ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October 21 - 22, 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October 21 - 22, 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topical Bioequivalence Update Robert Lionberger, Ph.D. Office of Generic Drugs.
Advertisements

Quality by Design for Topical Dosage Forms
Statistical Evaluation of Dissolution for Specification Setting and Stability Studies Fasheng Li Associate Director, Pharmaceutical Statistics Worldwide.
1 Sreeni Padmanabhan SPE – AU 1617 Tel:
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
1 Polymorphs in Pharmaceutical Products Janet Andres TC
Particle Size and Polymorph of Drug Substance Summary Slides.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Dale P. Conner, Pharm.D. Division of Bioequivalence OGD, CDER, FDA
Overview of Guidance Documents and Decision process: Biopharmaceutics Section Mehul Mehta, Ph.D. Director Division of Pharmceutical Evaluation I OCPB,
Solubility and Dissolution Pharmaceutical Technology.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science May 3, 2005 Factors Impacting Drug Dissolution and Absorption : Current State of Science Lawrence X. Yu,
Assessing Quality-by-Design A CMC Review Perspective
Challenges and Opportunities in Enhancement of the CMC Section of NDAs: Quality – by - Design Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Individual Bioequivalence Lawrence J. Lesko, Ph.D. Director Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
1 ACPS November 15, Update Nancy B. Sager, Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Food and.
FDA Nasal BA/BE Guidance Overview
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
1 Polymorphs in Pharmaceutical Products Janet Andres TC
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Applications of Analytical Chemistry in Pharmaceuticals Corey M. Chong 10Mar10.
1 Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs: Regulatory Perspectives Sam H. Haidar, R.Ph., Ph.D. Pharmacometrics Office of Generic Drugs.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July , 2008 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Frank O. Holcombe,
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Pt WHO-consultant 1 WHO Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice &
October 22, EFFECT OF PHYSICO- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF DRUG ON ABSORPTION By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Waiver of In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System Ajaz S. Hussain,
What Impact should ICH Q8 have on ICH Q6A Decision Trees?
1 The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Dr Mohammad Issa.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Purdue University – Industrial and Physical Pharmacy - Morris Discussion Questions of Polymorphism in ANDAs Ken Morris Industrial and Physical Pharmacy.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
Drug Release Specification: In Vivo Relevance Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director, OPS/CDER/FDA.
1 FDA Guidance for Industry: ANDAs: Impurities in Drug Substances Published by US FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research June 2009.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Bioavailability of Dietary Supplements: Key Issues in Defining the Research Agenda Impact of Formulation on Bioavailability? Discussion Leader: Stephen.
Bioequivalence Criteria Research Plan Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics and the Replicate Design Technical Committee Advisory Committee.
Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER, FDA ACPS Meeting, ACPS Meeting, Oct. 22, 2003 Office of Generic Drugs Research.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Subcommittee Introduction and Objectives Eric B. Sheinin Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
BIOPHARMACEUTICS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Roma Mathew.
BSC Biowaiver: Components, Requirements and Criteria
*M.Pharmaceutics (3rd Semester), Anand Pharmacy College, Anand.
CDER/Office of Generic Drugs1 Regulatory Issues Related to Crystal Habits - Polymorphism 1:45 - 2:00Polymorphs - What’s the Problem? Gary Buehler, R. Ph.,
THERMAL ANALYSIS FOR PREFORMULATION TRIALS
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Formulation of an oral dosage form utilizing the properties of cubic liquid crystalline phases of glyceryl monooleate Ref.: European Journal of Pharmaceutics.
Office of Pharmaceutical Science OPS Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER FDA Food and Drug Administration HHS Health and Human Services 1 Advisory.
1/20 PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Gastrointestinal Absorption: Role of the Dosage Form
Biopharmaceutic Considerations in Drug Product Design
Scientific rationale for EU regulatory expectations concerning product composition in case of Class-I and Class-III medicinal products Dr Ridha BELAIBA.
The Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS)
Presentation transcript:

ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in ANDAs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs Food and Drug Administration Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs Food and Drug Administration

2 Presentation Outline l What is polymorphism? l How does polymorphism affect pharmaceutical properties of drugs? l l To what extent should scientific considerations be given to polymorphism in ANDAs? l What is polymorphism? l How does polymorphism affect pharmaceutical properties of drugs? l l To what extent should scientific considerations be given to polymorphism in ANDAs?

3 What is Polymorphism? Haleblian JK. J. Pharm. Sci. 64: (1975) Ordered arrangement Disordered arrangement ICH Definition on Polymorphism

4 Characterization l l Crystallography; x-ray diffraction pattern u u Nonequivalent crystal structure l l Microscopy l l Thermal analysis; DSC and TGA l l Apparent solubility studies l l Intrinsic dissolution rate l l Infrared absorption, and Raman spectroscopy l l Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance l l Crystallography; x-ray diffraction pattern u u Nonequivalent crystal structure l l Microscopy l l Thermal analysis; DSC and TGA l l Apparent solubility studies l l Intrinsic dissolution rate l l Infrared absorption, and Raman spectroscopy l l Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

5 Pharm. Properties Exhibited by Different Polymorphs l Melting Point l Hygroscopicity l Chemical and Physical Stability l Apparent Solubility and Dissolution l Bioavailability and Bioequivalence l Manufacturability l Melting Point l Hygroscopicity l Chemical and Physical Stability l Apparent Solubility and Dissolution l Bioavailability and Bioequivalence l Manufacturability

6 Effect of Polymorphism on Melting Point DSC profiles of the fluoroquinolone (US Patent 5,985,893) Temperature ( o C) Watts/g

7 Effect of Polymorphism on Hygroscopicity Moisture sorption of the fluoroquinolone (US Patent 5,985,893) Form III Form I Relative Humidity Weight Gain % w/w

8 Effect of Polymorphism on Apparent Solubility Solubility of the fluoroquinolone (US Patent 5,985,893)

9 Effect of Polymorphism on Intrinsic Dissolution Form I Form II Dihydrate Kabayashi et al. Int. J. Pharm. 193: (2000)

10 Effect of Polymorphism on Bioavailability : Low Solubility Drugs Kabayashi et al. Int. J. Pharm. 193: (2000) Dihydrate Form I Solution

11 Polymorphic Form Conversion During Manufacturing l l Milling/micronization l l Wet granulation u u Inter-conversions between anhydrates and hydrates, or between different hydrates l l Spray-drying u u Amorphous form l l Milling/micronization l l Wet granulation u u Inter-conversions between anhydrates and hydrates, or between different hydrates l l Spray-drying u u Amorphous form

12 Decision Tree Development on Polymorphism in ANDAs l Process for evaluating when and how polymorphs of drug substances in ANDAs should be monitored and controlled u Based on the ICH Guidance Q6A decision trees on polymorphism u Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) l Process for evaluating when and how polymorphs of drug substances in ANDAs should be monitored and controlled u Based on the ICH Guidance Q6A decision trees on polymorphism u Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)

13 ICH Q6A: Decision Tree #4 Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria for Polymorphism in DS and DP for NDAs l Part 1 u Do multiple polymorphic forms exist? l Part 2 u Is routine polymorph testing of DS valuable? l Part 3 u Is routine polymorph testing of DP valuable? l Part 1 u Do multiple polymorphic forms exist? l Part 2 u Is routine polymorph testing of DS valuable? l Part 3 u Is routine polymorph testing of DP valuable?

14 Limits to Oral Drug Absorption Gastric Emptying Transit Absorption Dissolution Metabolism l Dissolution Rate = D *S/h (C s - C l ) v D - diffusion coefficient v S - dissolution surface area v h - Aqueous boundary thickness v Cs - Solubility v Cl - Concentration in dissolution media l Absorption: Permeability l Dissolution Rate = D *S/h (C s - C l ) v D - diffusion coefficient v S - dissolution surface area v h - Aqueous boundary thickness v Cs - Solubility v Cl - Concentration in dissolution media l Absorption: Permeability

15 What is the BCS? l The BCS is a scientific framework for classifying drugs based on their aqueous solubility and intestinal permeability.

16

17 Decision Trees on Polymorphism in ANDAs l l Decision Tree #1. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs l l Decision Tree #2. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs for drug substance l l Decision Tree #3. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs for drug product l l Decision Tree #1. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs l l Decision Tree #2. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs for drug substance l l Decision Tree #3. Investigating the need to set acceptance criteria of polymorphs for drug product

18 Decision Tree #1. Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria of Polymorphs Decision Tree # 2 START Are there known polymorphs with different apparent solubility? NO YES END No further test or poly- morphic acceptance criteria for drug substance and drug product Are all known polymorphs highly soluble? NO YES Adequate knowledge of drug substance polymorphs is available by the time an ANDA is filed

19 Drug Substance Polymorphism: Knowledge versus Process l l FDA receives many ANDA applications for the same drug substance l l Each applicant needs to have adequate knowledge on drug substance polymorphism to make appropriate decisions u u Each applicant has a unique approach to address polymorphic issues u u Polymorphic information may come from literature, patents, compendia, experience, or others l l The Decision Tree # 1 emphasizes knowledge on polymorphism; not approaches used l l FDA receives many ANDA applications for the same drug substance l l Each applicant needs to have adequate knowledge on drug substance polymorphism to make appropriate decisions u u Each applicant has a unique approach to address polymorphic issues u u Polymorphic information may come from literature, patents, compendia, experience, or others l l The Decision Tree # 1 emphasizes knowledge on polymorphism; not approaches used

20 Polymorph Appearing and Disappearing l Benzylidine-dl-piperitone l Polymorph    l M. P. ( o C) l 1921  and  in Australia,    l 1936  in Scotland,  or    l 1987  in India no ,  not mentioned l Benzylidine-dl-piperitone l Polymorph    l M. P. ( o C) l 1921  and  in Australia,    l 1936  in Scotland,  or    l 1987  in India no ,  not mentioned From David Grant

21 BACPAC I Guidance (2001) Bulk Actives Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Documentation l “Generally, only two physical properties of the drug substance, morphic form and particle size, are considered critical for evaluation of equivalence.” l Equivalence of Physical Properties u “ Conformance to established acceptance criteria for morphic form or, where acceptance criteria do not exist, the isolation of the same form or mixture within the range of historical data,…” l “Generally, only two physical properties of the drug substance, morphic form and particle size, are considered critical for evaluation of equivalence.” l Equivalence of Physical Properties u “ Conformance to established acceptance criteria for morphic form or, where acceptance criteria do not exist, the isolation of the same form or mixture within the range of historical data,…”

22 Decision Tree #1. Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria of Polymorphs Decision Tree # 2 START Are there known polymorphs with different apparent solubility? NO YES Initial scientific characterization of the form(s): e. g., X-ray Powder Diffraction, DSC / Thermoanalysis, Microscopy, and/or Spectroscopy END No further test or poly- morphic acceptance criteria for drug substance and drug product Are all known polymorphs highly soluble? NO YES

23 Decision Tree #2. Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria of Polymorphs for DS Decision Tree # 1 Is there a polymorphic specification in the USP? (e.g., melting point) Set new polymorphic acceptance criteria for drug substance Is the USP polymorphic specification adequate? NO YES NO YES Set the same polymorphic acceptance criteria for drug substance as the USP Decision Tree # 3 1) Different polymorphic form 2) Allow to establish tight specification

24 Decision Tree #3. Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria of Polymorphs for DP Decision Tree # 2 Is there sufficient concern that polymorphic acceptance criteria for drug product should be established? YES No need to set polymorphic acceptance criteria for drug product END NO Next Slide In general, there should not be a concern if 1) The most stable polymorphic form is used or 2) The form is used in a previously commercialized product

25 Decision Tree #3. Investigating the Need to Set Acceptance Criteria of Polymorphs for DP (Continued) Dissolution testing can frequently detect potential conversion of polymorphs. In rare cases, solid characterization methods have to be used. Does the drug product dissolution testing provide adequate controls if the polymorphic ratio changes? NO Set acceptance criteria for the drug product dissolution testing as a surrogate for polymorph control in the drug product END YES Previous Slide Set acceptance criteria for the drug product using other approaches, such as solid characterization method END FDA BA/BE Guidance: “It is recommended that the sponsor select the agitation speed and medium that provide adequate discriminating ability, taking into account all the available in vitro and in vivo data.”

26 Presentation Outline l What is polymorphism? l How does polymorphism affect pharmaceutical properties of drugs? l l To what extent should scientific considerations be given to polymorphism in ANDAs? l What is polymorphism? l How does polymorphism affect pharmaceutical properties of drugs? l l To what extent should scientific considerations be given to polymorphism in ANDAs?

27 Questions l Do the proposed decision trees adequately address the key polymorph issues (stability and bioavailability) that should be considered in FDA's regulatory assessment on an ANDA? u Decision Tree#1. Are there other issues with respect to characterization of polymorphic forms that FDA should consider? u Decision Tree #3 addresses the necessity of having a polymorph spec for drug product when using the most stable or previously used form: v Please comment on methods, approaches, and challenges for establishing specification for polymorphs in drug products. Also, in your experience, how often would you anticipate that such a specification necessary? l Do the proposed decision trees adequately address the key polymorph issues (stability and bioavailability) that should be considered in FDA's regulatory assessment on an ANDA? u Decision Tree#1. Are there other issues with respect to characterization of polymorphic forms that FDA should consider? u Decision Tree #3 addresses the necessity of having a polymorph spec for drug product when using the most stable or previously used form: v Please comment on methods, approaches, and challenges for establishing specification for polymorphs in drug products. Also, in your experience, how often would you anticipate that such a specification necessary?

28 Questions l What additional considerations, if any, should be addressed on the issue of manufacture-ability or "process-ability" when different polymorph forms are present?