Office of Special Education Programs US Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Advertisements

Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Birth to Five: Watch Me Thrive! Developmental and Behavioral Screening and Support Christy Kavulic, EdD Office of Special Education Programs.
Early Achievers Overview Starting Strong – August 15, 2012.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
Departments of Education and Public Welfare Office of Child Development and Early Learning Executive Budget
Using Strengthening Families to Meet the Goals of Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
After the Grant: Sustainability & Scale-up of the NC/CSEFEL Initiative NC/CSEFEL Panel Norman Allard Lanier DeGrella Brenda Dennis Khari Garvin Marta Koesling.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Welcome on behalf of Teri Chapman Director of Special Education Joanne Winkelman, Office.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
State Performance Plan: A Two-Way Street Ruth Ryder Larry Wexler Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
SHAME FEAR I AM NOT SEEN ACCESS I AM SEEN SYSTEMS CHANGE I AM A SPECIAL CITIZEN ACCOUNTABILITY and BUILD CAPACITY I BELONG AND MEANINGFUL LIFE EFFECTIVENESS.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
RESULTS-DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION Ann Moore, State Director Office of Special Education (OSE) January 2013.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
RPTAC Region 4 Conference: Results-Driven Accountability Gregg Corr, Ed.D. Director Division of Monitoring and State Improvement Planning Office of Special.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Georgia Parent Mentor Kickoff: Inform, Imagine, Inspire with Results-Driven Accountability Ruth Ryder DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
From Preschool to Post-School Outcomes Preparing Florida’s Youngest Students to Become College and Career Ready Monica Verra-Tirado, Chief Florida Department.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Using Formative Assessment
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Bureau of Family Health: Infant Toddler Services
2018 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Using Data to Build LEA Capacity to Improve Outcomes
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

Office of Special Education Programs US Department of Education

OSEP Mission OSEP is dedicated to improving results for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities ages birth through 21 by providing leadership and financial support to assist states and local districts to provide comprehensive IDEA services

Organizational Chart US Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences (IES) Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) Michael Yudin, Acting Assistant Secretary Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) Monitoring and State Improvement (MSIP) Gregg Corr, Director Research to Practice (RTP) Larry Wexler, Director Team ATeam BTeam CTeam D National Initiatives Team Secondary Transition Team Elementary and Middle School Team Early Childhood and Parent Team Christy Kavulic, Associate Division Director Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Melody Musgrove, Director Ruth Ryder, Deputy Director Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA)

Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Part C Purposes Ensure that infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families receive early intervention services and their rights are protected Assist States and local programs Ensure EIS providers and parents have the necessary tools To assess and ensure effectiveness

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Part B Purposes Ensure that children with disabilities have a free appropriate public education and their rights are protected Assist States and localities Ensure educators and parents have the necessary tools To assess and ensure effectiveness

Statutory Monitoring Focus Primary Monitoring Focus  Improving early intervention results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities  In the past, our focus was on ensuring that Grantees (States) meet IDEA program procedural requirements

What we focus on is what improves. 8

Over the course of the last nine years OSEP has taken the steps necessary to prepare for a results focused accountability system Data timeliness and quality much improved Compliance rates much improved

Vision for RDA All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families.

Core Principles Principle 1: Partnership with stakeholders. Principle 2: Transparent and understandable to educators and families. Principle 3: Drives improved results Principle 4: Protects children and families Principle 5: Differentiated incentives and supports to States Principle 6: Encourages States to target resources and reduces burden Principle 7: Responsive to needs

OSEP Theory of Action Vision: All infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities will achieve improved educational results and functional outcomes. : All infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities will receive individualized services in natural settings. Strands of ActionIf OSEPThen … provides guidance in a timely and responsive manner..communicates its vision effectively … States will have the information they need to align their activities to OSEP’s vision …States will promote higher expectations for CWD …States, LEAs and EIS providers will have higher expectations for CWD, will access resources to provide effective interventions and services to infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities …All infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities will receive individualized services in natural settings and demonstrate improved educational results and functional outcomes … engages strategically with other ED programs, Federal agencies, States, grantees and outside organizations … OSEP will more effectively leverage resources to improve services for CWD OSEP will increase the reach and impact of its work … provides differentiated resources and evidence-based information …supports the development of effective personnel that support CWD … States have increased capacity to support LEAs and EIS providers to deliver effective interventions …the number of effective personnel will increase … holds States and grantees accountable for clearly identified, measureable results …engages States in planning, assessment and evaluation … States put systems in place that lead to improved results for CWD and protect the rights of children and families Technical Assistance Accountability Leadership Collaboration

Components of RDA State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) measures results and compliance. Determinations reflect State performance on results, as well as compliance. Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance supports improvement in all States, but especially low performing States.

State Systemic Improvement Plan The SPP/APR includes a comprehensive, multi-year State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP), focused on improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, that includes the following …

Year 1— FFY 2013 Delivered by April 2015 Year 2— FFY 2014 Delivered by Feb 2016 Years 3-6— FFY Feb Feb 2020 Phase I Analysis Phase II Plan Phase III Evaluation Data Analysis; Infrastructure Analysis; State-identified measureable result; Coherent Improvement Strategies; Theory of Action. Multi-year plan addressing: Infrastructure Development; Support EIS Program/LEA in Implementing Evidence-Based Practices; Evaluation Plan. Reporting on Progress including: Results of Ongoing Evaluation; Extent of Progress. Revisions to the SPP. SSIP Activities by Phase

SSIP and the SIMR Part B Assessment for SWD (Reading and/or Math) Graduation Rate for SWD (May be paired with drop-out) Post School Outcomes (using Multi Tiered Levels of Support) Other – must be related to an indicator on the SPP/APR Part C Early Childhood outcomes (Social Emotional and/or Knowledge and skills or Behavior) Family outcomes (May also cluster with ECO) Other – must be related to an indicator on the SPP/APR

OSEP State Systemic Improvement Plan: A Conceptual Framework for Improving Results for Children with Disabilities

OSEP Results-Driven Accountability Conceptual Framework for OSEP Differentiated Monitoring and Support to State Education Agencies and Lead Agencies Based on Their Levels of IDEA Implementation and Capacity to Support Improved Results High Implementation X High Capacity = Improved Results for Children with Disabilities

Differentiated Monitoring and Support SSIP Implementation Support activities, including on site visits or calls and desk support All States have received TA on SSIP development and general TA from Regional Resource Centers and other OSEP-funded TA Centers Targeted TA based on determinations and SSIP Low performing States will get more intensive support Connecting our work with RTT Early Learning, SIG and ESEA Flex

SSIP Implementation Support Activities SSIP Implementation Support Activities have been and will continue to be an opportunity for: The State, State partners (including local programs),and OSEP to engage in conversation focused on the SEA’s and LA’s work on completing the SSIP OSEP and State partners to support the SEA/LA efforts to complete Phase I of the SSIP OSEP and State partners to analyze the States’ capacity to support LEA/EIS programs in implementing IDEA and improving outcomes OSEP and State partners to collaborate with the State to identify technical assistance and resources that the SEA/LA will need to increase their capacity to develop and implement the SSIP

SSIP Implementation Support Activities SSIP Implementation Support On-Site or calls and Desk Support Activities are not IDEA compliance monitoring activities. OSEP will not be making findings based on conversations that occur during the SSIP Implementation Support on-site/ calls/desk support activities

Outcomes of SSIP Implementation Support Activities OSEP Increase understanding of the State’s capacity to support LEAs/EIS programs in implementing IDEA and improving outcomes for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities Inform the development of OSEP’s accountability system, including what TA and guidance OSEP will need to provide States States Identify resources that would be useful to States as they continue to work toward improved outcomes for all infants, toddlers, children and youth Explore ways to leverage resources and affect change at the local level Increase understanding of the State’s capacity to complete the SSIP Increase awareness and begin to identify the TA and support that the State will need to develop and implement the SSIP

OSEP Review and Analysis of the SSIP Due April 1, 2015 (Phase I of the SSIP) Evaluation Tool consists of a checklist and qualitative analysis The review and analysis rating will be based on looking at all five components and the specific elements within each component High Quality vs. Adequate Quality vs. Low Quality rating Based on the Quality rating States will receive either universal, targeted or intensive TA and support to move into phase II of the SSIP

WEBSITE FOR MORE INFORMATION

OSEP Early Childhood Investments Part D of IDEA

IDEA Part D Discretionary Grant Program National activities to improve the education of children with disabilities Technical Assistance and Dissemination Personnel Development Technology and Media Projects State Personnel Development Grants Parent Training and Information

OSEP EC Investments The National IDEA Technical Assistance Center on Early Childhood Longitudinal Data Systems (SRI International) Provide technical assistance to States on the development and enhancement of statewide early childhood longitudinal data systems to improve States’ capacity to collect, analyze, and report high- quality data required under sections 616 and 618 of the IDEA.

OSEP EC Investments IDEA Data Center (Westat) Provide technical assistance to build capacity within states for collecting, reporting, and analyzing high-quality IDEA data.

OSEP EC Investments The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) Support States in administering high-quality and effective IDEA Part C early intervention and Part B preschool programs, increasing the use of effective practices in the programs, and enhancing the outcomes for young children and their families served in the programs.

OSEP EC Investments The Early Childhood Personnel Center (University of Connecticut) To support States in developing and implementing integrated and comprehensive systems of professional development so that all personnel have the skills and competencies to provide services and supports to young children with disabilities and their families.

OSEP EC Investments National Center on Coursework and Training Modules (Vanderbilt University) – IRIS Center Develop and promote the use of innovative teaching and learning tools, coursework, and training modules to improve the quality of preservice preparation and professional development programs and expand the content on evidence-based practices that is provided in these programs.

OSEP EC Investments Grants to prepare early childhood personnel 14 awards in 2014 ($250K for each of 5 years) Awards go to universities to prepare scholars at the bachelor, master, or state certificate level

OSEP Parent Investments Parent Training and Information Centers Provide parents of children with disabilities the training and information they need to enable them to participate effectively in helping their child with disabilities meet development and learning goals and understand their rights and protections under IDEA.

Department of Education Early Childhood Goals  Access to high-quality early learning programs  Effective early learning workforce  Comprehensive early learning assessment systems

BUILDING ON A $1 BILLION INVESTMENT RACE TO THE TOP-EARLY LEARNING CHALLENGE – 20 STATES

Preschool Development Grants Support states to build, develop, and expand voluntary, high-quality preschool programs for children from low- and moderate-income families. Development: for states with small or no state- funded preschool programs Expansion: for states with larger state-funded preschool programs and/or a Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) grant

Preschool Development Grants High-Quality Preschool Program means an early learning program that includes structural elements that are evidence- based and nationally recognized as important for ensuring program quality, including at a minimum— (f) Inclusion of children with disabilities to ensure access to and full participation in all opportunities; (2) Ensure that the percentage of Eligible Children with disabilities served by the High-Quality Preschool Programs is not less than either the percentage of four-year-old children served statewide through part B, section 619 of IDEA, or the current national average, whichever is greater.

EXPANDING PRESCHOOL PRESCHOOL DEVELOPMENT GRANTS – 31 INTENTS TO APPLY Puerto Rico

ED EARLY LEARNING EFFORTS WORKING TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES BIRTH THROUGH THIRD GRADE Improved outcomes My Brother’s Keeper Studies, Research, and Evaluations Parent Toolkit Bridging the Word Gap Technical Assistance Focus on Suspensions/ Expulsions

Department of Health and Human Services Early Head Start and Child Care Partnerships A new competitive grant opportunity to support the partnering of Early Head Start programs with child care providers. New or existing Early Head Start grantees will partner with regulated center-based or family child care providers who agree to meet the Head Start Program Performance Standards. The resulting partnerships will allow programs to leverage their funds to provide more high quality early learning slots in their community.

Interagency Initiatives Making sure all of our youngest children are screened and given support early are important priorities for the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services and Education

Birth to Five: Watch Me Thrive! Toolkit 1.A compendium that reviews implementation, reliability and validity characteristics of screening instruments 2.User guides, designed for providers from multiple sectors and the communities in which they live 3.Collection of resources to bring awareness to parents and providers about healthy child development

Interagency Initiatives Early Childhood Interagency Policy Board Developing a public awareness campaign for preschool inclusion Policy Statement Exemplars of Inclusion User Guides Collection of Resources

Please Contact OSEP with Questions