Certification Requirements RAs are supportive of certification Want to make process as simple as possible – for both IOOS office, and for RAs (“Less is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Advertisements

1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Introduction to Integrated Library Systems
Special Education Student Information System Project New York City Department of Education | Special Education Student Information System Project 1 SESIS.
Password?. Project CLASP: Common Login and Access rights across Services Plan
Password?. Project CLASP: Common Login and Access rights across Services Plan
Chapter 9 Training for Organizations The Training Proposal: Putting Plans Into Writing.
Geospatial Platform: The Value Proposition Summary of Comments NGAC Geospatial Platform Subcommittee October 2011.
WGITA Project Governance Wayne Jones Executive Director Australian National Audit Office.
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Grant Proposal Basics 101 Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Working with SharePoint Document Libraries. What are document libraries? Document libraries are collections of files that you can share with team members.
Conducting the IT Audit
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 4 Negotiation and the Management of Conflict.
Developing an IOOS Data Management Plan that Satisfies NOAA’s Requirements and IOOS Certification Requirements John Ten Hoeve 9/11/13.
Google Training By: Amy Shannon and Dave Auwerda.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Debra Hernandez, SECOORA Walter Johnson, BOEMRE Ru Morrison, NERACOOS Charly Alexander, IOOS Office.
Developing Your Vision and Goals Module Five. Producing a High Quality Plan: The Essential Components Evidence- Based Focused on Regional Economic Development.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
1 THE NATIONAL SPACE WEATHER PROGRAM Sixth Symposium on Space Weather Session 1: Space Weather Agency Updates AMS Annual Meeting January 12, 2009 Mr. Samuel.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course
AY 2009 Unit Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
CSSII Topical Team on Decision making process Steven Hosford, Topical Team Chair on behalf of CSSII Topical Team on Decision making processes CEOS SIT-28.
Management Report Annette Freibauer Management Report Annette Freibauer Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena.
Operational Planning preparing to act Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Data Management and Communications (DMAC) Steering Team November 28, 2007 Conference Call to Begin On-line Polling on Standards.
Josie Quintrell, NFRA Executive Director October, 2010 MACOORA Board Meeting.
Zdenka Willis Briefing to GCOOS March 4, 2010 US IOOS Update.
Overview of the RBS Plan Review Process Leslie Ann Hay, Implementation Lead Megan Stout, CDSS Analyst.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
1 Preparation of Six-Year ED Sector Programme Cycle and its 1st biennium Advantages -Real alignment of biennial C/5 (within 6-year ED Programme Cycle)
Integration Issues for RTF Guidelines: Savings, Lifetimes and Cost/Benefit October 24, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker, SBW.
US IOOS Independent Cost Estimate: Summary Information.
Info gathering complete? Info gathering complete? Evaluate Alternatives Evaluate Alternatives Reality Check Reality Check Team Review Team Review SOP’s.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
1 June 11, 2013 Board Meeting Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
Central Lancashire Preferred Core Strategy Your local councils working together to plan for a better future for everyone.
Please use the following two slides as a template for your presentation at NES. The Inventory Verification Process: More Than Just Finding Your Stuff Scott.
Presented to Wisconsin Department of Transportation presented by Traffic Operation Infrastructure Plan Team 3/10/08 Traffic Operation Infrastructure Plan.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
7. Follow-up to Governing Board requests (a) Requests for extension Ingrid Barnsley, Carrie Pottinger.
Urban transport Report back on themes that emerged from breakout sessions urban transport.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting November 19, 2013.
Timelines SEM Reports and Other Strategies. SPP 11 and 13 Child Find Items on the district’s “Report Card” from the state. We were at approximately 98%
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
Adaptive Software Development Process Framework. Version / 21 / 2001Page Project Initiation 2.0 Adaptive Cycle Planning 5.0 Final Q/A and.
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
Working in Groups in Canvas
Introductory Remarks and Meeting Goals
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course
US IOOS®, NDBC, CO-OPS Partnership Discussion
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
WSC Market Report Task Force Meeting
Roadmap for Programme of Work
Trustbuilder How do you make decisions when
Adaptive Product Development Process Framework
CTI STIX SC Monthly Meeting
Working Group on Statistical Confidentiality Item 3 of the Agenda
Wrap up of agenda item no. 3
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Presentation transcript:

Certification Requirements RAs are supportive of certification Want to make process as simple as possible – for both IOOS office, and for RAs (“Less is More”) Focus: should be meeting ICOOS Act requirements and in proportion to small size of program (RAs currently receive only $1-2m a year) IOOS office has additional mechanisms available for management: 5-year proposal, annual work plans, cooperative agreement requirements, policies, Strategic Operations Plan Can increase requirements if program really increases in funding/scope

Current certification draft Detailed, complicated Addresses management issues that aren’t required by law Data criteria not workable NFRA will submit alternative for a streamlined approach – focused on outcomes, not specific mandates that allow for regional flexibility Hope to work with IOOS office to craft revised criteria

National Synthesis of Regional Build-out Plans PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT Synthesize regional plans into a national vision Identify common products & services Define regional observing system needed to deliver these Learn where we can share and collaborate Highlight – and appreciate – regional diversity

Timeline for follow-up Dec 2 - corrections & revisions (v.1.1) on spreadsheets only on to H & L put into electronic in color & comment in cell with color. Dec 9 - H & L send revised spreadsheets to Suzanne Dec 16 - Revised outline for report to SC Dec SC call to discuss outline Dec 21 - JQ tries to find graphic help for report Jan 20 - First draft including outline of Executive Summary Jan 27 - Con Call to Discuss - SC? Open to interested parties? Feb 15 – handout document draft Feb 28/Mar - Use part of meeting to discuss final draft March 16 - Final Draft

Revisions for V 1.1 USE ELECTRONIC VERSION Errors in #s of platforms & #s of FTEs Rethinking of #s based on discussion Calculate FTEs for O&M based on some template? Done for hf radar, not for others….? Who decide? Expert teams? When?CARD estimates not helpful Put webmaster in DMAC – but make sure it’s culled out separately, put info mgr/communications in education/engagement; put product developers under product development; Review R&D, because several are product development; if you put ftes in R&D, can you mve them elsewhere? We will handle as group and develop a # that everyone can use. Capture the kinds of stations that are rolled up in broad categories (some are cost effectiveness, some may be more complicated) CARD estimates for O&M – Suzanne checked, not really helpful for support for platforms, could use better info.

How do we deal with #s A lot of commonalities. But big issue is #s: 2 RAs tend to be higher. Are the others too low? Options: go back and revise; or somehow deal with a common approach for the purpose of this common plan How do we represent regional diversity? Are these truly VW plans? We tried to give more boundaries, but hard to do? How do we synthesize into a national plan? Show that we ARE a network and not just 11 individual systems? Do we do an average, mean, median, mode, standard deviation? How do we deal with outliers?

Additional Action Items Develop national modeling plan Develop R&D vision/plan Identify top priorities for sensor tech $$

Working Outline 1. Background 2. Common user-driven priorities applicable to all regions- Products/services to meet needs of each theme Integrated/cross-cutting products Outcomes and success measures Examples region-specific priorities (e.g. in text boxes) 3. Components of synthesis —assets required to meet common needs Platforms, including variables--fixed, mobile, remote Modeling—categories of models, evaluation and integration,, link to themes/products; DMAC, Product Development, Education and Training, Governance

Working Outline 1. Background 2. Common user-driven priorities applicable to all regions- Products/services to meet needs of each theme Integrated/cross-cutting products Outcomes and success measures Examples region-specific priorities (e.g. in text boxes) 3. Components of synthesis —assets required to meet common needs Platforms, including variables--fixed, mobile, remote Modeling—categories of models, evaluation and integration,, link to themes/products; DMAC, Product Development, Education and Training, Governance