New Orleans / ACC / SOCMA November 2003 Randy McDonald, OAR, USEPA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
SUBPART N MACT AMENDMENTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART N.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT OVERVIEW
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July, 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Fresh Air Consulting Norman L. Morrow, Ph.D. November 5, 2003 MON Equipment Leak Requirements.
Anne M. Inman, P.E. Air Permits Division September 11, 2012.
MON MACT Storage Tank & Transfer Racks Presenter: James Leonard November 5, 2003 ACC/SOCMA Conference New Orleans, LA.
RICE MACT and Oil Analysis
The Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine (RICE) MACT Summary
Fresh Air Consulting Norman L. Morrow, Ph.D. November 5, 2003 MON Continuous PV Requirements.
NSPS OOOO & Fracking Air Quality Rule Updates Oil & Gas Environmental Compliance Conference – Appalachian Basin May 13-14, 2014 Robert Keatley, PE Senior.
SOCMA/ACC Conference Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP (MON) Compliance Overview November 5 & 6, 2003 New Orleans, LA Marcia B. Mia Compliance Assessment and.
New Emission Rules for IC Engines Presented by Scott Wallace Devon Gas Services, L.P.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
IAC Student Meeting February 19, 2004 Using DOE BestPractices Steam Tools And Resources Dr. Anthony L. Wright Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Implementation and Management of Leak Detection and Repair Programs – New Rules and Other Considerations Nebraska Ethanol Safety & Environmental Coalition.
Presented by Michael R. Dixon, P.E. Dixon Environmental November 2003 MON RULE BATCH PROCESS VENT REQUIREMENTS.
Materials Lifecycle Solutions MACT DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS HAP - HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: FEDERAL LIST OF 188 COMPOUNDS AND COMPOUND CATAGORIES. COMMON.
NCMA Workshop March 24, 2015 Booker Pullen Supervisor, Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919) Permitting.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
VOC and NO x Rules Related to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Air Quality Division Bob Gifford Air Quality Specialist, Air Quality Division Presented.
The New Federal NESHAP Air Quality Rule for Oil and Natural Gas Area Sources Susan Bassett, Air Quality Team Leader URS Corporation Rocky Mountain EHS.
New Air Quality Regulation “NSPS OOOO” Oil and Natural Gas Industry Workshop October 24, 2012 Robert Keatley, PE Senior Engineer/Supervisor DEP – Division.
Pinal County Air Quality Workshop Casa Grande – January 14, 2014 Kale Walch & Anu Jain – Permit Engineers.
HSEQ M. A. Vancil November 6, 2003 Page 1 ACC/SOCMA MON MACT Workshop November 5-6, 2003 New Orleans, LA Michael A. Vancil, PE Bayer Polymers LLC.
1 RECENT CHANGES TO THE EPA MACT RULE FOR COMPOSITES MANUFACTURING For Composites 2005 September 29, 2005 Keith Barnett, Environmental Engineer Office.
Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP Compliance for a New Countermeasure Flare Production Facility at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant FRANKLIN engineering group,
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
WILL ALLISON AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION APRIL 16, 2012 Oil and Natural Gas Air Pollution Standards.
ONLINE GENERAL PERMITS NJDEP October 9, 2013 ACE Academy.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Benzene Waste Operations 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF SOCMI Wastewater 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
1 REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES NESHAP Applicability and Requirements of the Final Rule For Composites 2004 October 6, 2004 Keith Barnett, Environmental.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
New Air Quality General Permit G-70A Oil and Natural Gas Industry Workshop October 24, 2012 Laura Jennings Engineer DEP – Division of Air Quality 10/24/2012.
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
1 Public Hearing for Amendments to Rule 2020(Exemptions) Rule 4621(Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers, Delivery Vessels, and Bulk Plants)
Analytical Laboratories - Potential and Restricted Emissions Kevin Tyson, Air Quality Analyst Wednesday, December 10, 2014.
DRAFT: 9/10/98 REINFORCED PLASTICS MACT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT FOR EXISTING OPEN MOLDING SOURCES Briefing Package for Outreach Meeting with Small Businesses.
§ Planned Maintenance, Startup, and Shutdown (MSS) at Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities.
Permit Application Information and Work Group Exercises Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Portland Cement NESHAPs & NSPS, and Related Solid Waste Combustion Rules David L. Jones Eastern Kern APCD November 4, 2011 California Desert Air Working.
John Curtin Iowa Department of Natural Resources.
Simple but Complicated Air Quality Permitting for Generators
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Presentation transcript:

New Orleans / ACC / SOCMA November 2003 Randy McDonald, OAR, USEPA

Outline Status of NESHAP Status of NESHAP General applicability General applicability General requirements General requirements MACT standards MACT standards Notifications, reports, and records Notifications, reports, and records

Status 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart FFFF 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart FFFF NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing Publication date - ? Publication date - ? Technical corrections/rule amendments Technical corrections/rule amendments

Layout of Rule Applicability Applicability General requirements - reference (with exceptions) to subpart SS General requirements - reference (with exceptions) to subpart SS MACT standards MACT standards Alternative standards Alternative standards Reporting and recordkeeping Reporting and recordkeeping

Applicability - Who’s Out Minor Sources Minor Sources Inorganic chemical manufacturers Inorganic chemical manufacturers Affected sources covered by other MACT Affected sources covered by other MACT Research and development facilities Research and development facilities End use operations End use operations Fabrication Fabrication Spinning Spinning Molding Molding Forming Forming

Applicability – Who’s In Major sources Major sources MCPU process, use, or produce organic HAP, HCl, HF, or Cl2 MCPU process, use, or produce organic HAP, HCl, HF, or Cl2

MCPU Processing equipment, including storage tanks and loading racks, operated to produce NAICS 325 organic chemical Processing equipment, including storage tanks and loading racks, operated to produce NAICS 325 organic chemical Chemical may be family of materials Chemical may be family of materials Chemical may be isolated intermediate Chemical may be isolated intermediate CMPU that has batch vents CMPU that has batch vents

Isolated intermediate Product of a process that’s stored Product of a process that’s stored Marks the end of a process, i.e., MCPU Marks the end of a process, i.e., MCPU Storage reflects long term, not batch cycle Storage reflects long term, not batch cycle Examples Examples Stored intermediate is used onsite and shipped offsite Stored intermediate is used onsite and shipped offsite Stored intermediate feeds two different processes Stored intermediate feeds two different processes

Family of Materials Product is a grouping of similar material Product is a grouping of similar material Near identical HAP emission profiles Near identical HAP emission profiles Near identical manufacturing equipment Near identical manufacturing equipment Advantages Advantages Reduced reporting and recordkeeping Reduced reporting and recordkeeping Consistency with Title V permit Consistency with Title V permit Less operating scenarios Less operating scenarios Possible P2 option Possible P2 option

Affected Source Existing Existing Facility-wide collection of MCPU, heat exchange system, and wastewater system Facility-wide collection of MCPU, heat exchange system, and wastewater system New New New or reconstructed facility-wide operations New or reconstructed dedicated MCPU with PTE of 10/25 tons

Example #1 –Affected Source If An affected source adds new equipment to existing MCPU Then New source standards do not apply if new equipment does not constitute reconstruction of dedicated MCPU or facility-wide source

Example #2 – Affected Source If An affected source adds new equipment to create new MCPU Then New source standards do not apply if no reconstruction of facility-wide source or construction of dedicated 10/25 ton MCPU

Example #3 – Affected Source If If Major source adds new equipment and begins producing MON chemical for the first time at the facility Major source adds new equipment and begins producing MON chemical for the first time at the facilityThen Facility becomes a new affected source. Any process changes and additions are also subject to new source standards

Primary Product Nondedicated equipment Nondedicated equipment Single process unit group (PUG) per § (e) Single process unit group (PUG) per § (e) Option for subparts GGG, MMM, and FFFF Option for subparts GGG, MMM, and FFFF

Overlapping rules MON as alternative compliance MON as alternative compliance Tanks - 40 CFR part 60 subparts Kb and Y Tanks - 40 CFR part 60 subparts Kb and Y Vents – subparts DDD, III, NNN, and RRR Vents – subparts DDD, III, NNN, and RRR Racks – part 61 subpart BB Racks – part 61 subpart BB Equipment leaks Equipment leaks part 60 subpart VV part 60 subpart VV part 61 subpart V part 61 subpart V Wastewater Wastewater part 63 subparts GGG and MMM part 63 subparts GGG and MMM part 61 subpart FF part 61 subpart FF

Process Unit Group Identify equipment associated with at least one nondedicated MCPU Identify equipment associated with at least one nondedicated MCPU Add other nondedicated process unit with common equipment Add other nondedicated process unit with common equipment Determine primary product for 5 year period and comply with subpart GGG, MMM, or FFFF Determine primary product for 5 year period and comply with subpart GGG, MMM, or FFFF Adding process units allowed Adding process units allowed Redetermine primary product every 5 years Redetermine primary product every 5 years

PUG and Overlapping Standards

No shared processing equipment – no PUG No shared processing equipment – no PUG May comply with FFFF for wastewater May comply with FFFF for wastewater

General Standards Compliance requirements - subpart SS Compliance requirements - subpart SS § (b) for closed vent with flare § (b) for closed vent with flare § (c) for closed vent with control § (c) for closed vent with control § (d) for fuel gas system (tanks and racks) § (d) for fuel gas system (tanks and racks) § (e) for recovery device (continuous vents) § (e) for recovery device (continuous vents) § for halogen reduction device § for halogen reduction device

Review of subpart SS Standardized standards Standardized standards Closed vent systems Closed vent systems Control devices – flare and nonflare Control devices – flare and nonflare Recovery devices Recovery devices Routing to fuel gas system or process Routing to fuel gas system or process Process vents Process vents Storage tanks Storage tanks Transfer racks Transfer racks Equipment leaks Equipment leaks

Subpart SS Closed vent system requirements Closed vent system requirements Bypass monitoring Bypass monitoring Inspections Inspections Flare requirements Flare requirements Incinerators, boilers, and process heaters Incinerators, boilers, and process heaters Performance tests Performance tests Monitoring requirements Monitoring requirements

Subpart SS Absorbers, condensers, carbon adsorbers Absorbers, condensers, carbon adsorbers used as control devices used as control devices used as recovery devices used as recovery devices Performance tests Performance tests Monitoring requirements Monitoring requirements Halogen scrubbers Halogen scrubbers Testing Testing Monitoring Monitoring General performance test requirements General performance test requirements Recordkeeping Recordkeeping

General Standards Determine halogenated vent per § Determine halogenated vent per § Combined emission streams Combined emission streams Use design evaluation from subpart GGG for small control devices Use design evaluation from subpart GGG for small control devices Supplemental gases defined in MON Supplemental gases defined in MON

General Standards No excused excursions No excused excursions No percent reduction compliance demonstration with TOC No percent reduction compliance demonstration with TOC No flare control for halogenated vents, HCl, HF, or Cl2 No flare control for halogenated vents, HCl, HF, or Cl2 Use Table 4 for surge control vessels and bottom receivers Use Table 4 for surge control vessels and bottom receivers

Standards for Continuous Vents Table 1 for Group 1 vents Table 1 for Group 1 vents 98 percent reduction or 20 ppmv 98 percent reduction or 20 ppmv Flare (or boiler per subpart SS) Flare (or boiler per subpart SS) Recovery to TRE of 1.9 Recovery to TRE of 1.9 Reduce halogens after combustion by 99 percent, to 20 ppmv, or 0.45 kg/hr Reduce halogens after combustion by 99 percent, to 20 ppmv, or 0.45 kg/hr Reduce halogen atoms before combustion to 20 ppmv or 0.45 kg/hr Reduce halogen atoms before combustion to 20 ppmv or 0.45 kg/hr Use §63.982(e) if using recovery device Use §63.982(e) if using recovery device

Standards for Batch Vents Table 2 for Group 1 vents Table 2 for Group 1 vents Reduce total HAP from sum of vents by 98% Reduce total HAP from sum of vents by 98% Reduce total HAP from sum of vents by 95% with recovery device Reduce total HAP from sum of vents by 95% with recovery device Reduce HAP from any individual vent with flare or to 20 ppmv Reduce HAP from any individual vent with flare or to 20 ppmv Reduce halogen from halogenated vent before or after combustion device Reduce halogen from halogenated vent before or after combustion device

Batch Vents Determine group status Determine group status No emission estimates required w/ alternative standard or control device operated at hypothetical worst case No emission estimates required w/ alternative standard or control device operated at hypothetical worst case Exceptions to subpart SS Exceptions to subpart SS Process condensers not control devices Process condensers not control devices Initial compliance under worst-case conditions Initial compliance under worst-case conditions Daily or block averaging allowed Daily or block averaging allowed Periodic verification for devices < 1 tpy Periodic verification for devices < 1 tpy Correction for supplemental gases Correction for supplemental gases

Hydrogen Halide and Halogen HAP Table 3 Table 3 Reduction by 99% for vents from affected process (sum of vents > 1,000 lb/yr) Reduction by 99% for vents from affected process (sum of vents > 1,000 lb/yr) Reduction to 20 ppmv Reduction to 20 ppmv Comply with § Comply with § Design evaluation allowed for any size device Design evaluation allowed for any size device Caustic strength may be monitored Caustic strength may be monitored

Standards for Storage Tanks Table 4 for Group 1 tanks Table 4 for Group 1 tanks Comply with 40 CFR part 63 subpart WW Comply with 40 CFR part 63 subpart WW Comply with subpart SS requirements for process vents Comply with subpart SS requirements for process vents Reduce halogen from halogenated vent before or after combustion device Reduce halogen from halogenated vent before or after combustion device Use vapor balancing alternative from subpart GGG Use vapor balancing alternative from subpart GGG

Standards for Transfer Racks and Equipment Leaks Table 5 for Group 1 racks Table 5 for Group 1 racks Table 6 for eq. lks. Table 6 for eq. lks. Comply with subpart TT for batch only MCPU Comply with subpart TT for batch only MCPU Pressure testing allowed Pressure testing allowed Flexible hoses not considered in reconfiguration Flexible hoses not considered in reconfiguration

Standards for Wastewater Table 7 for Group 1 wastewater streams Table 7 for Group 1 wastewater streams 10,000 ppmw total HAP (>50 ppmw Table 8) 10,000 ppmw total HAP (>50 ppmw Table 8) 1,000 ppmw total HAP at 1 liter per minute 1,000 ppmw total HAP at 1 liter per minute 30,000 ppmw Table 9 (<50 ppmw Table 8) 30,000 ppmw Table 9 (<50 ppmw Table 8) Planned routine maintenance – 240 hours for wastewater tanks Planned routine maintenance – 240 hours for wastewater tanks Offsite management and treatment Offsite management and treatment RCRA treatment needs no certification RCRA treatment needs no certification Table 9 HAP streams to offsite treatment Table 9 HAP streams to offsite treatment

Compliance Alternatives Pollution prevention Pollution prevention Emissions averaging Emissions averaging 20/50 ppmv outlet standard 20/50 ppmv outlet standard

Notifications and Reports Initial notification Initial notification Notification of performance test Notification of performance test Precompliance report Precompliance report NOC status report NOC status report Compliance reports Compliance reports

Records As required by referenced subparts As required by referenced subparts Operating scenario Operating scenario Group 2 batch vent emissions Group 2 batch vent emissions PUG documentation PUG documentation

Questions?