Lessons Learned on Val Ed Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Dr. Erika Hunt Center for the Study of Education Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploring and Assessing New Teacher Induction Program Models
Advertisements

{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. Research and Development The team: Porter, Murphy, Goldring, Elliott, Polikoff, May, OToole, Cravens Wallace Foundation.
Future Administrators Program Informational Meeting October 9, 2013 Mission: To support the personal and intellectual success of every student, every day.
Administrators Meeting April 21, Key Areas of Grant-Based Monitoring Schools to be Served Instructional Assessments Instructional Strategies and.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
Mentor as Learner-Leader Delawares Sixth Annual Policy and Practice Institute by NYC Leadership Academy June 25, 2008 NYC Leadership Academy: CC BY-NC-SA.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT I & II Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. SAELP Project Director.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.
Introducing LEADAlabama June 13, 2012 EDUCATEAlabama/LEADAlabama Section.
Alabama Teacher Leaders VAL-ED Instructional Leadership Survey January 2013.
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
FIVE KEY STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPING HIGH-GROWTH SCHOOLS.
David Hvidston, Bret Range,and Courtney McKim, University of Wyoming Wyoming Association of Secondary School Principals Lander, WY January 2015.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,
The Conceptualization and Validation of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED) Ellen Goldring, Vanderbilt University Henry May,
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
National SAM Project Kentucky Georgia Iowa Illinois Delaware California New York Missouri Texas Missouri.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Session Materials  Wiki
DEVELOPING DEEPER AND MORE MEANINGFUL EVALUATION SYSTEMS Lisa Hood, Center for the Study of Education Policy Funded by a grant through the McCormick Foundation.
Next Generation Professionals Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Opportunities, Practice & Outcomes Interim Joint Committee on Education July 12, 2010.
Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania Joseph Murphy, Ellen Goldring, & Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
EDU 791 Module Figures Permissions for Graphics Barbara Orr September 2007 This document and the others within the series can be downloaded free of charge.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Assessing Learning-Centered Leadership Andrew C. Porter University of Pennsylvania Joseph Murphy, Ellen Goldring, & Stephen N. Elliott Vanderbilt University.
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Special Webinar on Principal Effectiveness February 22, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
The Administrator: Key Factor in Student Achievement Dr. Rita L. Robinson The Mid-Atlantic Equity Center Promoting the Achievement of Students of Color:
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
SD Math Partnership Project An Overview Marcia Torgrude and Karen Taylor.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Los Angeles Unified School District Leadership Academy Cohort 8 Leadership Excellence through Administrator Development (LEAD) Program.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Lessons Learned on Val Ed Performance Evaluation Advisory Council
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Presentation transcript:

Lessons Learned on Val Ed Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Dr. Erika Hunt Center for the Study of Education Policy

My Background Director of Illinois State Action for Education Leadership Initiative (IL-SAELP) – Funded by The Wallace Foundation since 2001

Background of Val Ed Developed by a 3-year grant from The Wallace Foundation ($1.5 million) Validation grant by Institute of Education Sciences ($1.5 million) Primary resources/attention by IL-SAELP to Val Ed = Development of Principal Evaluation IAI

Use of Val Ed for Principal Prep Study To compare skills/behaviors of new principals coming out of old Type 75 programs to new principals coming out of new Principal Endorsement programs Goal -- To recruit a sample of 100 – New principals who completed a Type 75 program within last five years – Out of 193 potential participants, were able to recruit participants – 2 backed out 6 participants could not meet teacher feedback threshold of 50%

Why Val Ed? Measures principals effectiveness using 360º feedback from teachers, supervisors, and principal Is the only 360º principal evaluation tool aligned with new 2008 ISLLC standards Field tested in a nationally representative sample Best measurement of leadership attributes and behaviors associated with student achievement results Rated highest in terms of validity and reliability

What Is Val Ed?

Val Ed Conceptual Model

Val Ed Framework

Sample VAL-ED Form

VAL-ED Performance Level Descriptors Below BasicBasicProficientDistinguished Leadership behaviors of core components and key processes of insufficient quality that over time are unlikely to bring the school to produce acceptable value added to student achievement and social learning. Leadership behaviors of core components and key processes of a quality that over time are likely to bring the school to produce acceptable value-added to student achievement and social learning for some sub groups of students but not all. Leadership behaviors of core components and key processes of sufficient quality that over time are likely to bring the school to produce acceptable value-added to student achievement and social learning for all students. Leadership behaviors of core components and key processes at levels of excellence that over time are virtually certain to bring the school to a point that produces strong value-added to student achievement and social learning for all students.

Feedback for Professional Growth

Val Ed Process District or school commits – Provide number of teachers and name of supervisor – Provide name of person in building to distribute survey codes (e.g., union building rep) Discovery Education generates codes – Codes include access codes for principal and supervisor Survey is distributed and completed by teachers, principal and supervisor – Teacher Institute Day/Not as Thorough – Time on Own/Partially Completed or Low Response

Best Uses of Val Ed The VAL-ED is best used as part of a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of a leader's behaviors – Joe Murphy and Ellen Goldring VAL-ED can be used annually or more frequently to: – Facilitate a data-based performance evaluation – Measure performance growth – Guide professional development VAL-ED is best tied to a plan for continuous improvement

Val Ed = Continuous Improvement 1)Principal evaluation Illinois Administrator Academy 2)Principal support/coaching SAMs initiative and Time Change Coaching New Principal Mentoring (esp. two-year programs) 3) Aligned with other data tools LPPW tool School Conditions surveys ( 4) Aligned district framework Charlotte Danielson Framework 5) Plan for district-wide prof. dev./communities of practice

Lessons Learned Takes a district/school commitment and understanding – Appoint district coordinator Educate teachers and principals about Val Ed Assure completion thresholds are met Coordinate into plan for professional growth – Need teacher buy-in to make meaningful – Need to carefully time distribution of survey Utilize mechanisms to monitor response rate Tie Val Ed assessment into a continuous improvement process

Val Ed Resources Val Ed Site - User Manual Conceptual Framework and Research Basis Discovery Education - ent/val_ed.cfm ent/val_ed.cfm