“Waters of the U.S.” in Missouri Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP Implications of Current Wetlands Policy and Management.
Advertisements

Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
401 Water Quality Certification South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.
Water Supply Law Use and ownership of water ( Water Law). Riparian Doctrine – land owners have a right to use water adjacent to their land (but they cannot.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability
Ohio Livestock Environmental Assurance Program. KEY REGULATIONS Chapter 6, LEAP Federal State –Ohio EPA –Ohio Dept. of Agriculture –Ohio Dept. of Natural.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
The Clean Water Act “Waters of the US” Proposed Rule -- What is it and what are the implications for agriculture? August 1, 2014.
Waters of the U.S. The EPA land grab. Background Water has always been regulated, either by states or the federal government. The federal law is the Clean.
Waters of the United States Defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act ASA Board Meeting July 8, 2014.
Waters of the United States Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Deidre G. Duncan.
EPA’s Proposed Rule on Waters of the United States February 27, 2014.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Crops and Soil Arable land is farmland that can be used to grow crops.
Field Assessment for Water Resource Protection Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service.
Looking at Agricultural Sustainability Sustainable Small Farming & Ranching Understanding “Sustainability” and “Whole Farm” Concepts.
Playing By the Rules: Water Quality Regulation and Animal Agriculture Thomas Bass, Montana State University Building Environmental Leaders in Animal Agriculture.
Cooperative Federalism in the Regulation of the Environment Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Tony Willardson Executive Director Western.
NEFU Annual Convention Mike Mullen - Licensing and Compliance Coordinator Division of Land Resource Regulation MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
2010 Agricultural Water Resource Development Workshop Series HOW TO APPLY FOR ASSISTANCE “PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT – THE PROCESS”
2015 FINAL WOUS DEFINITION “KEY PROVISIONS TO THE RULE” Presented by: Richard W. Whiteside, PhD, CWB, CSE Corblu Ecology Group, LLC.
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Regional General Permit (RGP) 31 Interagency Meeting June 11, 2015.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources Christopher Gale Bill Taft.
Organic Farming: An Overview Prepared by: L. Robert Barber, & Ilene Iriarte For: Guam Cooperative Extension Service & Guam Department of Agriculture Funding.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Earth’s Surface: Chapter 4 Section 3 Human Activities Affect Soil
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
2014 Envirothon Sustainable agriculture systems and organic farming Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey | 334 River Rd, Hillsborough, NJ.
Clean Water Act Section 404 How it affects your airport during project implementation.
“Waters of the U.S.” in New York Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Minnesota Buffers Initiative September 16, 2015 Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources John Jaschke, BWSR Executive Director Sarah Strommen,
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Pennsylvania Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Sustainable Agriculture UNIT 1 – SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Farm Field Record Keeping Jim Dunn Agricultural Economist Penn State University.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
“Waters of the U.S.” in Oklahoma Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
AGRICULTURE The growing of plants and raising of domesticated animals.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Farming methods  4.3. Farming Methods  All agriculture depends on soil.  Therefore, soil erosion is a major problem in agriculture.  Erosion happens.
“Waters of the U.S.” in Montana Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
Agriculture and Agricultural Practices
Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.
Presented by: Luke A. Wake, Esq. National Federation of Independent Business November 20,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Lisa Mangione Regulatory Division Los Angeles District January 14, 2016 USACE Regulatory Program Emergency.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
Agricultural pollution in Ukraine (Azov-Black Sea Region ) The World Bank.
Using Plants Sustainably. Sustainable Agriculture in Canada The two main agricultural practices used by Canadian farmers to increase crop yields are the.
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use. What is land use? The way people use land.
Crop Cultivation Systems
Cultivating Success Sustainable Small Farming and Ranching Fall 2016.
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use.
Environmentally sensitive areas
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP’S)
“Waters of the U.S.” in Pennsylvania Farmland
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Pipeline Planning and Construction: Environmental Considerations
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Environmentally sensitive areas
9th ANNUAL WETLANDS & WATERSHED WORKSHOP
Presentation transcript:

“Waters of the U.S.” in Missouri Farmland Maps by Geosyntec Analysis by American Farm Bureau Federation

Area of focus is near Linneus in Linn County in Northcentral Missouri. The area is a rectangle that is 7.5 miles wide and 4.5 miles tall and includes the University of Missouri’s Forage Systems Research Center.

Previous rules/guidance – Tributaries and Adjacent Wetlands Absent case-specific “significant nexus” finding, only perennial and intermittent tributaries (blue lines) and adjacent wetlands (green shapes) deemed jurisdictional. (Note: light blue shapes designate freshwater ponds.)

New WOTUS Rule – More Automatically Regulated “Tributaries” Ephemeral tributaries (red lines) deemed jurisdictional without further analysis. Ditches also regulated if “excavated in” or “relocated” a tributary. Note: This map does not show jurisdictional ditches and may not include all ephemeral tributaries.

New WOTUS Rule – Automatically Regulated Adjacent Waters Includes all “waters”—including wetlands—that lie even partially within a 100-foot buffer (pink shading) around all perennial, intermittent and ephemeral streams.

New WOTUS Rule – More Automatically Regulated Adjacent Waters Includes all “waters”—including wetlands—where any part is within the 100-year floodplain and not more than 1,500 feet from a tributary. Light green shading shows the 1,500-feet zone and hash marks show the known FEMA Flood Zone maps (which may be out-of-date or may not be relied upon by the Corps). Absent definitive flood zone information from the Corps, any water partially within the light green shading is a possible “adjacent water.”

New WOTUS Rule – Maybe Regulated “Significant Nexus” Waters Water/wetlands even partially within 4,000 feet (about ¾ mile) of a tributary can be regulated on a “significant nexus” finding. Orange shading shows land outside the possible adjacency zone but within the 4,000 feet zone. Even without mapping around jurisdictional ditches, the area of possible regulation covers the entire map.

The scope of the final rule’s impact in the focus area is similar to the rest of the state

Why Should I Try to Identify WOTUS on the Land I Farm? Unpermitted discharges of “pollutants” into WOTUS are unlawful— and carry large potential penalties—even if the farmer or rancher has no knowledge that a feature is WOTUS. If a feature is later determined to be WOTUS, government or citizen enforcers could “reach back” and impose penalties for any discharge that occurred over the past five years. Because the WOTUS rule is so broad and complex, however, it will be almost impossible for farmers and ranchers to determine with confidence that any potential “water” feature is not WOTUS. Consultants may provide useful advice on identifying wetlands, measuring distances, locating available floodplain maps and searching publicly available historical records. But the only way to be confident that any water feature is not WOTUS is to request a jurisdictional determination or “JD” from the Corps of Engineers.

What Activities May Trigger CWA Liability and Permit Requirements? The application from a mechanical applicator (sprayer/spreader/nozzle) of any “pollutant” in any amount into a WOTUS requires a section 402 NPDES permit issued by state regulatory agencies or directly from EPA. A permit is required even if the WOTUS is dry at the time of application. Pollutants include, among other things: – chemical or biological pesticides (herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and coated seeds) – fertilizers (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and micro nutrient) – manure and manure products (including compost) A discharge of “dredged or fill material” can occur as a result of farming or ranching activities that involve moving dirt in a WOTUS. These discharges require a section 404 “dredge and fill” permit issued by the Corps of Engineers (again, even if the feature is dry at the time)—unless the activity qualifies for an exemption explained below. Possibly regulated activities include: – manipulating the soil on a field, such as grading, laser leveling, terracing, plowing, deep ripping, etc.; – construction and maintenance of roads, fences, ditches, ponds and culverts. Congress established several exemptions from the section 404 “dredge and fill” permit requirement. Under these exemptions, farmers and ranchers may not need a permit for plowing, seeding, cultivating, and harvesting (defined as “normal” farming practices), or for certain other activities like minor drainage, upland soil and water conservation practices, drainage ditch maintenance, construction and maintenance of irrigation ditches, farm/stock ponds, farm/forest roads and maintenance of levees/dams. It is very important to understand that the Corps of Engineers has interpreted these exemptions very narrowly and its interpretations will generally be controlling in any enforcement action. As a result, many common farming practices that involve moving dirt in a WOTUS will NOT qualify for an exemption and will trigger a need for a 404 permit.

Forage Systems Research Center Research at this Center improves the quality of forage grass and determines its best use. An early promoter of management-intensive grazing, it supports the ag industry through courses in rotational grazing, cattle management and the economics of beef and forage. The interactions of cattle, plants and soil are necessary to understand cause/effect relationships in beef/forage systems. Since 1990, more than 3,000 farmers and educators from several states have attended the three-day intensive Missouri Grazing School.

Forage Systems Research Center Before

Forage Systems Research Center After

Wurdack Research Center Nestled along the Meramec River near Cook Station in the northeast Ozarks, this Center conducts demonstrations and research in integrated livestock, forages, forestry, agroforestry and wildlife management practices that are economically viable, environmentally sound and sociologically acceptable for the Ozark Region of Missouri. Timber covers most of the acreage, while 260 acres provide the base for forage production, rotational grazing and cattle production. Current research includes programs to improve forage, beef, agroforestry and timber.

Wurdack Research Center Before

Wurdack Research Center After

Hundley-Whaley Research Center On the outskirts of Albany and located on second bottom river soils, this Center provides an optimum location for agronomic studies including testing and comparison of new varieties and new products. Research also addresses improved management practices for crops, timber and bottomland soils. Ongoing research projects focus on the best management practices and economics for corn and soybeans. The 375-acre research center, located in Gentry County, is involved in pesticide evaluations and comparisons, and sustainable agriculture concepts.

Hundley-Whaley Research Center Before

Hundley-Whaley Research Center After

State-Wide “Waters of the U.S.” Zones MissouriAcresShare of Total Acres Total Acres in State44,692,943 Acres w/i 100-ft buffer (adjacent) 3,869,6677% Acres w/i 1,500-ft buffer (possibly adjacent) 4,1172,87492% Acres w/i 4,000-ft buffer (subject to “significant nexus” finding) 44,549, %