ACCESS TO UK RESEARCH OUTPUTS The developing RCUK position www.rcuk.ac.uk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH Public Access Policy What It Means for Authors and for Universities.
Advertisements

Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
Setting up an open access publication fund Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.
Open Access Dr Richard Masterman Director Research Innovation Services.
Fig. A | 1 | 12 | SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA We build understanding OPEN ACCESS and SSHRC Christian Sylvain, Director Policy,
NIH Public Access Compliance Cleveland Health Sciences Library Case Western Reserve University Kathleen C. Blazar.
Mark Toole 25 March “the principle that the results of research that has been publicly funded should be freely accessible in the open domain is.
Professor Andrew J Deeks PVC (Science) Durham University.
The transition to Finch: implications for the REF 29 November 2012 Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE.
Open Access Advocacy on the National - and International - Level Heather Joseph Executive Director, SPARC June 23, 2011 OAI7 Geneva, Switzerland.
Open Access, Research Funders and the Research Excellence Framework Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
Open Access Open Access Team, Library
The Finch Report and RCUK policies Michael Jubb Research Information Network 5 th Couperin Open Access Meeting 24 January 2013.
1 Get Up to Speed on the NIH Public Access Policy UNC-CH Health Sciences Library
Engineering Your Publication for the Future: Putting the NIH Mandate into Practice Martin Frank, Ph.D. Executive Director, APS Coordinator, DC Principles.
Open Access Policies in Scotland and the UK Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Society for Endocrinology Society for Endocrinology BES March 2007 Steve Byford Society for Endocrinology
Open Access – a funder’s perspective Robert Terry Senior Policy Adviser The Wellcome Trust.
NIH Public Access Policy Gary Byrd, PhD Linda Hasman, MSLS Health Sciences Library University at Buffalo State University of New York Gary Byrd, PhD Linda.
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
The NIH Public Access Requirement March 2014 Tara Douglas-Williams, MSLS.
1) You as the publisher, submit the article directly to PubMed Central after acceptance. 2) The publication contract sent to the author,
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 10/22/2009.
Institutional Compliance with the NIH Public Access Policy: Ensuring Deposit Rights, March 7, 2008 Sponsored by The Association of Research Libraries (ARL)
Februrary 2005UCSF Library & Center for Knowledge Management Scholarly Communication.
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE NLM Journal Archiving and Interchange Tagset Jeff Beck National Center for Biotechnology Information National Library of Medicine.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)
Open Access: a Biomedical Science Perspective Gerald M. Kidder, Ph.D. Associate Vice-President (Research) and Professor of Physiology Schulich School of.
Open Access to Scholarly Communications Open Access Scholarly Communication Workshop Vilnius, Lithuania February 2005.
Copyright 2006 M.R.Thorley/NERC Mark Thorley, Natural Environment Research Council Research Outputs: Their Access & Preservation A perspective.
Building Open Science Luis Ibáñez Kitware, Inc. The Insight Journal.
Open Access & Research Assessment Dealing with UK Open Access Requirements in Practice Dominic Tate Scholarly Communications Manager Edinburgh University.
Open Access and the Wellcome Trust: providing funds for open-access publishing Kathryn Lallu Grants Policy, Liaison and Support Manager Grants Administration.
Funding body requirements UKSG Webinar 26 th March 2014 Robert Kiley Wellcome
Open Access and Research Data Management: Information for PGR Supervisors Open Access and Data Curation team 17 th February 2015.
BERNARD BECKER MEDICAL LIBRARY Washington University School of Medicine December 2008 The NIH Public Access Policy How to Demonstrate Compliance RA Forum.
Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs Mark Thorley
Revised 7/19/10.  This policy states that, as of April 7, 2008, all articles resulting from U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) funds must be submitted.
Holly Phillips, MLIS, MS Erinn Aspinall, MSI Philip Kroth, MD, MS MLA 2007 Philadelphia, PA 5/21/2007 The NIH Public Access Policy at UNM: Sparking a Revolutionary.
U PDATED NIH P UBLIC A CCESS P OLICY Health Sciences Library staff Office of Grants & Contracts staff.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
Open access- a funders perspective (or “What we want from institutions”) CRC/RLUK/ARMA/SCONUL meeting 27 th January 2011 Robert Kiley, Head Digital Services,
Mathematics & UHM Library Sara Rutter Spring 2008.
NIH Public Access Policy. The Director of the National Institutes of Health shall require that all investigators funded by the NIH submit or have submitted.
Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs Mark Thorley
Traditional Distribution Electronic Distribution User Florida Entomologist Issues Reprints FTP.
Open Access and the Research Excellence Framework
Open Access - from a Library perspective Susan Ashworth, University of Glasgow Library.
Access to Research Data: NIH Public Access and PMC International Seminar on Open Access for Developing Countries 21 September 2005 Jane Bortnick Griffith.
{ OA Policy implementation: Chemical Sciences Ljilja Ristic MScChem PGLIS MCLIP Physical Sciences Consultant & Subject Librarian, RSL February 2016.
Open Access Defined An Introduction by Patti McCall.
Open Access to Scholarship: Department Chairs Meeting, 29 May 2009 Brian E. C. Schottlaender & Stefan Tanaka.
Implementing NIH Deposit Policies: Institutional Strategies at the University of Minnesota CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 7-8, 2008 Minneapolis, MN.
1 The NIH Public Access Requirement [short presentation] June 2013.
Guide to publishing OA at the RSC. How to apply for open access There are two main ways to apply for open access: Gold for Gold voucher Payment of an.
1 The NIH Public Access Requirement [short presentation] November, 2009.
ARL 1 NIH Public Access Policy: Background for Campus Implementation Strategies Karla Hahn ARL Office of Scholarly Communication Coalition for Networked.
RCUK Policy on Open Access Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Things that you need to know about Open Access, the REF and the CRIS Rowena Rouse Scholarly Communications Manager May 2016.
Open Access: what you need to know This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.This work is licensed under a Creative.
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
Funding body requirements
Updated NIH Public Access Policy
Presentation transcript:

ACCESS TO UK RESEARCH OUTPUTS The developing RCUK position

Consultation to date – Phase 1 Spring 2004-Summer workshops and dissemination of draft statements to 34 key stakeholders Major changes in policy including removal of a predetermined time lag for deposit

Consultation to date – Phase 2 April-May 2005 Consultation of all UK Universities Received 50 responses Supportive of proposed policy Majority has institutional repositories or are in process of setting up

Consultation to date – Phase 3 June-Sept 2005 Public consultation Received 84 responses from individuals and organisations, including many of the original 34 key stakeholders and some additional universities Meetings held with learned societies and publishers, including the Science Council and ALPSP members

Consultation to date – Phase 3 responses General support for the four basic principles Responses in 3 groups: RCUK proposal is balanced and reasonable, but could be strengthened Open access publishing is a threat and implementation should be delayed Proposed policy should not be implemented, in particular its requirement to deposit, as there is no real problem with the current environment

Consultation to date – Phase 3 specific issues 'subject to copyright and licensing restrictions‘: misunderstood by some, concern about inclusion by others 'an appropriate e-print repository (either institutional or subject-based) …' questions about ‘appropriate’ and about funding Author pay fees questions about model, but not RCUK condition Peer review and version control important to address

Consultation to date – Phase 3 specific issues Role of learned societies is important, especially in terms of peer review. Other issues raised: –support for addressing the accessibility of primary research data –support for the RCUK position on VAT

Wider developments - 1 The Wellcome Trust: –from 1st October 2005, all papers from new research projects must be deposited in PubMed Central or UK PubMed Central within 6 months of publication. US National Institute of Health: –starting 2 May , NIH-funded investigators are requested to submit to the NIH National Library of Medicine's (NLM) PubMed Central (PMC) an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance for publication The Canadian Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council –adopted the principle of open access and is undertaking a public consultation

Wider developments - 2 Universities UK: –problems with the current subscription system –practical benefits of institutional repositories –Supports RCUK efforts to promote open and unrestricted access to research outputs The Russell Group: –publicly-funded research should be publicly available –current system of scholarly publishing does not always work in the best interests of the research community –supports the development of institutional repositories of research papers, and will actively encourage their researchers to deposit their work in them.

Process A final announcement is expected in November No implications for Research Council grants in October as originally proposed. Likely for grants awarded after early Consultation responses review by RCUK Research Outputs Information Group, chaired by Prof J Wood Recommendations to be considered by RCUK Executives Group Ongoing process of consultation and dialogue with stakeholders Review in 2008

Under development - 1 Position statement with effect from 1 April 2006 for all grant applications Independent scientific study into the impact of open access to report in 2008 with support from key stakeholders Reconsideration of policy in 2008 based on the evidence provided by the study –Note: that it is extremely unlikely that there will be many deposits before mid 2008 which result from research applications received by the Councils after April 2006

Under development - 2 Refine current statement and develop implementation guidelines Discuss model copyright and licensing arrangements with key stakeholders –Is there a role here for the DTI research communications forum ? Early 2006: workshop for learned societies on open access, Support from JISC, RCUK, RIN, the Science Council