Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) Globally An overview Niklas Höhne 16/01/2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ongoing discussions on the formulation of National Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) and their possible inclusion as market mechanisms in a post-2012.

Advertisements

Seite 1 Introduction to TRANSfer: A new GIZ Project on Transport NAMAs Towards climate-friendly transport technologies and activities Dr.-Ing.

NAMAs and the Building Sector UNFCCC Workshop Buildings under UNFCCC Flexible Mechanisms Chia-Chin Cheng UNEP-SBCI Beihang University International Green.

1 Programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change (Decision 17/CP.8) Seoul, Rep. Of Korea 26 – 30 September 2005 Dominique Revet (UNFCCC)

Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation

Conceptualizing NAMAs within Green Growth Plans Ben Sims Regional Officer Global Green Growth Institute.

- The NAMA Facility - Experience with Providing Support for the Implementation of NAMAs NAMA work programme – SBI in-session workshop 5 June 2014, Bonn.

Ann Gordon Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment Belmopan Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in the post 2012.

Ideas on NAMA development and implementation Carolyn Neufeld KfW Carbon Fund.

UNFCCC secretariat Tshering Dolma Sherpa Status of negotiations on NAMAs UNFCCC LAC Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs 31 August – 2 September, 2014, Bogota,

Beyond CDM: Options for the wind industry 21 April 2010, Warshaw EWEC 2010 Marion Vieweg.

The NAMA Governance Structure in Lebanon Rola El Sheikh Ministry of Environment NAMA Regional Workshop Singapore August

UNFCCC Secretariat SDM programme CDM‘s contribution to global climate action; its sucesses and further contribution Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC secretariat.

Setting the Scene.. Do we need a general slide on the CC/development relationship, or do they ‘get’ this already? John Drexhage Director, Climate Change.

Regional Programms Climate Change Mitigation Alexandra Soezer Carbon Technical Advisor Bonn, March 24 th 2012.

1 Carbon Markets - from CDM to NAMAs Dr. Silke Karcher German Federal Ministry of Environment Alexanderstraße 3 / Berlin Fon:

NAMA Facility Support for the Implementation of NAMAs

Mitigation in the context of national sustainable development plans and strategies Miriam Hinostroza & Karen Olsen UNEP DTU Partnership Latin American.

UNFCCC secretariat - Mitigation, Data and Analysis Programme Gopal Raj Joshi, Associate Programme Officer Overview and Status of Operation of NAMA Registry.

Adaptation & Technology Gaps Anne Olhoff Head of Programme Climate Resilient Development UNEP Risø Centre UNEP Adaptation Knowledge Day V, Bonn, 9 June.

Technical aspects of NAMAs: Options and methodologies for developing baselines for different categories of NAMAs* Neha Pahuja Associate.

Climate Action 1 International Climate Action – EU Contribution EU – Central Asia Working Group on Environmental Governance and Climate Change 2 nd Meeting.

Robust institutional arrangements for national mitigation efforts Karen Holm Olsen & Miriam Hinostroza Low Carbon Development Programme UNEP DTU Partnership.

FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture

Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions What Could “Nationally Appropriate” Entail in an Indian Context Srinivas K, & Tirthankar Mandal, CANSA, New Delhi,

1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.

EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on

The NAMA Facility – Support for the Implementation of NAMAs.

The GEF Experience in Financing Technology Transfer: Overview Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Europe and CIS Dubrovnik, Croatia, February.

Colombia Experience on Institutional Arrangement for NAMAs Nathaly Torregroza Vargas Nathaly Torregroza Vargas Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable.

UNFCCC Secretariat From PoA to NAMAs - Co-existence (opportunities and challenges) Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America.

UNFCCC Secretariat Utilizing the existing CDM institutional arrangements for NAMAs Perumal Arumugam Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America.

Andrew Howard, UNFCCC secretariat Manager for Strategy, Collaboration and Communications (Carbon Markets) Introduction to INDCs and the role of economic.

GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.

Sudhir Sharma, URC 5th June 2014 Bonn, Germany Overview of NAMAs listed in UNFCCC Registry - Expressed support needs Sudhir Sharma Senior Climate Change.

Cost assessment of capacity building requirements for market mechanisms 10 March 2010 Dr. Niklas Höhne, Ecofys,

The Green Climate Fund: Challenges and Opportunities Some thoughts on how the Green Climate Fund could close the Energy Justice gap Martin Hiller, Energy.

Post-Kyoto: Copenhagen Copenhagen Accord – Leading up to the meeting – developing country arguments: Developed countries must “take the lead” NAMAs must.

Markets & Mechanisms Developments inside and outside the UNFCCC negotiations. Building and Urban Methodologies Workshop UNFCCC, Bonn, March 2014.

Global Environment Facility Climate Change 14 May 2004 Siv Tokle GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Unit.

The Kyoto Protocol’s Flexibility Mechanisms. Major Issues in Implementing Flex Mechs Supplementarity Additionality – Baselines – Additionality – Leakage.

UNFCCC secretariat William Kojo Agyemang-Bonsu, Manager, Non-Annex I Support sub-programme, Mitigation, Data and Analysis Programme Nationally Appropriate.

CDM: Enhancing demand and improving supply Fatima-Zahra Taibi, UNFCCC secretariat Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America and the Caribbean.

NAMA Facility Support for the Implementation of NAMAs UNFCCC Regional Workshop Sept. 2015, Santiago, Chile.

The Emissions Gap Report 2015 Geneva ♦ 6 November, 2015 What contributions do the INDCs make towards the 2 0 C target? How can the 2030 emissions gap be.

UNFCCC secretariat From CDM to NAMAs – Synergies between CDM and NAMAs Perumal Arumugam Latin American Carbon Forum, Bogota (03 – 05 Sep 2014)

Ann Gordon Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment Belmopan Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions in the post 2012.

Panel discussion for international support for NAMAs and LEDS Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for Latin America and the Caribbean 31 August – 2 September,

KfW Carbon Fund From PoA to NAMA Barcelona 31th of May 2011.

REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.

Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.

| Paul Lucas 1 Future energy system challenges for Africa: Insights from Integrated Assessment Models 1 st Africa Sustainable Development Forum.

NAMAs in the Context of National Sustainable Development Karen Holm Olsen Brainstorming session, 9 April 2013, AM (CET) UNFCCC coordinated.

Post 2012 Carbon Market Development Global Carbon Markets 9. August 2011 Jørgen Fenhann.

Local Action Moves the World ICLEI’s Experience on Cities & Climate Change Sunandan Tiwari ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability, South Asia EM.

Pan Xunzhang Understanding the fairness of countries’ (I)NDCs under the Paris Agreement goals Pan Xunzhang Academy of Chinese.

GEF Support for Renewable Energy in SIDS and The Paris Agreement

Colombia Experience on Institutional Arrangement for NAMAs

Institutional Strengthening Support

Overview of the international climate policy & finance framework and the building of the REDD+ mechanism Josep A. Garí Africa Advisor, UN-REDD Programme.

Emily Chessin Representative of Regional Specialist

NAMA Database & Annual Status Report on NAMAs

Launch of the Urban Pathways project

Climate Change Technical Advisor

NAMAs and INDCs: what are the interlinkages

Panel Discussion on Supporting NDC Implementation Through Market and Non-Market Based Approaches: Carbon Pricing and More 6 September 2016 Kazuhisa KOAKUTSU.

enhancing global climate ambition through markets

UNFCCC Needs-based Finance (NBF) Project

The Initiative for Climate Action Transparency

cCR; GPC Workstream and implementation: Sub-national to national

Presentation transcript:

Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) Globally An overview Niklas Höhne 16/01/2014

© ECOFYS | | Outline 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne2

© ECOFYS | | Timeline of the international climate negotiations Niklas Höhne Bali 2007: “Nationally appropriate mitigation actions by developing country Parties in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity-building, in a measurable, reportable and verifiable manner” 16/01/20143

© ECOFYS | | NAMAs submitted in 2009 Targets South Africa: GHG reduction target of 34% from business as usual (BAU) emissions growth trajectory by 2020 and of 42% by 2025 Strategies Côte d'Ivoire: Elaboration of an action plan for renewable energy Policies and programmes Botswana: Various policies in the transportation sector Projects Togo: Projects to replace existing lamps with high efficiency lamps 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne4

© ECOFYS | | Financing of NAMAs 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne5

© ECOFYS | | Outline 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne6

© ECOFYS | | Niklas Höhne16/01/20147

© ECOFYS | | Financial support can narrow the gap 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne8 Source: UNEP 2013

© ECOFYS | | Progress in climate policy 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne9 Countries covering 67% of global emissions implement climate laws or strategies Source: Dubash et al / Size scaled to national GHG emissions in 2010

© ECOFYS | | Outline 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne10

© ECOFYS | | Global NAMA action > 83 NAMAs and 32 feasibility studies in 34 countries 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne11 Source:

© ECOFYS | | 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne12 State of play of NAMAs > 40 submissions to the UNFCCC Registry: 50% from two countries; 4 unilateral > NAMA Database contains 83 NAMAs and 32 studies from 34 countries Source:

© ECOFYS | | 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne13 Regional distribution of NAMAs > Latin America most active region – Followed by Africa (not Asia!) – Europe: Serbia submitted 12 NAMAs > Broader regional spread than CDM – Africa and Least Developed countries notably larger share – Possible reasons ● NAMA emphasize on national appropriateness and sustainable development ● Flexibility in design ● Asian reluctance to phrase mitigation action as NAMAs CDM NAMA Source: accessed 15/01/2014 Source: Ecofys et al 2013

© ECOFYS | | 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne14 Sectoral distribution of NAMAs CDM NAMA Source: accessed 15/01/2014 Source: Ecofys et al 2013 > Energy supply still largest share (36%) – Followed by transport and buildings > Broader sectoral coverage than in CDM – Esp. transport and buildings notably more relevant – Possible reasons ● Less stringent MRV requirements ● Accounting for medium to long term emission reduction and transformational change possible

© ECOFYS | | CDM only projects 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne15 Types of NAMAs NAMA > Policy, programmes, strategies and plans NAMA is the focus (59%)

© ECOFYS | | Outline 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne16

© ECOFYS | | NAMA success stories > NAMA facility (UK/Germany) has been set up and finances the implementation of 5 project – Chile: Self-supply Renewable Energy – Costa Rica: Low Carbon Coffee NAMA – Mexico: NAMA for Sustainable New Housing – Colombia: Transit-oriented Development – Indonesia: Sustainable Urban Transport Program Indonesia > Best practice examples for NAMA process – Indonesia - Institutional framework and coordination of NAMAs – Bhutan - Application of a rapid gender assessment to identify entry points and targets for women in LEDS/NAMA design – Lebanon - NAMA Prioritization Process 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne17 Source: nama-facility.org

© ECOFYS | | NAMA outlook and challenges > Overall level of ambition not sufficient to reach 2°C limit – Fast progress on NAMAs essential – Progress on NAMA finance in 2015 agreement > Is the vague definition of NAMAs an opportunity or a barrier? – National appropriateness will need to be balanced with need for defining NAMAs further > Transparency – Submitted proposals vary in degree of detail – (Best practice) learning across countries difficult > Financing – Level of financing available needs to be sufficient – Difficult determination of which share of the action is financed 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne18 Challenges on NAMA will be covered in a later presentation

© ECOFYS | | Backup slides 16/01/2014Niklas Höhne19

© ECOFYS | | Climate Action Tracker Niklas Höhne16/01/201420