Statistical Models for the Analysis of Brain Connectivity Based on fMRI Data Yoshio Takane McGill University and University of Victoria September 19, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) for fMRI
Advertisements

General Linear Model L ύ cia Garrido and Marieke Schölvinck ICN.
General Linear Model Beatriz Calvo Davina Bristow.
MCUAAAR: Methods & Measurement Core Workshop: Structural Equation Models for Longitudinal Analysis of Health Disparities Data April 11th, :00 to.
1 st Level Analysis: design matrix, contrasts, GLM Clare Palmer & Misun Kim Methods for Dummies
Outline What is ‘1st level analysis’? The Design matrix
The General Linear Model Or, What the Hell’s Going on During Estimation?
6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models 6-1 Introduction To Empirical Models.
Objectives (BPS chapter 24)
How to evaluate the cross-cultural equivalence of single items Melanie Revilla, Willem Saris RECSM, UPF Zurich – 15/16 July.
Group analyses of fMRI data Methods & models for fMRI data analysis 26 November 2008 Klaas Enno Stephan Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research.
“Ghost Chasing”: Demystifying Latent Variables and SEM
Today Concepts underlying inferential statistics
Correlational Designs
Lorelei Howard and Nick Wright MfD 2008
CORRELATIO NAL RESEARCH METHOD. The researcher wanted to determine if there is a significant relationship between the nursing personnel characteristics.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Experimental Design Tali Sharot & Christian Kaul With slides taken from presentations by: Tor Wager Christian Ruff.
Chapter 12 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian
GUIDE to The… D U M M I E S’ DCM Velia Cardin. Functional Specialization is a question of Where? Where in the brain is a certain cognitive/perceptual.
Factor Analysis Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Dynamic Causal Modelling THEORY SPM Course FIL, London October 2009 Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University.
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation Analysis
From Localization to Connectivity and... Lei Sheu 1/11/2011.
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
L 1 Chapter 12 Correlational Designs EDUC 640 Dr. William M. Bauer.
Analysis of fMRI data with linear models Typical fMRI processing steps Image reconstruction Slice time correction Motion correction Temporal filtering.
FMRI Methods Lecture7 – Review: analyses & statistics.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
2004 All Hands Meeting Analysis of a Multi-Site fMRI Study Using Parametric Response Surface Models Seyoung Kim Padhraic Smyth Hal Stern (University of.
All Hands Meeting 2005 The Family of Reliability Coefficients Gregory G. Brown VASDHS/UCSD.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 12: Wrap Up: Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions for SEM.
Dynamic Causal Modelling Will Penny Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK FMRIB, Oxford, May
Path Analysis and Structured Linear Equations Biologists in interested in complex phenomena Entails hypothesis testing –Deriving causal linkages between.
Analysis of Brain Connectivity through fMRI Data: Dynamic GSCA and GCANO Yoshio Takane University of Victoria and McGill University September 3, 2015 Given.
Introduction to connectivity: Psychophysiological Interactions Roland Benoit MfD 2007/8.
Module III Multivariate Analysis Techniques- Framework, Factor Analysis, Cluster Analysis and Conjoint Analysis Research Report.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Marta I. Garrido Thanks to: Karl J. Friston, Klaas E. Stephan, Andre C. Marreiros, Stefan J. Kiebel,
The world before DCM. Linear regression models of connectivity Structural equation modelling (SEM) y1y1 y3y3 y2y2 b 12 b 32 b 13 z1z1 z2z2 z3z3 0 b 12.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
Statistical Analysis An Introduction to MRI Physics and Analysis Michael Jay Schillaci, PhD Monday, April 7 th, 2007.
Dynamic Connectivity: Pitfalls and Promises
1 Tom Edgar’s Contribution to Model Reduction as an introduction to Global Sensitivity Analysis Procedure Accounting for Effect of Available Experimental.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Multivariate Statistics.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan Mathematics in Brain Imaging, IPAM, UCLA, USA,
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
Dynamic Causal Models Will Penny Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Stefan Kiebel, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan MultiModal Brain Imaging, Copenhagen,
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM fMRI Course London, October 2012.
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). CCA This is it! The mother of all linear statistical analysis When ? We want to find a structural relation between.
Methods of Presenting and Interpreting Information Class 9.
Mihály Bányai, Vaibhav Diwadkar and Péter Érdi
5th March 2008 Andreina Mendez Stephanie Burnett
Effective Connectivity: Basics
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
2nd Level Analysis Methods for Dummies 2010/11 - 2nd Feb 2011
Effective Connectivity
Multiple Change Point Detection for Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices Dehan Kong University of Toronto JSM 2018 July 30, 2018.
Dynamic Causal Modelling
12 Inferential Analysis.
Zillah Boraston and Disa Sauter 31st May 2006
Hierarchical Models and
Effective Connectivity
Chapter 3 General Linear Model
MfD 04/12/18 Alice Accorroni – Elena Amoruso
WellcomeTrust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Structural Equation Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Statistical Models for the Analysis of Brain Connectivity Based on fMRI Data Yoshio Takane McGill University and University of Victoria September 19, 2013 This talk is dedicated to Professor Haruo Yanai of St. Luke College of Nursing

Structural Equation Models (SEMs) Methods for investigating if hypothesized relationships among observed variables are consistent with data path analysis (sociology) simultaneous equation models (econometrics) Latent variables to simplify the relationships among observed variables (psychometrics)

Effective Connectivity SPC V5 V1 V1 = Primary Visual Cortex V5 = Middle Temporal Area SPC = Superior Parietal Cortex Attention to Visual Motion Study (Friston et al, 2003)

Time Series of Three ROIs Five BOLD signals for each ROI ROIs Constructs or latent variables BOLD signals Observed variables

The Attention to Visual Motion Data Source: Friston et al. (2003) u1 = Photic u2 = Motion u3 = Attention

Shift Matrices

Experimental Stimuli

Time Series of Experimental Stimuli u1 = Photic u2 = Motion u3 = Attention

Model Features (1)Features in Conventional SEM – Contemporaneous Effects of ROIs on other ROIs (2) New Features – Time Lagged Effects – Stimulus Effects a) Direct effects b) Modulating effects

Model Fitting Estimate model parameters in such a way as to minimize the sum of squared residuals under some side conditions

Assessment of reliability – Bootstrap method Data are correlated A modified moving block bootstrap method A Special Bootstrap Method

Result 1 : Attention to Visual Motion Data Estimates, SE, p-values

Result 1 : Attention to Visual Motion Data

Result 2: Memory Task Data PCUN MOG MTG HIP INS THA DCG Source: Wang et al. (2010)

Result 2: Memory Task Data PCUN MOG MTG HIP INS THA DCG

A Summary so far Dynamic GSCA can accommodate more complex and elaborate models Single optimization criterion/ Simple and reliable algorithm Modified moving block bootstrap method to handle correlated observations

Extensions of Dynamic GSCA 1.Dynamic GSCA with latent interactions 2. Simultaneous analysis of multi- subject data Multi-sample (multi-group) comparison Multilevel analysis

Latent Interaction

Multiple Subjects A recent article posted at a blog site called NEUROSKEPTIC is questioning the validity of some procedure in SPM (Does it mean “Spurious Positive Mapping” rather than “Statistical Parametric Mapping?”) based on Eklund et al. (2012), who examined nearly 1500 individual resting-state fMRI data sets by SPM, and found significant task unrelated activations in a majority of cases.

A commentary of the article said “It is quite common to find such spontaneous activations in individual data. However, those activations are not synchronized across individuals, so they tend to disappear when multiple-subject data are simultaneously analyzed.”

Second Model Measurement model: -- Extracts the most representative variations of ROIs across subjects within groups -- Multiple-set canonical correlation analysis (instead of PCA-like model as before) -- Homogeneity across subjects, but not across ROIs Structural model remains essentially the same as before (but includes latent interactions)

The Bootstrap Method Sample from subjects Equivalent to sampling blocks of length equal to T Calculate mean, sd, and p-values for estimated parameterst and fit indices We may also bootstrap any contrasts between parameters (e.g., directionality of influence).

An Example Data Set

Equality Constraints

Analyses No stimulus effects; 7 ROIs are bidirectionally connected; Time-lagged effects of order 1 Analysis I: All parameters are assumed equal across groups. Analysis II: No parameters are assumed equal. (Equivalent to two separate analyses.)

Time Series of ROIs: Assumed Equal Across Groups IPL-L PreCG-L CL-L CL-R IPL-R PreCG-R SMA

Time Series of ROIs: Separate Groups Normals Schizophrenics

The Second Order PCA of SeparateTime Series for ROIs Normal 49.2%. 35.7% IPL-L PreCG-L CL-L CL-R IPL-R PreCG-R SMA schizophrenic IPL-L PreCG-L CL-L CL-R IPL-R PreCG-R SMA I II

Time Series for ROIs: ROI 4 Equated Across Groups Normals Schizophrenics

Future Prospects User friendly program More flexible constraints Groups created by repeated measurements Time varying regression coefficients in structural models Nonlinear models(?); Differential equations

Contributions by Kwanghee Jung (McGill  Univ. of Texas at Houston) Lixing Zhou (McGill) Heungsun Hwang (McGill) Todd Woodward (University of British Columbia)

Thank you

Historical 1 Unified SEM (Kim et al., 2007) – autoregressive effects Extended unified SEM (Gates et al., 2010) – stimulus effects GSCA (Hwang & Takane, 2004) – PCA-SEM Dynamic GSCA (Jung et al., 2012)

Historical 2 Regularized GCANO (Takane et al., 2008) Functional GCANO (Hwang et al., 2012) GCANO –PCA (Hwang et al., 2013) Dynamic GCANO – GCANO-SEM