1 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ Forecast Activities Compiled from input from different groups.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Advertisements

The July – August 2014 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ Field Campaigns in the Front Range Region of Colorado: Summary of Experiment Design and Preliminary Findings.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
CLARIS WP4.3 : Continental-scale air Pollution in South America.
Predictability study using the Environment Canada Chemical Data Assimilation System Jean de Grandpré Yves J. Rochon Richard Ménard Air Quality Research.
Objective: Work with the WRAP, CenSARA, CDPHE, BLM and EPA Region 8 to use satellite data to evaluate the Oil and Gas (O&G) modeled NOx emission inventories.
GEOS-CHEM GLOBAL 3-D MODEL OF TROPOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Assimilated NASA/DAO meteorological observations for o x1 o to 4 o x5 o horizontal resolution,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Air Quality Products from.
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
Impact of Mexico City on Regional Air Quality Louisa Emmons Jean-François Lamarque NCAR/ACD.
Infusing satellite Data into Environmental Applications (IDEA): PM2.5 forecasting tool hosted at NOAA NESDIS using NASA MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging.
Transitioning CMAQ for NWS Operational AQ Forecasting Jeff McQueen*, Pius Lee*, Marina Tsildulko*, G. DiMego*, B. Katz* R. Mathur,T. Otte, J. Pleim, J.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
IDEA - Infusing satellite Data into Environmental (air quality) Applications Summer 2003: Prototype Analysis, Fusion, and Visualization of NASA ESE and.
ECMWF's activities in atmospheric composition and climate monitoring
1 Air Quality Reanalysis (Translating research to service) 13 th CMAS Oct27-29, 2014, Chapel Hill Pius Lee 1, Greg Carmichael 2, Yongtao Hu 3, Edward Hyer.
Visualization, Exploration, and Model Comparison of NASA Air Quality Remote Sensing data via Giovanni Ana I. Prados, Gregory Leptoukh, Arun Gopalan, and.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,
FLIGHT PLANNING IN INTEX-A The DC-8 at MidAmerica airport.
Studies of Emissions & Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC 4 RS) Brian Toon Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic.
Significant contributions from: Todd Schaack and Allen Lenzen (UW-Madison, Space Science and Engineering Center) Mark C. Green (Desert Research Institute)
MELANIE FOLLETTE-COOK KEN PICKERING, PIUS LEE, RON COHEN, ALAN FRIED, ANDREW WEINHEIMER, JIM CRAWFORD, YUNHEE KIM, RICK SAYLOR IWAQFR NOVEMBER 30, 2011.
Variational Assimilation of MODIS AOD using GSI and WRF/Chem Zhiquan Liu NCAR/NESL/MMM Quanhua (Mark) Liu (JCSDA), Hui-Chuan Lin (NCAR),
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
Results Figure 2 Figure 2 shows the time series for the a priori and a posteriori (optimized) emissions. The a posteriori estimate for the CO emitted by.
1 Air Quality during the Sept Houston DISCOVER-AQ Deployment and Preliminary Evaluation of NOAA CMAQ Air Quality Forecasts Kenneth Pickering, NASA.
UIOWA, NCAR, GMAO, NRL Chemical forecasts for Aug 16 th flights 15 Aug 2013 Compiled by Mary Barth and Pablo Saide, Arlindo da Silva, David Peterson, contributions.
Melanie Follette-Cook (MSU/GESTAR) Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) Rob Gilliam (EPA) Jim MacKay (TCEQ) CMAS Oct 5-7, 2015.
Comparison of CMAQ Lightning NOx Schemes and Their Impacts Youhua Tang 1,2, Li Pan 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Jeffery T. McQueen 4, Jianping Huang 4,5, Daniel Tong.
UIOWA, NCAR, GMAO, NRL Chemical forecasts for Aug 14 th flights 13 Aug 2013 Compiled by Mary Barth and Pablo Saide, Arlindo da Silva, David Peterson, contributions.
Chemical forecast from NASA, U.Iowa & NCAR Arlindo DaSilva, NASA Goddard Pablo Saide, Greg Carmichael, U. Iowa Louisa Emmons, Mary Barth, Mijeong.
Recent Advances in the Use of Chemical Transport Models in Atmospheric Chemistry Studies G. Carmichael, I. Uno, Y. Tang, J. Woo, D. Streets, G. Kurata,
Do better aerosol forecasts improve weather forecasts? A regional modeling and assimilation study. Mariusz Pagowski Stuart McKeen Georg Grell Ming Hu NOAA/ESRL,
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
G-IDAS Richard Engelen.
Studying impacts of the Saharan Air Layer on hurricane development using WRF-Chem/EnKF Jianyu(Richard) Liang Yongsheng Chen 6th EnKF Workshop York University.
Air Resources Laboratory 1 Comprehensive comparisons of NAQFC surface and column NO 2 with satellites, surface, and field campaign measurements during.
1 Using Satellite Data to Improve Operational Atmospheric Constituents Forecasting Capabilities Shobha Kondragunta, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Xiaoyang Zhang, UMD.
Regional Chemical Modeling in Support of ICARTT Topics:  How good were the regional forecasts?  What are we learning about the emissions?  What are.
1 RAQMS-CMAQ Atmospheric Chemistry Model Data for the TexAQS-II Period : Focus on BCs impacts on air quality simulations Daewon Byun 1, Daegyun Lee 1,
Influence of Lightning-produced NOx on upper tropospheric ozone Using TES/O3&CO, OMI/NO2&HCHO in CMAQ modeling study M. J. Newchurch 1, A. P. Biazar.
Chemical Data Assimilation: Aerosols - Data Sources, availability and needs Raymond Hoff Physics Department/JCET UMBC.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
MOPITT and MOZART for Flight Planning and Analysis of INTEX-B Louisa Emmons Peter Hess, Avelino Arellano, Gabriele Pfister, Jean-François Lamarque, David.
Global Aerosol Forecasting System Applications to Houston/Costa Rica Aura Validation Experiments Arlindo da Silva Global Modeling and Assimilation Office,
TES and Surface Measurements for Air Quality Brad Pierce 1, Jay Al-Saadi 2, Jim Szykman 3, Todd Schaack 4, Kevin Bowman 5, P.K. Bhartia 6, Anne Thompson.
Convective Transport of Carbon Monoxide: An intercomparison of remote sensing observations and cloud-modeling simulations 1. Introduction The pollution.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Fire Products NASA ARSET-AQ Links Updated November 2013 ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences.
UIOWA, NCAR, GMAO, NRL Chemical forecasts for Aug 21 th flights 20 Aug 2013 Compiled by Louisa Emmons, Pablo Saide, Arlindo da Silva, David Peterson contributions.
M. Newchurch 1, A. Biazar 1, M. Khan 2, B. Koshak 3, U. Nair 1, K. Fuller 1, L. Wang 1, Y. Park 1, R. Williams 1, S. Christopher 1, J. Kim 4, X. Liu 5,6,
Impacts of Assimilation of Air Quality Data from Geostationary Platforms on Air Quality Forecasts Gregory Carmichael(1), Pablo E. Saide (NCAR), Meng Gao.
Literature Review: Impacts of background ozone production on Houston and Dallas, TX Air Quality during the TexAQS field mission R. Bradley Pierce (NOAA/NESDIS),
Potential use of TEMPO AOD & NO2 retrievals to support wild fire plume & O3 & PM2.5 forecast in National Air Quality Forecasting Capability (NAQFC) Pius.
Use of Near-Real-Time Data for the Global System
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT: CONCENTRATIONS AND FLUXES
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Charles University in Prague
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
ICARTT: COORDINATED ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY CAMPAIGN OVER EASTERN NORTH AMERICA AND NORTH ATLANTIC IN SUMMER 2004 International, multi-agency collaboration.
Chris Misenis*, Xiaoming Hu, and Yang Zhang
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Presentation transcript:

1 DISCOVER-AQ and FRAPPÉ Forecast Activities Compiled from input from different groups

The Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) of the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) Will Provide O3 Forecast Support 4 meteorologists at the APCD will continue to issue statewide and Front Range forecasts for O3 and other pollutants 7 days a week. These will include a 9 AM MDT update, a hour forecast by 3 PM MDT, and a multi-day outlook (crafted specifically for FRAPPE and DISCOVER-AQ.) Meteorologist will also issue advisories for blowing dust, wildland fire smoke, stratospheric O3 intrusions, and any air quality event in Colorado. Forecasts are based on several synoptic and mesoscale meteorological models, a variety of satellite products, observations, in-house regression tools, and more than 7 decades of combined staff Colorado air quality forecasting experience. RAP HRRR best tool for 15-hour convection outlook. Forecasts and advisories are currently disseminated on our web pages and via listserves, AIRNow, local media, and hotlines. We can arrange for project-specific methods of distribution. A large number of wildfires will absorb much of our time. CDPHE Patrick Reddy/Gordon Pierce

3 Meteorology Forecast maps – NWS surface and NAM upper air; today and the next 3 days NAM/MOS time series – Denver and Ft. Collins; today and next 3 days; T, TD, WS, WD, RH, POP, Sky cover BUFKIT – NAM – time series of cloud amount by altitude, precip, and PBLH – next 3 days PBLH from NOAA/ARL WRF-ARW Wind fields at several sigma levels from NOAA/ARL WRF-ARW Cloud forecast maps – NAM, GFS, Canadian, GEOS-5 NWS forecaster comments/advice Fly/no-fly recommendations DISCOVER-AQ Forecast Briefings Ken Pickering

4 Air Quality Air quality yesterday – surface station O 3 observations Air quality forecast maps – NOAA/ARL CMAQ products – O 3, NO 2, HCHO today and tomorrow Ozone forecasts from State agency – today, tomorrow, beyond? Air quality yesterday – surface station PM 2.5 observations AERONET and MODIS AOD – yesterday Air quality forecast maps – NOAA/ARL CMAQ product – surface PM 2.5 Air quality forecast maps and time series – GEOS-5 aerosol extinction, AOD, mass concentrations by aerosol type PM 2.5 forecasts from State agency – today, tomorrow, beyond? DISCOVER-AQ Forecast Briefing Ken Pickering

AM Review meteorological and air quality model products AMConsult with NWS forecaster and CDPHE air quality forecaster 11 AM – 1 PMPrepare/finalize briefing 1 PMConduct briefing Forecast Schedule Ken Pickering

CMAQ4.7.1Both CONUS(12 km) & DISCOVER-AQ/FRAPPE (4 km) Map projection & gridLambert Conformal & Arakawa C staggering Vert. co-ordinate42 σ-p unevenly spaced levels Gas chemistryCb05 with 156 reactions Aerosol chemistryAero5 with updated evaporation enthalpy Anthropogenic emission 2005NEI as base year, mobile projected using AQS*, area and off-road used CSPR^, point source uses 2012 CEM data WRAP oil and gas emissions data Biogenic emissionBEIS-3.14 Lateral BCRAQM (B. Pierce) AForecast: 12 km nested to 4 km 42 vertical layers Air Resources Laboratory/NOAA: DISCOVER-AQ/FRAPPÉ preparation meeting, April , Boulder NAQFC-orecasting support: Initialized at 00 UTC with 60 hours forecast duration WRF-ARWBoth North America (12 km) & CONUS (4 km) Map projection & gridLambert Conformal & Arakawa C staggering Vert. co-ordinate 42 σ-p unevenly spaced levels advectionRK3 (Skamarock and Weisman (2008)) SW & LW radiationRRTMG (Iacono et al. 2008)) PBL PhysicsMellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) level 2.5 closure Surface layer schemeMonin-Obukhov Similarity with viscous sub-layer Land Surface ModelNCEP NOAH Cloud MicrophysicsThompson et al. (2008) Cloud convective mixingBetts-Miller-Janjic Mass adjustment Ken Pickering

9 AM12 PM 2 PM 5 PM Forecast from 06Z SEP 25 Ken Pickering

NOAA Experimental CMAQ Forecast for Today from 06Z (1 AM CDT) 3 PM 5 PM

Conroe Galveston CMAQ missed elevated O 3 layer Conroe profile well forecast O 3 maximum to NNW of Houston well forecast Ken Pickering

GEOS-5/GOCART Forecasts CO Smoke SO 4  Global 5-day chemical forecasts customized for each campaign O3, aerosols, CO, CO 2, SO 2 Resolution: Nominally 25 km  Driven by real-time biomass emissions from MODIS  Assimilated aerosols interacts with circulation through radiation Ken Pickering

GEOS-5 Atmospheric Data Assimilation System FeatureDescription ModelGEOS-5 Earth Modeling System, with GOCART coupled to radiation parameterization Fire EmissionsQFED: Daily, NRT, MODIS FRP based Met Data AssimFull NWP observing system (uses GSI) Aerosol Data Assimilation Local Displacement Ensembles (LDE) MODIS reflectances (Aqua & Terra) AERONET Calibrated AOD’s (Neural Net) Stringent cloud screening Forecasts5 day forecasts twice daily: 0Z an 12Z Resolutionnominally 25 km, 72 layers, top ~85 km Aerosol SpeciesDust, sea-salt, sulfates, organic & black carbon Carbon SpeciesCO 2, CO with several tagged tracers 11 Ken Pickering

QFED: Quick Fire Emission Dataset  Near real time estimates based on MODIS Fire Radiative Power (AQUA/TERRA)  Current focus on MODIS  Through Joint Center for Sattelite Data Assimilation (JCSDA) collabotating with NOAA/STAR on the inclusion of data from  Geostationary  VIRS  Plume Rise model (Freitas et al. )  Driven by GEOS-5 meteorology  Under tuning/validation QFED relies on LANCE MODIS Level 2 Fire Data Ken Pickering

GEOS-5 aerosol forecast from 00 UT 14 Sept. Cloud cover Extinction AOD GEOS-5 global model at 0.25 deg. resolution; GOCART aerosols, CO, SO 2 ; includes assimilation of MODIS AOD Run by Arlindo da Silva at NASA/GSFC Ken Pickering

14 High AOD associated with agricultural fire plumes from Mississippi Valley. Back door cold front pushed smoke over Houston. No real impact seen in surface PM2.5. Houston Aerosol Episode of Sept. 14, 2013 Hourly PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Ken Pickering

Post Mission Modeling Simulations of DISCOVER-AQ/FRAPPE period with CMAQ and WRF-Chem: 36, 12, 4 km resolution domains (perhaps 1.3-km if necessary) Use best available emission inventories Evaluate WRF meteorology using: Surface stations, sondes, tethered balloon, wind profilers, aircraft Evaluate chemistry and emissions through comparisons with P-3B and C-130 in-situ data, surface in-situ data, Pandora and AERONET remote sensing data Evaluate model column vs. surface correlations against those from observations Evaluate spatial and temporal variability in model vs. that in observations Ken Pickering

16 Jointly with DISCOVER-AQ Additional Met & Chemistry Products Short-term forecasts for aircraft and mobile vans Decisions on Flight Day and Flight Pattern for C-130 up to 3-5 days out Special events (LRT, fires,...), transport/flow patterns, emission flight conditions,.... FRAPPÉ Forecast Briefings Gabriele Pfister

FRAPPÉ Forecast Products Satellite Products FINN near-realtime fire emissions (based on MODIS fire counts) (NCAR/ACD) MOPITT CO (within 1 day of overpass) (NCAR/ACD) IASI CO (~ 4-day delay) (NCAR/ACD) Met Forecasts WRF with assimilation (NCAR-RAL) 3DVar (no radar DA, 3h UC/12h fcst/1km) 3DVar (with radar DA, 1h UC/12h fcst) 4DVar (with radar DA, 3h UC/12h fcst) RTFDDA (with radar DA, 3h UC/24h fcst) Chemical/Tracer Forecasts MOZART-4 global, 5-day forecast (NCAR) Full chemistry at 1.9°x2.5° (possibly assimilation of CO) Tracer forecasts at 0.5°x0.5° (CO, isoprene-like,....) RAQMS (NOAA/NESDIS) Global 1x1 degree on-line chemical and aerosol assimilation and forecasting system Assimilation of MODIS AOD, MLS stratospheric O 3 profiles and OMI total O 3 WRF-Chem (NOAA/ESRL) WRF-Chem on RAPid refresh (RAP) 13km domain; 48 hour forecast WRF-Chem Tracers (NCAR/ACD) - added to RTFDDA FLEXPART (NCAR/ACD): Forward trajectories for defined sources

Global Modeling, Fire Emissions and Satellite Support for FRAPPÉ Louisa Emmons, Christine Wiedinmyer, & MOPITT team NCAR/ACD

Fire Emissions Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN) Daily fire emissions of trace gases and particles FINN is run in real-time based on MODIS Rapid Response fire counts Plots and data files available for forecasts and hindcasts Additional fire products will be compiled: NASA QFED NOAA HMS … NCAR/ACD Christine Wiedinmyer

MOZART-4 driven by GEOS-5 Full chemistry at 1.9°x2.5° 5-day forecasts, hourly output, currently operational NCAR/ACD Louisa Emmons

MOZART-4 Tracers Forecasts of tracers only at 0.5° horizontal resol. – Isoprene-like tracer based on MEGAN isoprene emissions – Anthropogenic NOx tracer from individual cities and/or regions – Fire CO tracer for various regions – Others? – Similar to forecasts for DC3 ( ), will be run specifically for FRAPPE NCAR/ACD Louisa Emmons

Chemistry Satellite Observations MOPITT CO – available within a day of overpass IASI CO – about 4-day delay, global coverage 2x/day NCAR/ACD Louisa Emmons

Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Real-time Air Quality Modeling System (RAQMS) Global 1x1 degree on-line chemical and aerosol assimilation and forecasting system Assimilation of MODIS aerosol optical depth, MLS stratospheric ozone profiles and OMI cloud cleared total column ozone MODIS fire detection and Ecosystem/Severity dependent fire emissions Real-time verification using US EPA AIRNow surface ozone and PM2.5 measurements Currently used to initialize real-time 8km WRF-CHEM forecast (GOCART aerosol mechanism, ) and 13km RAP-chem forecast (RACM chemical and MOSAIC aerosol mechanisms, NOAA/NESDIS Brad Pierce

Forecasting weather and air quality with RAP-Chem RAP-Chem = WRF-Chem on RAPid refresh (RAP) domain Dx=13km, RAP is operational at NCEP with hourly forecast cycle (meteorology only) Experimental RAP-Chem: – Includes gas-phase chemistry (O3), aerosols (modal approach), Secondary Organic Aerosols ( SOA, Volatility Basis Set approach) – Includes also wildfires, volcanic ash (if major eruption within North American Grid), dust, sea salt – Aerosol interaction with radiation (microphysics interactions may also be included) – Chemical boundary conditions from RAQMS or MACC – still to be decided – NEI 2011 emissions – Produce AQ forecasts and work towards improving weather forecasts – 48-hr forecasts – Currently on display: O3 (various levels), Nox, CO, HCHO, PM25, OA, Precipitation. Three cross-sections. More possible. Currently displayed on the WEB: full domain and zoomed in CONUS domain ). More possible. NOAA/ESRL Georg Grell

Basic domains, additional Colorado zoom would be possible Example of CONUS zoomed domain Ozone mixing ratio (ppbv) Full RAP domain NOAA/ESRL Georg Grell

STEP - Short Term Explicit Prediction Summary of DA/NWP systems Outside systems: NSSL (3DVar with radar DA, 1h UC*/12h fcst) GSD/FAB (LAPS with radar DA, 1h UC/12h fcst) UK MetOffice (UM-WRF, 6h UC/36h fcst) Note: - Each organization will run their own system - No extra resource required from NCAR NCAR systems: WRF 3DVar (no radar DA, 3h UC/12h fcst/1km) WRF 3DVar (with radar DA, 1h UC/12h fcst) WRF 4DVar (with radar DA, 3h UC/12h fcst) RTFDDA (with radar DA, 3h UC/24h fcst) * UC – Update Cycle Nested WRF domain 1km 1km nowcast/hydro domain CHILL S-Pol 3km radar DA domain NCAR/RAL Jenny Sun/David Gochis

Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Finalize domains and configurations of each subsystem Yellowstone: - Account - Dedicated cores - Disk space - Data transfer pre-operational testing of each subsystem Finish real-time data flow for all obs. Initial version of web display System Installation Finalize web display Data transfer and Display of outside systems STEP hydromet 2014 (7 July – 15 August) Integrated system testing Project Timeline NCAR/RAL Jenny Sun/David Gochis

NCAR/ACD WRF-Chem Tracers Add to 3km STEP Forecast Inert with specified lifetime Anthropogenic tracer (NOx like) (area, non-road, point sources) Mobile tracer (NOx like) Oil & Gas tracer (ethane like) Agricultural tracer (emission info needed) Suggested Tracers: Mary Barth/Gabriele Pfister

Lagrangian particle dispersion products with FLEXPART deterministic trajectory trajectory clusters sensitivity maps horizontal and vertical information ICARTT/NetCDF/plots airmass history and emissions loading trajectories from ground stations / aircraft paths forward and backward in time based on GFS (global) and WRF (regional) model forecasts / analysis can be convolved with emissions NCAR/ACD Christoph Knote/Rajesh Kumar

Satellite NO 2 Columns: May-Sep Morning Orbit Si-Wan Kim, NOAA/ Andreas Richter, U. of Bremen NOAA

Satellite NO 2 Columns: May-Sep Afternoon Orbit Si-Wan Kim, NOAA/ Andreas Richter, U. of Bremen NOAA

SCIAMACHY NO 2 Columns: May-Sep Dots: Oil and Gas Wells Si-Wan Kim, Gabrielle Petron, Gregory Frost, NOAA NOAA