Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPOTLIGHT ON THE LELAND LEGACY ® PUMP FROM THE LELAND LEGACY PUMP Provides answers to particulate sampling problems. High flow rates + 24-hr run times.
Advertisements

QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA AIR QUALITY PROGRAM CRAIG KREMAN ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTOR QUAPAW TRIBE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE 2014 National Tribal Forum.
Although this monitor is owned and operated by the State of Missouri, significant research was conducted with this technology for fence-line monitoring.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Challenges and Issues with Reporting the AQI for PM 2.5 on a Real-time Basis David Conroy, EPA New England Anne McWilliams, EPA New England January 30,
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler
Finding That Elusive Pot of Gold or Networking Your Shelter Rebecca Peltzer & Jennifer Bradley, Polk County – Air Quality Steve Drevik, Agilaire.
How long will the test last?
ADVANCES IN MONITORING METHODS FOR AIRBORNE PARTICLES Philip K. Hopke Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY USA.
1 Patron Queuing System Team Gong Archit Agarwal Thanh Nguyen Adnan Salam.
Air Quality Monitoring In Singapore
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
Lesson 5 What devices do we use to measure radon?.
1 Suburban air quality monitoring. Measuring Air Pollution in the Mid-Atlantic United States Bebhinn Do Meteorologist, NC DAQ Some slide material provided.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methods Lydia Scheer ITEP.
Evaluation of Simultaneous PM10, PM2. 5, and PM10-2
Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies by Michael Corvese, Product Manager Thermo Electron Corporation Air Quality Instruments.
Introduction to Thermo Electron Instruments Robert Kinsella Sky Patton Thermo Electron.
The New Adventurer Pro Is Here!. What’s New? Bright alphanumeric dual line display Better weighing cell and weighing performance 7 application modes Better.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Particulate Matter Monitoring in the Eastern Sierra Region A Brief History Presented by Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District.
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
QA/QC of Scottish Air Quality Data Ken Stevenson.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
Air Quality Surveillance Branch Air Monitoring Operations l Manual and Non-criteria Samplers » Reggie Smith » Special Purpose Monitoring & Data Support.
Introduction to BGI Instruments
Continuous Particulate Training Workshop
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING
Bloodhound™ Logging System Infrared™ Hydrocarbon Analyzer System 0-100% auto ranging Total gas with Chromatograph model- C1-C4 iso and C4 normal Accurate.
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Continuous Particulate Monitoring Using Light Scatter Photometers.
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Three Kings Quarry 19 August 2013 – Site Liaison Group Meeting Site Monitoring Report 1.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Measurement of Air Pollution Copyright © 2009 by DBS.
WESTAR Council – Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Workshop Portland, Oregon April 13-14, 2005 Real-Time Smoke Monitoring.
Next Generation Air Monitoring: An Overview of US EPA Activities National Air Quality Conference RTP, NC February 12, 2014 Tim Watkins US EPA/Office of.
GSM sites Cooling systems description Standard Air Conditioner SystemEmergency Cooling SystemEnergy Saving Cooling System Air Conditioner Cooling system.
Industrial Hygiene Indoor Particles: Technology Copyright © 2008 by DBS.
BLM Rig Study Air Monitoring Meeting: January 12, 2015 Data: 08/22/2014 through 12/30/ 2014.
OAR Perspective on Air Sensors Kristen Benedict National Tribal Forum on Air Quality 5/13/14.
What’s on the Horizon? Allabelle Allison ITEP/TAMS Center.
Measurable Outcomes of a Woodstove Changeout on the Nez Perce Reservation Tuiaana Moliga – Student Intern for Nez Perce Tribe’s Environmental Restoration.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
Using Measurements and Modeling to Understand Local and Regional Influences on PM 2.5 in Vicinity of the PRGS.
Assessing Ambient Air Quality James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
1 Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society Intermediate Licence Course Murray Niman G6JYB Slide Set 4 (3) Technical Basics -2: Circuits Chelmsford Amateur Radio.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
Air Quality Monitoring ENV 4101/5105 Elements of Air Pollution 3/3/20161 Aerosol & Particulate Research Lab
Quality Management & Operations Support Branch Quality Assurance Section Presented By: Webster Tasat.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Copyright © 2007 Exceptional Events and Data Collection in the Vicinity of the West 43 rd Avenue Monitor MAG Regional Council April.
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
RP-16, Verification of Laboratory Environments Presented by: Doug Cooper TAC.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
N Engl J Med Jun 29;376(26): doi: 10
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Session 4: Air Pollution Measurements
F&J SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Introduction to Tisch Instruments
Continuous PM2.5 Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS) Moved to roof on request of resident (noise and compressed gases were of concern) Secure location with temperature and humidity control, as required for TE-43C SO 2 analyzer took time to acquire Also required power supply installation See following slide for orientation of Marina Towers and operating area

Proximity of Marina Towers to Potomac River Generating Station

ENSR/Mirant Meteorological Station

Location of Meteorological Station Relative to Marina Towers

Program Constraints No meteorological data available to the study team Meteorological system proposed for logging on Met One E-BAM PM-2.5 system, and subsequent production of time-resolved presentations E-BAM PM-10 is USEPA FRM, E-BAM PM-2.5 is not

Duration of Study Start Date – 26 OCT 2006 (PM-2.5 only) Add SO 2 – 16 APR 2007 –Some SO 2 data lost due to elevated temperatures in the sampler housing area –Some PM-2.5 data lost due to sampler malfunction towards end of study End Date – 16 OCT 2007 Demobilization – 16 OCT 2007

QA/QC and Operations Routine calibrations as required All calibrations performed and documented in accordance with 40CFR58 All gases and standards NIST traceable and documented “Shelter” temperatures exceeded 30°C on occasion, acceptable for E-BAM, not for TE-43C (SO 2 )

E-BAM Uses beta attenuation for measurement of mass Uses continuous filter tape for mass measurement Lightweight and completely portable –A/C, battery or solar-panel operation possible –Important because first site location was on tenant’s balcony thus small size and portability important USEPA FRM for PM-10, CA equivalent for PM-2.5 Continuous measurements –Accuracy and precision consistent with USEPA requirements for Class III designation for PM 2.5 Accuracy of 2.5 μg in 24 hour period –Data are updated every second, and data records updated every minute Data retrieval via satellite, dial-up, cell-phone radio modems available or direct connection to built in data logger

TEOM Uses tapered element oscillating microbalance, for mass measurements Uses discreet filters for mass collection Larger size, less portable –Requires additional housing for outdoor use –250 lb weight including required outdoor enclosure USEPA equivalent PM-10 monitor, USEPA CACM for PM-2.5 Real-time mass concentration averages: 10 min default, 10 to 3600 sec; long-term averaging: 30 min, 1, 8, and 24 hr, with a data output rate of 2 sec Precision: ±1.5 μg/m³ (1-hour ave), ±0.5 μg/m³ (24-hour ave)

Federal Reference Methods Three classes of equivalent method are established –Class I equivalent methods provide capability for collection of several sequential samples automatically without intermediate operator service. Samples on daily basis. –Class II equivalent methods include all other filter based methods that produce a 24-hour measurement. –Class III equivalent methods include both continuous or semi- continuous methods. The FRM PM2.5 Air Sampler is an advanced manual method for performing PM2.5 measurements. The sampler was designed to meet the monitoring requirements of the EPA reference method for monitoring PM2.5 –Advantages: The FRM PM2.5 Air Sampler provides a direct measure of PM mass. It is not sensitive to particle size, density, or color and is highly reliable in ambient conditions ranging from –45 to +45°C, as well as in areas with high humidity conditions. –Disadvantages: The FRM PM2.5 Air Sampler is a manual method that cannot provide continuous, real-time data. It is time consuming, laborious, and costly.