Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading the Socratic Seminar
Advertisements

STUDENT LED CONFERENCES
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Motivation and Learning Work Preference Inventory: Intrinsic & Extrinsic Motivation.
Effects of teaching approaches on learning outcomes: the role of metacognition in developing indicators Network 10 symposium Mirror, Signal, Manoeuvre:
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else! I can get to the right answer but I don’t understand well enough to explain it yet. I understand.
1 Examining the role of Self-Regulated Learning on Introductory Programming Performance Susan Bergin, Ronan Reilly and Des Traynor Department of Computer.
Mathematical problem solving strategies used by pre-service primary school teachers Zsoldos-Marchis Iuliana Babes-Bolyai University This research was.
Obtaining reliable feedback from students about teaching
Cultural Diversity Awareness in Kansas Universities This cultural diversity awareness study observes and compares the cultural diversity awareness in relation.
Study Skills Ways to improve study skills Grade 2.
Copyright © 2001 by The Psychological Corporation 1 The Academic Competence Evaluation Scales (ACES) Rating scale technology for identifying students with.
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else! I can get to the right answer but I don’t understand well enough to explain it yet. I understand.
Understanding the Teaching/Learning Process
ABSTRACT Key Terms: Parent involvement, Common Core State Standards, Homework, K – 2 Mathematics In this study, the 2015 REU mathematics team from Elizabeth.
Good Morning! Announcements
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Daniel C. Moos, PhD. Introduction: Personal Beliefs “Discovery Learning” “Critical Thinking” “Constructivist Approach” “Humanistic Approach” Teacher as.
Metacognition Garfield Math Coaches September 2007.
Examining Attitude Toward Statistics Among Graduate Nursing Students MyoungJin Kim, PhD, Illinois State University INTRODUCTION While the integration of.
Natural Europe Posttest Students The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project. To analyze.
STOP DOING MATH LONG ENOUGH TO LEARN IT How to Study Math –Short Version Delano P. Wegener, Ph.D. Spring 2005.
Scaffolding Instruction Support for Learners. Adapted (with permission) from: From Apprenticeship to Appropriation : Scaffolding the Development of Academic.
Welcome to the State of the STEM School Address National Inventor’s Hall of Fame ® School Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
J.J. Navarro 1, T. Mardones 2, A. Ivanova 2 & L. Zamorano 2 1 Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CHILE) y Universidad de Sevilla (ESPAÑA) 2 Universidad Autónoma.
Adult innumeracy and the influence of negative mathematics attitudes, low self-efficacy beliefs, and mathematics anxiety in student primary teachers –
Boosting Pre-Service Teachers’ Awareness of Open Educational Resources: A case of stock photographs for teacher project Asst. Prof. Dr. Praweenya Suwannatthachote.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
SRL Slides Prepared by Nancy Perry University of British Columbia
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 13 Assessing Affective Characteristics.
Learning and Motivation Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Natural Europe Posttest Students (Control group) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project.
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I remember, involve me and I learn-” Benjamin Franklin.
Teacher-Parent Conferences Valuable Strategy for Improving Academic Success Norman Public Schools October 2, 2008.
Descriptive Research Study Investigation of Positive and Negative Affect of UniJos PhD Students toward their PhD Research Project Dr. K. A. Korb University.
CarboOcean Bergen Carboschools+ What did students, teachers and scientists learn? Elma Dijkstra & Martin Goedhart Department of Education Faculty.
Academic Workout Jim Burke Monitoring Your Understanding.
The Academic Sustainability Gap
Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.
E.S.P William E. Yugsán April 17, They are factors which influence learners' attitude to learning a language What are learner characteristics? Hi,
Social and Emotional Development Presented by: Rose Owens Kathleen Lee November 17, 2011 Room 412.
Outcomes for Mathematical Literacy: Do Attitudes About Math Change?
College Student’s Beliefs About Psychological Services: A replication of Ægisdóttir & Gerstein Louis A. Cornejo San Francisco State University.
By: HANIM MOHAMED (MP ) SITI FATIMAH ZAINI (MP091421)
Chapter 14: Affective Assessment
Health Awareness Instrument Norbert Jerina Norbert Jerina Javier Leung Javier Leung Tirana Porter Tirana Porter Destini Robinson Michelle Salmona Cheral.
The Effects of Instrumental Pullout Lessons on Academic Achievement in Grades 1-5 and Teacher Attitudes Jenna Stamper.
NON-COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF FIRST GRADERS AND THEIR COGNITIVE PROGRESS Brun Irina, Ivanova Alina, Kardanova Elena, Orel Ekaterina Center of Education.
Self-Regulated Learning Students take charge of their own learning.
EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF NON- COGNITIVE FACTORS AFFECTING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE Joanna Tomkowicz, CTB (with assistance from Wendi Wright, Statistical Analyst.
Check In, Check Out Presented by: Jenny Rohrbaugh, IST Facilitator Noelle McCarthy, School Counselor Scotts Branch Elementary School.
Learning Outcomes Participants choose: one of the five learning outcomes Exploratory path to get there Complete Learning Environment Design form Present.
Adviser: Associ. Prof. Dr. Eva Salazar-Liu Presenter: Nai-yi, Chang 張乃懿 Student ID:
The Results of Using Educational Games on Math Score for Preschool Children Pavinee Komanasin.
+ The attitude of medical students toward otolaryngology, head and neck surgery Ahmad Alroqi,MBBS,Ahmad Alkurdi,MD,Khalid Almazrou,MD,FAAP Presented By.
Presenter: Alice Instructor: Dr. Kate, Chen Date: January 17, 2011 Web 2.0 in learning English: The student perspective 1.
Development of the Construct & Questionnaire Randy Garrison & Zehra Akyol April
GEDIZUNIVERSITY izmir Seyit Ömer Gök 12 Dec 2013.
Traditional descriptors Multi-item measures Preference measurement
Presenter: Chen-Yo Chi Advisor: Dr. Chin-Ling Lee Date: June 1, 2009
Asoc.prof. Linda Daniela Researcher Raimonds Strods
A Survey of Learners Opinions
CHAPTER I INTELLIGENCE
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
Understanding the Teaching/Learning Process
Learning online: Motivated to Self-Regulate?
User perceptions on pleasure reading facilities provided by the Main Library of University of Colombo NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select.
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
Understanding the Teaching/Learning Process
Presentation transcript:

Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis Self-regulation during pre-service primary school teachers’ mathematical problem solving Iuliana Zsoldos-Marchis Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania This research was funded by Babes-Bolyai University, contract number GTC_34070/2013

Self-regulated learning Self-regulated learning (SRL) is an academically effective form of learning, through which the learner set goals and make plans before starting to learn; monitor and regulate his/her cognition, motivation and behavior during the learning process; and reflect on his/her learning process. Self-regulated learning skills are important for a successful mathematical problem solving.

Research design Goal: to study pre-service primary school teachers’ attitude towards Mathematics and their self-regulation during Mathematical problem solving. Sample: 202 Preschool and Primary School Pedagogy specialization students from Babes-Bolyai University: 196 (97,03%) female, 7 (2,97%) male students; 91 (45,05%) 1st year, 67 (33,17%) 2nd year, 44 (21,78%) 3rd year students.

Research design Instrument: questionnaire Containing: two demographical questions regarding the participants’ sex and year of study; 28 items related with the research topic, which are formulated as affirmations measured on a 4 point Likert scale. Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the questionnaire is 0.83.

Results Students’ attitude towards Mathematics and mathematical problem solving 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand. dev. 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) I like Mathematics. 2.33 0.87 15.84 46.04 27.23 10.89 Mathematics is boring for me. 1.63 0.84 55.45 30.20 9.90 4.46 I like to solve mathematical problems. 2.37 0.89 17.82 39.60 32.18 10.40 Mathematics will be useful in my future. 2.79 0.77 3.47 46.03 18.32 Mathematics is difficult for me. 2.30 0.98 22.77 38.61 24.26 14.36 I am good in Mathematics. 2.19 0.86 23.27 31.68 5.45 I don’t like to solve more problems of the same type. 2.10 0.95 31.19 37.13 22.28 9.41 After I understand a method, I like to solve more problems of the same type. 26.24 34.65

Results Students’ attitude towards Mathematics and mathematical problem solving 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand. dev. 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) I like Mathematics. 2.33 0.87 15.84 46.04 27.23 10.89 Mathematics is boring for me. 1.63 0.84 55.45 30.20 9.90 4.46 I like to solve mathematical problems. 2.37 0.89 17.82 39.60 32.18 10.40 Mathematics will be useful in my future. 2.79 0.77 3.47 46.03 18.32 Mathematics is difficult for me. 2.30 0.98 22.77 38.61 24.26 14.36 I am good in Mathematics. 2.19 0.86 23.27 31.68 5.45 I don’t like to solve more problems of the same type. 2.10 0.95 31.19 37.13 22.28 9.41 After I understand a method, I like to solve more problems of the same type. 26.24 34.65 64.35% of the students consider Mathematics useful for their future

Results 38.12% of the respondents like Mathematics Students’ attitude towards Mathematics and mathematical problem solving 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree 38.12% of the respondents like Mathematics Affirmation Mean Stand. dev. 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) I like Mathematics. 2.33 0.87 15.84 46.04 27.23 10.89 Mathematics is boring for me. 1.63 0.84 55.45 30.20 9.90 4.46 I like to solve mathematical problems. 2.37 0.89 17.82 39.60 32.18 10.40 Mathematics will be useful in my future. 2.79 0.77 3.47 46.03 18.32 Mathematics is difficult for me. 2.30 0.98 22.77 38.61 24.26 14.36 I am good in Mathematics. 2.19 0.86 23.27 31.68 5.45 I don’t like to solve more problems of the same type. 2.10 0.95 31.19 37.13 22.28 9.41 After I understand a method, I like to solve more problems of the same type. 26.24 34.65

Results 42.58% of the respondents like to solve mathematical problems. Students’ attitude towards Mathematics and mathematical problem solving 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand. dev. 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) I like Mathematics. 2.33 0.87 15.84 46.04 27.23 10.89 Mathematics is boring for me. 1.63 0.84 55.45 30.20 9.90 4.46 I like to solve mathematical problems. 2.37 0.89 17.82 39.60 32.18 10.40 Mathematics will be useful in my future. 2.79 0.77 3.47 46.03 18.32 Mathematics is difficult for me. 2.30 0.98 22.77 38.61 24.26 14.36 I am good in Mathematics. 2.19 0.86 23.27 31.68 5.45 I don’t like to solve more problems of the same type. 2.10 0.95 31.19 37.13 22.28 9.41 After I understand a method, I like to solve more problems of the same type. 26.24 34.65 42.58% of the respondents like to solve mathematical problems.

Results Students’ attitude towards Mathematics and mathematical problem solving 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand. dev. 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) I like Mathematics. 2.33 0.87 15.84 46.04 27.23 10.89 Mathematics is boring for me. 1.63 0.84 55.45 30.20 9.90 4.46 I like to solve mathematical problems. 2.37 0.89 17.82 39.60 32.18 10.40 Mathematics will be useful in my future. 2.79 0.77 3.47 46.03 18.32 Mathematics is difficult for me. 2.30 0.98 22.77 38.61 24.26 14.36 I am good in Mathematics. 2.19 0.86 23.27 31.68 5.45 I don’t like to solve more problems of the same type. 2.10 0.95 31.19 37.13 22.28 9.41 After I understand a method, I like to solve more problems of the same type. 26.24 34.65 69.30% of the respondents like to solve more problems with the same method.

Results How students solve mathematical problems 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) After I read the problem, I reformulate the text with my own words. 2.61 0.98 15.84 26.23 38.12 19.80 After I read the problem, I extract the data from it. 3.28 0.75 1.98 12.38 41.58 44.06 While solving the problem, I check, if I used all the given data. 3.07 0.84 5.45 15.35 46.04 33.17 After I solve the problem, I check, if the result is correct. 3.12 0.87 3.96 20.30 35.64 40.10 After I solve a problem, I think, if it could have been solved with a different method. 1.97 0.94 39.60 30.69 23.27 6.44

Results Students have good approach to a new problem: How students solve mathematical problems 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Students have good approach to a new problem: 57.92% reformulate the text 85.64% extract the data Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) After I read the problem, I reformulate the text with my own words. 2.61 0.98 15.84 26.23 38.12 19.80 After I read the problem, I extract the data from it. 3.28 0.75 1.98 12.38 41.58 44.06 While solving the problem, I check, if I used all the given data. 3.07 0.84 5.45 15.35 46.04 33.17 After I solve the problem, I check, if the result is correct. 3.12 0.87 3.96 20.30 35.64 40.10 After I solve a problem, I think, if it could have been solved with a different method. 1.97 0.94 39.60 30.69 23.27 6.44

Results Students have good control during problem solving: How students solve mathematical problems 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Students have good control during problem solving: 79.21% check, if they used all the data 75.74% check, if the result is correct Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) After I read the problem, I reformulate the text with my own words. 2.61 0.98 15.84 26.23 38.12 19.80 After I read the problem, I extract the data from it. 3.28 0.75 1.98 12.38 41.58 44.06 While solving the problem, I check, if I used all the given data. 3.07 0.84 5.45 15.35 46.04 33.17 After I solve the problem, I check, if the result is correct. 3.12 0.87 3.96 20.30 35.64 40.10 After I solve a problem, I think, if it could have been solved with a different method. 1.97 0.94 39.60 30.69 23.27 6.44

Results How students solve mathematical problems 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) After I read the problem, I reformulate the text with my own words. 2.61 0.98 15.84 26.23 38.12 19.80 After I read the problem, I extract the data from it. 3.28 0.75 1.98 12.38 41.58 44.06 While solving the problem, I check, if I used all the given data. 3.07 0.84 5.45 15.35 46.04 33.17 After I solve the problem, I check, if the result is correct. 3.12 0.87 3.96 20.30 35.64 40.10 After I solve a problem, I think, if it could have been solved with a different method. 1.97 0.94 39.60 30.69 23.27 6.44 Only 29.71% of the students try to solve a problem with more methods.

Results How students solve mathematical problems (cont.) 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) If I can’t solve a problem, I read its text more times. 3.19 0.83 3.96 14.85 39.11 42.98 If I can’t solve a problem, I search for a similar worked example. 3.06 0.96 7.43 15.84 40.10 36.63 If I can’t solve a problem, I ask for help. 2.94 0.86 6.44 20.79 45.05 27.72 If I can’t solve a problem, I give up quickly. 1.99 0.88 31.68 44.96 17.33 6.93

Results Students have good help seeking strategies: How students solve mathematical problems (cont.) 1 – don’t agree, 2 – a bit agree, 3 – agree, 4 – strongly agree Students have good help seeking strategies: 82.09 % reread the text 76.73% search for similar worked examples 72.77% ask for help Affirmation Mean Stand dev 1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%) If I can’t solve a problem, I read its text more times. 3.19 0.83 3.96 14.85 39.11 42.98 If I can’t solve a problem, I search for a similar worked example. 3.06 0.96 7.43 15.84 40.10 36.63 If I can’t solve a problem, I ask for help. 2.94 0.86 6.44 20.79 45.05 27.72 If I can’t solve a problem, I give up quickly. 1.99 0.88 31.68 44.96 17.33 6.93

Conclusions more than one third of the students likes Mathematics and enjoy solving mathematical problems; two third of the respondents consider Mathematics useful for their future; almost one third of the students don’t like to solve more problems of the same type, they prefer diversity as regarding problem types. Students are aware of the utility of Mathematics in their future carrier, but they see learning Mathematics as memorizing rules, solving methods and strategies.

Conclusions almost three quarters of the students have a good approach when analyzing a new problem; students have a good control during problem solving; only less then one third of the students try to solve a problem using more methods; they have a good behavior when they can’t solve the problem. Students have good problem solving behavior.

Thank your for your attention!