Disability 101 Postsecondary Disability Training Institute Donna Korbel & Christine Wenzel June 10, 2014 Philadelphia, PA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training Module III Speaker notes included. Primer on Special Education in Charter Schools Guidance for Operators Part A Pre-Authorization and Planning.
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Core Knowledge and Competencies, Professional Standards for Working with Children Birth Through Age Eight and in Afterschool Programs NJ Instructor Approval.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
Advancing Our Profession INTRODUCTION Why Does It Matter?
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
SEM Planning Model.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Purpose of the Standards
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
{ Understanding Disability Services By Holly Zuckerman – Access Coordinator Disability Resource Center.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Outcomes Assessment and Program Effectiveness at Florida Atlantic University : Student Affairs Gail Wisan, Ph.D. July 13, 2010.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Building Up Your Disability Services Toolkit Webinar Series Running a Small Disability Services Office: Tips and Tricks March 11, 2015.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Advancing Our Profession INTRODUCTION Why Does It Matter?
Copyright 2005, CAS All rights reserved. Tidewater Community College and CAS –The Basics of Program Self-evaluation in Community College Student Affairs.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Student Affairs and Services Creating an environment for learning and service.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
Social Work Competencies Social Work Ethics
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
ACUI TRAINING Core Competency Module. Purpose Overview of the 11 core competencies Introduction to the resources offered by ACUI regarding the core competencies.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Overview of Session Review of the 3 Pillar Documents
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
TSMO Program Plan Development
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
to Enhance Student Success
Gem Complete Health Services
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Disability 101 Postsecondary Disability Training Institute Donna Korbel & Christine Wenzel June 10, 2014 Philadelphia, PA

Overview Introductions Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) –Mission Statement –Why CAS? –Guiding Laws & Principles –Understanding the 12 “General Standards” Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Foundations of our Practice Standards and Guidelines developed by the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS). –AHEAD as a member association has them posted on their website –Invites members to use in the design and assessment of their programs Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

We have AHEAD so why CAS? Disability rights and inclusive education have increased the number of individuals with disabilities accessing higher education Number of students with complex disabilities increasing; staff sizes, however, are not. Therefore, it has become essential for disability services personnel to collaborate and work with their colleagues to share the responsibility of ensuring equal access to buildings and programs. CAS reflects this shift and can be used to design & evaluate disability offices. Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

CAS Mission “promote the improvement of programs and services to enhance the quality of student learning and development.” Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

CAS Is a consortium of professional associations who work collaboratively to develop and promulgate standards and guidelines and to encourage self-assessment. Has been the pre-eminent force for promoting standards in student affairs, student services, and student development programs since its inception in Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

CAS Standards and Guidelines Each CAS standard contains 12 common criteria categories All functional area standards are comprised of both specialty standards and guidelines. –All standards use the auxiliary verbs “must” and “shall” and appear in bold print so that users can quickly identify them. Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Legal Foundations for Disability Services Rehab Act 1973 & Section 504 Federal civil rights legislation Requires: –Students are eligible –Students provide evidence of a disability –Guarantees access not progress or success –Focuses on self-advocacy Section 504 does not automatically carry out in college IDEA Federal special education legislation Requires: –Free, appropriate education –Evaluations –Development of an IEP; modifications –Team of professionals –Progress towards goals –Clear transition goals Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Legal Foundations for Disability Services in Postsecondary Environment ADAAA of 2008 Effective January 1, 2009, final regulations went into effect March 15, Broadens scope of who is individual with a disability Expanded definition of major life activities Impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if, when active, it limits major life activity Decision as to whether an impairment substantially limits major life activity made without regard to effects of mitigating measures. Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Inclusive Environments Universal Design & Instruction (UDI) Person First Language Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Laws Summed Up Colleges do not have to provide special education instruction Tutoring & evaluations are not required services Colleges cannot guarantee success Students must meet academic & technical standards of institution Students must self-identify and provide appropriate documentation Institutions are not required to make fundamental alterations or reduce or waive requirements Guarantee access, not success Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

CAS Standards & Guidelines

Guiding Principle One Mission Statement “The primary mission of Disability Resources and Services (DRS) is to provide leadership and facilitate equal access to all institutional opportunities for disabled students.” Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle One Disability Resources & Services must: –provide institution-wide advisement, consultation, and training on disability-related topics, including legal and regulatory compliance, universal design, and disability scholarship. –collaborate with partners to identify and remove barriers to foster an all- inclusive campus –provide individual services and facilitate accommodations to students with disabilities Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Two Program “the formal education of students, consisting of the curriculum and the co-curriculum, must promote student learning and development outcomes that are purposeful, contribute to students’ realization of their potential, and prepare students for satisfying and productive lives.” Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Two Disability Resources & Services must: –Collaborate with colleagues and departments across the institution to promote student learning and development, persistence, and success. –Identify relevant and desirable student learning & development outcomes from the 6 domains and related dimensions. Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Two: Domains & Dimensions DomainDimension Knowledge, acquisition, integration, construction & applicationUnderstanding & connecting knowledge from a range of disciplines; constructing knowledge, relating knowledge to everyday life Cognitive complexityCritical & reflective thinking, effective reasoning, creativity Intrapersonal developmentRealistic self-appraisal ; self-understanding ; self respect, identity development; commitment to ethics and integrity; spiritual awareness Interpersonal competenceMeaningful relationships, interdependence, collaboration and effective leadership Humanitarianism & civic engagementUnderstanding & appreciation of cultural/human differences, social & civic responsibility, & global perspectives/ Practical competencePursuing goals, communicating effectively, technical competence, managing personal affairs, career development, demonstrating professionalism, health & wellness, & living purposeful & satisfying life.

Guiding Principle Two Disability Resources & Services must: –Assess relevant and desirable student learning & development –Provide evidence of impact on outcomes –Articulate contributions to or support of student learning & development in the domains not specifically assessed –Articulate contributions to or support of student persistence and success –Use evidence gathered through this process to create strategies for improvement of programs and services Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Two Disability Resources & Services must be: –Intentionally designed –Guided by theories & knowledge of learning & development –Integrated into the life of the institution –Reflective of developmental & demographic profiles of the student population –Responsive to the needs of individuals, populations with distinct needs, and relevant constituencies –Delivered using multiple formats, strategies & contexts Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Two The scope of the DRS must include these 5 program components: –Appropriate & relevant office policies, procedures, and practices –Individual consultation, accommodation, and services –Proactive dissemination of information –Institution-wide education, consultation, and advocacy –Guidance and technical assistance to the institution on disability-related laws and regulations Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Three Organization and Leadership –Disability Resources & Services must be structured purposefully and organized effectively. DRS must have: Clearly stated goals Current and accessible policies and procedures Written performance expectations for employees Functional work flow graphics or organizational charts demonstrating clear channels of authority Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Three DRS must be situated within the institutional structure so that it has organizational leadership with authority to advise the institution effectively on its obligations Leaders with organizational authority for the DRS must provide: –Strategic planning –Supervision & management –Advance the organization –Maintain integrity Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Four Human Resources –Disability Resources & Services must be staffed adequately by individuals qualified to accomplish mission and goals. –Within institutional guidelines, DRS must: Establish procedures for staff recruitment & selection, training, performance planning, and evaluation Set expectations for supervision & performance Assess the performance of employees individually & as a team Provide access to continuing & advancing education and professional development opportunities Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Four DRS must also: –Maintain position descriptions for all staff –Institute recruitment & hiring strategies that encourage individuals from under-represented populations to apply –Develop promotional practices that are fair, inclusive, proactive, and non-discriminatory –Have personnel who are qualified and have applicable certifications & degrees –Consider work/life initiatives such as compressed work schedules, flextime, remote work Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Four DRS professionals must stay abreast of research, legislation, policies, etc. that affect programs & services Staff members must be technologically proficient & understand ethical and legal uses of technology Support staff must understand mission & UDI Graduate assistants, student employees & volunteers, must be adequately trained & supervised All staff—including student employees, GA’s, & volunteers—must receive training on confidentiality, policies, & procedures Staff must be trained in emergency procedures, crisis responses, and prevention efforts Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Five Ethics –Disability Resources & Services must review relevant ethical standards & must adopt or develop appropriate statements of ethical practice –Staff must respect private nature of personal disability information –Staff must understand disability within the framework of the disability community –DRS staff must value disability as a valued aspect of diversity & as an integral part of the educational experience –Students with disabilities should be included in helping to create inclusive environments for the institution Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Five DRS must publish & adhere to statements of ethical practice New staff must be oriented to ethical standards & statements of ethical practice Statements of ethical practice must specify that staff respect privacy & maintain confidentiality in all communications & records Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Five DRS staff members must inform users of programs and services of ethical obligations & limitations stemming from codes, laws, and licensure requirements DRS must adhere to institutional policies regarding ethical and legal use of software and technology Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Six Law, Policy, & Governance –Disability Resources & Services must be in compliance with laws, regulations, and policies that relate to their respective responsibilities –DRS must inform staff members, appropriate officials and users of programs about legal obligations, risks & liabilities, & limitations –DRS must have written policies on all operations, transactions, or tasks that have legal implications Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Six DRS must: –Regularly review policies –Inform staff members need to be informed about risk management & personal liability –Have procedures & guidelines consistent with institutional policy for responding to threats & emergencies –Must not participate in or condone harassment of any form –Obtain permission to use copyrighted materials & instruments –Be knowledgeable about internal & external governance systems that affect programs & services –Take advantage of professional development opportunities to stay informed of changes in laws & regulations –Collaborate with designated institutional compliance official to promote and support non- discriminatory practices Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Seven Diversity, Equity, and Access –Within the context of each institutions mission, and in accordance with laws, and codes, Disability Resources & Services must create and maintain educational and work environments that are Welcoming, accessible, and inclusive to persons of diverse backgrounds Equitable and non-discriminatory Free from harassment Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Seven DRS must: –Advocate for sensitivity to multicultural & social justice concerns –Modify or remove practices, facilities, structures, systems, & technologies that limit access or promote inequities –Include diversity, equity, & access initiatives in strategic plans –Foster communication that deepens understanding of identity –Promote respect about commonalities & differences among people –Address the characteristics & needs of diverse population when creating culturally relevant & inclusive programs, services, policies, procedures, & practices Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Seven DRS must: –Provide staff with access to multicultural training –Respond to needs of all students & populations when establishing hours of operation, & developing methods of delivering programs & services –Ensure physical, program, & resource access for persons with disabilities –Recognize needs of distance learning students –Actively foster disability as a positive & integral part of the institutions diversity

Guiding Principle Eight Institutional and External Relations –Disability Resources & Services must reach out to internal & external constituents to: Establish, maintain, & promote understanding with those who have an interest or may impact students served by DRS Garner support & resources as defined by mission Disseminate information about DRS Collaborate to offer or improve programs for students Engage diverse individuals, groups, & organizations to enrich educational environment & experience Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Eight DRS must also –Be highly visible within the institution –Serve as liaison to & work collaboratively with institutional units on disability-related matters –Maintain information about community resources that serve the disability community –Ensure access is considered in institutional policy decisions –Promote interactive process for students to identify as disabled and request accommodations –Engage in ongoing process of identifying physical and programmatic barriers and working to ensure equal access Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Nine Financial Resources –Disability Resources & Services must have funding to accomplish the mission & goals –The allocation of DRS financial resources must be able to support infrastructure of service delivery, & ensure that accommodations are fully funded –DRS budget expenses must include recognition of accommodation expenses that vary with enrollment –DRS must estimate variable accommodation expenses based on institutions population of disabled students & advise administration of these estimates Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Ten Technology –Disability Resources & Services must have adequate technology to support mission & goals –DRS must advocate for assistive & adaptive technology that ensures access –DRS must use technology to provide information regarding mission, staffing, programs, services, & contacts to students –DRS must explore use of technology to enhance delivery of programs and services –DRS must maintain policies to address the security & confidentiality of information –DRS must have plan for replacing & updating existing hardware and software Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Ten DRS must also: –Be timely in securing or arranging for assistive technology necessary for a student’s access to materials –Collaborate to ensure technology is accessible, usable, and compatible with other assistive technologies –Promote review & evaluation of institutional websites, management systems, course materials, etc. for adaptability –Apprise institution of emerging issues regarding accessibility & technology –Develop clear policies for students to follow when providing them with access to technology Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Eleven Facilities and Equipment –Disability Resources & Services must have adequate, accessible, suitably located facilities & equipment that support their mission & goals. –DRS staff members must have work space that is well- eqiupped, adequate in size, and designed to support work –Staff members must have access to private space –Design of facilities must guarantee security of records & ensure confidentiality Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Eleven DRS must include these features: –Accessible offices & program spaces –Appropriate space for alternate media production –Adequate & appropriate space for administering exams –Conference room & training space adequate enough to accommodate persons who use wheelchairs or scooters –Nearby availability of accessible restrooms, water fountains, elevators & ramps –Accessible parking –Multisensory emergency devices –Access to institutional student database –Database resources for DRS record keeping & report generation Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Guiding Principle Twelve Assessment & Evaluation –Disability Resources & Services must have clearly articulated assessment plan to document achievement of stated goals & learning outcomes, demonstrate accountability, provide evidence of improvement, and describe resulting changes in programs & services –Results of assessments must be used to identify needs & interests in revising DRS –Student data collection system must be used to document & analyze utilization of DRS services Korbel & Wenzel, 2014

Piece of Cake…….Right??? Questions???? Concerns?????