I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise Find out what happens in proton-proton collisions at the LHC as seen by the ATLAS.
Advertisements

Apostolos Tsirigotis KM3NeT Design Study: Detector Architecture, Event Filtering and Reconstruction Algorithms XXV Workshop on recent developments in High.
Using HOURS to evaluate KM3NeT designs A.Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S.E.Tzamarias In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study VLVnT Athens, 15 October.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
Simulation of the RPC Response José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting University Hassan II Casablanca, Morocco September.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Is B s 0 production by neutrino interactions interesting? Presented at the Super-B factory workshop as an alternative approach Nickolas Solomey 21 April.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
GLAST background review dec Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m 2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies.
Tracker Reconstruction SoftwarePerformance Review, Oct 16, 2002 Summary of Core “Performance Review” for TkrRecon How do we know the Tracking is working?
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
17-19 Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan Oct, 2007Geant4 Japan 2007 Geant4 Japan.
KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
HOU Reconstruction & Simulation (HOURS): A complete simulation and reconstruction package for Very Large Volume underwater neutrino Telescopes. A.Leisos,
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
Muon Monte Carlo: a versatile tool for lepton propagation through matter Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL, Berkeley, USA October 31, 2006, Dortmund University.
PIXEL Slow Simulation Xin Li 3/16/2008. CMOS Active Pixel Sensor (APS) Epitaxy is a kind of interface between a thin film and a substrate. The term epitaxy.
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector  Types of Events.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
RICE: ICRC 2001, Aug 13, Recent Results from RICE Analysis of August 2000 Data See also: HE228: Ice Properties (contribution) HE241: Shower Simulation.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Particle Detectors January 18, 2011 Kevin Stenson.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Yonsei Univ. M.G. Song.  Introduction  Scope for efforts  Evaluation  Cosmic muon test  Preamp  Summary and Outlook.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 5 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 5 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
Naba K Mondal TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
W. Riegler/CERN History of Instrumentation ↔ History of Particle Physics The ‘Real’ World of Particles Interaction of Particles with Matter Tracking Detectors,
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
Introduction to hands-on Exercise
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
How a Particle Detector works
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Oscillation Physics at INO
Presentation transcript:

I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do simulation studies will be added. And a box in the INO-ICAL detector. The first part will have diagram showing steps of simulation. Will you please go through this and tell me if the contents are OK. Or some thing more to added to this. Simulation work carried out for INO can be divided into following four steps: Generator of Atmospheric neutrinos. Simulation of Detector. Track Reconstruction. Data Analysis. Generator of Atmospheric Neutrinos: The first step in simulation will be to generate atmospheric neutrinos interaction in our detector. Neutrinos produced in the atmosphere travel through the atmosphere and earth before reaching the detector. Depending on the distance they travel they undergo oscillation on their way. Neutrinos undergo different type of interaction with matter. Depending on the cross section of this interactions, only a small fraction of neutrinos will interact with matter in the detector and produce secondary particle namely leptons and hadrons. Using the flux of atmospheric neutrinos, the flux of neutrinos at the detector over a period of time is calculated and randomly different types of interaction are simulated. GENERATOR uses available simulation package to carry out the process described above and gives energy and momentum of neutrinos that underwent interaction and of the secondary particles produced. DETECTOR SIMULATION: Next step in simulation is to see how these secondary particles produced in neutrino interaction propagate through the Detector and give us signal. As these particle pass through the detector they ionize the gas in RPC the active detector. This signals are picked up by the supporting electronics to give us position, time and charge deposited. Different interaction leave different signature in the detector. Using simulation package called GEANT 4 ( GEANT stand for Geometry and Tracking.) first a detector is made, then the particles produces by the GENERATOR are passes to this DETECTOR SIMULATION, GEANT4 propagates these particles through the detector and simulate the interaction it will undergo on its way before losing all its energy. And then the point at which the particles passed through the active detector is recorded as will be done with real detector. Thus as the output of detector simulation we have signals ( lets call is a Hit) in different layer of RPC through which the particle had passed through ionizing the gas, its position, time and the charge deposited in RPC. Eventually giving use tracks of particles in the detector. For this reason ICAL is also a TRACKING DETECTOR. RECONSTRUCTION: All three energy of the neutrino that interacts with the detector is shared by the secondary particle produced. If we can reconstruct back the energy of these secondary particle i.e. lepton and hadrons we can sum it up to get back the energy of the neutrinos. For atmospheric neutrinos oscillation studies we will be looking at muon neutrinos, and suppression in number of mouns from the expected no. So in most of the interaction we intend to get a muon which takes away large fraction of neutrino energy. Muons leave long track while hadron leaves shower of hits near the vertex of interaction. Thus in this step we will use the output from the Detector Simulation to fit a data to get back muon and hadron energy and direction which in turn will tell us about neutrino energy and direction. This is called RECONSTRUCTION OF NEUTRINO PARAMETERS. RECONSTRUCTION is done in two steops: 1) Separate the HITS ( point where the particle ionized the gas in the gas detector.) that more likely feature a track from the hadron hits and noise hits (signals from some stray interaction of electronic noise.) 2) Use KALMAN FILTER TECHNIQUE to get back the reconstruction of momentum, direction, and charge of the moun. 3) Pick up the hit near the vertex which are more likely to come from hadron shower and use appropriate calibration to get back the energy of hadrons. Different technique in used for neutral current. PHYSICS ANALYSIS: After having reconstructed back parameters of neutrino, this data is analyzed. This will help us understand the physics reach of INO detector we will be building. Simulation studies also help us to optimize the parameters of the detector in order to get maximum out of the result we intent to do. Show a plot of neutrino oscillation form simulated data.