L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das.
Advertisements

12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Efficiency and Purity Studies Outside the VXD: Applying AxialBarrelTrackfinderZ and GarfieldTrackFinder By: Tyler Rice, Chris Meyer August 21, 2007.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
March 13, 2002 Daniel Whiteson L3 tracking - muons! Daniel Whiteson LBL.
22 June 2000 D  NIU Workshop S. Doulas From Detector to Ntuples: Muons Steven Doulas Northeastern University Boston, MA D0 Muon Upgrade Group.
Linear collider muon detector: Marcello Piccolo Amsterdam, April 2003.
Status of CBM muon studies I.Vassiliev, S.Gorbunov, I. Kisel and A.Kiseleva 16-Oct-06 Motivation Simulation tools cbmroot2 v06 Signal and background simulations.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
May 22, 2000Muon ID VR Pushpa Bhat1 Run II Muon Software An Overview Pushpa Bhat Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
1 Pad Chamber Simulation Results for Muon Trigger Upgrade 10/13/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade meeting.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Tracking Software Status Tracking Software Status Norman A. Graf for the tracking group ( prime architect: David Adams ) Software and Data Analysis Workshop.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Aurelio Juste (Fermilab) Rencontres de Moriond, March OUTLINE Tevatron Run 2 The upgraded DØ Detector Status Performance First Physics Results Outlook.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
EM resolutions from low to high energy Jan Stark, LPSC Grenoble CAT Force meeting, May 13 th, 2003.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Layer00 Efficiency Studies Stephen Levy, UChicago.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
W/Z Muon Selection For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001 “Tight” and “Loose” Muon selection for the WZ group.
UIUC - BTeV Muon Trigger S. Davis, M. Haney, M. Selen, Use FPGA hardware + DSP algorithms to find tracks in muon detector subsystem. –Must provide adequate.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Hough-4-14.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Trang Hoang Florida State University - Dzero
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Motivation Fact: The multi-generational structure of the quark doublets requires explanation and could herald compositeness. Under hypothesis of compositeness,
BTeV Muon Trigger Algorithm: Timing: R&D: Overview
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Motivation Fact: The multi-generational structure of the quark doublets requires explanation and could herald compositeness. Under hypothesis of compositeness,
Hit and Tracking Data set used: From loose to tight cuts Pythia p+p
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger Muon efficiencies Muon rejection Summary and Outlook

The D0 Muon system  Central region (|  |  1):  3 layers of drift tubes  1 layer inside, 2 layers outside the toroid  2 layers of scintillation counters  Forward region (1<|  |<2)  3 layers of Iarocci tubes  3 layers of trigger scintillators

Functionality of the L3 trigger Linux PC farm, adapted offline reconstruction code, 45 ms per event M. G. M.W.

Input parameters "Tight" # of scint. hits in A >0 # of wire hits in A >1 # of scint. hits in BC >0 # of wire hits in BC >2  2 of track >0 (i.e. fit converged) "Loose" 1 of the "tight" criteria failed no  2 requirement "A-stub" # of scint. hits in A >0 # of wire hits in A >1 Definitions of muon categories  track quality (below)  transverse momentum  detector region  match with central track or calorimeter

A first glimpse: geometrical coverage On a large scale loose tracks are uniformly distributed in  and  Tracks are missing: at octant boundaries in forward region in the bottom octants at transition from WAMUS to FAMUS Number of loose tracks Single  MC,  flat from -2.5 to 2.5, p t flat from 2.5 to 200 GeV all loose tracks

Efficiencies for single muon MC Overall efficiencies: 50% for "tight." 77% for "loose.“ 71% for "a-stubs." Eff. for tight muons and A- stubs are correlated.

Data: the "Moriond samples" Sample of 1894 selected Di-Muon events in FAMUS  I n 84 % of the events at least one a-stub was found by the trigger  " 82 % " " " at least two a-stubs were found  " 83 % " " " at least one loose muons were found  " 81 % " " " at least two loose muons were found  " 78 % " " " at least one tight muon was found  " 46 % " " " at least two tight muons were found

Rejection factors over L1  Data: special run with L1 trigger “mu1ptxctxx” only  events  Without p t cut the rejection factor is 1.88 for loose and 4.1 for tight muon tracks

The next steps  Fix memory leak.  Event by event comparison of L3 results and offline reconstruction.  Improve efficiency. Problem in unpacker ?  Implement cross-octant segments etc.  Build relational filters for physics. Summary current status  L3 muon trigger works “in principle”  Efficiencies too low