Wood Bioenergy Carbon Accounting – Beyond Carbon Neutrality Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of Climate Change on Canada’s Forests and Rural Communities Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture & Forestry Avrim Lazar President & CEO Forest.
Advertisements

Maine Forestry Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options Thomas D. Peterson PSU James E. Smith USFS Jack D. Kartez USM.
An Introduction to Carbon Modelling Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Quito, Ecuador March, 2004.
Bioenergy: GHG balances ‘Carbon lean’, not ‘carbon neutral’
Forestry and Climate Change - issues and potential indicators For UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists, Edinburgh, May 2007 Simon Gillam, UK.
Renewable Energy Directive Øyvind Vessia Policy Officer European Commission, DG Energy – Renewables and CCS Policy.
Opportunities to Increase Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Global Change Research Program Senate Agriculture.
Page 1 As of September 2001 IEA Bioenergy Task38 ISO 9001 certified Perspectives on the timing of benefits of forest-based.
Understanding the carbon footprint of wood and paper products Presented to: State of California, Department of General Services EPP Task Force PCRC Paper.
ENFA European Non-Food Agriculture – WP 32 Energy and Greenhouse Gas Balances Hannes Schwaiger, Gerfried Jungmeier Kick-Off Meeting 10 th May 2005 Geomatikum,
Managing forests for carbon storage Bill Keeton Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources University of Vermont.
Air Pollutant Climate Forcings within the Big Climate Picture * Jim Hansen March 11, 2009 Climate Change Congress Global Risks, Challenges & Decisions.
Module 1: Understanding Bioenergy Resources
23/06/20151 Northern ToSIA Assessing sustainability of forest based activities in rural areas of the Northern Periphery Elspeth Macdonald, Forest Research.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Biomass Electricity Megan Ziolkowski November 29, 2009.
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Slide 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Task.
Fossil C emissions associated with C flows of wood products Kim Pingoud VTT Energy P.O.Box 1606 FIN VTT IEA Bioenergy Task.
FEG Autumn Symposium David Read UK Forests and Mitigation of Climate Change.
Thailand’s National Strategy on Climate Change Aree Wattana Tummakird Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP) Ministry.
Carbon Emissions from Harvesting Wood Products and Bioenergy Justin Ford-Robertson.
Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin Using TPO and DOE/EIA surveys to track wood.
Laura Wood. Definition Biomass is all plant and animal matter on the Earth's surface. Harvesting biomass such as crops, trees or dung and using it to.
Harvest residue utilization in small- and large-scale bioenergy Systems: 1 Julian Cleary, Post-Doctoral Fellow Faculty of Forestry University of Toronto.
Bio-energy Initiatives and Collaboration in New Brunswick Climate Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting February 5, 2009 By: Bryan Pelkey Department of.
Chapter 10 - Biofuels. Introduction Existing standards for carbon accounting Forestry schemes as carbon offsets Biomass energy in place of fossil fuels.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
Sunlight CO 2 Water Fibres Oxygen Sweden’s Green Gold.
Wisconsin’s Link to REDD GCF Aceh May Wisconsin Why does Wisconsin support Cap & Trade?
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Forest Carbon Accounting Approaches for Use in Regulatory and Financial Trading Schemes Biometrics Working Group.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Euroforenet Conference 20/11/2007 Brussels European Commission Kyriakos MANIATIS Biofuels & Industry DG TREN.
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir Forestry Operations Edie Sonne Hall University of Washington College of Forest Resources USDA.
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
International Conference on Wood-based Bioenergy LIGNA+Hannover, Germany, May 2007 Photo: NTC Photo: Stora Enso Mobilization of Wood Resources for.
Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum Workshop #5: Meeting the Challenges of a Rapidly Changing Climate Policy Environment April 6-9,
Exploring Solutions Activity 2: Clearing the Air.
Biomass Power By Zack Bekowies, Marion Berger, and Tori Chrumka.
Forestry Projects: Measurement and Monitoring Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Victoria, BC, Canada Biological Sequestration.
Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science Disturbance, degradation, and recovery: forest dynamics and climate change mitigation Professor Rod Keenan Acknowledgements.
A Grand Plan for FIA’s role in a FS National Carbon Accounting System Linda S. Heath USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, FIA Forest Carbon Accounting.
Is Biomass Burning Worse than Coal? Kevin Bundy & Brian Nowicki Center for Biological Diversity
Carbon Offsets and Financial Opportunities Coastal Fertilization Program Meeting Kevin Astridge – Forest Practices Branch February 4 th, 2008.
Seite 1 Stand: Article 3.4 and CDM outcomes: implications for wood based industries / bioenergy Bernhard Schlamadinger IEA Bioenergy Task 38,
Status: Criterion 5—Maintenance of forest contribution to global carbon cycles Linda S. Heath James E. Smith USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research.
Barshinger Creek Restoration Project - CO2 Emissions Contributions Diesel on-site GallonsCO2/GallonLbs CO2 EmittedTotal Lbs CO2 Emitted Fuel for on-site.
Overview of a model to estimate the GHG balance of the New Zealand forest industry 22 March 2004 Isabel Loza-Balbuena PhD candidate School of Forestry.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Page 1 Task 38 Australia New Zealand Participating Countries USA Canada Croatia Austria The Netherlands Denmark UK Sweden Norway Finland Ireland Highlights.
DECC’s BEaC Model (Bioenergy Emissions and Counterfactual Model) Dr Anna Stephenson March 8 th, 2013.
Doris Hamill October 14, 2013 Doris Hamill October 14, 2013.
FOUR KEY SCIENTIFIC INSIGHTS ON THE IMPACTS OF USING FOREST BIOMASS FOR ENERGY An Analysis by the Society of American Foresters’ Biogenic Carbon Accounting.
Biomass and Bioenergy Approaches to Assessing Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential Carly Green 20 November 2003IEA Bioenergy Task 38 National Meeting -
The Cliff Notes on Biomass Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Levels Clean Air Task Force 18 Tremont Street Suite 530 Boston, MA Prepared for 2016 Northeast.
Tomas Lundmark SLU Sweden
Climate neutrality and forests
Determinants of Carbon Benefits for Transatlantic Wood Pellet Trade
Policies to Accelerate the Bioeconomy: Unintended Effects and Effectiveness Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
A Forest Industry Perspective on Carbon Accounting
Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
Can managed forest land provide effective strategies for climate change mitigation ? - examples from Sweden IEA Bioenergy Canberra, March 26-30, 2001.
Global Forest Carbon Budget (tons of C/y)
Massachusetts Forest Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study
Karen Abt USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station
Presentation transcript:

Wood Bioenergy Carbon Accounting – Beyond Carbon Neutrality Ken Skog, Project Leader USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin 2011 National FIA User Group Meeting Sacramento, CA March 8-10, 2011

Topics  What are the “right” or “helpful” research questions to ask about wood bioenergy carbon emission offsets?  A Joanneum Research study – GHG offsets by wood source over time –Carbon neutrality number over time – CN(t) Logging residue [temperate forests] Intensified thinnings [Austria] Intensively managed forest plantations – on fallow ag land – by clearing existing forest (if time)  More forestry research questions

Possible “right” or “helpful” questions (my translation of sources)  Searchinger et al. – to what degree does an increase wood energy use decrease GHG emissions [over time] by alteration of forest growth/ emissions.  6/18/2010 letter from Forestry groups to EPA Administrator – Is an increase in wood energy use “good” as long as forests are managed sustainably and forest carbon is increasing? (letter says yes) Good? = less carbon emissions “overall” to the atmosphere?  Manomet study – How quickly (years) and by how much will emissions from fossil fuel power system be offset by increasing use of Mass. forest biomass in selected wood-power systems?  Joannuem Research – By increasing use of a specific source of wood fuel use in place of fossil fuel for power, what fraction of a fossil systems emissions would be offset by using specific wood sources in t years?

Question: By increasing use of a specific source of wood fuel use in place of fossil fuel for power, what fraction of a fossil power emissions would be offset by using specific wood sources in t years? Bioenergy system Fossil fuel system Source: Giuliana Zanchi

Setting up the problem - 1  Focus: –What is the emission offset of an increase in wood use ( to a new constant level) to make electric power/ heat and power  Assume –kwh / kg wood carbon = kwh / kg of coal carbon –Kwh / kg natural gas carbon = 0.6 kwh / kg wood carbon  Exclude emissions to obtain and transport wood or fossil fuel

Setting up the problem - 2  Compute carbon neutrality number, CN(t) –Fraction of fossil emissions offset by time t by increase in wood use from a given source CN (t) = [E FF (t) – NE w (t)] / E FF (t) E FF (t) = Cumulative fossil fuel emissions avoided NE w (t) = Cumulative wood emissions to time t – Change in forest growth/ emissions due wood energy use to time t CN(t) than fossil emissions CN(t) = 0 cumulative net wood emissions = fossil emissions CN(t) = 1 net wood carbon storage totally offsets fossil emissions

Examples: CN(t) for wood use from 1. Additional harvest from a managed forest 2. Logging residues from a managed forest 3. New plantations on fallow land 4. New plantation after harvesting existing forest

Illustrative case studies Biomass net emissions (green) Fossil fuel emissions (orange) CN factor (black) Model: GORCAM (Graz Oak Ridge Carbon Accounting Model) Growth curve based on Austrian yield table for Spruce No disturbances included Source: G. Zanchi

1. Additional fellings from a managed forest (1) Rotation period: 90 years Rotation forest: 90 hectares Harvesting: a) Baseline: 60% of increment b) New Management: 80% of increment The additional biomass is used for bioenergy Source: G. Zanchi

1. Additional fellings from a managed forest (2) Biomass net emissions (green) Fossil fuel emissions (orange) CN factor (black) CN(t) = 0 at ~ t = 180 yrs CN(400) = ~ 0.5 Source: G. Zanchi Rotation period: 90 years Rotation forest: 90 hectares Harvesting: a) Baseline: 60% of increment b) New Management: 80% of increment The additional biomass is used for bioenergy

2. Felling residues from a managed forest Rotation period: 90 years (  90 ha) Baseline: Logging residue left in the forest New Management: 2/3 logging residue to bioenergy Source: G. Zanchi Biomass net emissions (green) Fossil fuel emissions (orange) CN factor (black) For a coal alternative CN(30) = 0.6 If natural gas is the alternative CN(30 ) = 0.3

3. New plantations Baseline: low carbon change land (e.g. cropland) New Management: new forest to produce bioenergy (no forest land use change) Source: G. Zanchi Biomass net emissions (green) Fossil fuel emissions (orange) CN factor (black) CN(t) >1 for all t

Forestry research questions for the U.S. on wood energy carbon offsets  For logging residue – what is CN(t) by location? (generate U.S. map using logging residue decay curves)  Are there better metrics of emission offset over time ? (e.g. relative cumulative radiative forcing – wood vs fossil fuel)  CN(t) for current timber management with more thinnings, by forest type  CN(t) for fire hazard reduction thinnings?  CN(t) for mill residue (is landfill the alternate decay if not used? Composite products? pulp?)  Are there broad management guidelines for thinnings to attain say CN(100) > 0.5? (e.g. Marland and Marland 1992)

Publications Manomet study: Walker, T. (Ed.). Contributors: Cardellichio, P., Colnes, A., Gunn, J., Kittler, B., Perschel, R., Recchia, C., Saah, D., and Walker, T Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. Report No.: NCI Repo A., Tuomi M., Liski J., Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy, no. doi: /j x McKechnie J., Colombo S., Cheng J., Mabee W., MacLean H.L. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environ Sci Technol Jan 15;45(2): Palosuo T, Wihersaaari M, Liski J, Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions due to energy use of forest residues –Impacts of soil carbon balance. Woody biomass as an energy source – Challenges in Europe. EFI proceedings no 39, 2001 Schlamadinger B and Spitzer J, CO 2 mitigation through bioenergy from forestry substituting fossil energy. In: Biomass for energy, environment, agriculture and industry. Proceedings of the 8th European Biomass Conference.Vienna, Austria, 3-5 October 1994, Volume 1. Ed. Chartier P., Beenackers A.A.C.M., Grassi G., pp Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Lüdeke M, Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Bioamss and Bioenery 8 (4): Schlamadinger B and Marland G, The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy 10 (5/6): Source: G. Zanchi

Thank you Ken Skog –

4. New plantations – existing forest is converted Baseline: Existing forest is converted New Management: new forest to produce bioenergy Biomass net emissions (green) Fossil fuel emissions (orange) CN factor (red) CN(t) < 0 for t < ~80 years Source: G. Zanchi