City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) Overview: Sweeping Changes for Defined Benefit Pension Plans Presented by David S. Boomershine, Senior Actuary Boomershine.
Advertisements

South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
1 Understanding Coronado’s CalPERS Rates. 2 Agenda  Basic Concepts  How Rates are Set  What causes rates to rise and fall?  Coronado Rates – historically.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to House Appropriations Committee _____________________________________.
Georgia Government Finance Officers Association October 1, 2013 How to Read an Actuarial Valuation Report: “It’s Not Just a Sleep Aid”
FCERA Board of Retirement and Fresno County Board of Supervisors Joint Meeting – April 30, 2009 Contribution Volatility and Asset Smoothing FCERA Board.
Wisconsin Retirement System Experience Study Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company December 11, 2003.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Pension Accounting Chapter 17
Contribution Rates and Benefits of the U.S. Pension System International Pension Conference FIAP and the Chilean Pension Funds Administrations Association.
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
FA3 Lesson 7. Pension costs and obligations 1.Pensions 2.Defined contribution vs. defined benefit 3.Accounting for pensions 4.Pension worksheet.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
City Rates and Actuarial Issues 2007 Annual Training Seminar 2007, Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Chapter 21: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
IAS 26 – Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans Wiecek and Young IFRS Primer Chapter 36.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 14 – Pension Plan Experience Analysis By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
Choosing between Defined Benefit Plans & Defined Contribution Plans Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of Law University of Oklahoma Canada Cup – Toronto.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Commonwealth of Massachusetts OPEB Commission Meeting April 5, 2012.
Version Date : Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Corrections Officer Retirement Plan Elected Officials’ Retirement Plan Fiscal Year 2010.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
Actuarial Measures of US Household Income and Wealth from Defined Benefit Pension Plans By Marshall Reinsdorf for presentation at the UNECE Group of Experts.
THE FINANCIAL REPORTING WORKSHOP 25 TH AND 29 TH AUGUST 2014 HILLTON HOTEL, NAIROBI IAS 26 ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING BY RETIRMENT BENEFIT PLANS 1.
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs to accompany Deegan, Australian Financial Accounting 7e 12-1 Chapter 12 Accounting for employee benefits.
Covered Employer Training Program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2016.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
City of San Diego Retiree Medical Proposal City Council Presentation May 13, 2011.
Unfunded Actuarial Liabilities For a Defined Benefit Plan: UAL t = AL t – F t ”Funding Ratio” = F t / AL t We can calculate this Unfunded Actuarial Liability.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 FCERA Benefits and Reserves January 11, 2006 P.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Governmental Accounting Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits Local Government Corporation.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Regional Transportation District Salaried Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Plan Presented by: Terry Bright January 13, 2015  Foster City, CA  Denver,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
ACTUARIAL VALUATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -CA RAHUL JAIN
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
Lecture 23 Pension Plan Funding
CHAPTER 17 Pensions 2.
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
Section 28 Employee Benefits
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Insurance and Pension Fund Operations
Presentation transcript:

City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013

2 October 1, 2012 Valuation Review

3 Basic Funding Equation

4 The Annual Required Contribution (ARC) for the 2012 and 2013 fiscal year is $762,010 and $912,745. The 2012 ARC is equal to 57.53% of estimated participant compensation. The 2013 ARC is equal to 87.38% of estimated participant compensation. Expected employee contributions for the 2012 plan year are $100,221. Expected employee contributions for the 2013 plan year are $80,622.

5 Analysis of Actuarial Experience Total Normal Cost increased from $452,071 for the 2012 fiscal year to $480,722 for the 2013 fiscal year. As a percentage of estimated payroll, the increase was from 34.13% to 46.02%. Participant salaries were lower than expected. The expected increase for active participants was 7.40%; the actual increase was 4.39%. The actuarial value of plan assets increased approximately 6.8% due to investment earnings assuming mid-year cash flow. We anticipated an increase of 7.75%. The market value of assets increased approximately 19.3%.

6 Analysis of Actuarial Experience Cont. With the 2012 valuation report, the following changes were made this year: The valuation interest rate was lowered to reflect current expectations of your plan's long term investment performance. The new rate was decreased to 7.50%. The mortality table was updated to the IRS Prescribed Mortality – Generational Annuitant and Non-annuitant, male and female. The salary scale was decreased 80 basis points to reflect past experience and the expected level of future salary increases. The inflation assumption was decreased to 2.5%.

7 Smooth unexpected investment return over 4 years Reduces volatility of ARC Development of Actuarial Value of Assets

8 Development of Actuarial Value of Assets continued…. a)Market Value of Assets as of 10/01/2011$10,102,657 b)Contributions/Transfers823,015 c)Benefit payments(326,813) d)Expenses(26,730) e)Expected Interest on (a, b, c, and d)801,573 f)Expected Value of Assets as of 10/01/2012 (a+b+c+d+e) 11,373,702 g)Market Value of Assets as of 10/01/201212,571,796 h)Current year excess appreciation/(shortfall) (g-f)1,198,094 i)Adjustments to market value (sum of deferred amounts)561,842 j)Actuarial value of assets (g-i)12,009,954

9 Deferred Asset Gains/(Losses) Plan Year Allocation Year $(210,757) 2010 $(210,757)$59, $(210,757) $59,097$(197,913) 2012 $(210,756) $59,097 $(197,912) $ 299, $59,096 $(197,912) $299, $(197,912) $299, $299,523 Total $(843,027) $236,387 $(791,649) $1,198,094 Deferred$0 $59,096 $(395,824) $898,570 Adjustment to market value (sum of deferred amounts) $561,842

10 Valuation History Deposit calculations are based on the plan’s actuarial funding method and the City’s funding policy. The City’s funding policy has been to calculate the Annual Required Contribution equal to the City’s Normal Cost plus an amount to fund the unfunded Frozen Initial Liability over 30 years. Plan Year Beginning10/1/201210/1/201110/1/201010/1/2009 Total Normal Cost (% of Estimated Payroll) $480,722 (46.02%) $452,071 (34.13%) $673,627 (39.58%) $772,490 (44.24%) Employee Normal Cost$80,622$100,221$129,320$136,795 Employer Normal Cost$400,100$351,850$544,307$635,695 Annual Required Contribution (% of Estimated Payroll) $912,745 (87.3%) $762,010 (57.5) $953,218 (56.0%) $1,051,450 (60.2%)

11 Funded Status Present Value of Accrued Benefits: The comparison uses the asset values divided by the present value of all benefits accrued to date. The liability measure does not include a provision for future service accruals or salary increases. Present Value of Future Benefits: Ultimately, the plan will need to fund the Present Value of Future Benefits. This present value assumes future salary increases and service credits. It is the present value of the projected benefit payable at retirement for each current plan participant. The funded status is a measurement of the plan’s assets compared to the benefit liabilities. The value of these benefit liabilities on either an “accrued” or “projected” basis. Another measure that we have not shown includes the plan termination liabilities. The actual cost to terminate the plan would be based on annuity purchase rates at the time of termination.

12 Plan Year Beginning10/1/201210/1/201110/1/201010/1/2009 Plan Assets Market Value Actuarial Value * $12,810,101 $12,248,259 $10,102,657 $10,788,956 $9,370,501 $10,186,540 $7,921,579 $9,505,895 Present Value of Accrued Bens Funded % (Market Value) Funded % (Actuarial Value) $15,251,081 84% 80% $12,443,511 81% 87% $11,519,812 81% 88% $10,269,646 77% 93% Present Value of Proj. Bens Funded % (Market Value) Funded % (Actuarial Value) * Limited to 120% of MVA $19,144,638 67% 64% $16,608,976 61% 65% $17,853,094 52% 57% $18,628,881 42% 51% Funded Status

13 Actuarial History Plan Year Beginning10/1/201210/1/201110/1/201010/1/2009 Lives Covered Active Vested Terminated/DROP Retired Total Salary Increases Actual Expected 4.4% 7.4% 3.2% 7.4% 3.0% 7.5% 6.8% 5.6% Investment Return Market Actuarial 19.34% 6.81% (0.44)% (1.65)% 10.53% 0.98% (3.09)% (1.65)%

Defined Benefit Plan Sponsors are in a Challenging Environment Plan Sponsor Law changes Accounting Changes Market Conditions Administrative Complexity Forecasting & Projections Plan Design Review Asset Liability Modeling Frozen Plan Solutions Bundled Services Principal Financial Group