River Section Segment length (km) Total length (km) West river 0.50634.975 East river 0.53633.49 Grand Mean 0.52068.465 N * Scale applies to larger map.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Selected results of FoodSat research … Food: what’s where and how much is there? 2 Topics: Exploring a New Approach to Prepare Small-Scale Land Use Maps.

Advertisements

Figure 1: Location map of hydrographic and coastal sampling stations.

Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.

Lacy Smith Geog /13/2010. Project Sites & Background.

Geoscience Australia Md Anisul Islam Geoscience Australia Evaluation of IMAPP Cloud Cover Mapping Algorithm for Local application. Australian Government.

Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.

Abstract Ryan Stanley and Steve Taylor, Earth and Physical Sciences Department, Western Oregon University, Monmouth, Oregon, Land Cover Analysis.

Harvard University Graduate School of Design Exploring 30 Years of Land Use Change: Landsat Time Series Images and Simple Image Classification Techniques.

Unsupervised Classification of Higgins Beach and Vicinity Remote Sensing (GEO 205) Author: Stanley Max Final Project Using ERDAS Imagine 8.7 to Conduct.

RATIOS OF SCALE DRAWINGS. SCALE DRAWINGS SCALE DRAWINGS: A scale drawing is a drawing that represents a real object. The scale of the drawing is the ratio.

Freshwater Wetlands By Caulay Vermeulen. Global Map I could not find a global map specific to freshwater wetlands but this map shows global reservoirs.

Geography of INDIA Draw & Label a map with physical features: oceans, seas, rivers, mountain ranges, deserts, plateau, etc…

Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.

Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.

ASPRS Annual Conference 2005, Baltimore, March Utilizing Multi-Resolution Image data vs. Pansharpened Image data for Change Detection V. Vijayaraj,

How to stratify watersheds? For the regional-scale studies we need to identify the upper / middle / lower regions of each watershed. There are many ways.

Indoor mapping exercise Plotting information from seismic profiles on to a map.

Dilations Section 9.7. Dilation A dilation is a transformation that stretches or shrinks a figure to create a similar figure. A dilation is not an isometry.

Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed

 Up to what level of classification can we perform on LISSIII/LISSIV data?  Is any advantage of high spectral resolution of LISSIII over LISSIV. If.

Airborne Measurements of the Columbia River Plume Andy Jessup and Bill Plant APL-UW Determine Plume Location/Characteristics –SST –Water Type/Sediment.

Geographic Information Systems in Water Science Unit 4: Module 16, Lecture 3 – Fundamental GIS data types.

Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics

Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics

Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:

Change Detection The process of identifying differences in the state of an object or phenomenon by observing it at different times. Change detection applications:

Land cover mapping of Asia ， Central Asia, and Middle East for GLC2000 project Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi Sato, and Zhu Lin Center for Environmental Remote.

Validation of MODIS Snow Mapping Algorithm Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.

During the 20 th century, thematic maps have been an ever useful tool for correlating data sets and representing relevant information. Recent technological.

An Improved Global Snow Classification Dataset for Hydrologic Applications (Photo by Kenneth G. Libbrecht and Patricia Rasmussen) Glen E. Liston, CSU Matthew.

Lecture 20 – review Labs: questions Next Wed – Final: 18 March 10:30-12:20 Thursday, 12 March.

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Data

International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 Exercise : Forest fire modeling Yousif Hussin Associated Institute.

Continued Declines in Mature and Secondary Forest Cover in a Previously Settled Region of Eastern Pará A.S. de Almeida 1, T.A. Stone 2, E.A. Davidson 2,

Accuracy Assessment Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Sampling Method

A new prior distribution of a Bayesian forecast model for small repeating earthquakes in the subduction zone along the Japan Trench Masami Okada (MRI,

Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.

By: Reid Swanson Sam Soper. Goal: To describe land cover/use changes that have occurred in the Twin Cities Metro-Area from the 1991 to 2005 Quantifying.

Visual Images of The Berlin Wall

Land Classification on the Kaibuskong River Subwatershed

Urban growth pattern of the San Antonio area

Spatial Models – Raster Stacy Bogan

Features of Maps.

Two-Dimensional Kinematics

HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING

Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:

Measures of Central Tendency, Dispersion, IQR and standard deviation

CHANGES IN BARRIER ISLAND ENVIRONMENTS DURING SEA-LEVEL RISE

Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery

Supervised Classification

CS654: Digital Image Analysis

Image Information Extraction

Section 2.5 notes Measures of Variation

How Scientists use Statistics

The Pagami Creek Wildfire

Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky

Lecture 20 – review Thursday, 11 March 2010 Labs: questions

Statistical Classification on a Multispectral Image

Classification of Snow Leopard habitat in Mt. Everest National Park

Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)

Percentage of watershed area in critical zone*

WP05: Turkey Land Use Change Model

Image Classification of the Upper South Fork Eel River Watershed

Calculating land use change in west linn from

Change in Land Cover in Elk Grove

Chapter 1 Section 7 How do you read a map?

Presentation transcript:

River Section Segment length (km) Total length (km) West river East river Grand Mean N * Scale applies to larger map only

Figure Y: Conceptual schematic of the unsupervised classification methods used on the basemap Geo-rectified infrared image with three color bands (R,G,B) Original classified image with 32 classes Unsupervised classification using the Maximum likelihood algorithm Final classified image

Figure 3: Unsupervised classification of land-use/ land cover in the lower Pascagoula River, MS. Primary Growth Zones High marsh Low marsh Anthropogenic structures Forest River ColorClassification. Primary Growth Zones High marsh Low marsh Anthropogenic structures Forest River ColorClassification. Primary Growth Zones High marsh Low marsh Anthropogenic structures Forest River ColorClassification. Primary Growth Zones High marsh Low marsh Anthropogenic structures Forest River ColorClassification. Primary Growth Zones High marsh Low marsh Anthropogenic structures Forest River ColorClassification.

Horizontal profile Salinity (‰) River mouthRiver fork Salinity (‰) Figure Z: Horizontal profile interpolation of salinity collected in December 2003.

Figure 7: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistics of salinity (‰) collected during March 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS. (‰) WestEast Range0.02 – – 3.36 Mean Standard deviation N251179

Figure 8: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistics of salinity (‰) collected during May 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS (‰)(‰) WestEast Range0.3 – – Mean Standard deviation N

Figure 9: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistics of salinity (‰) collected during July 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS. (‰)(‰) WestEast Range0 – – 9.19 Mean Standard deviation N

Figure 10: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistics of temperature (°C) collected during March 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS. (°C) WestEast Range – – Mean Standard deviation N251179

Figure 11: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistic of temperature (°C) collected during May 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS (°C) WestEast Range – – 28.4 Mean Standard deviation N

Figure 12: Interpolated horizontal profiles and descriptive statistics of temperature (°C) collected during July 2003 from the east and west distributaries of the Pascagoula River, MS. (°C) WestEast Range – – Mean Standard deviation N