Talk to Us Approach to Evaluation Lindsay Wager 1 st April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Talking Mats Project Scottish Borders Council Enabling people with dementia to continue to communicate their views, needs and preferences as their condition.
Advertisements

An exploration of the experience of patients who participate in research as co-learners with primary care teams Louise Worswick, PhD Student/Researcher,
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Pupil voice: comfortable and uncomfortable for teachers.
Personal Project REPORT.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Wynne HARLEN Susana BORDA CARULLA Fibonacci European Training Session 5, March 21 st to 23 rd, 2012.
Secondary and Further Education Pupils into University: An outreach Summer School Project working with pupils aged fourteen to nineteen. Jane Ellis and.
The Religious Education Quality Mark St Gabriel’s Teachers’ Weekend September 2013 Jane Brooke and Mary Myatt.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Letter of Information & Consent Process Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Virtual Interactions For Online Learning Mawdudur Rahman, Ph.D. Visiting Professor, College of Business Zayed University Dubai, UAE Online Chats and Threads.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Leadership Development Programme
PROJECT OVERVIEW. Grundtvig Learning Partnership Through this Learning Partnership, participating organizations have agreed to address the following subjects:
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development PILOT WORKSHOP EVALUATION MARY RICHARDSON MER CONSULTING.
Evaluating the impact of careers guidance for continuous improvement
Please help yourself to a drink. We will start at 9.15a.m.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
ADAPTED FROM: EPSTEIN, J. L., ET AL., (2002). SCHOOL, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS: YOUR HANDBOOK FOR ACTION, SECOND EDITION. Interactive Homework.
Annamari Ylonen and Brahm Norwich Evaluation of the project.
The LCVP is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan A Teacher’s Experience of WSE LCVP Conference.
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Teacher Documentation Form (1 of 4) Ambassador name: mail: fax: This form will help you to document the LOLA process you implemented in your class and.
Julie Thomson and Margaret McCann Glasgow Caledonian University Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Using Technology to Encourage Social Interaction.
PRIMARY SCIENCE Education Consultancy Primary Science Quality Mark Funded by the Wellcome Trust.
Strathkinness Primary School An introduction to the Curriculum for Excellence – 24 th March 2010 (Revised March 30 th 2010 with new links added)
ArtFULL – finding and using evidence of learning Centre for Education and Industry University of Warwick.
Consult Research 27th April 2010 Supporting the Transition to Fatherhood: An Evaluation of HTGC in Staffordshire Claire Fraser Consult Research w:
© The Association for Dementia Studies Mixed methods evaluation of the Intergenerational Schools Dementia Project The challenges of working with children.
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
Museums and Galleries Education Programme 2 Final Report Centre for Education and Industry University of Warwick.
Evaluation of an IPL Seminar Series Dr Jane Day, Head of Division & Dr Ruth Strudwick, Senior Lecturer School of Nursing & Midwifery, and School of Science,
Creativity Project Learning Outside the Classroom St John’s Catholic Primary School, Burscough.
Parental Informal Payments to Education Latvia’s report.
Y9 Option Pathways 2013 to Aim of the Evening  To fully explain the process of the Y9 Option Pathways from the point of view of pupils in the school.
Research Ethics Western University Non-Medical Research Ethics Board Letter of Information & Consent Process Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
Resources and Support for Personal Tutors and other staff – Updates, August 2015 Contents: Online guidance, resources & FAQs for staff and students Student.
Supervising Workplacement Learning at Work. Goals How learning has changed in the last few years. Learning at work through a three way partnership. Collecting.
We are all learners: changing a school culture Tanya Thompson and Keith Jackson St Andrews Middle School.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
Silver Arts Award Guide Use this PowerPoint to help you to complete your Silver Arts Award. The instructions in GREEN tell you what you need to do, these.
Keeping on Track 5 th February 2014 NBP16 PEG PAIR PURPOSEFUL ASPIRATIONAL INDEPENDENT RESILIENT.
June 2004 Marisa Agostinelli. Tutors’ meeting programme REPORTING AND REFLECTING on the teachers’ training course.REPORTING AND REFLECTING BREAKING NEWS:
Traffic lights show news that the school thinks is GOOD, REQUIRING IMPROVEMENT, or INADEQUATE. The Palmer Academy Self-Evaluation for Parents & Carers.
PBL Instructional Design. PBL Instructional Design Name: Name of PBL: Grade Level: Content Area:
SUPPORTING PEOPLE PROVIDER FORUMS An overview of Supporting People’s new approach to Performance Monitoring and Quality Assurance.
29 September 2010 Experience, strengths and needs in capacity building for evidence uptake SECURE Health Partners Planning Meeting 9 December 2013 Dr Aaron.
The Religious Education Quality Mark. Why an RE Quality Mark? How would it be if ….. The quality of the RE in your school was celebrated and acknowledged?
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Governor Support Service Training Governor Workshop 31 st March 2016 As a service we have a responsibility to enable all governors to access appropriate,
Giving our audience a voice Stephanie Pace, ZSL London Zoo.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Evaluating outreach initiatives
Welcome to Scottish Improvement Skills
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
EDC/HRE policies and practices based on research and evaluation
The English RCT of ‘Families and Schools Together’
Tim Peake Project Space Ambassador Training
South Texas Psychiatric PBRN
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Program Evaluation Essentials-- Part 2
Employer engagement: too little too late?
What are the key elements of observing and giving feedback?
Name of presentation 28 April, 2019
Unit 5: Working with Parents and Others in Early Years
Presentation transcript:

Talk to Us Approach to Evaluation Lindsay Wager 1 st April 2014

2 Questionnaires written by PhD student (member of Outreach team). Pupils- pre involvement questionnaire - post visit questionnaire - focus groups - celebration event questionnaire Teachers- pre involvement questionnaire - interviews - post project questionnaire Researchers- pre involvement questionnaire - interviews - post project questionnaire Year 1 Purpose: to evidence impact of project in terms of intended outcomes and to inform practice regarding content, structure, level etc. of programmes.

3 School StudentsTeachersResearchers Senior Managers in Schools Main aims and objectives -Understanding of purpose of research at University -Understanding about the research topic relating to the sub-project -Understanding about intentions to study at HE and engage in future research -Understanding of purpose of research at University -Confidence in leading their own research projects within school -Views on students’ interest in attending HE, engagement with research and researchers -Views on benefits for students, school and personal being involved in project -Challenges and barriers of involvement -Perceived impact of project on students, school and personal -Views on working with school students -View on personal barriers and concerns with engagement to project -Views on impact of interactions to students and teachers -Personal impact of interactions -Views on how student and teacher feedback is influencing development/review of activities -Views on benefits for school, teachers and students being involved -Perceived impact of project on students, school and teachers involved Methodologies -Questionnaires to all participating students (pre and post interactions) -Focus group of 5-6 randomly selected students from each participating school -Questionnaires to all lead contact teachers from each school (pre and post interaction) -Interview with each contact teacher -Interview with teachers who withdraw from project -Questionnaires to all researchers -Focus group -Exit interviews for any researchers who withdraw from project -Interviews (towards end of project 2017) Timeline of evaluation interaction -Pre-interaction questionnaire to be completed before first interaction with researchers -Post-event interaction questionnaire -Focus group session up to 2months after the first interaction -End of year/full interaction celebration event questionnaire to be completed at end of year celebration event -Pre-interaction questionnaire to be completed on agreeing to be part of project -Interview session up to 2 months after first interaction -Post-interaction questionnaire to be completed at end of year celebration event -Exit interview should school withdraw from project -Pre-interaction questionnaire -Focus group session up to 2 months after first interaction -Post-interaction questionnaire to be completed at end of year celebration event -Exit interview should researcher withdraw from project -Initial interview to coincide with first interaction/school signing up to project -Final interview to take place after last interaction in year 3 of project

4 Focus of questionnaires/ nature of questions Lost PhD student Programmes didn’t follow planned structure due to planning process. logistics involved with paper questionnaires Pupil/ parental consent Difficulty getting data from researchers Celebration event questionnaire Useful data on impact of project on academic aspirations and enjoyment of science at school. Useful feedback and positive comments from pupils. Focus groups particularly useful in lieu of questionnaires. Issues encountered Successes

5 Original pupil questionnaireNew pupil questionnaire Have you visited the University of Southampton before? If yes, please describe the activity. Does anyone in your family have a degree? If yes, please state who? How interested are you in attending university? How do you feel about learning science at school? How interested are you in studying science subjects after your GCSEs? How would you rate your confidence in leading your own scientific research in school? Do you think scientific research is used by companies or the general public? What do you hope to find out during the visit today? Have you visited the University of Southampton with your school before? What do you think the term ‘research’ means? Why do you think universities carry out research? Do you think the scientific research that happens at the University of Southampton is directly relevant to your everyday life? Please explain your answer. How confident are you at carrying out scientific investigations at school? Use focus groups to unpick ideas they have related to themselves as researchers.

6 Questions to focus on information required Questionnaires and consent forms online (will still need parental consent forms for pupils). Nature of questions? (focus for researcher and teacher questionnaires). Parental consent? Long term impact? Senior management? Getting full data sets (particularly researchers). Moving forward… Feedback…