Mouse; NOTC1; Q01705 Function: protein binding Process: Notch signaling pathway Process: positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH T-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Institutional Research Training Grants
Advertisements

What’s NIH? National Cancer Institute National Eye Institute National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inst. National Human Genome Research Inst National Institute.
NIH Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) R15 AASCU November 5, 2009 Mary Ann Guadagno, PhD Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health.
Expiring Funds April Update SAC Meeting April 24, 2013.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
1 Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NIH F-31 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Predoctoral Fellowships to Promote Diversity in Health-Related.
National Institutes of Health K awards Margie Lee Dept Population Health BHSI Fellowship Writing Workshop Phase 1 – Feb 5, 2011.
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2011 November 3, 2011 Approaches to Biomedical Research and Development Portfolio Analysis: Examples From the.
ACADEMIC RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AWARD AREA (R15) Paula Flicker.
NIH Brown Bag Lunch SOT 2010 March 9, 2010 Janice Allen, PhD Michael Humble, PhD Division of Extramural Research and Training (DERT) National Institute.
Weathering the Storm: How to Establish and Sustain an Independent Research Career in an Era of Limited Funds Lawrence J. Prograis, Jr., M.D Senior Scientist,
An Introduction to NCI's Childhood Cancer Genomics Scientific Workshop January 29, 2015 Presenters Donna Ludwinski of Solving Kids' Cancer Amy Bulman and.
NIH Regional Seminars 2014 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.
Grant Writing Introduction  Overview of Grantwriting  NIH.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute James P. Kiley, Ph.D. National Heart,
Page Rankings: What do they teach us? Faina Linkov, PhD Ronald LaPorte, PhD And the Global Health Network Supercourse project University of Pittsburgh.
Introduction to the NIH Grants System
NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.
NIH K-08 Application Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award
Gene Ontology Project
Short Overview of the NIH SBIR/STTR Program “Lab to Life”
Bethesda, MD. NCI National Cancer Institute NCCAM National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NCMHD National Center for Minority Health.
Peer Review of NIH Research Grant Applications Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health.
NCRR American Society of Plant Biologists NIH Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA)
NIAID Commitment to Influenza Research and Preparedness F. Gray Handley Associate Director for International Research Affairs National Institute of Allergy.
Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Arthritis.
NIH Investment in the Science of Learning Robert M. Kaplan NIH Associate Director for Behavioral and Social Sciences Sabrina Liao Geehta Senthil Office.
NIH International Programs
The Review of Your NIH Grant Application Begins Here Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. Director NIH Center for Scientific Review.
NIH K-01 Application Mentored Research Scientist Development Award
Only build an ontology if: You have a body of data to annotate.
American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2009 November 14, 2009 Building Data Systems to Support Evaluation in a Biomedical Research and Development.
Innovation Corps (I-Corps) at NIH: Hypothesis-Driven Customer Discovery for SBIR/STTR Grantees Bench 2 Business (B2B) – University of Kentucky May 19,
The Grant Renewal Review Process Nywana Sizemore, PhD Scientific Review Officer Molecular Oncogenesis - MONC Oncology I - Basic Translational - OBT Integrated.
National Institutes of Health. Much of the biomedical research in the United States is supported by the Federal Government, primarily the National Institutes.
Jo Anne Goodnight NIH SBIR/STTR Program Coordinator NIH Mission Improve human health through biomedical and behavioral research, research training and.
NIH Grant Renewal Review Process (and Beyond)
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
Center for Scientific Review (CSR). Office of the Director National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and.
1 ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT RESEARCH INSTITUTES PRESENTATION San Antonio Texas September 24 – 26, 2007.
An Overview of Peer Review at CSR – Critical Do’s and Don’ts Joy Gibson, D.Sc. Director, Division of Translational and Clinical Sciences American Association.
BME 301 Lecture Twenty-Three. How are health care technologies managed? Examples: MRI Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Vitamin C treatment for scurvy Research.
NIH F-32 Application Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Postdoctoral Fellowships
Discovery: Stem Cell Biology Proposed Actions Continue infrastructure award program Characterize cell lines Stimulate more research on basic biology Train.
1 Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD NIH AREA Program Director NIH Regional Seminar Scottsdale, Arizona April 28, 2011.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
FY 2011 Acquisition Charts CHART 1 - Displays total NIH FY 2011 acquisitions in dollars. It is divided into the seven components of acquisition at the.
The Search for a “Better Way:” Reauthorization of the National Institutes of Health Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., Director, NIH July 19, 2005 House Energy and.
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Richard E. Swaja, Ph.D. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering BERAC –
The NIH Funding Process Peggy McCardle, PhD, MPH Child Development & Behavior Branch National Institute of Child Health & Human Development We wish to.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal Angela Y Ng, MBA, PhD Scientific Review and Referral Officer Center for Scientific Review NCI DCB New Grantee Workshop.
Expired Funds SAC March 26, 2014 Cristy Perrin, OALM.
1 AIRI Statistics – Trends in NIH Awards Presented at Association of Independent Research Institutes (AIRI) 2008 Annual Meeting September 10, 2008, Washington,
Gene Ontology Project
Data provided by the Division of Information Services, Reporting Branch NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH) DATA BOOK Fiscal Year 2010.
“The Grant Proposal Pathway” Hypothesis: Understanding what happens to a proposal between the time it is submitted and a funding decision is made will.
Office of Research Support.  Departmental Grant Manager – Enters information into SPS.  Sponsored Projects System (SPS) is where Grant Managers can.
Organizational Funding Portfolios and Beyond: Assessing the Full Research Landscape Panel Session 731 American Evaluation Association EVALUATION 2012 October.
Science for Global Health: Fostering International Research Collaboration James Herrington, PhD, MPH Director Division of International Relations Fogarty.
How to get funded from the National Institutes of Health Minda R. Lynch, Ph.D., Chief Behavioral and Cognitive Science Research NIDA.
Jeanne McDermott, PhD,MPH,CNM Program Officer Division of International Training and Research Fogarty International Center National Institutes of Health.
NIH HIV/AIDS Research Priorities
American Evaluation Association
The Influence of Domain-Specific Metric Development on Evaluation and Design: An Example from National Institutes of Health Technology Development Programs.
NIH F Applications and You
“How Can Providers Address the Lack of R01 Studies. ” Robert H
NIH Predoctoral Fellowship Information Session
National Institutes of Health
Overview of the Health & Human Services SBIR/STTR Programs
Presentation transcript:

Mouse; NOTC1; Q01705 Function: protein binding Process: Notch signaling pathway Process: positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter Process: cell fate specification Process: compartment specification Process: determination of left/right symmetry Process: positive regulation of apoptosis Process: somatic stem cell division Process: epithelial to mesenchymal transition Process: epidermis development Process: hair follicle development Process: heart development Rat; NOTC1; Q07008 Function: Process: embryonic development Genetic assay Mutant phenotype Direct assay Curator review Protein interaction Sequence similarity

Specific Aims circa 2003  Provide structured vocabularies and ontologies for molecular biology  Support and promote the use of the ontologies to annotate gene products.  Extend the GO Consortium to include new model organism databases.  Build and disseminate informatics resources and tools to support community use of the GO vocabularies.

GODatabase.org  Hits = 77,012  Visits = 14,063  Sites = 6,638  Averages per week

7, obo.sourceforge.netobo.sourceforge.net 10 song.sourceforge.netsong.sourceforge.net 6 genome.ucsc.edugenome.ucsc.edu 3, , ,900 sciencemag.orgsciencemag.org 14, ,500 Number of links to a site: as reported by Google

NIH funded experimental research that uses the GO 1.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2.National Institute on Aging (NIA) 3.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 4.National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) 5.National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) 6.National Cancer Institute (NCI) 7.National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 8.National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) 9.National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) 10.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 11.National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) 12.National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) 13.National Eye Institute (NEI) 14.National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 15.National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 16.National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) 17.National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 18.National Library of Medicine (NLM) 19.National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NCMHD) 20.National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 21.National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) 22.National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) 23.National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) 24.Fogarty International Center (FIC) Sample of 77 research papers, both intra-mural & extra-mural research.

Publications  PubMed – GO in abstract ( 459) includes papers in 162 journals  Endocrinology, J. Neurosci Res., J. Dent Res, etc.  Google Scholar  ‘gene ontology, tool for unification of biology’ 1348 citations as of April 1, 2006

Survey: close to 1500 replies in 3 weeks, almost all positive

Congratulatio ns ! We are successful

Specific Aims circa 2003  Provide structured vocabularies and ontologies for molecular biology  Support and promote the use of the ontologies to annotate gene products.  Extend the GO Consortium to include new model organism databases.  Build and disseminate informatics resources and tools to support community use of the GO vocabularies.

Specific Aims  2006: We will maintain comprehensive, logically rigorous and biologically accurate ontologies.  2003: Support and promote the use of the ontologies to annotate gene products.  2003: Extend the GO Consortium to include new model organism databases.  2003: Build and disseminate informatics resources and tools to support community use of the GO vocabularies.

Specific Aims  2006: We will maintain comprehensive, logically rigorous and biologically accurate ontologies.  2006: We will comprehensively annotate 9 reference genomes in as complete detail as possible.  2003: Extend the GO Consortium to include new model organism databases.  2003: Build and disseminate informatics resources and tools to support community use of the GO vocabularies.

Specific Aims  2006: We will maintain comprehensive, logically rigorous and biologically accurate ontologies.  2006: We will comprehensively annotate 9 reference genomes in as complete detail as possible.  2006: We will support annotation across all organisms.  2003: Build and disseminate informatics resources and tools to support community use of the GO vocabularies.

Specific Aims  2006: We will maintain comprehensive, logically rigorous and biologically accurate ontologies.  2006: We will comprehensively annotate 9 reference genomes in as complete detail as possible.  2006: We will support annotation across all organisms.  2006: We will provide our annotations and tools to the research community.

Defining the roles of a group Purpose What is the group’s purpose? What makes this group necessary and unique? What is the lifespan? Group Leader Who tracks progress and makes sure that milestones are met? Activities What are the key deliverables of this group? What criteria are used to set priorities? Members What is the criteria for membership, and what role does each member play? Meeting calendar How often do they meet? Through what communication channels? What are the milestones? Metrics of success What are the group’s objectives? How is the group success evaluated? Linkages How does the group interact and share information with other key groups? Process What are the key decisions? How are decisions made? What is the flow of choices? What tools might be used to make this more efficient?

Reference genomes group Purpose We will comprehensively annotate 9 reference genomes in as complete detail as possible. Group Leader Rex Activities Annotations and protein sets Members Representatives from each of the 9 genomes Meeting calendar How often do they meet? Through what communication channels? What are the milestones? Fortnightly phone calls. Metrics of success % of genome annotated, depth measurements Linkages Annotator driven ontology development, user community, computational group (NLP), and outreach group Process What are the key decisions? How are decisions made? What is the flow of choices? What tools might be used to make this more efficient

Scientific Advisory Board Ashburner, Blake, Cherry, Lewis Mungall Computational architecture Chisholm Reference Annotation Hong Community Advocacy Human* Harris Ontology Content MicrobesWorm*FlyWeed*Mouse*Budding Yeast*Zebrafish Clark Annotation outreach *one of the GO supported annotators works on this project Slime mold* Hill Annotator- Ontology liaison Sets objectives & priorities Manages projects & deliverables …and we all carry out the work, just as we do now.

Specific Aims 2006  We will maintain comprehensive, logically rigorous and biologically accurate ontologies.  We will comprehensively annotate 9 reference genomes in as complete detail as possible.  We will support annotation across all organisms.  We will provide our annotations and tools to the research community.

Defining the roles of a group Purpose What is the group’s purpose? What makes this group necessary and unique? What is the lifespan? Group Leader Who tracks progress and makes sure that milestones are met? Activities What are the key deliverables of this group? What criteria are used to set priorities? Members What is the criteria for membership, and what role does each member play? Meeting calendar How often do they meet? Through what communication channels? What are the milestones? Metrics of success What are the group’s objectives? How is the group success evaluated? Linkages How does the group interact and share information with other key groups? Process What are the key decisions? How are decisions made? What is the flow of choices? What tools might be used to make this more efficient?

Scientific Advisory Board Ashburner, Blake, Cherry, Lewis Mungall Computational architecture Chisholm Reference Annotation Hong Community Advocacy Human* Harris Ontology Content MicrobesWorm*FlyWeed*Mouse*Budding Yeast*Zebrafish Clark Annotation outreach *one of the GO supported annotators works on this project Slime mold* Hill Annotator- Ontology liaison Sets objectives & priorities Manages projects & deliverables …and we all carry out the work, just as we do now.

Send us please..  Additional Notes to Kimberley  Any slides to Suzi

Next meeting November (between Guy Fawkes and Thanksgiving) Hinxton? Marseille?