Six Countries Programme Workshop 23 - 24 May 2006 Shaping the future through learning from the past – Evaluation and Foresight Dr. Mari Hjelt Gaia Consulting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Support for the coordination of activities TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS Context, Rationale and State of Play Presentation by Julie Sors European Commission Rotterdam,
Advertisements

The role of policy advisers in policy learning Wolfgang Polt- Joanneum Research Institute for Technology and Regional Policy
Policy learning from two rounds of Swedish Technology Foresight Lennart Lübeck Innovation Policy Learning: Change in Thinking - Change in Doing?
Kicking off Innovation Capacities through Regional cooperation in the Western Balkan Region Zoran Aralica, the Institute of Economics, Zagreb
Mission statement: The Innovating Regions in Europe want to create a policy consulting community of practice in the field of regional innovation policy.
ICZM in Europe Jon Parker European Commission - DG Environment
European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), Maastricht E. Best © EIPA, 2008 The European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA): Learning to.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Responsibility.
Partnerships: influencing local economic and employment development Brussels, October 9th, 2007 Gabriela Miranda Policy Analyst OECD, LEED Programme.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
S&T foresight and government decision-making in the European Research Area Brussels, 21 November 2001 Introduction Rémi Barré OST Associate Professor,
Workshop on Sector Approaches in the Context of EU Integration Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina March 2010 Debriefing of the Workshop on Sector Approaches.
FTA-Approaches integrated in the broader SPI Context Improving Regional RTDI Policies & Investments *G. Clar, **H. Acheson, *S. Hafner-Zimmermann, *B.
IPTS workshop on ICTs for learning the host country language by adult migrants in the EU Seville 1-2 October Welcome and Introduction Clara Centeno.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Adaptive.
| | Learning from EuroHealthNets Health Inequalities Projects.
Managing Strategic and Organizational Change as a Top-Down Process Hertie School of Governance Elective – Sessions 6/7 Dr. Jörg Dräger March 23 rd, 2012.
MLW 1: Systems Thinking for Foresight: The Case of Romanian Higher Education System Susana Elena-Pérez Knowledge for Growth.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
The “Knowledge sharing platform” in the 6th EC FP Initial training for National Contact Points Brussels 30th October 2002 by Belmiro MARTINS,
Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: From theory to practice Interregional Seminar and Partnership Fair Enhancing university-business.
Tools and Methodologies in Assessing Technology Needs: An Overview Contact: Prof. Zou Ji Dept. of Environmental Economics and Management Renmin University.
The Use and Impact of FTA Attila Havas and Ron Johnston Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Australian Centre for Innovation Third.
EVALUATION as an instrument of governance for a regional social plan Dr. Annamaria Casini (sociopolitical management expert) SULMONA - 22nd October 2012.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
1 S3 Platform: Achievements and outlook on activities for 2014 Moritz Haller JRC, Unit for International, Interinstitutional and Stakeholder Relations.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.
Framework for Recreation in Canada 2015:
March, Entrepreneurship is the mindset and process to create and develop economic activity by blending risk-taking, creativity and/or innovation.
European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing 07 April 2011 Jorge Pinto Antunes Strategy and Analysis Unit DG SANCO, European Commission.
1 FUTURREG Evaluation Objectives and methodology 3nd Steering Committee Meeting Malta, 28/6/2006.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
EU-CORD Advocacy Workshop November Expectations Give new direction and extra energy for EU-CORD’s advocacy in Brussels. Make people enthusiastic.
Dr Ritva Dammert Director Brussels May 27, 2009 Evaluation of the Finnish Centres of Excellence Programmes
WORKING TOWARDS INCLUSIVE ASSESSMENT Messages from across Europe Reutte 28th February 2008.
Sustainable Futures FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY Meirion Thomas Cardiff Business School & CMInno Group In collaboration.
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
PERSPECTIVES FROM THE OECD ROLF ALTER DIRECTOR FOR PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OECD Key Challenges in Public Procurement 3 rd Annual.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
THE SECURITY SECTOR REVIEW PROCESS. ISSUES Understanding: -Scope: What are the elements of a SS Review? -Need: Why review the Security Sector? -Process:
04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.
1 Implementation. 2 ‘It ain’t over till it’s over’ … and even then, it’s not over either! Implementation is  the realisation of the stated objectives.
(I)WRM indicators A GWP PERSPECTIVE Water Country Briefs Project Diagnostic Workshop, Geneva, December 2010 Mike Muller : GWP-TEC.
Proposed Process for Development of a Health Research Agenda in Kenya Dr. Charles M. Nzioka, Head, DHR&D Ministry of Health 21 st June 2014.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
Open data Program pp.kk.vvvv Osasto Finland Open data policy in Finland  Long history of Open Government  Freedom of Information Act in 1766.
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Session 9 – Data exploitation and publication
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Philine Warnke and Gaston Heimeriks IPTS
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Martin Müller InRoad Coordinator InRoad
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
FORESIGHT WHY? WHAT? HOW? by Sergio Azzopardi.
Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts on policy and decision making 28th- 29th September 2006 Towards.
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
The Use and Impact of FTA
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Presentation transcript:

Six Countries Programme Workshop May 2006 Shaping the future through learning from the past – Evaluation and Foresight Dr. Mari Hjelt Gaia Consulting Ltd (

2 Foresight and Evaluation – A broad set of actions Foresight can be defined as a systematic, participatory, future intelligence gathering and medium-to-long-term vision-building process aimed at present day decisions and mobilising joint actions. (EC High Level Expert Group on Foresight: Thinking, debating and shaping the future: Foresight for Europe, 2002) Given that it is probably impossible to arrive at a single definition of evaluation which will have universal appeal, we have chosen instead to identify some crucial elements which should normally characterise evaluations. Evaluations should be analytical, systematic, reliable, issue-oriented, and user-driven. (Evaluation of EU Expenditure Programmes - A guide)

3 Both Foresight and Evaluation are policy learning processes that … enhance knowledge and decision-making within organisations and communities. answer questions and/or address issues through the collection and analysis of information. are best implemented as a systematic process that is both planned and purposeful and with a clear intention of using the findings. provide us with means of understanding both what we do and the effects of our actions in the context of the environment and the society in which we live.

4 FUTURE Evaluation and foresight – the difference is in the time perspective Societal environment and framework conditions Policy makers environment PAST Foresight Evaluation Development paths in the past -e.g. macroeconomy, employment.... Anticipated future development - megatrends and weak signals Ex-post evaluation of policy - efficiency and quality - effectiveness - impact assessment Ex-ante evaluation of policy - policy analysis - impact assessment - technology assessment Strategic decision making Source: Valovirta ja Hjelt (2005) Evaluation needs to be connected to the context Foresight needs to be connected to the policy environment

5 Instrument level objective: adaptive planning Levels of evaluation and foresight in innovation policy Organisation level objective: design instruments Who? Foresight - why?Evaluation - why? oStrategic evaluation – optimal policy mix oEffectiveness of instruments oSelecting priorities oVision building oNeed assessment Policy level objective: allocate R&D resources oRationale for policy creation and national innovation system

6 Challenges and questions for discussion Systematic foresight and evaluation management = knowledge accumulation Who has the management responsibility? How to truly use the knowledge across policy sectors? How to manage a process instead of a project? Working together = thinking together Who creates commitment? How is this maintained? How are the real needs identified and addressed? Across policy sectors? Foresight centralized planning How are truly visionary processes created?