Initial ConEx Deployment Examples draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt apologies from Bob Briscoe, BT presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well MORE INFO: -ECN.
Advertisements

PMIPv6 Localized Routing Problem Statement draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-ro-ps-01.txt Marco Liebsch, Sangjin Jeong, Qin Wu IETF75 - Stockholm NetExt WG, 30.
WELCOME! Multipath TCP Implementors Workshop Saturday 24 th July Maastricht Philip Eardley MPTCP WG Co-chair.
Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-00 Bob Briscoe IETF-80 Mar 2011.
TSVWG #1 IETF-92 (Dallas) 24 th March 2015 Gorry Fairhurst David Black WG chairs.
ConEx Abstract Protocol What’s the Credit marking for? draft-mathis-conex-abstract-mech-00.txt draft-mathis-conex-abstract-mech-00.txt apologies from Bob.
© British Telecommunications plc 1 Network Performance Isolation in Data Centres using ConEx Congestion Policing draft-briscoe-conex-policing-01 draft-briscoe-conex-data-centre-02.
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Honolulu, IETF-91, 14th Nov 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2003 Tutorial 11 Explicit Congestion Notification (RFC 3168) Limited Transmit (RFC 3042)
1 Internet Networking Spring 2003 Tutorial 11 Explicit Congestion Notification (RFC 3168)
Mobile Communication Congestion Exposure Scenario Version 01
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
SIP working group status Keith Drage, Dean Willis.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Huawei Confidential Security Level: Slide title :40-47pt Slide subtitle :26-30pt Color::white Corporate Font : FrutigerNext.
ConEx Concepts and Uses Toby Moncaster John Leslie (JLC) Bob Briscoe (BT) Rich Woundy (Comcast) draft-moncaster-conex-concepts-uses-01.
Mobile Communication Congestion Exposure Scenario
ConEx Concepts and Abstract Mechanism draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-07.txt draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-07.txt Matt Mathis, Google Bob Briscoe, BT IETF-87.
1 Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-02 Bob Briscoe, BT John Kaippallimalil,
Byte and Packet Congestion Notification draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-02.txt draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-02.txt Bob Briscoe, BT IETF-78 tsvwg.
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Toronto, IETF-90, 21 st July 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
1 Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-01 Bob Briscoe IETF-85 Nov 2012.
ConEx Concepts and Uses Toby Moncaster John Leslie (JLC) Bob Briscoe (BT) Rich Woundy (ComCast) draft-moncaster-conex-concepts-uses-01.
1 IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in (e) Networks draft-ietf-v6ops deployment-scenarios-01 Myung-Ki Shin, ETRI Youn-Hee Han, KUT Sang-Eon Kim, KT.
B 李奕德.  Abstract  Intro  ECN in DCTCP  TDCTCP  Performance evaluation  conclusion.
ConEx Concepts and Abstract Mechanism draft-mathis-conex-abstract-mech-00.txt draft-mathis-conex-abstract-mech-00.txt Matt Mathis, Google Bob Briscoe,
Prefix Delegation Protocol Selection T.J. Kniveton MEXT Working Group IETF 70 - December ’07 - Vancouver.
Congestion marking for low delay (& admission control) Bob Briscoe BT Research Mar 2005.
Byte and Packet Congestion Notification draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-01.txt draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-01.txt Bob Briscoe, BT & UCL IETF-70.
Byte and Packet Congestion Notification draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-00.txt draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-00.txt Bob Briscoe, BT & UCL IETF-69.
Draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses B. Briscoe, Ed. R. Woundy, Ed. A.Cooper, Ed. IETF 82.
ALTO BOF Charter Discussion. Charter Iterated (twice) on the list  Several comments on the first version Terminology, caching  No complains on current.
Congestion exposure BoF candidate protocol: re-ECN Bob Briscoe Chief Researcher, BT Nov 2009 This work is partly funded by Trilogy, a research project.
Tunnelling of Explicit Congestion Notification draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-03.txt draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-03.txt Bob Briscoe, BT IETF-75 saag.
Byte and Packet Congestion Notification draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-00.txt draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-00.txt Bob Briscoe, BT & UCL IETF-73.
IPR WG Agenda, Vancouver December Agenda 0900: Administrativia 0910: Status of WG documents 0915: Issues raised so far at Last Call 0945: Instructions.
ECE450 - Software Engineering II1 ECE450 – Software Engineering II Today: Introduction to Software Architecture.
Peer to Peer Streaming Protocol (PPSP) BOF Gonzalo Camarillo Ericsson Yunfei Zhang China Mobile IETF76, Hiroshima, Japan 13:00~15:00 THURSDAY, Nov 12,
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well.
An Architectural Introduction to the LISP Location-Identity Separation System draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-03 –J. N. Chiappa Yorktown Museum of Asian Art.
Towards Adaptive Congestion Management for Interactive Real- Time Communications Dirk KutscherMirja KühlewindBob Briscoe IAB/IRTF Congestion Control Workshop.
Initial ConEx Deployment Examples draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-02.txt draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-02.txt Bob Briscoe, BT Dirk Kutscher, NEC.
Network Performance Isolation in Data Centres using Congestion Policing draft-briscoe-conex-data-centre-01.txt draft-briscoe-conex-data-centre-01.txt Bob.
ConEx Concepts and Abstract Mechanism draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-01.txt draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-01.txt Matt Mathis, Google Bob Briscoe, BT IETF-80.
1 Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP draft-briscoe-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-03 Bob Briscoe, BT John Kaippallimalil,
Principles & Constraints Philip Eardley. Application-agnostic The CONEX protocol should be open about (independent of) the responses it allows to the.
RTP Splicing Status Update draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-for-rtp-11 Jinwei Xia.
AutoDESA Presentation Project Documentation October 2005.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
Byte and Packet Congestion Notification draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-02.txt draft-briscoe-tsvwg-byte-pkt-mark-02.txt Bob Briscoe, BT & UCL IETF-71.
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #5 Nov 8 th & 10 th 2010 Beijing, ietf-79 Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
RMCAT architectural overview Michael Welzl 1 RMCAT, 85 th IETF Meeting
The Benefits to Applications of using Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) draft-welzl-ecn-benefits-00 89th IETF Meeting London, UK 4 March 2014 Michael.
Initial ConEx Deployment Examples draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt apologies from Bob Briscoe, BT presented.
TSVWG IETF-89 (London) 5 th & 7 th March 2014 Gorry Fairhurst David Black James Polk WG chairs 1.
Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IP (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-04) Bob Briscoe (Simula Research.
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
Philip Eardley, Bob Briscoe, Dave Songhurst - BT Francois Le Faucheur, Anna Charny, Vassilis Liatsos – Cisco Kwok-Ho Chan, Joe Babiarz, Stephen Dudley.
Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) WG DMM Work Item: Forwarding Path & Signaling Management (FPSM) draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-03.txt M. Liebsch, S. Matsushima,
draft-briscoe-tsvwg-l4s-arch-00 B. Briscoe, K. De Schepper, M. Bagnulo
IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)
By, Nirnimesh Ghose, Master of Science,
IETF-86 RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques
Bob Briscoe, BT Murari Sridharan, Microsoft IETF-84 ConEx Jul 2012
15th November 2016 Gorry Fairhurst (via webrtc) David Black WG chairs
Bob Briscoe, BT IETF-72 tsvwg Jul 2008
CONEX BoF.
ECN Experimentation draft-black-ecn-experimentation
Distributed Systems CS
Encoding 3 PCN-States in the IP header using a single DSCP draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-04.txt Bob Briscoe, BT Toby Moncaster, independent Michael Menth,
Distributed Systems CS
Presentation transcript:

Initial ConEx Deployment Examples draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt apologies from Bob Briscoe, BT presented by Andrea Soppera, BT IETF-82 ConEx Nov 2011

draft status new individual draft draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt intended status:informational immediate intent: WG feedback on scenarios finish the two ‘sketchy’ scenarios adopt as WG item?

chartered? “… the CONEX WG will initially focus on one use case, where the end hosts and the network that contains the destination end host are CONEX-enabled but other networks need not be.... Goals and Milestones Mar 2011 Submit use case description to IESG as Informational...“ We have now two documents: a)what benefits does ConEx bring? ietf-conex-concepts-uses covers thisietf-conex-concepts-uses b)deployment arrangements of systems using ConEx briscoe-conex-initial-deploy targets thisbriscoe-conex-initial-deploy we tried including (b) in concepts-uses but (b) talks mechanism – inappropriate for concepts-uses

pre-requisites reading order 1.draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses 2.draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy

document structure A.recap (1p) refers to abstract-mech for details incremental deployment features of ConEx ConEx functional components B.first movers: senders C.network arrangements 1.single receiving network (the following slides) 2.mobile network → [draft-kutscher-conex-mobile] 3.internal to a multi-tenant data centre (write-up to be finished)

ConEx deployment features recap sender modification essential change each transport protocol incrementally no change required to queues & forwarding ECN not required in the network (but better if ECN) sender must at least ask receiver for ECN but OK if receiver not ECN-capable packets indicate whether they support ConEx

7 ConEx recap basic signals and functional units transport sender transport receiver congested network element policyaudit ECN loss SACK ECE Re-Echo-ECN Re-Echo-Loss DATA ACKS

some sources deploy ConEx first a speculative strategy that triggers ConEx deployment scavenging senders benefit the network, but the network can’t measure the benefit so scavenger tells the network the benefit (using ConEx) it knows the network monitors anything it can or the network operator is interested in a trial

single receiving network scenario I some sources deploy ConEx Software update app file-sharing app video streaming transport Legend Peering and Transit Dest ISP Z ConEx sources ConEx packets Non-ConEx packets Non-ConEx hosts BRAS Access Network ISP CDN Software Update File Sharing App

Legend single receiving network scenario II ConEx policerConEx monitorConEx audit ConEx sources ConEx packetsNon-ConEx packets for ConEx sources ISP Z replaces existing traffic management (e.g. Removing Application Rate Constraint) Customer consuming ConEx enabled traffic will perceive better service experience (e.g. Faster download) Non-ConEx hosts Peering and Transit Dest ISP Z BRAS Access Network File Sharing App Software Update ISP CDN

single receiving network scenario III Legend ConEx policerConEx monitorConEx audit ConEx sources ConEx packetsNon-ConEx packets ConEx policer/monitor can be distributed across multiple access interface -- remove need of centralised approach (traffic trombone) Non-ConEx hosts Peering and Transit Dest ISP Z BRAS Access Network ISP CDN File Sharing App Software Update

deployment incentives sources policed less than Non-ConEx traffic when sending large volumes if scavenging effectively network more satisfied customers – relaxed policing simpler traffic management simpler network design

status & plans review from Phil Eardley ‘better’ ASCII art wants similar scenario but start solely with trusted sources wants deployment incentives explained first plan – finish the document re-organise to describe incentives up front summarise mobile scenario [kutscher-conex-mobile] describe multi-tenant data centre scenario (simple) complete empty sections (e.g. tail pieces) working group input more reviews please WG feedback on scenarios? WG item?

Initial ConEx Deployment Examples draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt draft-briscoe-conex-initial-deploy-00.txt Q&A