1 Exclusive Quality (work in progress) Johan Stennek Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm CEPR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Industrial Economics (Econ3400) Week 3 August 7, 2007 Room 323, Bldg 3 Semester 2, 2007 Instructor: Shino Takayama.
Advertisements

Michael R. Baye, Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, 3e. ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter.
Public Goods and Economic Efficiency Presented by Cheng Yi Lik.
The Evolution of Licensing and What It Means to Our Business Strategies Society for Scholarly Publishing May 28, 2003 Alma J. Wills, Partner Kaufman-Wills.
Competition between content distributors in two-sided markets Harald Nygård Bergh, Hans Jarle Kind, Bjørn-Atle Reme, Lars Sørgard, Norwegian School of.
Trade-Offs by Harold Winter
Price Takers and the Competitive Process
The Role and Regulation of Interchange Fees in European Payments Cards The Role and Regulation of Interchange Fees in European Payments Cards Wilko Bolt.
The Economics of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance Robert Willig Princeton University Competition Policy Associates (COMPASS)
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Gordon Walker McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Vertical.
Externalities and Public Goods DERYA GÜLTEKİN-KARAKAŞ
Externalities and Public Goods
Economic Conditions Created by the Grant of a Patent $ Quantity.
Chapter 16 Public Goods and Public Choice © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
Chapters 14 and 15 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Public vs. Private Provision of Information Yale Braunstein March 2008.
Monopoly Monopoly and perfect competition. Profit maximization by a monopolist. Inefficiency of a monopoly. Why do monopolies occur? Natural Monopolies.
Economic Optimization Chapter 2. Economic Optimization Process Optimal Decisions Best decision produces the result most consistent with managerial objectives.
Taxes, Social Insurance, and Income Distribution <Review Slides>
Chapter 8. Monopoly How? Firm behavior Monopoly vs. Competition Price Discrimination Policy How? Firm behavior Monopoly vs. Competition Price Discrimination.
Economic Issues 101 D.W. Hedrick.
slide 1Competition in the long-run In the short-run the number of firms in a competitive industry is fixed. In the long-run new firms can enter or existing.
Designing Marketing Channels
Chapter 6 Designing the Marketing Channel.
Principles of Marketing Lecture-43 Summary of Lecture-42.
For use only with Perreault and McCarthy texts. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 18: Price Setting in the Business World.
Economics Introduction:
Using Selectivity to Motivate Channel Members. What Level of Intensity (Selectivity) is the Best Channel Strategy? Affects the ability to implement channel.
Inducements in France: no ban but transparency « Il disincentivo agli incentivi nella disciplina sui servizi d’investimento: tendenze europee e nazionali.
Externalities and Public Goods
08 Network Effects 5 Aaron Schiff ECON Reading: Cabral, Ch 17.
OECD IMPLEMENTING ENVIRONMENTALLY RELATED TAXES Outstanding issues Jean-Philippe Barde and Nils Axel Braathen OECD, Environment Directorate.
Business Strategy and Policy Lecture Recap Forward Integration Forward integration involves gaining ownership or increased control over distributors.
© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Marketing Management, 8e Chapter Ten Distribution Strategy Key Words /
TV wars: content and competition in pay-TV Helen Weeds, University of Essex 5 th Workshop on Media Economics Bologna, October 2007.
General Equilibrium and the Efficiency of Perfect Competition
David Bryce © Adapted from Baye © 2002 Power of Rivalry: Economics of Competition and Profits MANEC 387 Economics of Strategy MANEC 387 Economics.
©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism, 4th edition Upper Saddle River, NJ Kotler, Bowen, and Makens Distribution Channels.
Marketing Strategy II. Which Markets are the Most Attractive? Issues: 1. Segments offering a lot of surplus (Marketing Strategy 1) 2. Markets in which.
What is Economics?. Economics is... Study of how we make decisions based on limited resources.
Economic Dimensions of Integrated Water Resources Management Training of Trainers Integrated Water Resources Management.
Page 1www.ymagis.com Digital Cinema Ymagis, its business model and what it really means for european exhibitors, distributors and their relationships SECOND.
CHAPTER 6 The Economic Role of the State PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS: The Role of Government in the American Economy Randall Holcombe.
June Casuality Seattle: A Conference for Casual Game Developers, Publishers and Distributors 1 Don’t Roll Over Brian Robbins Director of Games,
13-1. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 13 Channel Management.
REVENUE PROTECTION IN THE UK Alan Dick UK Revenue Protection Association.
Pricing for Profits Factors affecting price Pricing Policies Pricing Strategies Pricing Techniques Do you have what it takes? Markup.
For use only with Perreault and McCarthy texts. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 17: Price Setting in the Business World.
Marketing Channel Strategy The term marketing channel was first used to describe the existence of a trade channel bridging producers and users. Early writers.
Chapter 181 Externalities and Public Goods. Chapter 182 Externalities Externalities are the effects of production and consumption activities not directly.
GLOBAL MARKETING Distribution Management. Why A Distribution Strategy? To make the right quantities of the right product or service available at the right.
Chapter 17 Price Setting in the Business World
Marketing in Tough Times Roger James FAMI CPM Chairman Australian Marketing Institute.
OPTIMAL COPYRIGHT TERM SONGS, COMPOSITIONS, RECORDINGS.
In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions:
Competitive Advantage The Value of Winning © 2008, James H. Biteman, DBA.
Overview of Sony Pictures Television Networks and Indian Regional Channels Opportunity Materials Presented to Sony Corporation’s Board of Directors July.
Market Failures. 1) Inadequate Competition Inefficient resource allocation Higher prices and reduced output Economic and political power.
©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism, 4th edition Upper Saddle River, NJ Kotler, Bowen, and Makens Chapter 13 Distribution.
Introduction to Economics What do you think of when you think of economics?
Telecom Regulatory Environment Indian Case Payal Malik.
SKF SERVICES – SHOULD WE GO DOWNSTREAM? ALEKSI HALTTUNEN, TAMARA HÜBER, JAVIER ORTIZ, LARI PELANNE.
Prof. Dr. –Ing. Kalamullah Ramli 1 Business Plan.
Exclusivity in sports broadcasting Some media economic notes Tom Evens (IBBT-MICT-UGent) E: Association for the Study of Sport and the.
Society for Scholarly Publishing May 28, 2003 Alma J. Wills, Partner
COMPETITION IN THE LONG-RUN
Distribution Strategy
The new Regulation and Guidelines on Vertical Restraints
Chapter 9: Setting the list or quoted price
Strategic Marketing Management | The Framework
Presentation transcript:

1 Exclusive Quality (work in progress) Johan Stennek Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm CEPR

2 Example: Sweden

3 Example: U.S.

4 Example: Summary 1.Exclusive distribution – Competition 2.Exclusive distribution – Quality

5 Questions 1.Why and when exclusive distribution? –Role of quality? –Competing distributors 2.Effect of ban on exclusive distribution?

6 The Model: Agents One producer of (a single) TV-channel Two TV-distributors Viewers

7 The Model: “ Timing” 1.Producer invests in quality 2.Producer and distributors negotiate over distribution rights 3.Distributors compete for viewers

8 3. Competition for viewers Setup Given –Quality –Distribution (prices fixed) Timing –Two distributors set subscription fees –Each viewer subscribes to one distributor Hotelling

9 3. Competition for viewers Subscription revenues Quality Aggregate subscription revenues Non-exclusive dist. Exclusive dist.

10 3. Competition for viewers Advertising revenues Quality Advertising revenues Non-exclusive dist. Exclusive dist.

11 3. Competition for viewers Subscription vs. advertising revenues Quality Revenues Loss of advertising rev. Gain in subscr. rev.

12 2. Bargaining for Distribution Rights Setup Given –Quality Timing –Alternating offers –Offer = price & type of distribution rights –If non-exclusive rights, bargaining continues

13 2. Bargaining for Distribution Rights Form of distribution “Efficiency” Exclusive rights if –High quality –Intense competition Intuition: Quality ↑ –Gain in aggregate subscription revenues ↑ –Loss of advertising revenues ↓

14 2. Bargaining for Distribution Rights Prices If exclusive rights –Fierce bidding competition In non-exclusive rights –Distributors don’t have to compete Note: Note: Increased quality –Exclusive distribution ”more likely” –Price for distribution rights ↑

15 1. Investment in Quality Setup Producer chooses quality –Benefits 1.Price for distribution rights ↑ - Better bargaining position - Increased subscription revenues (if exclusive) 2.Advertising revenues ↑ (if exclusive) May induce exclusive distribution –Costs

16 1. Investment in Quality Optimal qualities, given distribution Optimal quality Marginal cost of quality Optimal quality is always higher under exclusive distribution than under non-exclusive distribution, given any cost Optimal quality is higher the smaller is the cost of quality

17 1. Investment in Quality Optimal quality Optimal quality Marginal cost of quality threshold Positive relation: Quality – Exclusive Dist. 1.low cost → high quality → exclusive dist. 2.exclusive dist. → high quality lowhigh

18 Policy Experiment Given quality: –Ban on exclusive distribution good for all viewers Reduced quality: –Ban may harm all viewers __________________________________ Excluded households No ban: - can’t watch high quality channel - but very low price Ban: - can watch low quality channel __________________________________

19 Policy Implications “Efficiency defense” –Especially important when quality is high –Investment incentives may be too strong –Time consistency