2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Improving Student Outcomes: Using Technical Assistance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

February 29,  Name  Regional Rep & Location or Planning Committee  Organization.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
 AKA CIPP  Evaluators: Elaine Carlson and Tom Munk  Assist in summative evaluation of the center  Helped develop standardized logic model  Helped.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
National Center on Response to Intervention National Center on Response to Intervention NATIONAL CENTER ON RTI: USING EVIDENCE-BASED TA STRATEGIES TO SUPPORT.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
1.  May 27, 2010: Informational Webinar on Technical Assistance & Dissemination (TA&D) Centers  Description: The purpose of the session is for States.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
PLEASANTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL CLIMATE TRANSFORMATION GRANT.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Priority Initiative for KSDE Multi Tiered System of Support.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
ND State Personnel Development Grant North Dakota Scaling- up and Implementation Science Framework (ND-SISF )
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
Making Informed Decisions in MTSS through Family Engagement Data
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Supporting States in Building a Child Outcomes Measurement System
Establishing a Unified Professional Learning Infrastructure Kansas Technical Assistance System Network (TASN) Leverage Points & Lessons Learned Kerry Haag,
ESSA Updates NO new updates at this time
SPR&I Regional Training
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Improving Student Outcomes: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Colleen Riley, Director of Special Education, Kansas State Dept. of Education Kerry Haag, Assistant Director of Special Education, Kansas State Dept. of Education Crystal Davis, Coordinator, Kansas Technical Assistance System Network 215/227 repeated -S

Why the Change in Kansas? Increased expectations and accountability requirements Limited resources at all levels Categorical facelifts performed but reliance still exhibited More importantly… Not yet achieving the desired results for students Identified SEA Need: An overhaul of statewide TA system

From…. Kansas Statewide Technical Assistance Resource System (KSTARS) cycle ended Some projects conceived on disability specific statewide personnel needs Research-based & results-based staff development practices in place Degree & expectations for coordination with SEA and other KSTAR providers inconsistent among projects No system for SPP/APR improvement activity data retrieval

To…System Designed for Results State Board goals & policy alignment IDEA SPP/APR indicator clusters a priority Scaling-up supports needed in key areas Family engagement integrated component Beliefs and principles drive state TA system Tiered framework for delivery of assistance Data drives the level of support provided Can enter and retrieve impact of professional development from one access point

Exploration Milestones Summer 2008 State Director forms internal SEA planning team Fall 2008 Guided book study on Implementation Science SEA Staff and current KSTAR statewide providers Small cross project teams met face-face Held conference calls for entire network Stakeholder feedback and planning obtained Studied applications of Implementation Science Reviewed state data Determined areas of need Generated ideas and possible approaches Winter 2009: Subgroup formed and drafts concept proposal for KSDE Special Education Administration – Delivery and organization of TA re-conceptualized – Established the Core Value and Beliefs – Included Levels of Support to be provided – Shared with State Advisory Council, staff, providers

Installation Milestones October 1, 2009RFP released October 13, bidders conference calls October 23, 2009Letters of intent to submit received December 14, 2009Final KSTARS meeting held December 30, 2009TASN Proposals deadline January 13, 2009Proposals paneled & rec for funding February 9, 2010State Board award approval May 21, st Networking meeting held July 1, 2010 TASN TASN Year 1 begins! Start new 5 year grant cycle October nd Networking meeting held October 2011www.ksdetasn.org launchedwww.ksdetasn.org December rd Networking meeting held Feb-March 2011 Mid-year progress meetings held May 5, rd Networking meeting held May 10, 2011Yearly continuation due July 1, 2011TASN Year 2 begins!

Stakeholder’s Driving Questions – How can TA provided to districts (LEAs) change to more effectively support the implementation of evidence-based practices? – How can data be utilized to identify LEA need for support at differing levels of intensity? – How can sufficiently intense supports be provided so that LEAs can effectively implement evidence- based interventions? – How will SEA staff roles & responsibilities be redefined? – How will KSTARs (statewide projects) be impacted?

Standard Principles of Operation Standard Principles of Operation articulate expectations and outcomes for ALL priority areas and across all part of the SES TA System.

Common Approach Capacity building with emphasis on fidelity & sustainability. An emphasis and support for utilizing the principles contained in the implementation research. Continuation and scaling-up to address priority areas. Alignment and coordination regardless of funding stream.

Scaling-Up SPP/APR Cluster 1: Graduation, Dropout, Suspension/Expulsion, Transition Services, and Post Secondary Outcomes Goal: Provide implementation focused supports for districts to improve outcomes for students with disabilities in the areas of graduation/dropout, suspension/expulsion, transition services and post secondary outcomes.

Scaling Up SPP/APR Cluster 2: Assessment in Reading and Math, Reading and Math Proficiency, and Least Restrictive Environment Goal: Provide implementation focused supports for districts to improve outcomes for students with disabilities in the areas of reading and math achievement and providing services to students in the least restrictive environment.

Scaling Up Technical Assistance System Coordination & Evaluation Goal: Scaling-Up the stages of implementation and implementation drivers to build system capacity that support districts’ use of evidence based practices with fidelity in collaboration with SES TASN.

Continuation Multi-Tier System of Supports: MTSS Goal: Continue to build the infrastructure for the MTSS training system that will ensure sustainability.

Who are the TASN Providers? Staff members from: – SEA – State Personnel Development Grant – Education Service Center – Parent Training Information Center – Parent Information Resource Center – Universities (in/out of state) – State schools – Non-profit affiliate

Technical Assistance System Network Vision Evidence-based technical assistance to Kansas school districts is coordinated, based on sound data, and leads to improved outcomes for children and their families. Mission The TASN supports Kansas districts’ systematic implementation of evidence-based practices by establishing and maintaining communication and work alignment among all technical assistance providers in the network.

Purpose of TASN To increase the capacity of districts to implement and sustain the use of evidence-based practices that address priority areas determined by the Kansas State Department of Education Special Education Services Team (KSDE-SES).

TASN Belief System Priorities and resource allocation should, can, and will shift based on state data and other factors. All staff have the knowledge and skills necessary to provide the technical assistance outlined in project proposals and other KSDE directed activities designed to address priority areas. All services provided by TASN are focused on increasing district capacity to implement and sustain the identified evidence-based practices addressed in district improvement efforts. Intensity of TA (TASN resource commitment) is proportionate to district need.

A Tiered System In general, we are working to effectively provide 3 levels of support – Level 1: Available to all districts – Level 2: Available to some districts – Level 3: Available to a few districts

Shared Responsibility

TASN Website – Single Point of Access Common Calendar Resource Depot TASN TA Request System TA Provider Service Tracking

Logic Model Guides Evaluation 29

Examples of Evaluation Measures Completed by TASN providers – Fact Sheet Survey – Year End Update – Fidelity of Implementation Checklist Completed by District staff members – TA Request Site Survey – End of Training Questionnaire – Focus Groups Other state data

Some preliminary results… Not all measures for the system are in place We don’t have a full year of any system measure… In the process of compiling our first year’s system data

SPP/APR Indicator Level Links Individual indicator data collection system development, deployment & training Data analysis Generation of district public reports SPP/APR database & website for report production, writing, and management

Improvement Activity Management Planning – Activity implementation – Impact data collection (who, how, when) Implementation – Monitoring improvement activity progress – Ensuring collaboration and alignment Evaluation – Activity level – TASN System Logic Model tied to indicators

Challenges & Future Directions Refine processes for monitoring state improvement activities. Coordination among providers inside our system and establishing relationships with providers outside our system. Using the data to inform decisions as we refine TA supports. Internal PD for providers