1975 to  Peat consumption increased sharply from 250,000 to 866,000.  In jobs have been generated by direct peat exploitation and the processing industries.  France is a net-importer of peat with total peat imports of 466,00 t in  Peat imports mainly from the Baltic States (10%) and Ireland (10%) provide the main source for processed peat products such as organic amendments and growing media. Sources: Maitre (2003)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Peat production and trade in Switzerland  Since peat production has been banned in 1988 only processed peat products are exported but in relatively small numbers.  Germany is the main importer of processed peat products from Switzerland Sources: General Customs Direction (2004)

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004  Switzerland is a net-importer of peat mainly importing raw peat from Germany (more than three quarter of total imports).  Furthermore, Switzerland is importing peat from the Netherlands, Belgium and East European countries. Sources: General Customs Direction (2004) Peat production and trade in Switzerland

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Alternative peatland uses in the case study countries  Re-use of land after peat exploitation has also significant socio-economic importance for rural areas, in particular in countries like Finland.  Usually there four different options of re-using including forestry, agriculture, restoration to wetlands and the creation of waterfowl habitats.  Growth of forests can be very high and can have local importance in wood production and most cut-away areas in Finland can successfully be used for forestry.  Beside agriculture and restoration, tourism can be an important alternative for peatland uses in Finland and nature tourism is the most rapidly growing branch of the Finnish tourist industry. Sources:

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Alternative peatland uses in the case study countries  As peat production does not, or only very limited, take place in France and Switzerland, alternative peatland uses play an important role.  Protected areas in both countries provide opportunities for “eco-tourism” and in surrounding areas for extensive agricultural systems.  In Switzerland, financial support is provided for environmentally friendly agricultural activities as part of wetland management.  Agriculture has a significant role for ecological landscape management in areas with high conservation value which are often not suitable for competitive agricultural production.  Agriculture and nature administration can be important parts of the socio- economic framework of French and Swiss peatland both promoting sustainable tourism and providing income and employment opportunities.

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004  The comparison show that the economic importance of peatland strongly differs between different European countries.  Peat production is only significant in Finland with significant export earnings and locally important employment effects.  In France and Switzerland, where peat production does not play a major role, processing of peat and sustainable re-uses of peatland are economically more important.  Forestry, agriculture and tourism are important alternatives of using peatland in all three countries providing employment and income opportunities as well as contributing to the overall economy. Conclusion

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Conclusion  But intensive use of peatland has often caused environmental damage and the loss of valuable ecosystems with a high biodiversity.  Peat utilisation should be seen in a wider framework integrating environmental and socio-economic interests.  For the first three country case studies the study shows that there are a number of options for sustainable re-use of peatland such as forestry and extensive agricultural systems.  Integrating these activities with or around protected areas and national parks can be suitable options for peatland utilisation also increasing opportunities for tourism.

Economic data on peatland in Finland, France and Switzerland 12th International Peat Congress, Tampere, Finland, June 2004 Future tasks  The paper summarises the early stages and first findings of the socio- economic appraisal of peatland utilisation in Europe.  More country cases such as Scotland and Germany and hence more socio-economic aspects will be added.  Based on the economic review of peatland utilisation further, and more specific, economic assessments and sociological studies will be carried out for the different country cases.