How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Meeting Eleven: Leadership: Roles and Responsibilities.
Meeting Thirteen: Leadership: Roles and Responsibilities.
Meeting Ten: Leadership: Roles and Responsibilities.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
When Students Can’t Read…
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Parents as Partners in Education
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Consistency of Assessment
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Collaborative Data Teams
How Strong is Your School as a Professional Community?
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
Louisiana Math & Science Teacher Institute (LaMSTI) Overview of External Evaluation and Development of Self-Report Measures of Instructional Leadership.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 5 Leadership and Strategic Planning.
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Results Management: Principles and Strategies based on the work of Gary L. Bowen, Ph.D. and Dennis Orthner, Ph.D School of Social Work University of North.
Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management
Chapter 12 Intervention Activating Resources. Applying Generalist Intervention Skills Accentuate and develop strengths Experiment with changes Renegotiate.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Elementary Professional Development Day August 31, 2010 Gar-Field High School Dr. Steven L. Walts Superintendent of Schools.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Positive Behaviour for Success (PBS) Universals Pre-Training Session 2012 Positive Behaviour for Success Illawarra South East Region.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Meeting One: Leadership for Technology Integration and Implementation.
1. Staffing 2. Expectations 3. Instructional Leadership.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Presentation transcript:

How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Download PPT and handout > > >Courses I teach at

Distributed Leadership A focus on leadership PRACTICE: >the interactions between leaders, followers, and their situation leaders act in situations that are defined by others actions in a situation its routines, tools, and structures define leadership practice »Professor James Spillane, Northwestern University

Practice Leadership Practice Interactions Among Leaders, Followers, Situation Classroom Practice Interactions Among Teacher, Students, Curriculum

Interactions Between Situatio n Leaders, Followers

The Situation Shapes Leadership Practice >Tools, Routines, & Structures –Means to an end –Concrete illustrations of leaders intentions –Developed responses that routinize leadership practice for intended goals –Constrain and enable –Shape organization, and relationships >= Artifacts

Artifacts of Practice >Tools –a mediating device that shapes interactions between two people Improvement plan, observation protocol, student assessment data >Routines –Interactional, repetitive, recognizable, pattern of interdependent actions Meetings, annual SOL cycle of readying and testing >Structures –Conditions or characteristics: Time / schedule, school size, departments or teams, accountability, governance

Interactions Between

Distributed Leadership A focus on leadership PRACTICE: >the interactions between leaders, followers, and their situation leaders act in situations that are defined by others actions in a situation its routines, tools, and structures define leadership practice »Professor James Spillane, Northwestern University

Analytical Perspective >Who is a leader? –Role-based vs. Expertise-based Sources of influence Relative responsibilities, accountability >What is leadership? –System of Practice vs. Trait or Behavior Systemic view How interactions are fostered, their depth and quality

Discuss >What does taking a distributed leadership perspective highlight for you about your role and work as a school leader?

School Technology Leadership What we know >Team of people –Principal, Technology Integrators, Teacher Leaders >Leadership best predictor of integration – Rather than infrastructure or $$ spent >Vision is Key –Serves as an organizing concept

Outcomes of School Technology Leadership Classroom Level >Integration aids teaching and learning >Integration is strategic and effective School Level >Supportive Context >Enablers maximized >The organization learns

Outcomes of School Technology Leadership Classroom-level Integration >1. Learning outcomes drive the selection of technology. >2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning. >3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes. School-level Implementation >4. Ready access to supported, managed technology is provided. >5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration. >6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation.

Outcomes of School Technology Leadership Integration >1. Learning outcomes drive the selection of technology. >2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning. >3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes. Implementation >4. Ready access to supported, managed technology is provided. >5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration. >6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation. Leadership by teams to accomplish outcomes

Discuss >At your school, to what degree have you accomplished the technology –Integration outcomes? –Implementation outcomes?

A Distributed Approach to Technology Leadership >Increases Success via Team Method –More needs represented – More expertise included >Recognizes recursive effect –leaders act in situations that are defined by others actions –in a situation its routines, tools, and structures define leadership practice

Leadership >Definition: To exert influence in a particular direction >Core functions 1.To set direction 2.To develop peoples capacity for that direction 3.To restructure the organization to support that direction

Outcomes of School Technology Leadership Integration >1. Learning outcomes drive the selection of technology. >2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning. >3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes. Implementation >4. Ready access to supported, managed technology is provided. >5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration. >6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation. Teams Set direction Develop people Make the org. work to accomplish outcomes

Leadership & Classroom Practice 25% of impact on student achievement 75% of impact on student achievement Leadership Practice Interactions Among Leaders, Followers, Situation Classroom Practice Interactions Among Teachers, Students, Curriculum

Technology Leadership Leadership Practice Interactions Among Leaders, Followers, Situation Classroom Practice Interactions Among Teachers, Students, Curriculum Situations Artifacts --tools --routines --structures Set direction Develop people Make org work for Integration & Implementation Outcomes

Artifacts That Set Direction >To Set Direction –Identify and articulate a vision –Foster the acceptance of group goals –Create high performance expectations Tools, Routines, Structures –Technology vision- statement Relates to student learning –Regular mtg. discussion about priority of tech –Observation protocol for FB on quality of integration Indicators of current status and progress

Artifacts That Develop People >To Develop People –Offer intellectual stimulation –Provide individualized support –Provide an appropriate model Tools, Routines, Structures –Choice from among topics and ways to learn –Professional development Content area specific focused on in-depth understanding Long-term learning goals set –Availability of 1:1 help –PLCs discuss, observe, give feedback on efforts

Artifacts That Make Org. Work >To Make the Organization Work –Strengthen School Cultures –Modify organizational structures –Build collaborative practices Tools, Routines, Structures –Policies encouraging teacher empowerment and professional community –Tools for knowledge building, networked storage, time to meet –Physical proximity /interdependence with other integrators –Goal and vision consensus with external community

Discuss At your school, what leadership practices (artifacts: tools, routines, structures) 1.influence integration outcomes? (classroom technology integration practices) 2.create favorable implementation conditions?

Analysis Focus >Enabling Practices: –For technology outcomes being met, what tools, routines, and structures facilitate? >Constraining Practices: – For technology outcomes NOT being met, what tools, routines, and structures are missing? What interventions are needed? >Is Team Coordinated and Open to Input? –For setting direction, developing people, and making the organization work?