The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system Claudio QUINTANO, Rosalia CASTELLANO, Sergio LONGOBARDI University of Naples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Reasons behind the Results Markku Linna
Advertisements

Potential impact of PISA
Contextual effects In the previous sections we found that when regressing pupil attainment on pupil prior ability schools vary in both intercept and slope.
Equity - Research Reveals the What, the Where and the How November 21, 2011.
Programme for International Student Assessment PISA 2009 Competences of Portuguese students Warsaw, February 10, 2011 Carlos Pinto-Ferreira, Anabela Serrão.
PISA OECD Programme for International Student Assessment Learning trends Maciej Jakubowski 10 February 2011 Learning Trends Changes in student performance.
1 OECD Mean, OECD Average and Computation of Standard Errors on Differences Guide to the PISA Data Analysis ManualPISA Data Analysis Manual.
Understanding relationships between education, health and well-being among young people: what can the HBSC study contribute? Professor Candace Currie HBSC.
Hierarchical Linear Modeling: An Introduction & Applications in Organizational Research Michael C. Rodriguez.
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
According to the Statistical Yearbook for 2010, in 2008/09 year, only 41% of the total number of children in Serbia, aged between 0 and 7 years, were enrolled.
24 July 2014 PISA 2012 Financial Literacy results – New Zealand in an international context.
Cross-national Variations in Educational Achievement and Child Well-being Dominic Richardson International Society for Child Indicators Inaugural Conference.
Deborah Cobb-Clark (U Melbourne) Mathias Sinning (ANU) Steven Stillman (U Otago)
December Dubai, UAE International Assessments What is Going on Around the World How TIMSS is used to improve educational performance What Works.
Hacettepe University Usluel, Y. K., Kelecioğlu, H. & Mazman, S.G. COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER AND INTERNET USAGE OF PISA BALKAN COUNTRIES 2010.
A fuzzy clustering approach to improve the accuracy of Italian students’data An experimental procedure to correct the impact of the outliers on assessment.
LINEAR REGRESSION: Evaluating Regression Models. Overview Standard Error of the Estimate Goodness of Fit Coefficient of Determination Regression Coefficients.
Clustered or Multilevel Data
ICT and Education Indicators S
Analysis of Clustered and Longitudinal Data
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Introduction to plausible values National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
1. Measuring the Impact of Universal Preschool Education and Care on Literacy Performance Scores. Tarek Mostafa Institute of Education – University of.
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS Access to & use of ICT in education: A few results from a school survey Yanhong Zhang.
School Dropout in Rural Vietnam: Does Gender Matter?
Using PISA data in performance audit: Schooling of immigrant students in Finland Dr. Tanja Kirjavainen National Audit Office of Finland 8 th meeting of.
Validation of the Assessment and Comparability to the PISA Framework Hao Ren and Joanna Tomkowicz McGraw-Hill Education CTB.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Sampling and Nested Data in Practice- Based Research Stephen Zyzanski, PhD Department of Family Medicine Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
Gender, math and equality of opportunities Marina Murat Giulia Pirani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Productivity, Investment.
Early Selection in Hungary A Possible Cause of High Educational Inequality Daniel Horn research fellow Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
The PDST is funded by the Department of Education and Skills under the National Development Plan, Overview for Parents and the difference they.
Case Studies Harry Anthony Patrinos World Bank November 2009.
2007 by The Education Trust, Inc. Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 Prepared by the Education Trust December 2007.
Education and educational policy in the enlarged EU – the case of the Czech Republic NATIONAL CONTEXT New school act equity as a priority self evaluation.
Introduction Multilevel Analysis
Assessing assessment: the role of student effort in comparative studies Ray Adams Jayne Butler.
1 STANDARD ERRORS ON DIFFERENCES. How to compute the standard error of the difference between : – Two countries; – An OECD country and the OECD total.
Parents’ basic skills and children’s test scores Augustin De Coulon, Elena Meschi and Anna Vignoles.
Factor validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: An Assessment and Review Tom R. EikebrokkEllen K. NyhusUniversity of Agder.
Explaining variation in CCE outcomes (Chapters 7 & 8) National Research Coordinators Meeting Madrid, February 2010.
ראמ " ה The National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education Correlation between Pre-primary Education and Achievements in PISA 2009 Joel.
Widening Participation in Higher Education: A Quantitative Analysis Institute of Education Institute for Fiscal Studies Centre for Economic Performance.
Self-assessment Accuracy: the influence of gender and year in medical school self assessment Elhadi H. Aburawi, Sami Shaban, Margaret El Zubeir, Khalifa.
11th July 2008 University of Naples “Parthenope” – Faculty of Economics Department of Statistics and Mathematics for Economic Research 1 Evaluating the.
GENDER GAPS IN EDUCATION Angelica SALVI DEL PERO Social Policy Division Evidence from the OECD Flemish Ministry of Education & Training 18 October 2012.
School-level Correlates of Achievement: Linking NAEP, State Assessments, and SASS NAEP State Analysis Project Sami Kitmitto CCSSO National Conference on.
1 OECD Mean, OECD Average and Computation of Standard Errors on Differences Guide to the PISA Data Analysis ManualPISA Data Analysis Manual.
Sampling and Nested Data in Practice-Based Research Stephen Zyzanski, PhD Department of Family Medicine Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.
Reliability performance on language tests is also affected by factors other than communicative language ability. (1) test method facets They are systematic.
Q ROME, JULY 2008 Implementation and evaluation of imputation strategies to improve the data accuracy The case of Italian students data from.
By R. Gambacorta and A. Neri Bank of Italy - Statistical Analysis Directorate Wealth and its returns: economic inequality in Italy, The Bank.
Multivariate statistical methods. Multivariate methods multivariate dataset – group of n objects, m variables (as a rule n>m, if possible). confirmation.
1 Perspectives on the Achievements of Irish 15-Year-Olds in the OECD PISA Assessment
1 Main achievement outcomes continued.... Performance on mathematics and reading (minor domains) in PISA 2006, including performance by gender Performance.
Factors associated with achievement in PISA 2006 Why? Why? –Establishing links –Identifying things we can change –Valuable data in its own right E.g. bullying,
1 Gender and PISA Mathematics: Irish Results in Context SEAN CLOSE and GERRY SHIEL Educational Research Centre, St. Patrick’s College, Dublin, Ireland.
What is PIAAC?.
World Beaters or Underachievers
What have we learned from PISA and TIMSS?
Session 6: Education- International databases and comparisons
Assessments for Monitoring and Improving the Quality of Education
Esteban Villalobos, Diego Portales University
Lecture 4 - Model Selection
Between-school Variance in Achievement
ELEMENTS OF HIERARCHICAL REGRESSION LINEAR MODELS
From GLM to HLM Working with Continuous Outcomes
Educational Testing Service
MGS 3100 Business Analysis Regression Feb 18, 2016
Presentation transcript:

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system Claudio QUINTANO, Rosalia CASTELLANO, Sergio LONGOBARDI University of Naples “Parthenope” Statistical Methods for the analysis of large data-sets University G. d'Annunzio - Chieti-Pescara September 23, 2009 – September 25, 2009

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 2 Overview Investigating the determinants of student achievement Highlighting the influence of the TEST-TAKING MOTIVATION on territorial differences Italian data from the last PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) survey edition (2006) A MULTILEVEL REGRESSION MODEL is applied This approach is suggested by the hierarchical structure of the PISA data where students (level-one units) are nested in schools (level-two units) DATA GOAL METHOD

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 3 PISA students ( in Italy) schools (806 in Italy) 57 Countries The survey has involved The OECD’s PISA “Programme for International Student Assessment” survey is an internationally standardised assessment administered to 15 years old students

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 4 The survey assesses the students’ competencies in three areas Reading literacy Scientific literacy Mathematical literacy The OECD collects data on STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRE SCHOOL QUESTIONNAIRE SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS FAMILY ENVIRONMENT OF STUDENT PISA 2006 COGNITIVE TEST

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 5 International ranking -Reading literacy- ITALY: 469 points OECD average: 492 points Italy ranked 33th in reading among 57 countries

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 6 ITALY:462 points OECD average: 498 points Italy ranked 38th in mathematics among 57 countries International ranking -Mathematical literacy-

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 7 Italy ranked 31th in Science among 57 countries ITALY:475 points OECD average: 500 points International ranking -Scientific literacy-

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 8 The literacy divide READING MATHEMATICS SCIENCE

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 9 Determinants of learning outcomes Many studies (Marks, 2006; Korupp et al., 2002) emphasize the role of socio-economic background for determining learning outcomes and explaining the territorial differences. This work aims to asses how much the DIFFERENCES IN THE TEST-TAKING MOTIVATION “boost” the effect of socio economic background on the Italian literacy divide

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 10 Low stake test The PISA test is considered as a low stake test since the students perceive an absence of personal consequences associated with their test performance. Without an adequate effort, test performance is likely to suffer, resulting in the examinee’s test score underestimating his or her actual level of proficiency (Wise and De Mars, 2005; Wolf & Smith, 1995; Wolf, Smith, & Birnbaum, 1995)

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 11 Index of student effort 1.the “Test non-response rate” computed on the basis of the number of missing or invalid answers in the PISA cognitive test An index of student effort is computed on the basis of three variables : 3. the Students’self-report effort in the PISA questionnaire measured on a 10- point scale 2. the “Questionnaire non-response rate” computed on the basis of the number of missing or invalid answers in the PISA student questionnaire (family environment data)

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 12 Effort and performance Variation of the index of student effort in correspondence of the average performance at macro region level. Italy=100 The correlation coefficient between this index and the science performance is equal to 0,553 at national level

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 13 A two-level random intercept regression model is adopted Multilevel approach Variables at student level Variables at school level Error components ε ij ~ IID-N(0, σ 2 ) U 0j ~ IID-N(0, τ 2 ) cov(U 0j, ε ij )= 0 Outcome of i th student of j th school (Science plausible values)

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 14 Student performance (Science Test score) Scholastic context -School mean of ESCS -Parents’pressure -Private vs public Study programme Technical, Professional, Vocational, Lower secondary vs Classical studies Macro area North East, North West, South, South and Islands vs Centre Scholastic resources -Computers with web -Quality of educational resources -Teacher shoratge Gender Girls vs boys Home educational resources Self confidence in ICT Hours per week spent on homework Immigration background 1. or 2. generation vs native LEVEL 2 School j LEVEL 1: Student i within School j Causal structure of multilevel model

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 15 Estimation strategy A block entry approach is adopted (Choen and Choen, 1983) which consists to the gradual addition of the first and second level covariates The process starts with the simplest model, denoted the empty model, and then progressively adds complexity introducing school and student variables In the last model the index of student effort is considered with 8 school variables and 5 students variables

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 16 Block Entry Approach Student variables Scholastic context Study programme Scholastic resources School location Student effort Empty model

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 17 Pre-R 2 Proportion reduction in variance or “variance explained” (PRE-R 2 ) Variance component EMPTY MODEL Full model without effort index Full model with effort index Variance between schools 5, , Variance within schools 4, , , Variance expalined at school level - 80,82%88,97%

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 18 Effect of the student variables

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 19 Effect of the school variables

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 20 The index of student effort allows to explain a larger amount of variance, indeed after controlling for students motivation the accounted total variance total variance among schools increases from 80% to 89% socio-economic context The analysis confirms that the socio-economic context plays an important role on the student achievement The North-South divide has been overestimated by the PISA test since the score differences are also influenced by the lower effort and engagement of the Southern students Main findings

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 21 Territorial dummies With effort index:-25.46% With effort index:+0.82% With effort index:-48.47% With effort index:-47.50%

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 22 Collaboration indexes

The literacy divide: territorial differences in the Italian education system C.QUINTANO, R.CASTELLANO, S.LONGOBARDI 23 Transformation steps Rescaling procedure in order to obtain a common scale (0- 1) for each indicator (growing when the non- response rate declines) COLLABORATION INDEX 1) 2)