Join Together Project – Objective 2.4 Assessment Competence: Introduction & Overview Sandy Bowen University of Northern Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objective 2.4 ~ Assessment Competence = Team Leaders = Team Experts= Members 6/15/05.
Advertisements

Topical Team 2.2 Academic Content and Content Best Practices October 25 and 27, 2004 Brenda Simmons, University of Tennessee.
JOIN TOGETHER OBJECTIVE 1.2 & 2.3 FACULTY COMPETENCE WITH TECHNOLOGY & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MASTER TEACHER & PRE-SERVICE TEACHER TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCE.
Join Together Advisory Board Evaluation Team Report Donna Mertens Katrina Bledsoe Heidi Holmes Pauline Ginsburg ACE-DHH Conference Denver, Colorado February.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
North Carolina Positive Behavior Intervention & Support State Recognition Exemplar School Application PowerPoint Presentation.
Charter School Presentation May 2008 From the Page to the Stage Getting the Work Done!
Grade-level and Competency Portfolios for 2014 MCAS-Alt
Know Your Presidents Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher Guide Preservice.
The Kirn Primary School model of the curriculum James Wylie, HT Rockfield Primary Robyn McIlroy, ADHT, Kirn Primary.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Victorian Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat
New Opportunities in the Special Education Space NEKIA Business Development Institute November 17, 2005 Jane West, Ph.D. Washington Partners, LLC.
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
Project Workshops Schedule. 2 Important Points to Note Project Workshops will be Thursday at 1315 in LC 50 These workshops are compulsory for all project.
Assessment and Students who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing: Challenges and Recommendations John Luckner Ed.D. and Sandy Bowen, Ph.D. CEC Annual Convention and.
Liberal Studies CSU Stanislaus Blended Liberal Studies / Teacher Preparation Program Portfolio Objective: CSET Prep in a T eacher P erformance E xpectations.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Needs Assessment Sample Clover School Data Source: ADE, Federal Programs and School Improvement Units
Elementary Planning Process
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Pondamania: Exploring Pond Viability Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher.
Secondary Assessments Chet Laine Karen Haring November 10, 2010.
A case study of Quality Standards implementation in TASNEE Company ISO 9001: 2000, ISO 14001:2004 & OHSAS By Abdulgader Alharthi.
The National Agenda: Moving Forward on Achieving Educational Equality for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students Claire Bugen & Jay Innes National Summit April.
H. Johnson1 Join Together: A Vision for the Future – A Difference for Us All.
Exploring Strategies for the Secondary Level in Mathematics Patricia Latham and Cathie McQueeney September 28, 2006.
The Standards and Instructional Support Team Standards-Inspired Planning: By Teachers for Teachers, The Future of Instructional Design Standards and Instructional.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
Faubion Elementary School Ms.O’Neal Faubion Elementary School Ms.O’Neal Kindergarten- Room 3 Kindergarten- Room 3.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Resources for School and District Planning August 15, 2014.
Dissertation Proposal By Daniel D. Fasano October 15, 2013.
Oklahoma Academic Standards: What Career Tech Educators Need to Know For the Road Ahead Kerri White, Ed.D. Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educator.
Processes Development Department Of Education June 6 th, 2008.
1 Classrooms as Learning Portals: Teachers & Students as Learners Harold Johnson Kent State University “Join Together” K20.
SESSION 2.1 PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT TASKS IN GET GRADES R-9.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 3http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
 Before being accepted into the education program one had to do 30 hours of observation › This lets you know if you really want to be an educator  There.
1 Using What we Know, Learning What we Need: A Community of Learners for Deaf Education May 1, 2008 State Leaders Summit – Great Falls, MT Harold Johnson/Professor.
1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn.
Welcome to Central Middle School
Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Partnering to Help All Kids Learn New Jersey Current Partners: / NJ: 85.
EGS Research & Consulting Evaluation Activities and Intermediate Impact Measures Impact Survey Long-Term Impact Measures Year 3 Survey.
Join Together: A Nationwide On-Line Community of Practice and Professional Development School Dedicated to Instructional Effectiveness and Academic Excellence.
Gabriel Cappozzo Teacher Portfolio
Working on Your Units 12:00-1:30 – Components Overview Break 1:45-3:30 – Arts Performance Info.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
NORTHEN ZONE:MONDULI TC. 1. Prepare notes for their lesson plans in which they identify topics, student competencies, learning objectives for activities.
Common Core: Just the Basics Deanna E. Mayers Director of Curriculum Blendedschools.net.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
The Instructional Practice Suite for ELA/Literacy Core Advocate Webinar November 17, :00 – 8:00 EST The webinar will begin shortly. You may wish.
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
Preparing ELL Children for Success By Yolanda Hairston.
RDG 350 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Standards Based Presentation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
CJA 354 Week 4 Learning Team Sentencing Proposal (Preparation) NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at NEW/CJA-354-Week-4-Learning-Team-
Orientation to the Self-Assessment Process in Head Start.
Pinpoint Math.
Teaching & Learning Staff and Work Plan
Tennessee’s STEM School Designation
College Preparatory Mathematics (CPM)
Information July 15, 2015.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Join Together Project – Objective 2.4 Assessment Competence: Introduction & Overview Sandy Bowen University of Northern Colorado

A Great Team Effort The Join Together Team Katharine Slemenda and Harold Johnson John McLaughlin and Donna Mertens Topical Team Leaders Tom McNeil Michelle Hoversten and Sherry Ernsberger

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Topical Team Leaders John Luckner and Sandy Bowen University of Northern Colorado

Presentation Overview Brief overview of Objective 2.4 Introduction of team members and topics Summary of year one activities John Luckner will continue this discussion by looking at our next steps based on what we have learned November 4th (Thursday) 11:00-11:45 a.m. EST

Objective 2.4 Assessment Best Practices Competence of Preservice Teachers To identify the most empirically supported, assessment best practices for the use of student performance data to refine instruction for PK-12 students who are d/hh, that results in the integration of these into d/hh teacher preparation programs and their demonstration by d/hh preservice teachers.

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Goal Year 1 1. Conduct a needs assessment of the assessment best practices that have been empirically demonstrated to increase student academic (i.e., literacy, mathematics and science) achievement for all PK-12 students, hearing and/or d/hh.

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Comprehensive review of the literature Survey of the field Master teachers Teacher Preparation programs

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Comprehensive review of the literature What is out there? What does it tell us? Is it based on empirical research? Literature review has guided the development of the survey

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Topics and Team Members Literacy – Students who are Hearing - Jennifer Howell Literacy - Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing – Ann Velaski Language - Alfred White Math and Science - Sam Slike Test Adaptations - Jennifer Wolf Outcome Assessment Studies - Dee Kline Assessment of the Instructional Environment –John Luckner Multicultural Aspects of Assessment – Sandy Bowen High-Stakes Accountability Assessment - Sheryl Muir

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Literature review Rationale Hearing Students General Guidelines Formal Assessment Best Practices Informal Assessment Best Practices Students who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing General Guidelines Formal Assessment Best Practices Informal Assessment Best Practices References

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Literature review The team members submitted their findings to the team leaders We complied the individual reports into one document We submitted a 140 page document to the JT office

Objective 2.4 : Assessment Literature review was the first step Next steps …. Looking forward to seeing you in Banff!