Genetic Diversity and Fitness in Black-Footed Ferrets Before and During a Bottleneck S.M. Wisely, S.W. Buskirk, M.A. Fleming, D.B. Mc Donald, and E.A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab 3 : Exact tests and Measuring Genetic Variation.
Advertisements

The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) is one of the most endangered species in North America. The ferret is in a large family of mammals whose members.
 Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to change in populations  Alleles are lost more rapidly in small populations.
Population Genetics and Natural Selection
 Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to change in populations  Alleles are lost more rapidly in small populations.
Amanda Heyn, Laura Icenhour, & Evan Fitch The Black-Footed Ferret.
Migration. Q1. What would be the trend for allele frequencies of populations that that are large vs. very small? A.Large populations will have a greater.
Concept 23.3: Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow can alter allele frequencies in a population Three major factors alter allele frequencies.
Non-Random Mating. What is it? Non-random mating- the probability that two individuals in a population will mate is not the same for all possible pairs.
Deviations from Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium
Atelier INSERM – La Londe Les Maures – Mai 2004
Population Genetics I. Evolution: process of change in allele
Forces of evolution: migration and drift How can unfavourable alleles become common in a population? PKU: hypothesis 3.
Population Genetics: Populations change in genetic characteristics over time Ways to measure change: Allele frequency change (B and b) Genotype frequency.
Population Genetics What is population genetics?
Inbreeding. inbreeding coefficient F – probability that given alleles are identical by descent - note: homozygotes may arise in population from unrelated.
Human Migrations Saeed Hassanpour Spring Introduction Population Genetics Co-evolution of genes with language and cultural. Human evolution: genetics,
Salit Kark Department of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology The Silberman Institute of Life Sciences The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Conservation Biology.
2: Population genetics. Problem of small population size Small populations are less fit (more vulnerable) than large populations.
Genetic variation, detection, concepts, sources, and forces
Microsatellites as Indicators of Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations of Black Walnut (Juglans nigra L.) Across Indiana 1 Department of Forestry and.
Chapter 3 -- Genetics Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity -- Maintenance of genetic diversity is a major focus of.
Biodiversity IV: genetics and conservation
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
Hidenki Innan and Yuseob Kim Pattern of Polymorphism After Strong Artificial Selection in a Domestication Event Hidenki Innan and Yuseob Kim A Summary.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section B: Causes of Microevolution 1.Microevolution is generation-to-generation.
An event(s) in which a significant percentage of the population is killed or unable to reproduce. Population bottlenecks reduce the genetic variation.
Warm-up- hand this in for credit
Inbreeding if population is finite, and mating is random, there is some probability of mating with a relative effects of small population size, mating.
I. The Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution A. Initial Structure – 1940 Sources of VariationAgents of Change MutationNatural Selection RecombinationDrift.
The Evolution of Populations.  Emphasizes the extensive genetic variation within populations and recognizes the importance of quantitative characteristics.
Chapter 5 Characterizing Genetic Diversity: Quantitative Variation Quantitative (metric or polygenic) characters of Most concern to conservation biology.
Genes Within Populations
Population Genetics Evolution depends upon mutation to create new alleles. Evolution occurs as a result of population level changes in allele frequencies.
Measures of Variation Among English and American Dialects Robert Shackleton U.S. Congressional Budget Office.
Inbreeding.
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating IV. Genetic Drift A. Sampling Error.
Sources of VariationAgents of Change MutationN.S. RecombinationDrift - crossing overMigration - independent assortmentMutation Non-random Mating VARIATION.
I. I.Microevolution Evolution occurs when populations don’t meet all the H-W assumptions Process by which a population’s genetic structure changes = microevolution.
PACKET #59 CHAPTER #23 Microevolution 10/31/2015 4:20 PM 1.
Lecture 21 Based on Chapter 21 Population Genetics Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education Inc.
Large-scale recombination rate patterns are conserved among human populations David Serre McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Center UQAM January.
Section 6 Maintenance of Genetic Diversity Levels of genetic diversity result from the joint impacts of: Mutation & migration adding variation Chance &
INTRODUCTION TO ASSOCIATION MAPPING
Bottlenecks reduce genetic variation – Genetic Drift Northern Elephant Seals were reduced to ~30 individuals in the 1800s.
1 Population Genetics Definitions of Important Terms Population: group of individuals of one species, living in a prescribed geographical area Subpopulation:
Evolution of Populations
CONSERVATION GENETICS READINGS: FREEMAN Chapter 55.
Conservation Genetics
Methods  DNA was isolated from blood samples collected at four separate locations.  Samples were Nanodropped to ensure proper concentrations of DNA.
Biological Evolution Standard B – 5.4. Standard B-5 The student will demonstrate an understanding of biological evolution and the diversity of life. Indicator.
The plant of the day Pinus longaevaPinus aristata.
Chapter 16: Evolution of Populations Students know both genetic variation and environmental factors are causes of evolution and diversity or organisms.
Chapter 23 Evolutionary Change in Populations. Population Genetics Evolution occurs in populations, not individuals Darwin recognized that evolution occurs.
 DNA was extracted from New England cottontail fecal pellets 1 using a QiAmp DNeasy Stool Kit (Qiagen) Genetic Structure of an Isolated New England Cottontail.
Population Structure High population divergence at the state level Populations from western Indiana genetically differed from the BONWR population Genetic.
8 and 11 April, 2005 Chapter 17 Population Genetics Genes in natural populations.
EVOLUTION Descent with Modification. How are these pictures examples of Evolution?
Robert Page Doctoral Student in Dr. Voss’ Lab Population Genetics.
Crystiana Tsujiura (’14) and Judy L. Stone
Box 9.1 History of Conservation Genetics
Observed Heterozygosity Expected Heterozygosity
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating
The Evolution of Populations
Genetic drift in finite populations
The Evolution of Populations
Population Conservation
Mechanisms of Evolution Microevolution
Presentation transcript:

Genetic Diversity and Fitness in Black-Footed Ferrets Before and During a Bottleneck S.M. Wisely, S.W. Buskirk, M.A. Fleming, D.B. Mc Donald, and E.A. Ostrander Presented by: Melanie Crawford and Julie Bernard

Background Information Black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) is an endangered N. American carnivore Population decline due to habitat loss and land conversion during 20 th century Underwent bottleneck in mid-1980’s

Background Continued 1985 last wild population (N=40) Epizootics of canine distemper and sylvatic plague 18 individuals captured for breeding By 1986 no individuals living in the wild and 7 captive adults

Objectives To compare genetic diversity before versus during the bottleneck To compare the last wild population to two historical populations To determine whether fitness changes accompanied population changes

Objectives continued To compare the genetic diversity in black-footed ferrets to that of two sibling species, the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni) and the European polecat (Mustela putorius) Mustela eversmanni Mustela putorius

Prediction and Past Info Population genetic theory predicts and some empirical data suggests that genetic variability will decline, and individual fitness and adaptability will be lowered. Previous investigations of genetic diversity in black-footed ferrets found little or no allozyme variation Conservation biologists usually study populations after they become threatened and small

This study makes use of museum specimens to examine the bottleneck, as well as, historical genetic diversity More accurate because it compares current diversity with past diversity

Estimated genetic diversity in two sibling taxa with different population histories: - an undisturbed population of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni) - a bottlenecked population of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) Used to determine if interspecific comparisons of genetic diversity would accurately reflect the bottleneck in black-footed ferrets

Measured litter size in pre- and post- bottleneck black-footed ferrets to measure fitness The data from this experiment provide a test of a fundamental tenet of conservation biology, that severe bottlenecks lead to fitness losses that increase the likelihood of extinction

Materials and Methods Samples Tissue from 20 black-footed ferrets collected between 1891 and Trego County, KS 1891 (n=4; dried skeletal muscle) -Mellette County, SD 1972 (n=4; frozen skeletal muscle) -Meeteetse, WY (12 individuals; frozen kidney, heart, skeletal muscle)

Samples continued Steppe polecats (5 individuals; frozen skeletal muscle) -from a single location near Ba Daer Hu, Inner Mongolia European polecats (6 individuals; skeletal muscle in ethanol) -from a single contemporary population in west- central England

DNA Analysis DNA Extracted Amplified 24 Microsatellite loci

Statistical Analysis Deviations from HWE in pre-bottleneck WY of black-footed ferrets using exact test of HWE Linkage Disequilibrium between pairs of loci in the WY population using an exact test of P Inbreeding within sub-populations of black- footed ferrets and genetic structure among subpopulations

Statistical Analysis continued Differences in genetic diversity among five groups of ferrets: steppe polecat, European polecat, KS, SD, and WY Used three measures of genetic diversity -the number of alleles per locus averaged across loci (A) -the percent polymorphic loci (P o ) -expected heterozygosity (H e )

Statistical Analysis continued Estimated genetic diversity at 4 time periods: -1891: All individuals from 3 subgroups -1972: SD and WY (Assumed KS extinct) -1985: WY pre-bottleneck (12 indiv.) -1985: WY during bottleneck (7 indiv.)

Fitness Used previously published litter sizes Litter size is a measure of female fecundity and kit survival Compared reintroduced SD ( ) and pre-bottleneck WY ( ) # of kits above ground with female; kits were days old

Results DNA Analysis Amplified DNA from 27 high-quality samples at 24 loci 648 possible genotypes Quality of modern and frozen samples much greater than that of desiccated samples 16 single-locus genotypes dropped from analysis due to poor quality replicate amplifications (did not match initial DNA)

Results (con’t) Polymorphism 24 loci polymorphic in black-footed ferrets 21 loci p.m. in at least one species 7 loci p.m. in all three species (3 loci p.m. incl. rarest ferret pops) Allele length in bp (# of alleles) 24 microsattellite markers for three species of Mustela

Results (Con’t) No deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium was found No significant linkage disequilibrium found No significant difference in allele size among species

Results (Con’t) Subpopulations Subpops found to be genetically distinct F st (0.57 +/- 0.15) 16 alleles in 10 loci unique to Great Plains Greater population differentiation between Wyoming and Great plains than between South Dakota and Kansas GP subpops contained many alleles absent in WY, even though sample size was smaller

Results (Con’t) Current distribution of populations Small circles- origins of samples Historically, distribution wider (inset) KS and SD more similar than WY

Results (Con’t) Relief Map of Wyoming; non-populated regions correlate with mountainous regions

Results (Con’t) Significant difference in number of alleles per locus from all ferret species However, no significant difference in black-footed ferret species, specifically

Results (Con’t) When did we lose genetic diversity? Tested in four time periods Pre-Bottleneck During Bottleneck ***Severe loss in diversity between ’72 and ’85– due to extinction of last Great Plains population***

Results (Con’t) Fitness stayed relatively the same Litter size did not differ before and after bottleneck Before bottleneck: 115 litters, 4 years = 3.1 kits per litter After bottleneck: 68 litters, 3 years = 3.2 kits per litter

Discussion and Conclusion Genetic diversity of black-footed ferrets greatest in undisturbed Kansas grassland Greater He Values More polymorphic loci Higher # alleles/locus Genetic diversity of SD and WY less due to small, isolated nature of habitat Gen. div. positively correlated to pop size

Discussion & Conclusion (Con’t) Gen. div. great among subpops Can be only partially explained by genetic drift due to large distance between WY/SD and KS Greatest differentiation between closest subpops (WY/SD) Least differentiation between farthest subpops (SD/KS)

Conclusion and Discussion (Con’t) Abolishment of KS population had little effect on genetic diversity Abolishment of SD population, however, substantially reduced heterozygosity, number of alleles, and % polymorphism >>>Core Satellite Model of Population

Conclusion and Discussion (Con’t) Small decrease in gen. div. due to bottleneck associated with founder event Establishment of the captive population Litter size did not differ between samples species before, or after the bottleneck

Conclusion and Discussion (Con’t) Bottom line: Comparison of genetic diversity among subpops of black-footed ferrets (over 110 years) suggests that genetic diversity was greater prior to the extinction of the Great Plains subpops Bottleneck of WY pop in 1985 induced more loss of genetic diversity Ultimately, population losses, habitat loss, and land conversion account for the loss in genetic diversity